
Where the maple leaf falls on an altered mosaic
Long before Donald Trump, Velupillai Prabhakaran was a threat to Canada. After the UK and China agreed in 1984 that Hong Kong would revert to Chinese sovereignty 13 years later, the 'Mountain Master', head of the dreaded, global Triad mafia, became a threat to Canada amid the mass migration of Hong Kong Chinese to Vancouver. And then there was an outspoken consul general of India in British Columbia, who had the intention to alter Canada's national profile, but could not, since his tenure in the western province was not long enough for such a big enterprise. This would have required one or two decades of all-out efforts by Indians totally dedicated to such a task.
It is simplistic to view Mark Carney's recent election as Canada's prime minister, and the rise and fall of Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre as a fight within Canada's established two-party domination, or as a routine democratic exercise. Canada has been in a silent churn for many decades before the 47th president of the US caused the cauldron, so to speak, to overflow with Trump's threat to annex his neighbouring dominion.
Underpopulated Canada's liberal policy of attracting all varieties of undesirable immigrants has caused the country to be overrun by 'outsiders' and an increasing ghettoisation of immigrant communities. The deceptive peace of the Thousand Islands, which was once emblematic of Canada, has given way to expose an ugly underbelly caused by injudicious immigration. Canada now faces severe all-round problems, which are beyond Carney or Poilievre—and his future successor—to solve. If and when they attempt to do so, it will have serious consequences for Indian immigration to Canada for many years to come, and for the hitherto-thriving educational exodus from India to Canada.
Carney recently said that the US 'is a melting pot, Canada is a mosaic'. It has not been a pretty mosaic for a long time. During the nearly 15 years that I covered Canada as a foreign correspondent in North America, I have watched incognito extortion by cadres of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) from shopkeepers and small businessmen in the Greater Toronto area. Canada listed the LTTE under its Anti-Terrorism Act in 2006; it renewed the listing last year, presumably because the LTTE continues to be a terrorist threat long after its leader Prabhakaran was killed.
I once attended the proceedings of a House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, which was 'deeply disturbed by testimony claiming that some supporters of the LTTE practice intimidation and extortion among the large Tamil community within Canada'. Most estimates suggest that there are about 300,000 Canadians of Sri Lankan origin, mainly Tamils.
At the famous 'Mob Museum' in Las Vegas, the Triad crime syndicate's money laundering activities in Canada, its drug-peddling in British Columbia and its massive manipulation of Vancouver's real estate market have been extensively documented. So much so, at this National Museum of Organized Crime and Law Enforcement, as it is officially known, 'Vancouver model' is the name given to what the Hong Kong mob has perfected in the otherwise enchanting Canadian metropolis. This model is now being exported worldwide as the Triad spreads its wings further afield. Trump, even in his first presidential term, has been obsessed with the flow of the deadly opioid fentanyl from China to the Americas. Now that Carney and Trump have met, Hong Kong's extensive mafia network in western Canada may be jointly taken on by the two new North American leaders.
Law enforcement officials in British Columbia have told me during reporting visits that the Triad has extensively recruited Canadian Punjabi gangs—not Khalistanis—for gun running and drug dealing. Provincial ministers in Ontario province have shown me documentation of how Canadian truck drivers of Punjabi descent have been ferrying narcotics into the US, imaginatively hidden in their cargo. At one time, hundreds of Indian-origin truckers were languishing in jails across the border in the US after having been caught with large hauls of deadly opioids. The situation in the Prairie provinces, especially Alberta, has not been any better.
It was into such a volatile environment, ripe for a disruptive agenda, that an Indian consul general went to Vancouver about 15 years ago. He made no bones about wanting to 'transform Canada into a brown nation' from a white one. I am not naming him because he is no more and is, therefore, unable to defend himself against these revelations of highly undiplomatic behaviour. He certainly thought out-of-the-box and became hugely popular. Not only among Indo-Canadians, but also among Canadians of all South Asian descent. He briefly united western Canada's Indian community, which had been waging fratricidal battles between Hindus and Sikhs. Within the Sikh community, Khalistanis were then getting into bloody and often fatal attacks against other Canadian Sikhs who were opposed to separatism in Punjab.
I once accompanied this consul general to a few Indo-Canadian gatherings, where he said the time had come for mass migration by any means from South Asia to Canada. He said Canada would eventually become like some Caribbean nations where people of sub-continental origin are the majority. These Caribbean countries, he noted, successively elected ethnic Indians as their prime ministers.
I wondered if his strategy—like Trump's false hope that Canada would become the 51st US state—was merely to unite the fractious Indian community in his jurisdiction, which was hopelessly divided then as they are now. The results of Canada's parliamentary elections last month are ominous for Canadians of other ethnicity. Punjabi will be the fourth-most spoken language in the new House of Commons. There were 21 ethnic Indians in the previous House; three more have been elected this time.
But India must not expect that Carney will wave a magic wand and India-Canada relations will return to what they were before Justin Trudeau destroyed the relationship, unwisely abetted by strategists in the Indian establishment who cannot see beyond their noses. Bilateral economic relations will continue to thrive, but political or diplomatic relations may not keep pace. Unless India moves to Ottawa from London some of its people who salvaged Indo-British relations, which were also blighted by Khalistanis not long ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
Critical minerals will remain a problem in US-China talks. These industries are at risk.
Critical minerals will likely remain a source of leverage for Beijing in trade talks with the U.S., even if President Donald Trump's Thursday call with Xi Jinping speeds up the flow of rare earths to feed auto, industrial and other supply chains. The issue dates back to early April, when China imposed restrictions on exports of the metals as part of its retaliation against Trump's imposition of tariffs of up to 145% on its exports to the U.S. In mid May, after negotiators met in Geneva, the U.S. said China had agreed to lift the restrictions as the countries agreed to a 90-day pause on levies that were choking off trade between them. The problem is that while China is allowing exports of rare earths, used in magnets that go into automobiles, for example, companies that want to export them need licenses. Companies say they aren't easy to get, though Reuters reported on Friday that Beijing had granted temporary licenses to suppliers of the big three U.S. auto makers. Its report cited people familiar with the matter. A spokesperson from the Chinese embassy said he wasn't aware of the situation specifically related to the licensing, reiterating that the export control measures are in line with international common practices, nondiscriminatory, and not targeted at specific countries. While only a fraction of the members of the American Chamber of Commerce in China—mostly technology and industrial companies—were affected by rare-earth export restrictions, three-quarters of those said their supplies would run out within three months, according to a survey from the trade group. While the survey found that Chinese suppliers to U.S. companies had recently been granted six-month export licenses, they noted continued uncertainty because there is a large backlog of license applications. Gracelin Baskaran, a mining economist and director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said about 25% of licenses applied for have been given out, but that they aren't being processed fast enough. Part of that is due to the administrative task. China is the source of 100% of the rare-earth processing capability in the world, so it is issuing licenses for exports not just to the U.S., but for many other countries. But it could also be part of the negotiations. 'China has made it very clear it's not satisfied with the 90-day tariff pause and looking for a more durable solution to the tariff conundrum," said Baskaran, noting the deflationary impact of the tariffs on China's economy. 'It's not in their incentive to give out licenses quickly as their economy is in a downward spiral. These licenses are their leverage." The U.S. had been the dominant rare-earth producer until the 1990s, but China steadily took market share, ramping up production to levels that made it unprofitable for others, forcing them out, Baskaran said. A similar phenomenon is currently under way in nickel, she U.S. has been producing rare earths in California and is building out separation and processing capabilities, with companies like MP Materials boosting their refining abilities. 'It's a perfectly solvable problem and one the U.S. is working at warp speed to address," Baskaran said. 'It's not a forever problem." That said, it could continue be a source of pain, leaving the U.S. vulnerable in talks with China. An array of industries reliant on these critical minerals, from autos to electronics, semiconductors, and defense, are likely to suffer. Write to Reshma Kapadia at


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian diaspora to benefit as Canada proposes expansion of citizenship by descent
In a significant move expected to benefit the Indian diaspora and other immigrant communities, the Canadian government has introduced a new bill to remove the existing limit on citizenship by descent. The legislation, titled Bill C-3, was presented in Parliament on Thursday by Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab, as per a report by Lubna Kably in the Times of India. The current rule, introduced in 2009, restricts Canadian citizenship by descent to only the first generation born outside Canada. This means that a Canadian citizen who was themselves born outside Canada could not pass on their citizenship to a child born abroad. Similarly, they could not apply for direct citizenship for a child adopted overseas. The proposed bill aims to change this. According to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada ( IRCC ), 'As a result of the first-generation limit to citizenship by descent for individuals born abroad, most Canadian citizens who are citizens by descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born or adopted outside Canada. The current first-generation limit to citizenship no longer reflects how Canadian families live today—here at home and around the world—and the values that define our country.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Infertile Man Visits Orphanage And Hears, 'Hi Daddy.' Then He Realizes His Late Wife's Cruel Lies Crowdy Fan Undo As per Lubna's report in TOI, the issue has drawn legal scrutiny in recent years. In January 2024, a Canadian court ruled the first-generation limit unconstitutional. The government chose not to appeal the ruling. Although similar legislation was proposed in March 2024 by then-Immigration Minister Marc Miller, it did not pass, prompting its reintroduction this week. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) If passed, Bill C-3 would automatically grant citizenship to individuals who would have been eligible if not for the earlier restrictions. It also proposes a new system under which Canadian parents born abroad can pass on citizenship to their foreign-born children—provided the parent has lived in Canada for at least 1,095 days (or three years) before the child's birth or adoption. Live Events You Might Also Like: Canada's new bill to grant citizenship to thousands of people Ken Nickel-Lane, managing director of an immigration services firm, said to The Times of India, 'While Bill C-3 certainly addresses and rectifies a fault, or faults in the current Citizenship Act which certainly is warranted and just, it may face challenges given current public opinion towards immigration.' He added that the bill might put pressure on immigration quotas, potentially affecting temporary foreign workers critical to infrastructure and housing development. The IRCC has confirmed that, 'If the bill passes both Houses of Parliament and receives Royal Assent, we will work as quickly as possible to bring the changes into effect.' For many Indian-origin Canadians with children or adopted children born outside Canada, the bill—if passed—will mark a major shift in access to citizenship and legal status. You Might Also Like: Canada's first Express Entry draw under new Immigration Minister invites 277 applications

Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran furious over Trump's travel ban on 12 countries: ‘Racist, supremacist mentality'
An Iranian official denounced the "racist mentality" of US policymakers as US President Donald Trump reinstated the travel ban on 12 countries. Director General for the affairs of Iranians broad, Alireza Hashemi-Raja, said on Saturday the move was "a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers." He lambasted Trump's travel ban, saying that it "indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people". Meanwhile, Reuters quoted Iran's foreign ministry as saying in a post on X, "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law." US President Donald Trump signed a new order on Wednesday banning the citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. As per the order, the entry of people from seven other countries will be partially restricted. These include Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The ban takes effect on June 9, 2025 (Monday) at 12:01 am EDT (0401 GMT). The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists", was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. (With inputs from agencies)