Hugging Face Looks to Open-Source AI Robotics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Earnings Beat and Acquisitions Strengthen Rocket Companies Progress
Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE:RKT) is one of the 11 Best Short Squeeze Stocks to Buy Now. The company surpassed Q2 expectations and has bolstered expectations for its Redfin acquisition and pending COOP transaction. A businessperson using a laptop to review the details of a mortgage loan for a client. Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE:RKT) is a leading fintech platform delivering mortgage lending, real estate brokerage, personal finance, and homeownership solutions. The Michigan-based company's ecosystem includes Rocket Mortgage, Rocket Homes, Rocket Close, and Rocket Money. Its business model involves leveraging AI to streamline the homebuying and financial management experience. On July 31, 2025, the company reported achieving an EPS of $0.04 that surpassed the analysts' expectations of $0.03 in its Q2 earnings results. Additionally, Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE:RKT)'s revenue reached $1.36 billion, exceeding the projected $1.28 billion, further garnering positive attention from investors. In addition to this, Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE:RKT) is anticipated to close the COOP transaction in the fourth quarter of 2025, thus eliminating elevated transaction-related expenses that negatively impacted the company's second-half 2025 earnings. Also, the acquisition of Redfin, completed on July 1, 2025, brought a positive outlook to the company as the combination of the most-visited real estate brokerage website and the U.S.'s largest mortgage lender is expected to improve efficacy. With a short float of 58.38%, Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE:RKT) potentially has extreme short interest. However, the stock attracts investor interest as it is subject to a dramatic squeeze in positive momentum. While we acknowledge the potential of RKT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Best REIT Stocks to Buy Right Now and 10 Stocks with Huge Catalysts on the Horizon Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
The A List Writer Launching An Alternative To AI Song Creation
In theory at least, 'writing' a song has never been easier. Instead of spending hours or days hunched over a guitar, keyboard or digital workstation, all you need to do is open up a generative AI app, provide a few prompts and then sit back while the clever software does all the heavy lifting. Within hours, your creation can be vying for the attention of music consumers on a streaming platform, with AI also providing a cover picture and brand identity. But what happens when you score that inevitable multi-platinum hit record? Who actually owns the copyright? Is it you? Is it the Generative AI provider? Or more problematically, is it one or more of the countless musicians, songwriters and singers whose work has been diced, sliced and analysed to provide the software with the wherewithal to produce music tracks to order? And will you perhaps enjoy success with a song, only to be faced with a succession of lawsuits from artists who have noticed a certain similarity with their own work? This is a fast-moving space. Last year, generative AI startups Suno and Udio were on the receiving end of music industry lawsuits. However, as reported this year, talks are underway to allow AI models to be trained on music catalogs, with provision for musicians and songwriters to get paid. There's no denying that generative AI has its uses. Professional songwriters can use it as a means to speed up the production process and try out new ideas. Equally, online influencers with no musical ability can create soundtracks for their YouTube, Instagram and TikTok posts. It can even be used - as in the case of the last Beatles' single, to resurrect a poorly recorded demo and create something of real value. However, when it comes to creating original music for public consumption, there are real question marks around attribution and rights. Andreas Carlsson believes he has an alternative that is equally empowering in terms of music creation while also providing musicians, songwriters, record labels and catalogues with a means to protect their rights and open up new revenue streams. Aimed primarily at Generations Z and Alpha, it is a mobile app designed to create and ultimately distribute new music from rights-protected building blocks. A Lego Box Of Rights As Carlsson stresses, his perspective on this is very different from a Bay Area tech bro. Based in Sweden, he has been a successful songwriter for a quarter of a century, and his name has appeared on the recording credits of artists such as Britney Spears, NSYNC, The Backstreet Boys, Westlife and Celine Dion. 'I am a music man,' he says. 'I don't come from Palo Alto. I don't want to cannibalise the industry.' But what he does want to do is to enable musicians to monetise a market that is potentially huge. Traditionally, music making has required hard-won skills - the infamous 10,000 hours of practice - plus a certain amount of money to buy guitars, amps, computers, software and studio equipment. Despite that investment in time and energy, musicians struggle to secure any kind of decent return. Meanwhile, there are vast numbers of people who would like to put together songs from clips and samples, either for their own amusement or for commercial reasons. Carlsson's app - Hyph - is aimed at bringing these communities together. Musicians can provide stems (music tracks), which they retain full control over. Creators can meld those stems into finished tracks, either for personal use or to further their careers. In addition, record labels and catalog holders can make tracks from name artists available for manipulation, again keeping full control of the rights. 'What we've created is a Lego box of rights,' he says. Carlsson sees a historic precedent here, noting that the MP3 revolution was kicked off by Sweden's Pirate Bay and then Napster before a second Swedish company stepped in to bring order to the market. 'What Spotify got right was that you have to tick two boxes, namely attribution and control,' he says. In between that, you also need the consent of artists.' So who gains here? For instance, why should a major record label put its valuable music assets in the hands of a Generation Z creator? Well, at one level, it can be used for fan outreach. A way to engage music consumers more deeply. Something that can be quite difficult in the streaming age. However, Carlsson believes it is also a means to revive and monetise dormant sections of music catalogues by opening them up to be revisited and manipulated. And for bedroom musicians? Well, they get a chance to sell their music to creators. This isn't a new idea. Either offline or online, entrepreneurial musicians are already selling instrument and voice sample packs, either directly or through third parties. 'You should look at tech in terms of how it gives you the ability to scale your assets,' Carlsson says. You build a bank of assets that you can scale, and if you are a bedroom producer, you can play on a thousand songs.' Carlsson says his motivation is to provide a route to monetisation for those who struggle to make a living in today's music industry. The big names are fine. They generate millions of streams, not only for new releases but also for back catalogue work that might otherwise be dormant. In addition, they cash in on big-ticket shows, VIP access and merchandise. Further down the ladder, artists don't have those opportunities and per-play revenues for streaming are pretty paltry. 'I'm thinking of the self-releasing artists. The people who were like me when I was just starting out,' says Carlsson. The app was originally launched in Scandinavia, with backing from high-net-worth investors, with music stems supplied on a pay-for-work basis. The full launch takes place in September. In the future, he hopes to sign distribution deals with streamers while establishing its own distribution channels. It will be monetized through subscriptions - for professional users - and in-app purchases. Will this help musicians make money and will it prove to me more than a toy? That depends on whether the app can scale and that its alternative monetisation plan, involving active rather than passive consumption, will provide a big enough market. Carlsson thinks it will. 'Everyone is looking for the new format. If you look at the Zeitgeist and what is happening with youth, everyone wants to lean into what they're doing. It makes sense that everything becomes interactive,' he says.
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
FBI Warns iPhone And Android Users—Do Not Use These Codes
An 'impossible' to detect smartphone threat is now surging, with a new warning that more than 4 million attacks were observed 'in the first half of 2025 alone.' It's no surprise the FBI has a new warning for iPhone and Android users. We're talking QR codes, which Proofpoint warns 'burst on the scene in 2023' and are now being quickly 'adopted by threat actors as a way to remove the victim from the enterprise detection pipeline and bypass traditional URL scanning and filters.' The FBI has now issued a warning to all smartphone users that the latest such attack is taking hold, a change in tactics given all the headlines around unpaid toll, DMV motoring offenses and even the original favorite undelivered package texts. 'Criminals are sending unsolicited packages containing a QR code,' the bureau says, 'and once scanned, victims provide personal and financial information while unknowingly downloading malicious software that steals data from their phone.' Proofpoint warns 'it is impossible to tell if a QR code is a threat just by looking at it.' That makes 'these threats particularly dangerous,' with users now used to 'scanning QR codes with their phone cameras for everything from instructions to menus.' Just as with the FBI's latest advisory, these attacks are 'socially engineered to convince you to scan the code.' Once you do, you're 'redirected to a fraudulent website designed to steal sensitive data, such as login credentials, credit card numbers or personal data.' The FBI's advice is clear: 'Do not scan QR codes from unknown origins.' And while that includes this latest 'brushing' scam, with unsolicited packages delivered to your home with no sender details, it's more likely you'll be caught by a QR code in an email attachment or on a parking meter or even on a poster by the side of the street. The FBI says 'QR code scam has evolved much like all other scams,' and 'if you happen to scan a scammer's bad code, you could end up giving them access to your device.' Do that, the bureau says, and those attackers 'can access your contacts, download malware, or send you to a fake payment portal. Once there, you can inadvertently give them access to your banking and credit card accounts. If you make a payment through a bad QR code, it's difficult if not impossible to get those funds back.' Proofpoint says 'attacks that target people are all about hacking human nature,' and that's certainly the case with QR codes. In a world where your phone helpfully offers a link whenever it sees a code, without any of the link protection or warnings in other apps, it's easy to see why these attacks are surging. You have been warned.
