
Spain and Rutte Locked in Defense Showdown on Eve of NATO Summit
(Bloomberg) -- By refusing to agree spending increases to appease US President Donald Trump, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez threatens to derail a NATO summit that Secretary General Mark Rutte needs to run smoothly for the sake of the military alliance's future survival.
On the eve of the gathering in The Hague, things are going off the rails. European officials have expressed irritation at the spoiler role that Sanchez is playing when their number one task is to line up behind a pledge to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP. Rutte needs to keep Spain in line while preventing others like Slovakia from breaking ranks.
The NATO leaders are meeting against the backdrop of surging tensions in the Middle East after the US bombed three nuclear sites in Iran at the weekend, prompting Tehran to threaten retaliation. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is also well into its fourth year with Russian President Vladimir Putin continuing to make hardline demands for territory.
As host, and making his own debut in the top job, this is shaping up to be a worst-case scenario for the Dutch secretary general on his home soil. The risk is that Trump, who has already cottoned on to 'notorious' Spain and has kept his trip short, sees the divisions spill out in the open and gets an excuse to walk out.
Rather than securing his iron-clad pledge to stand by the post-war alliance's most sacrosanct principle of collective defense known as Article 5 (an attack on one is an attack on all), Spanish intransigence on spending may throw the optics into disarray.
'Spain thinks they can achieve those targets on a percentage of 2.1%' of gross domestic product, Rutte told reporters Monday. 'NATO is absolutely convinced Spain will have to spend 3.5% to get there.'
On Monday, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico joined Spain in saying that his country now would also reserve a right to decide how fast and by how much it increases its defense budget. Slovakia can meet the alliance's requirements without hiking spending to the 5% level, he said.
All member countries have signed off on ambitious new lists of weapons and troops — so-called capability targets — that each country needs to provide as part of its NATO commitment. The alliance has broken down the 5% goal to 3.5% spending on defense with an additional 1.5% dedicated to related investment.
'Each country will now regularly report what they are doing in terms of spending and reaching the targets,' Rutte said. 'So we will see and anyway there will be a review in 2029.'
Spain has refused to sign up to the 5% target, while also assuring NATO that it will fulfill the capability requirements. It's arguing that 2.1% of defense spending will be sufficient to achieve that.
Rutte has gone out of his way to accommodate Spain. The statement adopted at the summit will give Spain 'flexibility' to 'determine its own sovereign path for reaching the capability targets,' he told Sanchez in a letter on Sunday.
The question facing the NATO chief now is whether he can get all members to mute their objections by the time alliance members sit down for dinner on Tuesday hosted by King Willem-Alexander of The Netherlands.
--With assistance from Max Ramsay and Michal Kubala.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Documentary unearths Hampi's forgotten link to Italy
The idea took shape when a politician remarked that most European tourists were unaware of Hampi and India's other historic archaeological sites.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
NATO's new 5% defence spending target and what it means
NATO leaders are set to endorse a sweeping increase in defence investment at a key summit in The Hague on Wednesday (June 24), responding to rising geopolitical tensions and direct pressure from US President Donald Trump. The landmark agreement would commit member states to spending 5% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defence and security-related investments by 2035—a significant jump from the current 2% benchmark. The proposed 5% spending goal will be divided into two parts: 3.5% of GDP on core defence, including troops, weapons systems, and combat readiness—up from the current 2% focus. 1.5% of GDP on broader security investments, such as cyber defence, infrastructure upgrades for military mobility, and energy security. This broader definition reflects modern security challenges, including the need to defend against hybrid threats and safeguard strategic supply chains. While 22 of NATO's 32 members already meet or exceed the 2% defence target, the new 5% threshold presents a major leap. In 2024, NATO countries collectively spent 2.61% of GDP on defence, though with wide disparities—Poland exceeded 4%, while Spain lagged at under 1.3%. If all members had spent 3.5% on core defence last year, total spending would have surpassed $1.75 trillion, compared to the $1.3 trillion actually spent. Member states are expected to meet the new target by 2035, with a review scheduled for 2029 to evaluate progress and potentially adjust expectations. The decision is driven by a combination of: Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine and fears of a broader military threat within the next five years. Concerns over a potential drawdown of US forces in Europe, especially if Trump returns to the White House. A broader reassessment of Europe's ability to defend itself. 'NATO must prepare for a future in which it has to take on more responsibility,' Secretary-General Mark Rutte said, pointing to urgent needs in air defence, tanks, drones, and personnel. While the agreement appears to have broad support, some nations are expressing reservations. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has said Spain will only aim for 2.1% of GDP, even though his government signed off on the final communiqué. Despite such statements, NATO insists there are no opt-outs, and national defence spending will be closely monitored.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Iran US Airstrikes: Will war risk insurance premiums rise for vessels in Middle East? Here's insurance costs for ships passing through Gulf region as oil companies remove foreign staff from Iraq
FILE PHOTO: Oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz, December 21, 2018. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed/File Photo Synopsis War risk insurance premiums for Gulf shipping have increased after US airstrikes on Iran. Oil firms BP, Eni, and TotalEnergies are evacuating foreign staff from Iraqi oilfields. Iraq's oil output remains stable. Chinese and Russian companies have not changed their operations. Costs for shipping are rising sharply. Insurance costs for ships passing through the Gulf region have increased after US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Oil companies are removing foreign staff from Iraq, but production remains steady. ADVERTISEMENT War risk insurance for vessels entering the Middle East Gulf has risen to 0.5%. Last week, the rate was between 0.2% and 0.3%. The increase followed US military action against Iranian nuclear facilities. Sources from the insurance industry confirmed this to Reuters and The premium rise affects the total cost of a seven-day journey through the Gulf. The premium is calculated based on the ship's value. The increase adds tens of thousands of dollars per day to the overall expense. Each ship is evaluated individually by underwriters, but 0.5% was a common rate as of Monday. Also Read: World War 3 begins? After Iran, Israel, US, Yemen, now Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iraq get embroiled in conflict while Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE close airspace. More nations may join either side soon. See what's happening now and who may be Iran's next target BP, Eni and TotalEnergies have begun removing foreign staff from oilfields in Iraq. The Basra Oil Company confirmed this action. These companies operate in different parts of Iraq's southern oilfields. Iraq shares a border with Iran, where tensions have grown after recent military evacuations, oil production in Iraq is stable. Exports from the southern oilfields remain at 3.32 million barrels per day. Two officials from Iraq's oil industry confirmed this. Basra Oil says the removal of foreign staff has not affected production levels so far. ADVERTISEMENT Also Read: NYC Mayor Race: Who is Zohran Mamdani and what is his connection with India? Here's why is he making headlines BP has pulled out foreign workers from the Rumaila field. Italy's Eni cut staff at the Zubair field from 260 to 98. Those who remain continue to work with local teams. A spokesperson for Eni called the move a precaution and said the company is watching the situation closely. ADVERTISEMENT TotalEnergies has evacuated 60% of its foreign workers. The company has not commented publicly. Basra Oil says production is not affected. Chinese-run oilfields like West Qurna/1, Siba, and Faihaa are operating without any staff reductions. Russian company Lukoil has also reported no disruptions. ADVERTISEMENT Why have insurance premiums for Gulf shipping increased? The premiums rose due to US strikes on Iran and concerns over shipping risks through the Strait of Hormuz. Is Iraq's oil production affected by staff evacuations? No, Iraq's oil output continues normally despite the temporary evacuation of some foreign personnel. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates. Iran US Airstrikes: Will war risk insurance premiums rise for vessels in Middle East? Here's insurance costs for ships passing through Gulf region as oil companies remove foreign staff from Iraq Iran US Airstrikes: Will war risk insurance premiums rise for vessels in Middle East? Here's insurance costs for ships passing through Gulf region as oil companies remove foreign staff from Iraq Musk's lawyers say he doesn't use a computer — despite dozens of his own laptop posts proving otherwise Musk's lawyers say he doesn't use a computer — despite dozens of his own laptop posts proving otherwise Marjorie Taylor Greene sounds the nuclear alarm, warns Trump is dragging America straight into World War III Marjorie Taylor Greene sounds the nuclear alarm, warns Trump is dragging America straight into World War III Iran Israel war: Will Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Arab league, Gulf countries now join US, Tel Aviv against Tehran? Iran Israel war: Will Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Arab league, Gulf countries now join US, Tel Aviv against Tehran? Hailey and Justin on the verge of divorce? Bieber's cryptic silent treatment post raises eyebrows Hailey and Justin on the verge of divorce? Bieber's cryptic silent treatment post raises eyebrows Iran sleeper cell threat hits U.S. soil after base attack? Trump's sudden G7 exit linked to terror warning, reports say Iran sleeper cell threat hits U.S. soil after base attack? Trump's sudden G7 exit linked to terror warning, reports say Common sense absent: Judge rejects Trump admin's push to jail Kilmar Abrego Garcia before trial Common sense absent: Judge rejects Trump admin's push to jail Kilmar Abrego Garcia before trial World War 3 begins? After Iran, Israel, US, Yemen, now Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iraq get embroiled in conflict while Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE close airspace. More nations may join either side soon. See what's happening now and who may be Iran's next target World War 3 begins? After Iran, Israel, US, Yemen, now Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iraq get embroiled in conflict while Kuwait, Bahrain and the UAE close airspace. More nations may join either side soon. See what's happening now and who may be Iran's next target Shocking accusation: JD Vance hints Iran hid Uranium after alleged tip-off — from Donald Trump? Shocking accusation: JD Vance hints Iran hid Uranium after alleged tip-off — from Donald Trump? Iran strikes US base in Qatar, Saudi airspace closed — WWE Night of Champions now hanging by a thread NEXT STORY