logo
Looming tax deadline and glitches cause frustration

Looming tax deadline and glitches cause frustration

The Citizen2 days ago

Additional measures were implemented to help taxpayers stay compliant – and if not for the 'procrastinators' the problem 'could have been fixed' by now.
The chances of an extension to Friday's deadline are slim. Picture: AdobeStock
In the run-up to this year's filing season, employers are battling to meet the deadline for submission of their annual employer reconciliation declarations to the South African Revenue Service (Sars).
The deadline is Friday. Employers experienced glitches after Sars released an updated version of e@syFile, the software used to reconcile and validate the payroll data and electronic employee tax certificates submitted to Sars.
Employers submit monthly declarations, and the annual declaration (EMP501) reflects all the payments made in terms of employee pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) tax, Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) contributions, and employee tax incentive (ETI) and skills development (SDL) levies.
ALSO READ: 'Sars needs to play catch up,' says Kieswetter as tax collector goes digital
System issues
The system error forced Sars to make additional channels and measures available to enable employers to submit their information on time, says Ettiene Retief, independent tax specialist.
The new version created 'unexpected' issues where employers were unable to submit their EMP501 returns.
Following complaints from several recognised controlling bodies that represent tax practitioners, Sars acknowledged the problems.
It gave employers access to the older version when they could not solve their issues with the new version, and addressed issues through a dedicated email support channel.
Retief says the newer version might have been incompatible with specific anti-virus programmes used by employers or tax practitioners.
System updates by employer payroll systems may also have caused the incompatibility with e@syFile.
'There are also procrastinators. We have had two months to deal with issues – if people started engaging earlier, the problem could have been fixed already,' he adds.
ALSO READ: Sars beats expectations by collecting R1.855 trillion in 2024/25 tax year
The go-between
The Sars e@syFile software plays 'middleman' in the validation and reconciliation of the employer's payroll system and the validation of the electronic IRP5 tax certificate that is submitted to Sars.
This enables Sars to pre-populate the tax returns of almost four million individual taxpayers, and those with more complicated tax affairs can submit their tax returns with correct tax information.
According to Sars, the three elements that must reconcile for employer submissions include:
Monthly employer declarations submitted (PAYE, SDL, UIF and ETI);
Payments made (excluding penalty and interest payments); and
IRP5/IT3(a)s generated.
The chances of an extension of Friday's deadline are slim. Sars only has a month to process the information and start pre-populating tax returns for the start of the July filing season.
'If one deadline moves, it moves everything and that causes its own complications,' says Retief.
Another system glitch that frustrated taxpayers and practitioners last month was the inability to upload documentation relating to value-added tax (Vat) returns. 'As far as I am aware the issues were addressed.'
ALSO READ: Sars records increase in taxpayers who filed returns
Refund delays
André Daniels, head of tax controversy and dispute resolution at Tax Consulting SA, says taxpayers and tax practitioners alike are reporting a surge in delayed refunds.
Sars is citing 'pending verifications or audits' – but only after a manual status check is performed.
'This is not a procedural glitch – this is a systemic failure with serious financial implications,' Daniels said in a recent statement.
In many cases Sars has requested further verification documentation without issuing any formal notification through eFiling or via email.
'Making matters worse, there is often no link available to upload the required documents because no verification or audit letter was ever generated.'
Daniels says even if the link is provided and documentation uploaded, additional assessments are subsequently issued, stating that the 'burden of proof' was not discharged.
His advice to taxpayers is to act proactively and to confirm whether any verifications or audits have been raised behind the scenes.
He also advises taxpayers to use the dispute resolution steps to correct assessments where appropriate.
Retief notes that Sars is constantly upgrading, adding and changing its systems and programmes as part of its modernisation and digitalisation drive.
It is normal that there will be glitches.
Sars is generally alerted to problems and issues through the different representative bodies. 'I know there were issues, but Sars was quick to respond and solve some of it.'
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Treasury stands firm on unaffordability of continued extension of SRD grant
Treasury stands firm on unaffordability of continued extension of SRD grant

Eyewitness News

time7 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Treasury stands firm on unaffordability of continued extension of SRD grant

CAPE TOWN - Treasury is standing firm on the unaffordability of the continued extension of the social relief of distress (SRD) grant introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has budgeted R35.2 billion to pay the grant in this financial year, while also appealing a high court ruling that it relaxes its criteria for eligibility to include thousands more people. Delivering the second version of the budget in March, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana announced that the grant would be extended for yet another year. That is unchanged in the current version of the budget. ALSO READ: • SARS expects to see impact of increase in tax collection efforts from Q2 • Expanding list of tax-free food items won't benefit poorer households: Treasury • Treasury defends fuel levy increase However, responding to public submissions on the budget in Parliament on Friday, Treasury's head of public finance, Rendani Randela, said that Treasury has no choice but to appeal January's high court ruling that it include thousands more to receive the monthly R370 stipend. "That judgment is a fiscal risk on its own. And again, we are looking at the bigger picture here. Social assistance is not the only programme that we have, we also have other social assistance programmes outside the Department of Social Development." With 61% of the national budget going towards the social wage, Randela said Treasury believes that the existing social support net covers many of those also eligible for the SRD grant and double-dipping has to be avoided. Government is yet to take a decision on persistent calls from civil society for the SRD grant to become a basic income grant. "There's no way that we can't have a mechanism to filter out undeserving recipients of these social assistance programmes. That's why we are appealing that judgment because the way it is, if we don't challenge it, it is unaffordable."

Point of view: understanding the impact of eFiling fraud on South African taxpayers
Point of view: understanding the impact of eFiling fraud on South African taxpayers

IOL News

time12 hours ago

  • IOL News

Point of view: understanding the impact of eFiling fraud on South African taxpayers

Discover the troubling findings of the Tax Ombud's eFiling Profile Hijacking survey, revealing the extent of fraud affecting South African taxpayers and the urgent need for improved security measures. Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers The latest findings from the Tax Ombud's eFiling Profile Hijacking survey paint a stark picture of the vulnerabilities within South Africa's tax system. The Tax Ombud, Yanga Mputa, presented these findings this week. The numbers alone tell a worrying story: nearly half of the respondents were registered tax practitioners, while a significant portion, 32.7%, were individual taxpayers. The hijacking of tax profiles is not a minor inconvenience; it is a direct assault on the integrity of Sars, the security of taxpayers, and the trust that businesses and individuals place in the tax system. Alarmingly, a significant portion of those surveyed had firsthand experience with eFiling hijacking, with 41% reporting that they encountered this form of fraud. Meanwhile, 38% of tax practitioners had clients who fell victim to it, and 21% had witnessed it happening to someone else. These figures highlight that this is not a niche issue affecting a handful of unlucky taxpayers—it is widespread and systemic. The types of tax affected provide further insight into the nature of these attacks. Personal Income Tax was the primary target, making up 65% of reported cases, followed by VAT at 20% and Company Income Tax at 15%. This underscores the fact that individuals, rather than corporations, bear the brunt of eFiling fraud. The financial implications are severe: fraud amounts ranged from sums below R10 000 to staggering figures exceeding R1 million. For many victims, this is not just a bureaucratic headache, it is financial devastation. What is even more concerning is the response-or lack thereof—from authorities. More than half (52%) of the respondents did not report the matter to the police, and an additional 23% did not even know if they should. This raises critical questions about law enforcement's ability to assist victims and deter perpetrators. Even among those who did report their cases, the question remains: What action, if any, was taken? The survey further reveals the enabling factors behind these fraudulent activities: internal fraud and insider involvement, a lack of cybersecurity safeguards, system vulnerabilities, and ineffective response mechanisms from Sars itself. The fraudulent modification of banking details adds another layer to the crisis, demonstrating how easily financial data can be exploited. There is an urgent need for improved security measures and greater education and awareness of the risks. Sars, the institution tasked with protecting taxpayers, does not emerge unscathed from this report. While 71% of respondents attempted to report their cases to Sars, only 11% found the response to be effective. A staggering 89% of those affected indicated that Sars' intervention did little to resolve the issue. The failures range from a lack of communication and responsiveness to inefficiency and delays. Improved security measures, more thorough investigations, and a strengthened customer support framework should be the starting point. The most damning statistic of all is the assessment of Sars' communication and interaction following the discovery of fraud: 82% of respondents found it inadequate and ineffective. The victims of eFiling hijacking deserve better, swift action, transparency, and assurance that their financial records are secure. The findings of the survey make it clear: eFiling hijacking is a pressing issue that demands immediate attention. Addressing this challenge effectively is crucial to maintaining confidence in the tax system and ensuring taxpayers feel secure. Sars has an opportunity to strengthen its processes, enhance its responsiveness, and implement robust measures that protect individuals and businesses alike. By taking decisive action, it can reaffirm public trust and demonstrate its commitment to safeguarding taxpayer information. A proactive and transparent approach will go a long way in preventing further exploitation and ensuring the integrity of the system. * Maleke is the editor of Personal Finance PERSONAL FINANCE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store