Trump says EU not offering ‘fair deal' on trade
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (Jun 17) that the European Union had yet to offer a 'fair deal' on trade, as Washington negotiates tariff agreements with friends and foes alike.
'We're talking but I don't feel that they're offering a fair deal yet,' Trump said of the EU, speaking to reporters on board Air Force One before arriving back in the US from a G7 summit in Canada.
'And we're either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they will pay.'
Shortly after taking office, Trump upended the global economic order by accusing the US' trading partners of unfair practices and slapping huge tariffs on almost all countries.
Trump imposed a blanket 10 per cent tariff on most US trading partners and unveiled higher individual rates on dozens of economies including India and the European Union – although he swiftly paused the elevated rates.
While negotiations have been ongoing, the pause on those higher duties is due to expire on Jul 9.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The US president also imposed additional sector-specific levies on cars, steel, and aluminum, that have hit many US trading partners hard, including the EU.
World leaders at the Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday pushed Trump to back away from his punishing trade war, arguing that it posed a risk to global economic stability.
A day earlier, EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen called on G7 leaders to avoid protectionist trade policies.
'Let us keep trade between us fair, predictable and open. All of us need to avoid protectionism,' von der Leyen said at a press briefing.
The US president left the G7 talks early, citing the crisis in between Iran and Israel, and was back in Washington on Tuesday morning. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
17 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Appeals court hears arguments on Trump's Los Angeles troop deployment
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo A federal appeals court began hearing arguments on Tuesday on Donald Trump's legal authority to deploy the National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests and civil unrest, days after a judge ruled that the Republican president had called the National Guard into service unlawfully. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's ruling last Thursday was put on hold hours later by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Trump administration is seeking a longer pause while it appeals. Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate told a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit during arguments on Tuesday that Breyer "improperly second-guessed the president's judgment" about the need to call up the National Guard in order to protect federal property and personnel from "mob violence" in Los Angeles. "There is no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision," Shumate said. Breyer, in San Francisco, had ruled that the president unlawfully took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard, but Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marines' mobilization. Breyer said Trump had not complied with the law that allows him to take control of the National Guard to address rebellions or invasions, and ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom, who sued over the deployment. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in a city in the midst of protest and turmoil over the president's immigration raids. Political unrest spread to other parts of the country over the weekend, when a gunman assassinated a Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota and large protests took place in many other cities to coincide with a military parade that celebrated the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary on the same day as Trump's 79th birthday. California's lawsuit, filed on June 9, argues that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violate the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they were instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The administration argues that the law gives the president sole discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response and that neither the courts nor a state governor can second-guess that determination. In Thursday's order, Breyer said the protest fell far short of qualifying as a rebellion. "The court is troubled by the implication inherent in defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. The 9th Circuit panel consists of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
32 minutes ago
- CNA
Trump calls for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' as Israel-Iran air war rages on
DUBAI/JERUSALEM: President Donald Trump called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" on Tuesday (Jun 17) and warned that US patience was wearing thin, but said there was no immediate intention to kill Iran's leader "for now", as the Israel-Iran air war raged for a fifth day. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said meanwhile that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could face the same fate as Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, who was toppled in a US-led invasion and hanged in 2006 after a trial. "I warn the Iranian dictator against continuing to commit war crimes and fire missiles at Israeli citizens," Katz told top Israeli military officials. Explosions were later reported in Tehran and the city of Isfahan in central Iran, while Israel said Iran had fired more missiles towards it and air raid sirens sounded in Tel Aviv and southern Israel. Trump's comments, delivered via social media, suggested a more aggressive stance toward Iran as he weighs whether to deepen US involvement. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," he wrote on Truth Social. "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for patience is wearing thin." Three minutes later, he posted, "Unconditional surrender!" in all capital letters. Trump's sometimes contradictory and cryptic messaging about the conflict between close US ally Israel and longtime foe Iran has deepened the uncertainty surrounding the crisis. His public comments have ranged from military threats to diplomatic overtures, not uncommon for a president known for an often erratic approach to both domestic and foreign policy. Trump had predicted earlier on Monday that Israel would not be easing its attacks on Iran. But he also said he might send US Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff or Vice President JD Vance to meet Iranian officials. Trump had said his early departure from the Group of Seven nations summit in Canada had "nothing to do" with working on a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran, and that something "much bigger" was expected. Vance said the decision on whether to take further action to end Iran's uranium enrichment programme, which Western powers suspect is aimed at developing a nuclear bomb, "ultimately belongs to the president". Britain's leader said there was no indication that the US was about to enter the conflict. Trump was meeting with his National Security Council on Monday afternoon to discuss the conflict, a White House official said. The US is deploying more fighter aircraft to the Middle East and extending the deployment of other warplanes, three US officials told Reuters. The move follows other deployments that US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described as defensive in nature. REGIONAL INFLUENCE WEAKENS Khamenei's main military and security advisers have been killed by Israeli strikes, leaving major holes in his inner circle and raising the risk of strategic errors, according to five people familiar with his decision-making process. The Israeli military said Iran's military leadership was "on the run" and that it had killed Iran's wartime chief of staff Ali Shadmani overnight, four days after he replaced another top commander killed in the strikes. With Iranian leaders suffering their most dangerous security breach since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the country's cyber security command banned officials from using communications devices and mobile phones, Fars news agency reported. Israel launched a "massive cyber war" against Iran's digital infrastructure, Iranian media reported. Ever since the Iran-backed Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7, 2023, and triggered the Gaza war, Khamenei's regional influence has been weakening as Israel has pounded Iran's proxies, from Hamas in Gaza to Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq. And Iran's close ally, Syria's autocratic president Bashar al-Assad, has been ousted. Israel launched its air war, its largest ever on Iran, on Friday after saying it had concluded the Islamic Republic was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and has pointed to its right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stressed that he will not back down until Iran's nuclear development is disabled, while Trump says the Israeli assault could end if Iran agrees to strict curbs on enrichment. Before Israel's attack began, the 35-nation board of governors of the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. The IAEA said on Tuesday there were indications of direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at the Natanz facility, and that there was no change to report at the Fordow and Isfahan sites. Israel's Katz said the Iranian nuclear installation at Fordow, where an enrichment site is dug deep into a mountain, was an issue that will "of course" be addressed. SHIP COLLISION Israel says it now has control of Iranian air space and intends to escalate the campaign in the coming days. But Israel will struggle to deal a knock-out blow to deeply buried nuclear sites like Fordow without the US joining the attack, according to analysis echoed on Tuesday by Germany's leader. Iran has so far fired nearly 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones towards Israel, with about 35 missiles penetrating Israel's defensive shield and making impact, Israeli officials say. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said they had hit Israel's Military Intelligence Directorate and foreign intelligence service Mossad's operational centre early on Tuesday. There was no Israeli confirmation. Iranian officials have reported 224 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians had been killed. Residents of both countries have been evacuated or fled.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump contradicts spy chief Gabbard on Iran's nuclear programme
US President Donald Trump signing a document as Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard looks on, in February 2025. WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on June 17 repudiated Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's assessment that Iran has not been building a nuclear weapon, publicly contradicting his spy chief for the first time during his second term. In rejecting his top spy's judgment, Mr Trump appeared to embrace Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's justification for launching airstrikes last week on Iranian nuclear and military targets, saying he believed Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned early to Washington from the G-7 summit in Canada, Mr Trump was asked how close he believed Iran was to having a nuclear weapon. 'Very close,' he responded. When told that Ms Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the US intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead, Mr Trump replied, 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.' Mr Trump's comments recalled his clashes with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials. The office of the Director of National Intelligence did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms Gabbard also told Congress that US spy agencies did not believe that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had ordered the restarting of a nuclear weapons programme that the US and the International Atomic Energy Agency assessed ended in 2003. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment program was only for peaceful purposes. A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Ms Gabbard had not changed. They said that US spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice, a finding first reported by CNN. Some experts, however, believe that it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee that it would work. Mr Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a 'deep state' cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. Ms Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
