
Boy Scouts organization defeats appeals over $2.46 bln sex abuse settlement
May 13 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected calls to overturn the Boy Scouts of America's $2.46 billion sex abuse settlement, saying the appeals came too late to upend the settlement because the youth organization had already emerged from bankruptcy two years ago.
A small minority of the over 82,000 men who alleged they had been sexually abused by troop leaders as children had appealed the settlement, arguing that the deal was illegal because it contained sweeping legal protections for several organizations, like churches and local Boy Scouts councils, that did not file for bankruptcy themselves.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected similar legal protections for non-debtors in a 2024 ruling that upended the bankruptcy of Oxycontin maker Purdue Pharma. The 144 abuse survivors who filed appeals argued that the Purdue ruling meant the Boy Scouts' plan was also illegal.
In Tuesday's ruling, the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected arguments that the Boy Scouts' deal could not survive after Purdue, pointing out that the Supreme Court had explicitly declined to apply its Purdue decision to bankruptcy settlements that had been "substantially consummated."
The Boy Scouts settlement, approved in court in 2022, cannot practically be unwound, the 3rd Circuit ruled. Abuse victims have already been sent over $125 million in payments.
Gilion Dumas, an attorney for the men who appealed, said her clients were disappointed that their appeals were rejected on a "technicality."
"The BSA plan will pay sex abuse victims pennies on the dollar because there is not enough money to pay claimants in full," Dumas said on Tuesday.
The youth organization, which changed its name to Scouting America in February 2023, in a statement called the decision "a resounding victory for survivors of historical abuse in Scouting."
Adam Slater, an attorney who represented former Scouts who supported the settlement, said that the ruling would help deliver "meaningful compensation and long-overdue justice to all survivors, many of whom have been waiting for decades."
The Boy Scouts filed for bankruptcy in February 2020 after several U.S. states enacted laws allowing accusers to sue over decades-old abuse allegations. It emerged from bankruptcy in 2023.
The abuse survivors who had objected to the settlement had argued that they should be allowed to sue organizations, like local Boy Scouts councils and churches, that ran Scouting programs where abuse occurred. Those organizations received immunity from lawsuits in exchange for contributions to the Boy Scouts' bankruptcy settlement, despite not filing for bankruptcy themselves.
The court on Tuesday recognized that the Boy Scouts case was "unusual" and that the law has changed since the conclusion of its bankruptcy, saying there was "little doubt" that a similar plan would be rejected in court if it were filed today.
It said the result was a "bitter pill" for the abuse survivors who would likely have prevailed if the Boy Scouts had filed for bankruptcy a few years later.
But the current plan allows survivors to "recover for at least some fraction of the suffering they have endured. That human reality must not be lost among the legal intricacies of these appeals," the judges wrote.
Attorneys for the Boy Scouts of America, as well as insurers and abuse survivors who supported the deal, had argued that upending the settlement now would have had devastating emotional and financial consequences.
Restarting negotiations on a deal would have required the organization to take money back from claimants who had received settlement payments, and it would also force tens of thousands of men to revisit their abuse once again in the re-opened legal proceedings, according to the organization.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mommy influencer Emilie Kiser's desperate fight to stop video of son's death becoming public
Influencer Emilie Kiser has been fighting tirelessly to keep her late son's private records from becoming public, including tragic footage of the toddler's death. Kiser, a popular mommy blogger, lost her three-year-old son Trigg on May 18 - six days after he was found unresponsive in a backyard pool in Arizona. Before it was confirmed that Trigg, who was often featured in his mother's viral videos, was the child who died, many speculated online about him being the victim. Once news broke that he was the boy who drowned, a 'media frenzy' unleashed as internet sleuths and fans of Kiser took it upon themselves to request records - including videos - in relation to his death. This then prompted her to file a lawsuit just one week after his passing against several agencies in Maricopa County to block private information from getting out. On Wednesday, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County ruled in her favor, granting her temporary confidentiality, meaning evidence will not be released while the court makes its final ruling on the tragedy. The 26-year-old mother's declaration 'reflects an intensely personal account of her grief and trauma' that was 'submitted to help the court understand her perspective - not for public consumption,' a source told In her motion, Kiser has specifically urged the court to keep not just detailed records of Trigg's death private, but also footage as '100+ public records requests' for the video have come in, according to the source. The intense amount of records requests 'only serves to satisfy morbid curiosity more than any type of justice,' they added. Kiser, who was not home at the time of the drowning, 'should not be forced to relive the aftermath through viral footage,' the source stated. 'The motions behind the push for release are concerning. In many cases, requests appear to be driven by monetization and notoriety, not accountability,' they continued. 'That is not a valid justification for invading a family's grief.' Since news of her legal filing came out, many online have speculated that Kiser chose to do so as a way to cover up information, but according to the source, that is completely false. 'Emilie has fully cooperated with investigators. The focus here is not on withholding information, but on safeguarding the dignity of a child and allowing a grieving family the space and privacy to heal.' The source also revealed chilling details on what Kiser and her family are going through as 'rabid fans' have swarmed her home and tried to reach out to them. 'Rabid fans and media have surrounded Emilie's home, filmed through her windows, and sent unsolicited packages' they said. Kiser has four million followers on TikTok and 1.7 million on Instagram, but according to the source, her 'public profile does not negate her right to privacy, nor does it make her son's death a matter for public consumption. 'Being online should not strip someone of basic human decency.' Following the tragic ordeal at the family's pool, a neighbor told that the influencer's house was swarmed with five police cars. Emergency responders arrived and performed life-saving efforts until Trigg was airlifted to Phoenix Children's Hospital for specialized care. Kiser hasn't posted since the tragedy, but her followers have continued to flood her accounts with messages of support and condolences before she turned off her comment sections. Meanwhile, her husband Brady Kiser, Trigg's father, made his accounts private following his death. Kiser or her legal representation haven't reviewed the police report, security camera footage, scene photos, 911 recording, or autopsy photos, per the lawsuit. Kiser and Brady first became parents in July 2021 when they welcomed their son Trigg. Just over two years later, in September 2024, the couple revealed they were expecting their second child. 'WE GOTTA BABY GROWING,' Kiser captioned a sonogram post. 'We can not wait to add another angel to our family. Whatever you are, we love you so much already.' In March, the Kiser family officially grew by one with the arrival of their second son, Theodore. 'Emilie is trying her best to be there for her surviving son, two-month-old Theodore. But every day is a battle,' the suit said.


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The meal-delivery plan for your pet that's affordable, vet-approved, and delivers personalized food to your door
What if we told you that even your four-legged family members could get fine dining delivered to their doorstep? Well, surprisingly, that is exactly what we are here to tell you — Introducing The Pets Table (aka your pup's soon-to-be new obsession). The up-and-coming veterinarian-approved meal delivery brand is changing the game for furry friends everywhere with science-backed organic formulas. Whether you have a chihuahua or a golden retriever, The Pets Table is a tailor-made system that delivers fresh, healthy meals to your home with recipes that will have every dog saying 'WOOF!' The best part of all is the insanely low prices. Starting at just $1.38 a day, you can begin exploring this exciting brand! What makes The Pets Table such a standout brand is its science-backed roots. Every meal was developed by veterinarians and nutritionists, ensuring optimum dietary fulfillment. With seven recipes and four plans, their auto-delivery program is one of the most variety-packed out there, and unlike competitors, they offer allergy-friendly options too! Pet owners are impressed, to say the least, with one saying: 'Introducing my pup to their food has been an absolute game-changer. She tends to be picky, but their mixed plan of fresh and air-dried food has completely won over her heart!' Getting started with your pup's personalized plan really is as easy as pie (or, in this case, beef!). To start your journey, you take a short quiz that helps The Pets Table team recommend the best meal matches for your pet's specific needs with dry food, wet food, and dietary restriction options! From there, you get to hand-select which meals will make your four-legged family member happy, choose a delivery plan, and — that's IT. The Pets Table makes mealtime exciting again with recipes such as a top-rated Chicken Casserole and Beef Stew. One pet owner said: 'Easy, tasty option for our picky pet! I don't think we will ever be able to buy kibble again. Our Lab has always eaten his food but never seemed to really enjoy it. Now he is excited to eat, and his energy has improved substantially.' So what are you waiting for?! Give your pup the summer they deserve with delicious Michelin Star worthy meals from The Pets Table delivered right to your doorstep ASAP.


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests
Donald Trump accused Elon Musk of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome', as he signalled the official collapse of their once warm relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' His remarks illustrate the president's intense anger over the world's richest man's meddling with his legislative agenda after leaving the White House with a golden key and a warm televised send-off. Mr Musk immediately hit back, writing on his social media platform, X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Since stepping down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency last week, Mr Musk has slammed Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt. Discussion of their broken friendship overshadowed the president's Oval Office press conference with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, as Mr Trump said his former ally was lashing out because he did not get his own way. He claimed the Tesla chief executive was upset that his ally had been rejected as the next administrator of Nasa and that the bill meant the end of tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions to his company. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' he said. 'And if you saw the statements he made about me … he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Mr Trump added that Mr Musk was probably missing the Oval Office and the trappings of power. 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. 'But we have it with others too. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone.' Mr Musk appeared in the Oval Office last Friday for his send-off. At the time, Mr Trump said he was 'not really leaving' and would continue to visit the White House. Things quickly unravelled when Mr Musk went on a six-hour X session on Tuesday night, posting his criticism of the bill, particularly that it does not do enough to cut federal spending. Independent analysts warn that its spending cuts are not balanced by tax breaks, with the result that the bill will add more than $2 trillion to the national debt during the next decade. Mr Musk kept up his attacks on Thursday, live tweeting during the president's Oval Office sit-down with Mr Merz. He rejected claims that he had supported the bill when he was at the White House. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it,' he posted. Earlier, he resurfaced an old tweet of Mr Trump's. Wise words — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 And he continued as Mr Trump went on the attack, posting a message suggesting he might be amenable to a trimmed down version: 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' The bill is crucial to Mr Trump's strategy. It contains much of his domestic policy agenda, as well as the campaign promises that propelled him to victory in last year's election, such as ending taxation on overtime and tips. This week, Mr Trump all but disappeared from view as he focused on meetings and phone calls to keep Republicans on side. The bill has already passed the House but faces a difficult passage through the Senate.