Many international students hope to launch careers in the US. Their pathways may dim under Trump
Zeng said he has been rethinking his plans because of the Trump administration's pledge to aggressively revoke the visas of Chinese students. Having completed a masters degree in science and management, he is thinking about moving to Europe. Or going home to China.
'I am worried about working here,' said Zeng, 30. 'You never know what's going to happen.'
Many international students come to the U.S. with hopes of gaining work experience and returning to their home countries or pursuing a career in the U.S. But the administration's intensifying scrutiny of international students — and signs that formal career pathways for them may be closed — are leading some to reconsider their plans.
Beyond the steps the administration already has taken — expanding the grounds for terminating students' ability to study in the U.S., adding new vetting for student visas, moving to block foreign enrollment at Harvard — a key nominee has raised the possibility of ending a program that encourages international students to stay and gain work experience.
About 240,000 of the 1.1 million people on student visas in the U.S. are on Optional Practical Training — a one-year post-graduation period where they are authorized to work in fields related to their degrees. It can last up to three years for graduates in science, math and technology fields.
President Donald Trump's nominee for director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph Edlow, said during his confirmation hearing on May 21 that he would like to see an end to post-graduate work authorization for international students.
'What I want to see would be essentially a regulatory and sub-regulatory program that would allow us to remove the ability for employment authorizations for F-1 students beyond the time that they are in school,' said Edlow, referring to the F-1 visas on which most international students attend college in the U.S.
A program offers international students a foothold for careers in the US
The opportunity to gain career experience at U.S. companies, especially in technology and other fields where American companies dominate, has long been a draw of studying here. Many enter the H-1B visa lottery, hoping to be selected for one of the employer-sponsored visas that offer a pathway to permanent residency in the United States.
Threatening practical training opportunities would have long-term consequences for the U.S. in attracting international students, said Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA, which represents international educators.
'We turn global talent away at our own expense,' Aw said.
Like many international students, Marko, 29, finds himself glued to the news with a growing sense of alarm. His Optional Practical Training expires in a month, and he has applied for an extension but hasn't heard back, leaving him in limbo. Lawyers for the tech company where he works in New York City advised him to carry proof of his legal status in his wallet, which he finds 'dehumanizing.'
'The message being sent now is that: You are not one of us, and we are going to get rid of you,' said Marko, who asked that only his first name be used because he is worried about being targeted for removal from the country.
He has lived in the U.S. for a decade spanning college and graduate school, but his family and friends back home have encouraged him to leave. His hope is that he gets the OPT extension and can then apply for an H-1B visa and continue his life in the U.S., but he also worries about anti-immigrant sentiment and who will be targeted next.
Foreign students have been targeted on several fronts
In his first administration, Trump floated the idea of curtailing OPT, but that did not materialize. During the campaign, he suggested he would give green cards to foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges, a sentiment that students and educators hoped would signal more welcoming policies for international talent.
But since taking office his administration has cracked down on international students in several ways.
In April, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement began terminating the legal status of people with student visas who appeared in a database of police encounters. Many caught up in that effort were on OPT, and had to leave their jobs or risk violating laws about working without legal authorization. ICE eventually restored students' status after widespread legal challenges, but not before some chose to leave the country pre-emptively, fearing deportation.
In mid-May, some recent graduates received letters threatening to terminate their status if they did not update their employment records. While the letters gave them an opportunity to fix any reporting issues, it sent another wave of uncertainty through international graduates.
This week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the government would move to revoke visas of Chinese students with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical' fields.
Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang, a Chinese student who graduated Thursday from Harvard University, said in an interview that she had hoped to stay in the U.S. for a few years but she has been unsettled by the Trump administration's crackdown on visas.
"In terms of the plan going forward, I would say everything is up in the air at this point,' said Jiang, who is now open to going anywhere in the world to work in international development. 'At this point, it's difficult to say what will happen.'
___
Gecker reported from San Francisco. Toness and Associated Press writer Michael Casey contributed from Cambridge, Massachusetts.
___
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
3 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ali Noorani will replace Jim Canales as Barr Foundation president
'I am deeply humbled and grateful for the opportunity to lead the Barr Foundation at this moment and to build on its exceptional reputation as an institution that boldly stands in its values of deep and authentic partnership and investment in community,' he said in a Wednesday statement. His appointment marks a major transition at Barr. Its current president Jim Canales will step down after an 11-year tenure, during which he expanded the foundation dramatically and Advertisement In a statement, Hostetter praised Noorani for his 'humility, curiosity, and the long-term view that investing in potential and empowering people in communities always requires.' 'Throughout the search, Ali's enthusiasm for Barr's core issues of arts, climate, and education was palpable, as was his readiness to propel Barr into its next chapter,' she continued. Advertisement Founded in 1997, Barr has invested $1.7 billion to charitable causes in arts, education, climate resiliency, and racial justice. Under Canales, the foundation grew its grantmaking from $55 million to $130 million a year and more than doubled the size of its staff, now around 50 people. (Barr also supports the Globe's In a On Wednesday, he touted Noorani's 'instinctual strategic acumen and personal warmth that make him a tremendous asset as Barr seeks to meet the needs of this moment and beyond.' Jim Canales, the longtime president of the Barr foundation, will step down and transition to chair of the board by the end of the year. Matt Kalinowski Nonprofits across the state have taken an outsized role in upholding the state's social safety net this year, as federal programs intended to protect the vulnerable have been rolled back by the White House. The Boston Foundation With his background in immigration, Noorani may be uniquely equipped to handle the moment, supporters said in a statement. Advertisement 'In a time of extraordinary turbulence and disquiet, I can think of no better leader to take the helm of the Barr Foundation than Ali Noorani,' said Sam Gill, president of the New York-based Doris Duke Foundation. 'Ali's passion, intelligence, experience and humanity make him the perfect steward for the next chapter in Barr's legacy of investing in the human, natural and creative potential of our communities and our American society.' Diti Kohli can be reached at
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's Trifecta: Leveraging tariffs and energy dominance for industrial renewal
President Trump's trade and energy policies are recalibrating the global economic order — and not by accident. Under his leadership, trade is no longer simply about moving goods. It is a tool of strategic policy — one that drives industrial revival, and shapes strategic, economic and national outcomes. Trump's approach is disruptive but methodical. Tariffs create negotiating power, leading to trade agreements that reduce deficits and rewire supply chains. When combined with U.S. energy exports and capital markets, this strategy doesn't just rebalance trade — it reinvigorates American industry. As a senior negotiator on the U.S.-China Phase I Trade Agreement in Treasury during Trump's first term, I saw firsthand that what critics dismissed as 'erratic', 'chaotic' and 'unpredictable' was, in fact, deeply strategic. President Trump's instincts, honed by decades of high-stakes dealmaking, informed a broader strategy. He approached policy like a grandmaster playing three-dimensional chess: every tariff, handshake and message was a calculated move to reassert American economic leadership. Just as in Trump's first term, this administration began by confronting structural imbalances. The 2024 U.S. goods trade deficit hit $1.2 trillion — its highest in history. In response, Trump used executive authority to impose reciprocal tariffs — not as an end in themselves, but as tools to bring others to the table. Starting in early 2025, Trump's targeted tariffs compelled negotiations to rebalance trade relationships and repatriate supply chains. Japan agreed to reduce average industrial tariffs from 25 percent to 15 percent and pledged $550 billion in U.S.-bound investment. The European Union followed suit, agreeing to a framework that includes a baseline 15 percent tariff on industrial goods, expanded market access for U.S. energy, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals, and a commitment to $420 billion in foreign direct investment into the U.S. And, most recently, the United States also reached a trade agreement with South Korea: Seoul will face a 15 percent duty, reduced from a threatened 25 percent, in exchange for a pledge to invest $350 billion in U.S.-owned projects and purchase $100 billion in American liquefied natural gas and energy products. Indonesia and the Philippines opened markets for U.S. agriculture and energy, while committing to major purchases, including 50 Boeing aircraft. Vietnam accepted 20 percent tariffs and tighter controls on transshipped Chinese goods. Negotiations continue with India, Taiwan and others. Together, these countries now account for $809 billion — or 67 percent — of the 2024 U.S. trade deficit. Once deals with India and Taiwan are finalized, that coverage will exceed three-quarters. A mere 5 percent improvement across these relationships could slash the annual deficit by up to $95 billion. Beyond deficit reduction, these agreements reset incentives. They punish transshipment, enhance transparency and support rules-of-origin provisions that favor North American manufacturing. The result? Companies are investing in new U.S. production — auto components, semiconductors, specialty steel and energy systems. And job creation follows capital. Analysts estimate that up to 1.5 million advanced manufacturing jobs could be brought back to American soil over five years — a far cry from Barack Obama's declaration that some U.S. manufacturing jobs were gone forever. Trade reform paves the way for yet another explosion in growth: deploying U.S. energy and capital into newly aligned partner markets. Programs like America Crece and Asia EDGE, flagship infrastructure growth initiatives during Trump's first term, demonstrated the power of this model. This programming identified and unlocked growth opportunities in our partner countries using American energy exports and American equipment, employing American workers, and financing through American capital markets. In Latin America alone, we identified over $300 billion in infrastructure projects with U.S. private capital in the lead. In Vietnam, we identified $8 billion in near-term energy exports and $50 billion in longer-horizon infrastructure investments. Before the Biden administration ended this programming, we executed on $2.5 billion in transactions in Panama, backed a $3.5 billion facility in Ecuador and laid the groundwork for more than $4 billion in liquefied natural gas-based investment flows into Vietnam. Japan and Taiwan are now adopting this U.S. liquefied natural gas-driven model. Their national priorities — liquefied natural gas security and grid modernization — create natural demand for U.S. energy exports and financing partnerships. Trade deals open the market; energy and infrastructure partnerships deliver the substance. Our capital markets are unmatched in size, efficiency and depth. Trump's tariff leverage opens doors. Energy exports and U.S. financing flow through them — fueling global infrastructure while anchoring demand for American industry. This energy multiplier also advances a core tenet of Trump's economic agenda: U.S. energy dominance. American liquefied natural gas, coal and refined products are now strategic assets — tools of both commercial strength and geopolitical influence. Trump's approach fuses trade, energy and finance into a cohesive doctrine. It turns deficits into investment. It transforms market access into industrial revival. And it leverages the full might of U.S. capital to strengthen allies abroad and jobs at home. If the goal is to bring back U.S. manufacturing, secure energy markets and make capital markets work for working Americans — this is the model. The chessboard is set. And America, once again, is playing to win. Mitchell A. Silk served as assistant secretary for International Markets at the U.S. Treasury during Trump's first term. He was the senior Treasury official on U.S.-China trade negotiations and helped design America Crece and Asia EDGE. He is the author of ' A Seat at the Table: An Inside Account of Trump's Global Economic Revolution,' to be published in September 2025.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
South Africa dismisses U.S. human rights report as 'deeply flawed'
JOHANNESBURG (AP) — The South African government on Wednesday dismissed the U.S. State Department's latest assessment of the country's human rights conditions as 'inaccurate and deeply flawed.' The Trump administration this week released human rights reports for countries worldwide, including South Africa, asserting that the state of human rights in South Africa had 'significantly worsened' in 2024. It cited the unjust treatment of white Afrikaners after the signing of significant land reforms, which the Trump administration has claimed discriminate against the group that ruled the nation during the apartheid era. South Africa's Foreign Ministry expressed 'profound disappointment' with the report, saying its reliance on out of context information and discredited accounts was highly concerning.f The ministry highlighted that the United Nations had hailed the country's Land Expropriation Act as an important step in resolving racially unequal land ownership, underscoring the integrity of constitutional and human rights-based legislative processes. It added that the report was 'ironic' given the U.S exit from the U.N. Human Rights Council. 'This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its own agencies, such as ICE,' the ministry said. South Africa's government also dismissed as inaccurate the report's claims that it 'did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities.' The U.S. criticism of South Africa's domestic affairs is the latest in a series of tense diplomatic exchanges between the two countries since President Donald Trump was elected to a second term. During a state visit to the White House in May, Trump confronted President Cyril Ramaphosa with false claims that South Africa had been illegally occupying the farms of white Afrikaner farmers. The administration even speeded up the visa application processes for Afrikaners who wanted to relocate to the U.S as refugees. Along with suspending financial aid and imposing 30% tariffs on South Africa's exports to the U.S., Trump has denounced the country's stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict. South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool was expelled by the U.S. for his criticism of Trump, who has hinted that he may not attend the G20 summit of world leaders scheduled to take place in Johannesburg in November. The Afrikaans trade union Solidarieit, which was criticized by Ramaphosa over a recent visit to Washington, has announced new plans to visit the U.S. in September to meet with the Department of State and other parties to discuss abolishing racial-redress laws, reestablishing diplomatic ties, and creating a fair trade agreement between the two countries.
