logo
‘This isn't living': Afghan girls beaten in Taliban hijab crackdown

‘This isn't living': Afghan girls beaten in Taliban hijab crackdown

Telegraph5 days ago
Nafiseh's only mistake was showing her wrist.
The 17-year-old was shopping for clothes with her friends in Kabul when Taliban officers grabbed her, pulling her hair as they threw her into the back of a waiting van.
The men with long beards and American rifles slung across their shoulders beat her all the way to the police station west of Afghanistan's capital, her uncle said.
By the time they reached the police station, Nafiseh's complete black hijab – the covering that should have protected her according to the Taliban's laws – was stained with her own blood.
'She did nothing wrong,' her uncle said, his voice carrying the weight of a generation's helplessness. 'She was wearing a complete black hijab from the Arabs. They arrested her anyway.'
When Nafiseh's father arrived at the police station, the Taliban officers turned their rage toward him, their fists finding a new target in his desperate flesh.
'As soon as he arrived, they started beating and insulting him,' the uncle explained. 'They told him why first he let his daughter go out without a man, then why her wrist was visible.'
To secure Nafiseh's release, her father was forced to sign a pledge – a document promising to restrict her movements even further than before.
Dozens of women and girls, aged 16 to 27, were arrested across at least six neighbourhoods this week alone, with the Taliban claiming they were not wearing the hijab properly. But witnesses told The Telegraph that girls were being arrested even when they did follow the strict dress code – like Nafiseh.
The systematic round-up of women in Kabul represents an escalation in the Taliban's crackdown, with the victims' families threatened into silence. It's also a far cry from the image Taliban officials are trying to present to the West when encouraging tourists to visit the nation.
In the labyrinthine alleys of Kabul, terror now wears the uniform of virtue police – an equivalent of the notorious morality police across the border in Iran.
Witnesses describe scenes of armed jihadists chasing girls through narrow streets, with their victims running terrified and crying, seeking refuge in doorways that offer no protection.
'It was Saturday, and a group of women were walking,' one witness told The Telegraph. 'Of course, their male guardians were not always around to accompany them, but they needed to go and buy groceries.
'Then I saw girls running through the alleys, terrified and in tears, with Taliban fighters chasing after them.
'I asked what was happening, and people said the Taliban were arresting any girl they found on the street.
'The girls were scrambling in all directions. I watched as the Taliban beat them and forced them into a van. It was heartbreaking.
'One of my relatives was even wearing a mask, but they arrested her too. Because Afghanistan is such a traditional society, my uncle's family refuses to talk about her detention. She was held for two days. Now she's deeply depressed.'
Some of the girls were also arrested simply for being outside after dark.
In western Kabul, authorities have begun issuing public warnings via loudspeakers, instructing residents to comply with hijab regulations.
At checkpoints near busy commercial areas, officials from the Ministry for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice have been seen monitoring women's clothing and detaining those they deem non-compliant. The Orwellian body has employed women to monitor Instagram pages and report instances where other women dare show their faces online. 'They are needed to handle other women,' an official from the ministry said.
Girls wearing hijabs with decorations, bright colours – banned by the Taliban – or with strands of their hair showing are frequently targeted
Vehicles with tinted windows have been stationed near alleyways and shops and restaurants, ready to bundle women and girls away to be questioned. Many are taken to the Intelligence Directorate, where they can be held for up to three months – regardless of whether any formal charges are brought.
One woman, beaten and detained for hours, returned home to a family too scared to speak of her arrest.
'She doesn't speak and stays in bed all the time. We're really worried about her,' her brother said. 'We're afraid she might harm herself – there's so much pressure on women here.'
He added: 'They arrested her just for wearing a small plastic flower on her headscarf. The Taliban called us in. She wanted to become a doctor, then they closed universities and when she hung out with her friend, they arrested her.
'They humiliated me and my father, filmed us, and forced us to say on camera that we wouldn't let my sister go out alone again.'
In Afghanistan's traditional society, a woman's violation becomes the family's 'dishonour', creating a conspiracy of quiet that serves the Taliban's purposes.
'We are like caged birds'
A former university student described life for women in Afghanistan as being 'like a caged bird, just waiting for men to decide when to feed us'.
She said one of her friends took her own life a few months ago but her family refused to call it suicide as they saw it as a humiliation.
'This isn't living – we're just breathing inside our homes, with no access to anything.
'The Taliban want us all dead. Their problem is with our gender. The entire government is focused on controlling women – so men don't go to hell by looking at us.'
Women have been ordered not to speak loudly inside their homes, lest their voices escape and 'tempt' men outside.
Zahra Haqparast, a dentist and women's rights activist who was imprisoned by the Taliban in 2022 and now speaks from exile in Germany, said: 'No woman goes out in Afghanistan without a hijab.
'The Taliban's problem is women themselves. As a woman, you do not need to commit a crime. In the Taliban's view, you're a criminal by being a woman.'
The temperature in Kabul can reach 45C in summer. But the Taliban requires women to wear long black coverings in this heat, turning the simple act of existing outdoors into physical torture.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beyond the Bar – K-drama Episode 1 Recap & Review
Beyond the Bar – K-drama Episode 1 Recap & Review

The Review Geek

time4 hours ago

  • The Review Geek

Beyond the Bar – K-drama Episode 1 Recap & Review

Induction Episode 1 of Beyond the Bar begins with an introduction to Yullim Law Firm. Ko Seung-cheol is the managing partner of the firm, while Seo Yeon-su, is the head of financial Law. We also have Jung Ji-ung, who's the head of Antitrust Law, and Hong Do-yun, the head of Corporate Law. Finally, there's Yoon Seok-hoon, the head of Litigation. These guys are viewed as the pillars for the business, and oversee their respective departments with a keen eye for detail. It's a big day at the firm though as a group of Entry Level candidates vie for a place in the firm. Unfortunately, Kang Hyo-min doesn't make a great first impression. She's one of the recruits and she shows up late for the group interview. Her shoes are scuffed, she's got a stain on her shirt and she's flustered. Unfortunately, time is money when it comes to these cutthroat lawyers and she's kicked out before it even begins, with Seok-hoon leading the charge in booting her out the door. However, Hyo-min is no joke. She actually won the 12th National Law School Mock Trials and as we find out later on in the episode, her parents are also big players in the law scene. She's the daughter of prolific Chief Judge, Kang Il-chan, while her mother is Professor Choi Eun-hee at SNU Law. She's intelligent, eloquent and confident. She's also honest, but believes in justice. Hyo-min also has a keen eye when it comes to the law, and several scenarios (after being brought back into the group interview process) prove how intelligent she is. Despite her virtuous traits, Hyo-min knows that moral and legal standards don't always align when it comes to judgments, and she never lets her own emotions get in the way of what the law states. Hyo-min impresses the interviewers though and she manages to get invited into the Induction the following day. Team Intros are given by the various partners and out of all of them, Seok-hoon is the only one who doesn't sugar-coat what it's like working here. He gives a no-nonsense speech about how tough it'll be to work in Litigation. Unlike the other lawyers and bright-eyed newbies, Seok-hoon reminds everybody that after the initial probation period, performance reviews will actually determine which half will stay and which will be booted out. It's very much survival of the fittest and while everyone bemoans their chances and worries about their future, avoiding litigation like the plague, Hyo-min is the one who decides to take up the challenge. Seok-hoon is not happy. The partner doesn't trust her and given she was two minutes late to the group interview, he immediately sees her as a liability. Now, Seok-hoon isn't the only one in charge of Litigation. There's also Kim Yul-seong, who happens to be the division head of the litigation team. The team have had a decent win rate recently, courtesy of Heo Min-jeong, one of the associates, but for now we don't see a whole lot of these two characters. I'm guessing though, they'll be important in the chapters ahead. The new recruits aren't limited to just Hyo-min though, and while the others haven't picked litigation as their first choice, they've been thrown into the lion's den all the same. Hyo-min's boisterous friend, Guk-hyeon is here, while they're also joined by Sang-cheol and Ho-yeon. Hyo-min's first task comes from the Gangdong City Gas advisory case. After delivering a decent claim, she sits in on the shareholder meeting but notices a discrepancy in their numbers. Over the last seven years, only Onpyeong's revenue has dropped sharply. Hyo-min shows up at Onpyeong Hot Springs to take a closer look, but she winds up neglecting work as a result. Seok-hoon is not happy when she shows up two days later, sporting wet hair and flimsy excuses. Seok-hoon is ready to hit her with disciplinary measures for skipping work, but Hyo-min bites back, explaining what she's been up to. She points out that she's been 'working off-site'. Hyo-min reveals that the bathhouses are the biggest consumers of gas and Onpyeong has been open for over 30 years. So why the sudden drop in revenue? Well, given they're open 24 hours a day, she deduces that the usage amounts have been manipulated. Some of the gas has been stolen, which amounts to 2486839 cubic meters to be precise! Hyo-min has the documents to back up her theory too, and the court case looks set to be settled in the region of 3.8 billion won. This puts Hyo-min in a very favourable light, and she even makes her mark at the courthouse too, while Seok-hoon watches on. Despite getting the right outcome, Seok-hoon is quick to remind her that this doesn't excuse her absences and Hyo-min will need to tighten up her act if she wants to stay in litigation. The Episode Review Beyond the Bar is the latest law drama on Netflix and this first episode gets off to a decent start. We've got the usual cold, confident male protagonist alongside the plucky underdog protégé, not to mention a whole host of different characters to bolster out the supporting group. What's here though has the makings of something really endearing. The episode is nicely paced too and certainly doesn't drag on unnecessarily. The introduction to Hyo-min is a nice way of showcasing her talents, including her intelligence and tenacity to succeed. However, nothing here is over the top and it would appear that the show is going to play it straight rather than throw in a lot of comedy to lighten the mood. There's already some interesting threads at work, including the nuggets about Hyo-min's family and her seedy boyfriend, whom I'd imagine she's going to break up with soon. The concept in Beyond the Bar is interesting but we'll have to see whether Hyo-min is going to steamroll her through every case or if there will be some bumps along the way. Roll on the next episode. Next Episode Expect A Full Season Write-Up When This Season Concludes!

India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say
India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say

India will keep purchasing oil from Russia, despite President Donald Trump threatening to impose penalties for doing so, two Indian officials said on Saturday Officials in India, the most populous country on Earth, told Reuters and That contradicted a statement from Trump, who on Friday told reporters his understanding was that India would 'no longer' be buying oil from Russia. "These are long-term oil contracts," an unnamed Indian official told Reuters. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Last week, Trump said India would face unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil in addition to a 25 percent tariff on goods. However, China and Turkey, two countries that also purchase large amounts of Russian oil, have not faced similar penalty threats. India drastically increased its import of Russian oil after the Kremlin invaded Ukraine in 2022, while many other countries began to cut back it's imports. The cheap availability of Russian oil allowed India to reduce its reliance on other countries, such as Saudi Arabia or Iraq, who typically sell to Asian countries at a higher price. While India faced criticisms for doing so, the general consensus around India's increase in imports has been that it helps avoid a global surge in oil prices. It's unclear why exactly Trump has targeted India in reducing its import of Russian oil. The president has recently expressed frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin for failing to come to the peace talks table to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. On Friday, India's external affairs spokesperson Randdhir Jaiswal said India and Russia had a 'time-tested partnership' and that India was analyzing its energy sourcing. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," Jaiswal said, according to Reuters. India heavily relies on energy imports to sustain the needs of it's more than one billion population. It imports more than one million barrels per day.

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: Forget nuclear bluster... only getting tougher can curb cruel Putin

This week sees the 80th anniversaries of the only two uses of nuclear weapons in war against human targets. The Hiroshima bomb will be commemorated on Wednesday. The Nagasaki bomb will be marked on Saturday. These actions, though generally believed to have brought the Second World War to an end, remain highly controversial, not least because of the large number of non-combatant civilians who died of appalling injuries. American military authorities prevented the publication of some pictures of the aftermath for many years. Some of the scientists involved in developing the bomb regretted it deeply. Albert Einstein, who had urged President Franklin Roosevelt to embark on the research which led to it, later said this was 'the one great mistake in my life'. But whatever we think now about President Harry Truman's decision to drop two bombs on Japan, such discoveries cannot be undiscovered. Several countries, including Britain, concluded that the best response was to build their own bombs, so deterring attack by any other nuclear power. This policy has, on the whole, worked. The 1961 Cuban missile crisis was defused because both Moscow and Washington had the sense to see that a compromise was better than the end of the world. Both backed down. Since then, most of us have believed that Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) would deter all but the crazy from taking actions which might lead to the use of nuclear weapons. The Russians have developed a grim system known as the Dead Hand, which would deliver a shattering nuclear response to an American nuclear strike, even if the Kremlin leadership were all dead in the ruins of an irradiated Moscow. It was this which former Russian President Dmitri Medvedev was referring to when he recently taunted Donald Trump over his approach to Russia. And Mr Trump duly rose to the bait, proclaiming that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be 'positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to what he called the Russian's 'highly provocative' comments. This is probably bluster. Mr Trump's advisers will have told him that Mr Medvedev is not a significant figure. And the US Navy always has several of its 12 Ohio-class submarines, equipped with formidably accurate Trident multi-warhead missiles, within striking range of Russia. Even so, with a war still in Ukraine, it would be unwise to be complacent. MAD may have worked so far but the world is madder than for many years, with Russo-American relations tense, dogged by mutual incomprehension and personally unfriendly. Mr Trump may be unpredictable and erratic but the root of this problem is Vladimir Putin's cruel and lawless aggression, made worse by despicable bombing attacks on civilians. Mr Trump is right that it must stop, and it is Mr Putin who must stop it. If he does not, who knows where it might lead? Russia has relied too long on its nuclear strength to limit the West's response. The West must now deploy the most severe conventional military, diplomatic and economic means to bring Putin to the negotiating table and to obtain a ceasefire.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store