Disability worker loses voice for six years due to filthy conditions
A former disability support worker who alleges she was sent into urine and feces-covered homes by her employer has been left unable to speak for six years.
In late 2019, the 44-year-old, who asked not be identified, was working as a support worker for Woodbine, a not-for-profit that assists people with intellectual disabilities based in Warracknabeal in Victoria's wheatbelt, about 205 miles northwest of Melbourne.
Advertisement
The disability support worker of two decades took a client to Warracknabeal Hospital for treatment and had to stay with him for several days as it wasn't equipped to properly cater for their needs.
A 44-year-old mother working in disability support for Woodbine, a not-for-profit that helps those with intellectual disabilities, alleges being sent to urine and feces-covered homes, leaving her unable to speak for six years.
Google Maps
A number of other patients there had respiratory illnesses, and she came down with a similar illness as a result of her time there.
The mom-of-two spent three weeks off sick, and when she returned she alleges she was put to work in unsafe conditions.
Advertisement
'Unfortunately [the clients] weren't able to keep their house clean, it would be filthy… urine, faeces, and mum would have to go there quite a bit,' her 21-year-old daughter said. 'Mum didn't want to be rude. Woodbine was aware of the circumstances but there was nothing put in place to protect mum at all.'
As a result of her exposure to that environment, her respiratory condition worsened and she was diagnosed with a chest infection and pleurisy — inflammation of the lining of the lungs and chest cavity.
Her condition continued to deteriorate before she was eventually hospitalized in March 2020, losing her voice completely.
Advertisement
'She never came back and it developed into this vocal cord dysfunction from the recurrent infections,' her daughter said. '[The doctors said] mycoplasma pneumoniae is really hard to treat.'
Six years later, she can't speak for more than a few minutes. She lives in constant pain and has to take heavy muscle relaxants just to keep her vocal cord at peace.
She moved to the Gold Coast in 2022, and has been unable to work since her injury.
Advertisement
Her daughter said the impact on her mom and their family had been 'devastating'.
'Day-to-day is pretty up and down,' she said. 'Prior to this injury mum was quite a fit and healthy person, mum would do swimming with me, exercise has all come to a halt. She has to be on medication to get through the day. The financial implications have been [significant].'
'It's a very bizarre and unique situation,' said Shine Lawyers senior associate Nehad Elmassry, who is representing the worker.
'She contracts this viral disease — this is in the pre-Covid days — then she loses her voice chronically for the rest of her life. There's no surgery, no therapy, no kind of treatment that's going to get her to be able to speak the same way.'
Shine alleges Woodbine breached its duty of care by failing to provide her with personal protective equipment.
'There was no risk assessment when they sent her to the hospital,' said Elmassry.
'She complained about the environment the patients were in and they still sent her. She complained the patients were unwell, they told her 'go do your job'. Her condition continued to get worse. No one expects to go to work and lose your voice for the rest of your life. [Being] unable to work, that's the least of your problems. Her daily activities are impacted — she can't go to the shops, speak to other people, all of the things we take for granted.'
'Prior to this injury mum was quite a fit and healthy person,' her daughter said. 'She has to be on medication to get through the day. The financial implications have been [significant].'
News.com.au
Advertisement
She has been receiving WorkCover payments at 80 per cent of her previous salary for more than five years, but now intends to lodge an application for a serious injury certificate with the insurer in the coming months.
'She met the threshold to get compensation for losing her voice, now to get further compensation you have to sue the Victorian WorkCover Authority, which steps into shoes of the employer,' said Elmassry.
The claim has not been finalized but is expected to be 'hundreds of thousands for pain and suffering and economic loss'.
Advertisement
'Certainly if she can't work again, the WorkCover insurer would have to compensate her for the economic loss she would have suffered up until the age of 67,' he said.
Shine is hopeful the claim will reach settlement without having to go to court.
'If there's a dispute and we can't come to agreement on who's at fault, it could land in court,' said Elmassry.
'Woodbine [are] going to be under the gun. They'll be responding because they'll be asked a lot of questions.'
Advertisement
The woman's daughter said her mom felt let down by her employer of more than 20 years. 'They forced her to resign on pretty bad terms, it ended pretty nasty,' she said.
'Mentally it was just so draining. Mum was so passionate and caring for her clients, they were always treated as so much more than a job. They were mum's world, she loved her job. It's just been really tough.'
She added that the goal of the claim 'more to be recognised, to be shown that what happened wasn't fair'.
Advertisement
'This has been a really lengthy process and ultimately she just really wants it to come to an end,' she said.
Woodbine has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
30 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What's going on with measles, bird flu, and COVID? Here's a guide to the latest.
Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT Measles outbreaks. A canceled effort to develop a bird flu vaccine. An infectious new COVID variant and changing federal guidance about who should get boosted. In recent weeks, drama in D.C. has buried several vaccine-related developments. Today's newsletter explains what's new and what it means. COVID What's changed: Last month, health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. What it means: The administration has tried to narrow the pool of people it says should get boosted. But where some of the changes reflect reasonable readings of the science, others do not. Advertisement Dr. Nirav Shah, a top CDC official during the Biden administration, said experts debate whether younger children should get boosted. When Shah was in government, he recommended it. But many other countries don't, noting that most young children have a low risk of serious illness. The mRNA technology used in some COVID shots can also have side effects, including a condition called myocarditis that mostly affects boys and young men. Advertisement But Shah, who previously led Maine's CDC and is now at Colby College, says the evidence is much less debatable in the case of pregnant women. Not only are boosters safe and effective for them, but getting them protects babies in utero and up to 6 months old The way Kennedy made the changes has also troubled experts. Normally, health agencies gather outside advisers' input before making new recommendations. But Kennedy seems to have acted unilaterally. His announcement, made in a minutelong social media video, 🎁 ). 'What it suggests is that some of the conclusions are foregone,' Shah said. Kennedy argues that health experts made mistakes that undermined public trust during the pandemic. Shah acknowledges that, to a point. Some experts, he said, tried to squelch dissenting views or didn't effectively communicate that scientists' understanding of COVID would evolve, causing confusion when public health guidance changed. Other experts overstated 🎁 ). But the administration's approach risks sowing further confusion. Kennedy's announcement conflicts with an article that two Trump-appointed FDA officials published days earlier, which listed pregnancy as one factor that puts women ' 'What worries me is that when we get into another emergency situation, if trust in federal health authorities has waned, that's a problem,' Shah said. Advertisement Meanwhile, COVID keeps evolving. A variant called NB.1.8.1 has recently driven up cases in China and elsewhere. But for now, Shah isn't hugely concerned. NB.1.8.1 descended from Omicron, a variant that swept the United States in late 2021 and early 2022. So even if cases rise, existing vaccines and antibodies from prior infection will likely help protect against severe illness. The World Health Organization says the new variant ' Bird flu What's changed: A few months ago, bird flu was spreading rapidly among cows and chickens, What it means: Bird flu may be seasonal, which Given the uncertainty, some experts have faulted the administration for Advertisement Measles What's changed: Cases of the highly contagious virus continue to rise nationwide, but slowly. The largest outbreak, in West Texas, seems to be abating. Three Americans have died this year, all unvaccinated. What it means: A slowing case rate is good news, although many more people could have gotten sick than the official numbers reflect. The measles vaccine is safe, highly effective, and decades old, but Kennedy was slow to full-throatedly recommend it as the outbreak grew. 🧩 3 Down: 90° POINTS OF INTEREST Bob Lamb, who operates his gunsmithing business out of his garage in Cheshire, Mass., says the area has a "hunting culture." Erin Clark/Globe Staff Boston War of words: The US attorney for Massachusetts accused Boston Mayor Michelle Wu of making ' Dueling claims: Democratic activists asked a state agency to investigate Josh Kraft's mayoral campaign for allegedly Secret proceedings: A closed hearing begins in Boston today to determine whether a former Stoughton police deputy chief should lose his ability to work as an officer Evolving: A Boston nonprofit that launched after George Floyd's murder is navigating a backlash to Massachusetts and New England Karen Read retrial: The defense called a snowplow driver, who testified that he Market Basket case: Who's who in the latest Proxy fight: Representative Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts is running to become the top Democrat on an important House committee. His challengers Gun rights: Massachusetts has one of the country's strictest gun-control laws. But guns are ubiquitous in some towns — including Mount Katahdin deaths: Rescuers Trump administration One big bill: Trump's tax cut legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, a nonpartisan congressional agency found. Trump has Latest salvo: Elon Musk urged Republican lawmakers Weaponizing government: Trump directed his administration to investigate Joe Biden and his aides, alleging they hid Biden's decline and that some of his actions weren't legally valid. ( Russia-Ukraine war: Trump spoke with Vladimir Putin and said the Russian leader had pledged to retaliate against Ukraine's drone attack on Russian airfields last weekend. ( Israel-Hamas war: The United States vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. ( The Nation and the World Trans rights: Nebraska's governor signed a law banning transgender athletes from girls' sports. About half of states have similar bans. ( Overstaying their welcome: About 400,000 tourists who stayed in the United States longer than their visas allow — like the suspect in the Boulder, Colo., attack did — Explosive find: Officials in Cologne, Germany, temporarily evacuated 20,000 residents after construction work unearthed three unexploded US bombs from World War II. Experts defused them in about an hour. ( BESIDE THE POINT By Teresa Hanafin 💧 More rain this weekend: Either Boston is in 🎵 Rick Astley has the last laugh: 'Never Gonna Give You Up' has hit 1 billion streams on Spotify. 🦈 Films inspired by 'Jaws': From asthmatic sharks to 18-foot bears, here are some of the 🐔 Chicken wars: Mickey D's is bringing back the Snack Wrap after nine years because of demand — and the success of similar wraps from Burger King and Wendy's. ( 🏠 3 summer home rehabs: In downtown Burlington, Vt., Advertisement ⛱️ Beach etiquette: Don't encroach, block views, shake sand, disrespect wildlife, or do other things that are hallmarks of an obnoxious beachgoer. ( Thanks for reading Starting Point. NOTE: A 🎁 emoji indicates a gift link. A $ is a subscription site that does not offer gift links. This newsletter was edited and produced by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
Miami Herald
31 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
What patients can expect from the new leader of a South Florida hospital system
The University of Miami Health System has a new leader. Dr. Dipen Parekh, a surgeon who led the hospital system through the COVID-19 pandemic, will now serve as UHealth's chief executive officer and UM's executive vice president for Health Affairs. As UHealth CEO, Parekh will oversee the more than 17,500 employees who work across the hospital system at more than 100 facilities, including Bascom Palmer Institute, the nation's top hospital for opthalmology, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, the only National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center in South Florida. The urologic oncologist wants UM to 'push the frontiers of research.' That goal may be challenging at a time when more than 1,000 research grants in the country have been terminated by the federal government, according to a database created by two scientists documenting the terminations and as reported by STAT News. Parekh also sees more AI in the future of healthcare in South Florida. 'The demand for our services is increasing every day, and our responsibility is to meet that demand without compromising the excellence that defines UHealth,' Parekh told the Miami Herald Wednesday in an email. 'To do so, we must continue to improve how patients access our care—whether that's through new locations, more efficient systems, or advanced technologies. Artificial intelligence will play a key role in this effort. 'AI holds tremendous promise in helping us make smarter decisions, improve outcomes, and enhance the experience for both patients and providers.' UM's Board of Trustees unanimously agreed this week to promote Parekh, UHealth's chief operating officer and a longtime urology chair at UM's medical school, to CEO. The surgeon will takes over the top job from Joseph Echevarria, who since 2024 has juggled the jobs of UM and UHealth president and UHealth CEO. Echevarria will remain president. Parekh considers expansion to be one of the health system's greatest challenges — and opportunities — and has played a key role in UHealth's recent push into North Miami-Dade and Doral, one of South Florida's hottest growing medical hubs. Like other health systems, UHealth is trying to bring care closer to patients, a strategy to not only improve access to care, but to also attract and retain patients and employees. 'Dipen has played a pivotal role each step of the way as the University of Miami Health System has grown into one of the top academic medical centers in the country,' Echevarria said in a statement. 'He understands the mission —from the operating room to the classroom to the boardroom — and he embodies the excellence we strive to deliver for our patients, students, and community.' Who is UHealth's new CEO? UHealth is now the second hospital system in South Florida to be currently led by a physician. The veteran surgeon, one of UM's highest paid employees, has performed more than 6,000 robotic urologic cancer surgeries and has published more than 200 peer-reviewed publications, including a 'groundbreaking trial, published in The Lancelet in 2018, which established the efficacy of robotic-assisted surgery for bladder cancer,' according to the university. Parekh joined UM's medical school in 2012 as the chair of urology and is also the founding director of the Desai Seithi Urology Institute. He became chief clinical officer, his first system-wide administrative role, in 2017, before becoming chief operating officer in 2020, when COVID struck and hospitals became overwhelmed with sick patients. Besides being tasked with overseeing UHealth's day-to-day operations, Parekh in 2021 was also made executive dean for clinical affairs at UM's Miller School of Medicine. Becker's Hospital Review named him among the top 60 academic health system COO's to know in 2024. The private university declined to reveal is new salary. For years, UHealth has been the only academic health system in South Florida although that will change once Baptist Health South Florida finalizes the process of becoming the future teaching hospital of Florida International University. FIU has tapped Nicklaus Children's Health System to be its pediatric teaching hospital. UHealth's teaching hospital is Jackson Memorial, part of Miami-Dade's public hospital network. At UM's medical school and health system, researchers have long tackled infectious diseases, cancer treatments and therapies, Alzheimer's, dementia, genetic diseases and many other conditions. The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis is working with Elon Musk's startup company Neuralink to test whether its brain chip can give people who are paralyzed the ability to use mind to wirelessly control computers, smartphones and other electronic devices. 'Our role as an academic health system is not just to care for patients, but to lead in innovation, discovery, and training the next generation of healthcare leaders,' said Parekh, who plans to keep caring for patients while serving as CEO. 'That's what sets us apart — and that's what we'll continue to build on.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hiltzik: Study finds removing school mask mandates contributed to 22,000 U.S. COVID deaths in a year
Someday we Americans may stop quarreling over our response to the COVID-19 pandemic — lockdown orders, social distancing and so forth — but one category of debate may never become immune to second-guessing. That's the impact of anti-pandemic measures on schools and schoolchildren. According to popular opinion, these were almost entirely mistaken or ineffective. A newly published study from data scientists at Michigan State University knocks one pillar out from under this claim. It finds that the abrupt removal in 2022 of mandates that children wear masks in school contributed to an estimated 21,800 COVID deaths that year — a shocking 9% of the total COVID deaths in the U.S. that year. COVID-19 is less of a threat to children than accidents or the common flu. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya (2022) gets an assessment of child health dead wrong "We were surprised by that too," says Scott A. Imberman, a professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State and a co-author of the paper. On reflection, he says, given the mixing of children and staff in the close quarters of a classroom, "it's pretty easy to see how COVID could propagate to the wider community." In February 2022, about 50% of public school children, or more than 20 million pupils, were in districts with mask mandates; then, over a period of six weeks, almost all those districts rescinded their mandates. "You can see how that would create a pretty substantial surge in infections." Most of the surge, Imberman told me, was a "spillover effect" in the communities outside the schools themselves. The Michigan State finding undermines several myths and misrepresentations about COVID spread by the right wing. These include the claim that children are virtually impervious to COVID, which has been refuted by the injury and death toll among children. A related misrepresentation was that children can't pass on the infection to adults. In fact, because many children didn't show symptoms of the infection or had only mild, flu-like symptoms, they functioned almost like an undetected fifth column in spreading the virus to adults. Read more: Hiltzik: Stanford throws a party for purveyors of misinformation and disinformation about COVID Among those who vociferously promoted these myths is Jay Bhattacharya, the former Stanford medical professor who is now director of the National Institutes of Health, a subagency of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services. In a July 2022 op-ed originally published in the Orange County Register, for example, Bhattacharya and a co-author asserted that "COVID-19 is less of a threat to children than accidents or the common flu"; that's debatable, and irrelevant, since those are themselves major threats to child health. The article advocated discontinuing mask-wearing for all children, regardless of their vaccination status. But it was self-refuting, since it also acknowledged that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that mask mandates in school had produced "a roughly 20% reduction in COVID-19 incidence." The authors also acknowledged that masking in schools could help to shield adults from COVID. But they asked, "Since when is it ethical to burden children for the benefit of adults?" That was the wrong question. Reducing COVID infections for children was certainly not a "burden" on them, but a sound public health goal. How heavy was that "burden," anyway? Bhattacharya and his co-author posited that "masking is a psychological stressor for children and disrupts learning," and "it is likely that masking exacerbates the chances that a child will experience anxiety and depression." This sounds like guesswork derived from pop psychology, since the authors didn't point to any actual research to validate their conclusions about masking. Nevertheless, they argued that the drawbacks of masking exceeded the benefits. Yet the Michigan State estimate that the removal of mask mandates in the schools contributed to 21,800 deaths in 2022 alone turns the balance of costs and benefits on its head. I asked Health and Human Services for Bhattacharya's response to the study but received no reply. Read more: Hiltzik: These 'experts' sold the U.S. on a disastrous COVID plan, and never paid a professional price Much of the mythmaking about our pandemic response — indeed, the global pandemic response — is rooted in the absurd conviction that everything we now know about COVID was self-evident from the outset. But COVID was a novel human pathogen. As I wrote in 2022, there was little consensus about how it spread, at what stage of sickness it was most contagious, or who was most susceptible. As a result, most anti-pandemic policies in 2020-22 arose from an excess of caution. Mitigation measures were uncertain, but it did make sense to limit gatherings in small spaces, i.e., classrooms. Many such steps turned out to be effective, including social distancing and, yes, mask-wearing. The subsequent hand-wringing over school closings, accordingly, has the unmistakable smell of hindsight. Not 20/20 hindsight, mind you, but hindsight clouded by ideology, partisan politics and persistent ignorance. For example, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican champion of letting COVID-19 freely rip through his population, crowed that the results 'prove that we made the right decision' to keep schools open. Is that so? When Florida reopened its schools in August 2021 and banned remote teaching, child COVID deaths in the state more than doubled. One month into the reopenings, the heightened spread of COVID prompted districts across the state to shut down schools again and impose quarantines affecting thousands of pupils. This is how manifestly deadly decisions get redefined as "the right decision" in the partisan narrative. The Michigan State team documented the speed at which school mask mandates were dropped. The timeline begins in July 2021, when the CDC recommended universal masking in schools to enable a return to in-person instruction rather than fully remote or hybrid classes. The CDC's guidelines, the Michigan State study says, applied to all students whether they were vaccinated or not and all school districts, whatever the levels of COVID infection and transmission within their community. In the fall of 2021, about 65% of all students were subject to a state or local mask mandate. The mask mandates were highly controversial: "Many schools encountered pushback from politicians, parents, and community members" who questioned the efficacy of masking, the study relates. The districts that rejected the mandates tended to be "less urban, less diverse, and more likely to have voted for Trump in the 2020 election." On Feb. 25, 2022, the CDC eliminated its recommendation for universal school masking. Its rationale was that the exceptionally contagious Omicron variant of COVID had passed its peak and thus immunity had increased. But many districts had removed their mandates starting several weeks before the CDC revised its guidance, suggesting that the CDC was following, rather than leading, state and local preferences. The removal of mask mandates ran counter to scientific evidence that masks did indeed reduce the spread of COVID. Indeed, a study from Boston and Chelsea, Mass., found that the removal of mask mandates resulted in an increase of 45 COVID cases per 1,000 students and school staff — nearly 12,000 new cases — over the following four months. But in this particular, as in others related to pandemic policies, politics and ideology trumped the hard evidence, warping the public health response. Bhattacharya's record as an authority on pandemic measures is not encouraging. He was one of the original three authors of the 'Great Barrington Declaration,' a manifesto for herd immunity published in October 2020. The core of the declaration was opposition to lockdowns. Its solution was what its drafters called 'focused protection' — allowing 'those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk,' chiefly seniors. Read more: Hiltzik: COVID deniers claim a new study says mask mandates don't work. They should try reading it Focused protection, the drafters wrote, would allow society to achieve herd immunity and return to normality in three to six months. The declaration was essentially a libertarian fantasy. It contemplated sequestering seniors at home, without addressing how they would be kept fed and healthy. Nor did it address multigenerational households, in which millions of vulnerable elders live. Older family members, the declaration authors wrote, 'might temporarily be able to live with an older friend or sibling, with whom they can self-isolate together during the height of community transmission. As a last resort, empty hotel rooms could be used for temporary housing.' These never sounded like credible options. In his op-ed, Bhattacharya engaged in hand-waving about the toll of COVID on children, nearly 1,700 of whom died of COVID, according to the CDC. Bhattacharya calculated that school masking "might prevent one child death ... a tiny fraction of the approximately 900 deaths of children 5 to 17 years old in 2019. If the aim is to save children's lives, other interventions — like enhanced pool safety — would be much more effective." Yet death is not the only serious outcome from COVID. More than 14,000 children were hospitalized for COVID during the pandemic, according to the CDC. An untold number of them may suffer from long COVID or other lifelong manifestations of the disease. That should have given Bhattacharya pause before dismissing the efficacy of mask-wearing in schools, but there's no evidence that it has done so. The most important question raised by the Michigan State study is what it tells us about pandemic policies for the future. School closures and more general pandemic effects wreaked havoc on learning in the U.S. "The politics of masking got conflated with school closures," Imberman says. But masking was a "much lower-cost intervention than closing the schools." In fact, it was "a way out of closing the schools." So lumping it in with school closures is a mistake. Will we learn from the experience? Considering the current level of policymaking at Kennedy's Health and Human Services, sadly, there's reason to be doubtful. Get the latest from Michael HiltzikCommentary on economics and more from a Pulitzer Prize me up. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
