logo
Israel says Iran was building warheads capable of hitting London

Israel says Iran was building warheads capable of hitting London

Times2 days ago

Iran has been building the biggest ballistic missile arsenal on the planet, producing one-tonne warheads capable of reaching London, Israeli officials have warned.
The focus since last weekend's US strikes on Iran has been on the country's nuclear programme and controversy over whether or not it was 'completely obliterated', as President Trump has claimed. But Israeli officials say that was not the only objective when the attack on Iran was launched in the early hours of June 13.
'We actually acted because of two existential threats,' said Oren Marmorstein, spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry. 'One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat.'
Before the conflict, Tehran was estimated by the US to have about 3,000 ballistic missiles but the regime had been in the midst of an operation to increase production to 20,000, Marmorstein said, including some with payloads of one or two tonnes.
He said that on the morning of Tuesday last week, just before a ceasefire came into effect, a missile killed four people in their safe room in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba. 'Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those,' he added. 'That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb.
'They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the No 1 ballistic missile producer in the world. Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us.' He said these had the range to reach European cities, including London.
On the nuclear programme, Israel has yet to release the intelligence that prompted it to launch Operation Rising Lion — what Trump calls the 12 Day War.
'They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return,' Marmorstein said. He claimed Iran stepped up its programme after Israel's assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, in Beirut in September. It is a claim that has been echoed by Trump, though not by the US's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, when she testified to Congress in March.
'On uranium enrichment, they had stockpiled enough for nine nuclear bombs and we saw extreme acceleration on weaponisation. This was all part and parcel of a bigger plan for the annihilation of Israel with three elements — nuclear, ballistic and physical invasion,' Marmorstein said.
Marmorstein described the Israeli operation as 'successful beyond our expectations', adding: 'Just imagine the first night we took out the entire senior command of Iranian regime — think of the Nazis being deprived of the entire Wehrmacht command in the first days of World War Two.
'And these were surgical operations, getting to the right window at the right time, almost like James Bond.'
The Israelis are still assessing the damage done by America's bunker-buster bomb strikes — a question that has seen heated exchanges of words in Washington — but are confident, according to Marmorstein, 'it has been taken back years. The nuclear race has received a huge blow.'
The ballistic programme had also been damaged severely, he said, with many missiles eliminated, as were more than half of Iran's 300 missile-launchers, and the production facility for Shahed drones — something he said 'the Ukrainians are pleased about', because hundreds had been used by Russia against Kyiv.
A strike was also launched on a military facility in Yazd that houses Iran's heaviest declared missile, the Khorramshahr — a copy of a North Korean missile carrying a two-ton warhead.
The line of used espresso cups behind Marmorstein's desk testify to late nights over the past fortnight. The first Israelis knew of the war was when they were woken at 3am on Friday June 13 by an air raid siren.
'I told my wife and mother, 'This is very serious',' he said. 'We had expected the Iranians to react very soon and on a bigger scale. But they were so blown away by the scale of the Israeli operation, it took them more time to react than expected.'
Although some Iranian missiles managed to evade Israel's Iron Dome air defences, taking down blocks of apartments and killing 25 Israelis, this was far fewer than the hundreds or even thousands feared.
On Thursday, in his first public appearance in more than a week, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, declared victory against Israel and America. The US had been forced to enter the war, he said, 'because it felt that if it did not, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed.
Marmorstein smiles at this. 'The fact of the matter is the Iranian regime suffered huge blows not just to its nuclear and ballistic programme but to the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps], the Basij militia, and I think there is hope for something else …'
Although he says 'regime change was not part of this operation, that's for the Iranian people to decide', his office has been very busy with public diplomacy, putting out material in Persian on Instagram and other channels that has had more than 380 million views. He insists: 'This is not a fight with the Iranian people but with the regime.'
Since the ceasefire, Tehran has started a new crackdown and Marmorstein's office has noticed 200,000 Iranians have left the Instagram account.
He has a warning for the international community. 'This was a huge landmark, perhaps a turning point, but it's not over,' he said. 'We took Iran's nuclear programme years back but I'm not sure the nature of the regime's ambitions have changed. The international community needs to demand that the regime refrain from any foolish attempt to try and resume.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations
Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations

Sky News

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Government accused of 'stark' contradiction over position on Gaza genocide allegations

The government has won a long-running legal challenge about its decision to continue allowing the sale of spare parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, while suspending other arms licences over concerns about international humanitarian law in Gaza. But a key part of its case has highlighted mixed messaging about its position on the risk of genocide in Gaza - and intensified calls for ministers to publish their own assessment on the issue. PM braced for pivotal vote - politics latest Lawyers acting for the government told judges "the evidence available does not support a finding of genocide" and "the government assessment was that…there was no serious risk of genocide occurring". Therefore, they argued, continuing to supply the F-35 components did not put the UK at risk of breaching the Genocide Convention. This assessment has never been published or justified by ministers in parliament, despite numerous questions on the issue. Some MPs argue its very existence contrasts with the position repeatedly expressed by ministers in parliament - that the UK is unable to give a view on allegations of genocide in Gaza, because the question is one for the international courts. For example, just last week Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner told PMQs "it is a long-standing principle that genocide is determined by competent international courts and not by governments". 0:42 'The UK cannot sit on our hands' Green MP Ellie Chowns said: "The government insists only an international court can judge whether genocide is occurring in Gaza, yet have somehow also concluded there is 'no serious risk of genocide' in Gaza - and despite my urging, refuse to publish the risk assessments which lead to this decision. "Full transparency on these risk assessments should not be optional; it is essential for holding the government to account and stopping further atrocity. "While Labour tie themselves in knots contradicting each other, families are starving, hospitals lie in ruins, and children are dying. "The UK cannot sit on our hands waiting for an international court verdict when our legal duty under the Genocide Convention compels us to prevent genocide from occurring, not merely seek justice after the fact." 'Why are these assessments being made?' "This contradiction at the heart of the government's position is stark," said Zarah Sultana MP, an outspoken critic of Labour's approach to the conflict in Gaza, who now sits as an independent after losing the party whip last summer. "Ministers say it's not for them to determine genocide, that only international courts can do so. Yet internal 'genocide assessments' have clearly been made and used to justify continuing arms exports to Israel. "If they have no view, why are these assessments being made? And if they do, why refuse to share them with parliament? This Labour government, in opposition, demanded the Tories publish their assessments. Now in office, they've refused to do the same." 8:04 Judges at the High Court ultimately ruled the case was over such a "sensitive and political issue" it should be a matter for the government, "which is democratically accountable to parliament and ultimately to the electorate, not the court". Dearbhla Minogue, a senior lawyer at the Global Legal Action Network, and a solicitor for Al-Haq, the Palestinian human rights group which brought the case, said: "This should not be interpreted as an endorsement of the government, but rather a restrained approach to the separation of powers. "The government's disgraceful assessment that there is no risk of genocide has therefore evaded scrutiny in the courts, and as far as we know it still stands." What is the government's position? Government lawyers argued the decision not to ban the export of F-35 parts was due to advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the whole F-35 programme and have a "profound impact on international peace and security". The UK supplies F-35 component parts as a member of an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets. As a customer of that programme, Israel can order from the pool of spare parts. Labour MP Richard Burgon said the ruling puts the government under pressure to clarify its position. "This court ruling is very clear: only the government and parliament can decide if F-35 fighter jet parts - that can end up in Israel - should be sold," he said. "So the government can no longer pass the buck: it can stop these exports, or it can be complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza. "On many issues they say it's not for the government to decide, but it's one for the international courts. This washing of hands will no longer work." 0:55 Israel has consistently rejected any allegations of genocide. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branded a recent UN report on the issue biased and antisemitic. "Instead of focusing on the crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation… the United Nations once again chooses to attack the state of Israel with false accusations," he said in a statement. 3:06 The UK government has not responded to requests for comment over its contrasting messaging to parliament and the courts over allegations of genocide. But in response to the judgement, a spokesperson said: "The court has upheld this government's thorough and lawful decision-making on this matter. "This shows that the UK operates one of the most robust export control regimes in the world. We will continue to keep our defence export licensing under careful and continual review. "On day one of this Government, the foreign secretary ordered a review into Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL). "The review concluded that there was a clear risk that UK exports for the IDF (Israel Defence Forces) in the Gaza conflict might be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of IHL.

Israeli airstrike on popular Gaza beachside cafe leaves at least 30 dead
Israeli airstrike on popular Gaza beachside cafe leaves at least 30 dead

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Israeli airstrike on popular Gaza beachside cafe leaves at least 30 dead

At least 30 people including women, children and a local journalist were killed on 30 June in an Israeli airstrike on a beachfront cafe in Gaza City, medics have said. Israeli missiles killed at least 60 people across Gaza in some of the heaviest attacks in weeks as Israeli officials were due in Washington for a new ceasefire push by Donald Trump. Israeli tanks pushed into the eastern areas of Zeitoun suburb in Gaza City and shelled several areas in the north, while aircraft bombed at least four schools after ordering hundreds of families sheltering inside to leave, residents said

Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn
Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Iranian cyberattacks remain a threat despite ceasefire, US officials warn

A ceasefire between Iran and Israel has not ended the threat of cyberattacks from hacking groups supportive of Tehran, the FBI and federal cybersecurity officials warned Monday. In a public bulletin, the authorities warned that hacking groups affiliated with or supportive of Tehran may still seek to disrupt or disable critical infrastructure systems in the U.S. such as utilities, transportation and economic hubs. Hackers may also target defense contractors or other American companies with ties to Israel, the agencies said. 'Despite a declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' the agencies warned. The warning of continued cyberthreats after a halt to conventional warfare reflects the often opaque nature of cyber conflict. Hacking groups may have only loose ties to a nation state, and may seek to retaliate as an alternative to traditional military action. The bulletin outlined recommendations, including the use of regular software updates and strong password management systems to shore up digital defenses. Hackers backing Tehran have targeted U.S. banks, defense contractors and energy companies following American strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities — but so far have not caused widespread disruptions. While it lacks the technical abilities of China or Russia, Iran has long used its more limited capabilities to steal secrets, score political points or frighten opponents. Analysts have tied some of these activities to groups working on behalf of Iran's military and intelligence agencies. But in other instances, the groups appear to act independently.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store