‘Terrifying surge': Race Discrimination Commissioner calls out festering hatred
Speaking in Canberra on Wednesday, Giridharan Sivaraman said systemic and structural racism was limiting Australia's economic output and quality of life.
'Structural racism goes beyond racist slurs or harassment, though these are harmful enough,' he said at the National Press Club.
'Just as sexism isn't just about individual men treating women badly, racism isn't just about personal prejudice. It's the way our laws, policies, institutions, and entrenched norms consistently produce worse outcomes for people based on their race.'
Efforts to address systemic racism could follow other anti-discrimination reform, Mr Sivaraman said.
'When employers could fire women for falling pregnant, we didn't just shrug and accept it,' Mr Sivaraman said.
'Women, unions and allies advocated and we changed the law … That sense of justice you felt when fighting for equality, for what's right – that's exactly what we must supply to structural racism.'
Mr Sivaraman's speech traversed the ongoing racism and dehumanisation felt by First Nations people, the difficulties migrants faced settling into modern Australia, and the effects of the war in Gaza on communities here.
'The war in Gaza has triggered a terrifying surge of anti-Semitism, anti-Palestinian racism, anti-Arab racism and Islamophobic hate,' he said.
'Mentioning those different forms of racism doesn't mean equating them. Mentioning one doesn't invalidate another.'
Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim Australians were dehumanised by the Israeli-caused devastation in Gaza, he said.
'When the massacre of 1200 Jews and Israelis by Hamas on October 7 is not acknowledged, it dehumanises them. By extension, Jewish and Israeli Australians,' Mr Sivaraman said.
International conflicts affected Australians for varying reasons, he said.
'Of course we don't want conflict here, but we can't distance ourselves from the inhumanity that occurs, wherever it is occurring, overseas,' Mr Sivaraman said.
Communities here were deeply impacted by what was happening overseas in many different ways, he said.
'Sometimes it's because their families, friends and relatives have been killed or hurt,' Mr Sivaraman said.
'Or it's because they can identify with the people that are being killed or hurt.'
Mr Sivaraman told an anecdote of a couple who moved to Australia on skilled migrant visas but whose qualifications were not recognised and their workplace interactions were layered in idioms.
These skilled migrants were forced to take jobs that did not make full use of their skills, there was nowhere for them to pray, and they were shut out from advancing up the hierarchy into leadership positions.
In November, the Australian Human Rights Commission released a National Anti-Racism Framework. The road map has 63 recommendations across the legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors.
'We are talking about solutions that actually benefit everyone. They benefit everyone in terms of the general happiness and wellbeing of the society,' Mr Sivaraman said.
'They will benefit in terms of the economic impacts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
7 minutes ago
- ABC News
Just a week out from a parliamentary deadline, both Labor and Greens sticking to their guns
During every AFL trade week, there are a couple of deals that go down to the wire. One club boss insists their player is so skilled that there's no way they'll be traded, at least unless they get a bounty of draft picks or some good players in exchange. The other club boss says they value the player but can't pay the king's ransom being demanded. Occasionally, the gulf between the teams is so great that no deal can be struck. Other times, one club caves and pays too much, or accepts below-market value for their prized player. But mostly, after weeks of posturing and chest beating, both clubs agree to meet somewhere in the middle, usually right before the trade deadline. Tasmanian politics is in its own trade week era — and at the moment, the protracted negotiations are between Labor and the Greens. Labor needs the Greens to agree to their motion of no-confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff's government, and provide confidence in a Labor minority government. In return, the Greens want Labor to throw some policy concessions their way. Maybe start with matching the Liberals' ban on greyhound racing and go from there. So far, there has been the same amount of bluster you'd expect from AFL trade week. Labor insists it won't do a deal with the Greens, it won't compromise on its values and doesn't expect those it is negotiating with to do so either. But if it forms government, it will consider each idea for policy change on its merits, through a "sensible policy framework". Labor has mostly opted for the "greater good" argument — that the mostly progressive crossbench would be better off under a Labor Party that independents and Greens share some core values with, such as integrity, fixing the budget, health and housing. It's asking whether the crossbench really wants to leave the Liberals, and new Treasurer Eric Abetz, in charge of the state's finances. Especially when it could have Labor and its would-be treasurer, respected independent MLC Ruth Forrest. And whether the Greens really want to trust a premier that it voted no-confidence in just two months ago. The Greens so far have told Labor Leader Dean Winter to buzz off, and to come back when he's serious. Greens Leader Rosalie Woodruff drew a big line in the sand on Tuesday. Unless Labor offers up more than it is at the moment, she said the Greens cannot support Mr Winter as premier. Dr Woodruff reeled off a range of policies she would like movement on: ditching the proposed Macquarie Point AFL stadium, stronger environmental laws, and increasing the royalties paid by the salmon and mining industries to repair the budget. And in a classic trade-week manoeuvre, she pointed out Labor's weakened bargaining hand — that the guy doing the negotiating failed to win a quota in his own right in the seat of Franklin, while his party suffered a 3.1 per cent swing against it. And that while Labor doesn't need every individual crossbencher on board, it cannot form government without the Greens. The Greens also have the benefit of time. They can reject Mr Winter's bid for power now, tell their supporters they've extracted a greyhound racing ban from a Liberal party that just a month ago was telling the industry how valued it was, and will consider a further no-confidence motion in Mr Rockliff if he doesn't do what he has promised or makes decisions that outrage them. They know Labor are likely to come back and want to form government if they're unsuccessful this time. But if the Greens vote for Mr Winter to become premier now, they know it will lead to a partnership that will be awfully hard to end. The Greens see they're giving Mr Winter a blank cheque to govern if they side with him this time. And Dr Woodruff continues to argue the party will not do that without claiming some prized assets in return. We're fairly and squarely in the chest-beating part of trade week. A week out from deadline, both parties are sticking to their guns. But which end scenario will play out on Tuesday when parliament resumes? Will the Greens and Labor remain so far apart that neither bends — and Mr Rockliff remains premier? Will Labor concede enough that the deal becomes palatable to the Greens? Or will the Greens decide that when push comes to shove, they would prefer the Labor Party in charge over Mr Rockliff? After all, Dr Woodruff used her election night speech to point out the Greens have much more in common with Labor than the Liberals. With five days until deadline day, there's still plenty to play out. And while the Greens have displayed a willingness to return to the negotiating table, Dr Woodruff put plenty of caveats on her lack of support, starting every sentence with a "for now", or "at this stage". The scene is set for a tense and highly anticipated return of the state parliament. And despite all the bluster, every possible scenario remains on the table.
News.com.au
7 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Australian uranium explorers are shaping up for a tectonic shift in sentiment
Despite boasting the world's largest resources Australia's policies around uranium mining are uneven Queensland could be ready to soften its stance if the right project comes along Greenvale Energy is preparing to explore the high-grade Oasis project near Townsville, as it aims to become the state's yellowcake flag bearer Australia's uranium potential is often a topic of contention, with some states having moratoriums around mining yellow cake. That's despite a shift in sentiment across the globe, with other countries across the OECD pivoting towards nuclear energy in a bid to shore up both net zero targets and energy security. The United States has been doing much of the heavy lifting there. President Donald Trump has big dreams to quadruple nuclear energy capacity in the US to 400GW by 2050. It wants domestic, or at least friendly, sources of supply, as the US competes with Russia and China to claim its status as an "energy superpower". That macro demand picture and relatively stable prices of US$70/lb for spot and US$80/lb for term contracts, has exploration activity rising in Australia even without a nuclear industry of our own. Greenvale Energy (ASX:GRV) is one company gearing up to start drilling at its newly acquired Oasis project in Queensland, and CEO Alex Cheeseman told Stockhead that uranium mining the state might not always be in the doghouse. 'The understanding we have from engagement with government is that the current Queensland government will look to and consider overturning the uranium mining ban if and when a project of merit is put forward,' he said. 'I don't want to anchor the company's hopes on the whims of government, so we spread our risk by having projects in other states and territories as well. 'But Queensland is a mining state, and with the demise of coal mining they're going to need to start looking at other commodities and a sensible approach to uranium mining I think is definitely on the cards.' It also comes down to a marked change in sentiment globally towards nuclear energy, especially if we want to hit net zero targets. 'Australia has been mining and exporting uranium for 50-60 years. We don't have a nuclear industry in Australia but it feeds into a global market,' Cheeseman said. 'The US, China and even Europe are doubling down massively on nuclear energy for future energy requirements to achieve net zero, and for zero carbon emissions energy supply into the future. 'And Australia has always been involved in digging things out of the ground, concentrating them and then sending them off elsewhere to feed into a global supply chain – whether it be iron ore or lithium. I think uranium is part of that. 'I think there's a misconception that if you're mining uranium you need to have a nuclear industry in Australia, but we don't have battery manufacturing in Australia (and) make a lot of money selling lithium off to China, for example.' Value proposition As for Oasis, if it eventually gets into production, GRV sees similarities to the monstrous Rossing uranium mine in Namibia, once owned by Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO) and now the longest running uranium mine in the world. Originally found in Australia's original uranium exploration rush in the 1970s, Oasis hosts historical intercepts up to 1m at 0.72% U3O8 (15.8 lbs/t). Cheeseman said the main appeal was picking up a project that already had some known mineralisation, 'and the potential for a defining a resource that warrants a future mine.' A recent $1.8m cap raising for the company, which features Pilbara Minerals (ASX:PLS) founder Neil Biddle as its chair, will support Greenvale's plans to drill the project and will also drive the next phase of exploration across its Elkedra and Douglas River Uranium Projects in the Northern Territory. 'The value proposition we have is that we've been investing in securing uranium projects and starting early-stage work for a good 9-12 months so we're really an early mover,' Cheeseman said. 'We're not waiting until the market gets super-hot and then piling into it like most juniors do. 'We think there's a long-term structural deficit of uranium supply, that's putting upwards pressure on pricing, so we've decided to invest early in early stage exploration and then we'll advance projects to make discoveries, define resources and be ahead of the pack as the price really starts to gain traction. 'We see something coming and we want to be ahead of the curve.' Who else has an Aussie uranium project? Boss Energy (ASX:BOE) The most notable player in Australia is Boss with its Honeymoon mine in South Australia, where production kicked off at the start of 2024 after it was closed by previous owner UraniumOne back in 2013. Honeymoon is now one of three active uranium producers in Australia alongside BHP's (ASX:BHP) Olympic Dam (where it is a by-product of copper and gold mining) and the Beverley uranium mine. Boss' first full year of operations was a good one, delivering 872,607lb of drummed U3O8. Second half costs clocked in at $35/lb (US$23/lb) on a C1 basis. But the long term outlook for the mine was significantly written down. While a ramp up to 1.6Mlb at C1 costs of $41-45/kb (US$27-29/lb) and AISC of $64-70/lb (US$41-45/lb) is expected in FY26, the company warned that it may be unable to hit the previously assumed 2.1Mlbpa nameplate capacity of the mine. Boss shares have tumbled from $4.67 on June 30 to $1.77, with MD Duncan Craib already announcing before the guidance update that he would step aside for former IGO executive and company COO Matt Dusci. Deep Yellow (ASX:DYL) The company's merger with Vimy Resources included the 7.1Mlbpa Mulga Rock project in WA, which could start production as soon as 2028. Rising uranium prices have sent Deep Yellow's shares some 32% higher since it announced a merger with Vimy Resources. The project was the only future mine approved by the pro-uranium Barnett Liberal-National Government in WA before the entry of the anti-uranium McGowan Labor Government in 2017 which also beat a five-year substantial commencement deadline set out in its environmental approval. A DFS on the ~15-year Mulga Rock is currently underway. Deep Yellow also owns the more advanced Tumas project in Namibia. Core Energy Minerals (ASX:CR3) Last month CR3 kicked off maiden drilling at its Cummins uranium project in South Australia targeting 'roll front' style mineralisation. Historical drilling data – validated by French state-owned uranium exploration company Areva in 2009 – points to several broad, shallow zones of radioactive mineral concentrations over an area of more than 10km. CR3 has since interpreted several areas to host roll front mineralisation prospective for uranium, representing high-priority areas for the maiden drilling campaign. The company also owns the Brooker project, which sits directly to the northeast of Cummins along the western margin of the Port Lincoln Uplands in an area with several uraniferous granite source rocks and uranium occurrences. Koba Resources (ASX:KOB) KOB has notched up three new high-grade uranium finds at its Yarramba project in the past 12 months, right next to producing operations in South Australia. The latest find, the Everest prospect, is immediately north of Boss' 10.7Mlb Jasons Deposit and the Honeymoon uranium mine. That addition takes the count to three high-grade discoveries for KOB, all grading above 1000ppm, joining Berber (1.6m at 1026ppm) and Chivas (0.5m at 1028ppm). With heritage approvals now in hand, the company is set to begin infill and extensional drilling in September. Heavy Rare Earths (ASX:HRE) Since pivoting towards uranium last year with the acquisition of three uranium projects in South Australia near established mining operators, Heavy Rare Earths has been positioning for potential M&A interest if a major find emerges. Until that point, the company was focused on its Cowalinya rare earths project near Esperance, WA, a deposit comparable in style to the massive ion-adsorption clay types found in southern China and Myanmar, where most of the world's heavy rare earths are sourced. But, with an eye on the long-term value of critical minerals, the company viewed the opportunity to acquire three assets from Havilah Resources (ASX:HAV) – in one of the world's premier uranium producing jurisdictions – as highly compelling.
ABC News
37 minutes ago
- ABC News
Greyhound racing industry a 'scapegoat' in Tasmanian political power tussle, trainer says
A decision to ban greyhound racing in Tasmania within five years has left industry participants "devastated", and prompted one trainer to claim the sport is a "scapegoat" in a minority government's cling to power. On Sunday, Premier Jeremy Rockliff announced his government will end its funding for greyhound racing in the state by 2029. On Tuesday, he confirmed legislation would also be introduced in parliament to ban it. The move has been celebrated by animal welfare advocates and a number of newly elected Tasmanian crossbenchers, but has been criticised by incoming Shooters, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo di Falco, the state's first MP from the party. The decision comes as the minority Liberal government works to retain its hold on power, ahead of a motion of no confidence when parliament returns on Tuesday. Speaking to ABC Radio Hobart, greyhound trainer, owner and breeder Robyn Johnson said the industry was "just devastated". "We're all just really … filthy and angry," Ms Johnson said. She said participants were blindsided by the decision, as the premier had written to the industry backing it in, just weeks ago. "There was nothing said in the election [or] in pre-election promises," Ms Johnson said. Ms Johnson said in the letter from the premier, directed to the North West Greyhound Racing Club, Mr Rockliff wrote the government was committed to "support the longevity and sustainability of the racing industry". On Sunday, Hobart Greyhound Racing Club chair, Stephen Lockley said he was "devastated" by the move after half a century in the industry. Ms Johnson believes many Tasmanians made their minds up about the industry through information found on social media. "We consider there's a lot of intelligent people around, but they're all very happy to run with the information that's been put up on social media. "How many of them have actually been to a race meeting, had a talk to a trainer, had a talk to a re-homer? How many have actually come and seen the industry, and the [animal welfare] changes?" In 2023, the Johnson's kennels came under scrutiny from animal welfare activists. Her husband, Gary Johnson, at the time defended his operations and practices. On Tuesday, Mr Rockliff again backed in his government's decision. "We did commit to the racing industry more broadly, but we need to fully understand and appreciate that community expectations have changed," he said. Mr Rockliff confirmed the government would be moving legislation to ban greyhound racing in the state, making Tasmania the second Australian state or territory to do so, behind the ACT. Mr Rockliff acknowledged many in the industry would be "extremely disappointed". "But we need to understand that this is an industry that is in decline," he said. "The fact is, Tasmanian people do not like greyhound racing." The industry's transition will be overseen by a parliamentary committee, with support and advice from Racing Integrity Commissioner Sean Carroll. Mr Rockliff said there were 828 greyhounds in training, and a "very measured and sensible transition" for the sector would occur. RSPCA Tasmania chief executive Andrea Dawkins said the next steps would be "fleshed out" in due course. But, she said there was no doubt it would be an "enormous" task ahead to rehome all the dogs from the industry. "We know how many are registered. We know dogs are retiring all the time and we know that litters are being born," she said. "So that parliamentary committee process will need to talk about when litters cease to be born, because that's a very big part of the process. She said support would be needed for animal welfare organisations tasked with rehoming dogs. "Where many thousands of dollars add up in costs and fees to the RSPCA, Dogs Homes of Tasmania and others are in the dental work." Ms Dawkins said conversations were also underway with other RSPCAs around the state, in the event their assistance was required.
