
More than 100 people turn out for Hands Off Jamestown event
Apr. 5—JAMESTOWN — About 130 people gathered on public sidewalks on Mill Hill and 10th Street on Saturday in Jamestown, holding signs in a peaceful protest about cuts to federal programs and the direction of the federal government.
The Jamestown Hands Off March was held "in solidarity" with other Hands Off 2025 events around the country, according to Olivia Schloegel, who organized the local event with Barb Lang. Both are members at large of the League of Women Voters of North Dakota, and members of the organization co-hosted the event.
"It was meant to be a peaceful, brief but impactful demonstration to show our people power," Schloegel said. "And people are just really scared, a lot of people, so it's good to be together."
She said in an email to The Jamestown Sun that the event was a "peaceful collective statement of concern for the checks and balances of government and a call for our representatives to stand up against the destructive cuts to federal services, programs and jobs."
The Hands Off 2025 website said April 5 was a day for people to take to the streets nationwide with the message "Hands off!" to fight back against Donald Trump and Elon Musk "taking everything they can get their hands on and daring the world to stop them."
Schloegel said people are affected locally by federal cuts, from Social Security to a USDA program that provided food for schools.
"And so we wanted to make sure that local folks had an opportunity to show up and speak out against what we don't agree with, which is these destructive cuts at the federal level," she said.
People participating carried signs about various issues. Most walked from the sidewalk in front of Newman Signs down Mill Hill, where they were met by others, then stood on the sidewalk holding the signs facing traffic. Some vehicles honked their horns as they drove by in apparent support.
Hands Off protests were also scheduled Saturday in Bismarck, Fargo and Minot.
The national League of Women Voters was a partner in the coalition in bringing the national day of action event together. Others included the National Education Association, Interfaith Alliance, Human Rights Campaign, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and Stand Up for Science.
A North Dakota News Cooperative poll of 500 North Dakota voters released in March found 52% approved of the job that Donald Trump was doing as president, and 59% approved of the Department of Government Efficiency led by Elon Musk.
Several people shared with The Jamestown Sun about the issues that brought them to the event.
"I believe that our democracy is at risk and that if we don't stand up, that our Congress is going to let our democracy go away," said Patty Richter. "They're going to let autocracy and oligarchy take over and we will have no more rights. We can be plucked off the streets. We will go the same way as the Nazis did in the 1930s, and we have to do something because our senators, (John) Hoeven and (Kevin) Cramer, are doing absolutely nothing."
As a retiree, she is also worried about Social Security and the impact of losing Medicaid on families.
"I believe that they are going against the Constitution," Joyce Schulz said. "That we need to protect our national parks. That we need to protect Social Security, that we need to protect free speech and to the rule of law, which is not being followed right now in the United States with all of the executive orders and not listening to the judicial branch."
Penny Briese said she was standing up for veterans.
"I am a veteran and I'm appalled what's happening to our Veterans Administration. I'm here as a woman," she said. "I'm appalled what they're trying to do to our voting rights, especially married women and poor married women. I am just appalled at what they're doing to our public lands. I mean, those lands belong to us. Donald Trump is our servant. He is here to serve us. What he's doing right now, this is not service to the American people."
Lynne Tally, former executive director of Safe Shelter, said cuts to the health department and office that helps combat violence against women brought her to the event.
"I'm really concerned that it's going to have a really negative effect on the work that I did for 41 years," she said. "Helping people who are victims of domestic violence and sexual assault."
Alan Carlson said the list was long.
"I'm here to get Trump out of the way of Social Security, veterans benefits, messing with our kids education, women's choice, it goes on and on and on," he said. "I can't imagine people not standing up."
The tariffs were another concern.
"My retirement account went down $85,000 in the last two days and I'm a retired teacher so $85,000 to me is my livelihood," Carlson said.
"To help trans kids, gay people," Sue Borg said of her reason for participating. "They're just treated like they're not humans."
One woman, who did not want to be identified, said "millions of people are suffering because of these actions. And so I want to do something and this is something I can do."
Dina Laskowski said it was important for people to come together as a community to support each other.
"You know, you're looking at social services, you're looking at things that really impact our community. And all communities," she said. "And if we don't start joining hands ... the hands off is hands off change (to) certain policies that are going to affect our community."
She said people are more divisive and should be unified.
"You have differences of opinion, everybody looks at things in different perspectives," she said. "That's the important thing, is that we listen to each other and come to a conclusion that affects not 50% but 80 and 90% of the population."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The ‘Terrifying' Impact of Trump-Musk Breakup on National Security and Space Programs
This week's rapid, unscheduled disassembly of Elon Musk's bromance with Donald Trump has left officials at America's space and security agencies reeling. One NASA official, wary of the agency's dependence on SpaceX as the space exploration industry's leading recipient of government contracts, said the bitter public feud between the president and the former DOGE chief had at first been 'entertaining' but that later, 'it turned really terrifying,' per the Washington Post. Musk and Trump's falling out was received with similar horror at the Pentagon, the Post's report continued where officials initially thought it was 'funny' watching the pair trade barbs on their respective social media sites before 'there was a realization that we're not watching TV. This is a real issue.' Both NASA and the Department of Defence have reportedlt embarked on a blitz of calls in recent days to SpaceX competitors, urging firms like Sierra Space, Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Blue Origin, owned by Amazon's billionaire founder Jeff Bezos, to accelerate development of their rocket systems after Trump threatened to cancel Musk's contracts on Thursday night. Contracts held by SpaceX with the U.S. government, worth many billions of dollars, cover a wide variety of services, from launching satellites for the Pentagon and intelligence agencies to flying cargo and people to and from the International Space Station. Officials at NASA were apparently particularly concerned by Musk's threats, which he's since walked back, to discontinue SpaceX's use of its Dragon craft, which would potentially have left the agency without means of transporting astronauts to the orbiting research station. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse, that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous,' as one member of the agency told the Post. 'I can tell you there is deep concern within NASA.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Chris Cuomo Predicts Trump Will Sue Elon Musk for Defamation – and ‘I Think He Wins'
Chris Cuomo believes Donald Trump and Elon Musk have not yet begun to fight, predicting that the president will haul out his tried-and-true weapon – a defamation lawsuit – to finish the job. 'People are missing where this could lead,' the NewsNation and former CNN anchor said on 'Cuomo,' noting that he called their infamous flame-out months ago, rolling a clip of himself saying: 'I have a prediction. I do not think Musk and Trump are the way they are today a year from now. … There's only room for one bull in the yard.' That would be Trump, present-day Cuomo said, calling Musk's behavior 'So stupid. So potentially costly.' 'I do not see Trump as the loser,' he continued. 'Not right now. Musk lost access. He lost market share. He lost MAGA love.' Cuomo added that Musk was right to be upset over the lack of cuts in the the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' but has too much personally at stake – like 'cushy contracts with Tesla, SpaceX, and Starlink' – to be openly feuding with the president. But the costliest mistake Musk made, Cuomo said, was his Thursday X post accusing Trump of being named in the Epstein files: 'It wasn't a question. It was an accusation. And it implies Trump is a pedophile — to my ears.' Cuomo noted that Trump hasn't responded, but that's not an admission so much as a potential legal strategy. 'Unless Musk does some serious ass-kissing on the quick, Trump is going to sue him for defamation. And if Trump sues, I think he wins. Now, I don't often like Trump's use of litigation. … I don't like him suing '60 Minutes.' … CBS is just over a barrel because, allegedly, their merger won't be approved until the suit is settled. That's dirty pool.' But a Trump vs. Musk defamation suit 'is different,' Cuomo concluded. 'This is not just Musk the mogul. This is coming from Musk, who was so close to the White House that he had all kinds of clearances and access — with his Doge guys digging through everything. Trump could argue not only is the allegation false, but that Musk knows it's false. He knows what he said is BS. And then he could force a huge settlement or a humongous award.' Watch the entire monologue in the video above. The post Chris Cuomo Predicts Trump Will Sue Elon Musk for Defamation – and 'I Think He Wins' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.