Stroud park charges idea would 'put off' businesses
Businesses which use a park for professional activities, such as dog walking and personal training, say they would be put off from using the space if they were charged.It is one of the proposals included in Stroud District Council's (SDC) Stratford Park Vision and Ambition Development Plan, which sets out how to protect the space for future generations while encouraging more people to use it.A council spokesperson said blanket business charges were "at an early stage and required further development", and any revenue generated would be "reinvested in the park".But yoga teacher Oli Raeburn said "the whole beauty of having an outdoor space like the park is that it's free".
The document states the authority does not know how many businesses currently use the Gloucestershire park.The report author said charges could help cover the cost of any damage done to the space through commercial use and ensure proper insurance practices are in place.Many local authorities in England charge companies to use parks to contribute towards maintenance costs.
But Ms Raeburn, who owns Yogi Oli and has run community yoga sessions in the park for six years, said any potential charges would make her think twice about using the site."It would massively impact me, especially as my classes [in the park] are donation-based," she said."As it's a community project, it would put me off using the park as it would make it less accessible."The whole beauty of having an outdoor space like the park is that it's free."Ed Mobs uses the park for his EM Power personal training bootcamp sessions."I would have to look for a different location as my business wouldn't be able to absorb the cost."It just wouldn't be viable for me," he said.In contrast, Stroud residents have mixed views on the proposed levy.
Colin Weston, who walks his dog in the park, said: "If it was for a business then I have no problem with that. The council's got to make money too."Park user, Charles Moore, added: "I think that parks have changed over the years and many years ago they were just places for recreation, but I think it's reasonable to expect people if they're using them for their businesses to make a contribution."But Eric Wilkinson believes no one should be charged to use the space. "I think it would be a retrograde step. It is a beautiful park which is open and accessible to so many people and it needs to be kept free and open to all," he said.
Cinema and festivals
The Stratford Park Vision and Ambition Development Plan was endorsed by councillors at a SDC meeting on 19 June and the strategy is set to run until 2029.The report states the new strategy aims to make the park a "destination location" for communities to improve "health and well-being" and provide "cultural enrichment for all".Ideas put forward include creating "green way" corridors to connect the park to other open spaces in Stroud, hosting open air cinema and music festivals, launching a forest school and expanding the skate park and sensory gardens.In a statement, a SDC spokesperson said: "The Stratford Park Development Plan provides a framework for officers to explore the park's full potential, drawing on ideas through extensive stakeholder consultations."Some proposals, including the introduction of business charges for commercial use, remain at an early stage and require further development."The next step will involve benchmarking similar practices in other districts."Any revenue generated would be reinvested in the park to support its ongoing improvement and ensure it continues to benefit all users."The plan has been described as a "framework" document, and the council will bring forward set proposals in the future, which will be consulted and voted on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Multimillionaire couple sue insurers for £1m over fire that 'engulfed' their £2m house and £300k watch collection - after firm refused to pay out because they'd failed to declare building work
A multimillionaire couple are embroiled in a £1million legal battle with their insurer after the firm did not pay up for part of rebuilding costs as well as damage to a collection of Rolexes following a house fire. The £2million home of wedding makeup artist Biborka Bellhouse and her property investment boss husband Charles Bellhouse went up in flames on December 29, 2022, with 60 firefighters and eight fire engines having to bring the blaze under control. The four-bed detached house in Park Road, Chiswick, was seriously damaged in the blaze which broke out while they were in the process of having it extended and refurbished. Following the fire, which the couple say caused them 'psychological harm', they went on to claim £16,000 towards scaffolding to make the property safe and around £140,000 for alternative accommodation and furniture from their insurers, Zurich. Although the insurance firm agreed to pay the couple around £155,000 towards these costs, they refused to pay out over £1million for claims made for rebuilding the property, as well as a luxury watch collection. Mr Bellhouse, 46, and Mrs Bellhouse, 42, claimed around £600,000 to rebuild the house and up to £475,000 for contents, which included the property investment boss's Rolex Chronograph and Patek Philippe watches. The Rolex Chronograph and the Patek were individually insured for £40,000 and £187,000 respectively, while three other Rolex watches were insured for £75,000. Now the couple are suing Zurich Insurance Plc, by taking them to the High Court in a bid to force them to pay out so they can reconstruct their destroyed home. But, the insurance firm has insisted the family had breached the terms of their cover and thus invalidated their policy as they failed to inform them about the construction of their extension. In documents submitted to the court, Mek Mesfin, representing the multi-millionaire couple, explained the fire broke out causing 'substantial damage' to their home. Neither the couple or their children were home when the incident occurred. 'Following the fire, a claim was made under the policy,' said the barrister, who went to claim Zurich has 'wrongfully and in breach of the terms of the policy' refused to accept liability beyond scaffolding and rehousing payments. '[The insurance firm] has refused to pay the claimants any sum in respect of the losses which the claimants have suffered as a consequence of the fire.' According to the barrister, only one of the valuable watches was in the home at the time of the fire, however boxes and authenticity certificates may have perished in the flames, potentially impacting the value of the other luxury accessories. 'The authentication materials, including the boxes and/or certification, for the watches were in the property during the fire. Due to the unsafe condition of the property, the claimants do not know, but assume, whether they have been damaged or destroyed,' he said. Mr Mesfin insisted his clients are entitled to indemnity and/or damages from the insurance firm if the items suffered a loss in value as a result of damage to authentication materials in the fire. The couple are also claiming 'medical expenses' of around £8,000 from Zurich, stating that they have suffered 'psychological harm' and needed therapy due to Zurich's failure to pay up. They also want around £20,000 for additional scaffolding costs and around £600,000 to rebuild the property, although they say the project may cost more. However, lawyers for Zurich say it is not obliged to pay out anything else on the policy and has 'avoided liability' due to a 'misrepresentation'. They say that when the couple took out the insurance, they had no plans to carry out any major works to their home within the next 12 months. The company says it would not have insured the house had it known the extension and renovation was planned and as such the policy is invalid. At a pre-trial hearing in the case, Judge David Hodge explained: 'Zurich asserts that in May 2022, the claimants made a deliberate or reckless, or careless, qualifying misrepresentation by misrepresenting their intention to carry out contract works to their home in the following 12 months. 'The claimants expressly the property was not likely to undergo any contract works within the next 12 months 'The claimants did then, in fact, carry out the contract works; and these caused loss and damage, both to the contract works themselves, and to the property, on 29 December 2022, when a fire occurred during the course of the contract works. 'Without the misrepresentation, Zurich would not have entered into the contract of insurance with the claimants at all. Zurich have now avoided the policy.' However, he said the couple deny making a 'qualifying misrepresentation' and insist there is 'no factual basis' for the allegations made against them. They are suing for a declaration that Zurich is obliged under the insurance policy to compensate them in respect of the claim, together with an indemnity, damages, interest and costs. In its defence, Zurich barrister Daniel Crowley says that as well as denying they are liable to pay out anything else, the insurer is counterclaiming in a bid to force the family to pay back the £169,507 it has already paid out to them. The couple and the insurers have already clashed in two preliminary hearings. The case will now return to court for a full trial unless it is settled beforehand.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Any cut to cash Isa allowance ‘may not prompt savers to boost their investments'
Savers could end up having less money to put into stocks and shares if the cash Isa limit is cut, a finance expert has said. The comments follow speculation that plans to cut the annual tax-free cash Isa allowance could be announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech on July 15. The Government is looking at options for reforms to Isas to get what it feels is the right balance between cash and equities, to help savers earn better returns, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the push for growth. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has previously said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Cash Isas are often a first port of call when people are starting out, and they'll often gradually move over into investments as they find their feet. 'If the speculation is accurate, it means they'll have less available to transfer into a stocks and shares Isa – effectively reducing investments rather than boosting them. 'This is an issue which requires a carrot not stick approach. 'We know through extensive research that the barriers to investing are behavioural, so it's through encouragement and increased confidence that we will all increase the number of retail investors. 'This week's announcement of radical changes to financial information, through targeted support and changes to the boundary between financial advice and guidance, is a major breakthrough in supporting people to find that confidence to make the first step.' The FCA set out proposals earlier this week to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments. The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at savings provider Moneybox, said: 'Over the last two decades since their introduction, Isas have grown to become a much loved and trusted tool by the British public and Isa wrappers have become synonymous with their £20,000 annual limit. 'The current speculation around potential changes to the cash Isa is undoubtedly already causing uncertainty and confusion for consumers, which will weigh particularly heavily on first-time savers and those with less financial confidence who will naturally be more hesitant to explore new products. 'Simply cutting the tax-fee allowance on cash Isas will not necessarily prompt equal inflows into investing products either. ' People opt to use cash Isas over their stocks and shares counterparts for a multitude of reasons, including risk aversion, and reducing the amount of money these savers can put into the cash Isa is unlikely to change this mindset. 'Cash Isas specifically are perfect for anyone looking to build up emergency savings and achieve their short to medium-term financial goals. 'Once people have the peace of mind and security that cash savings provide they are more likely to have the confidence to start investing for their future.' Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said: 'The days of peaks and troughs in the cash Isa market are long gone. 'We used to see a rush to make the most of the cash Isa allowance by savvy savers at the beginning and end of each tax year. 'Since the recent uncertainty around the future cash Isa limit, and with higher interest rates eating into the tax-free personal savings allowance, more savers have been topping up their Isa contributions every month.' He added: 'Changing limits around cash Isas would be a risky move for the Government – these accounts are extremely popular with millions of savers, many close to or in retirement who don't want the risk and uncertainty associated with investment in stocks and shares. 'The billions being saved every year are an indication of how tax policy can be really successful in encouraging people to save responsibly.' But Michael Healy, UK managing director of trading platform IG, said: 'We're calling for the cash Isa to be scrapped altogether, so we can start channelling more tax relief and long-term wealth into reviving the UK stock market. 'Successfully building a culture of investing would have a seismic impact.' In May, Ms Reeves confirmed she does not plan to reduce the overall £20,000 limit on the amount that can be put into Isas each year. In an interview broadcast on BBC Newscast, the Chancellor was asked whether, in a few years' time, someone would be able to put a whole £20,000 per year into an Isa, as they are able to do now. Ms Reeves told the BBC: 'First of all, very few people are able to save £20,000 a year … we still want people to be able to save and I'm certainly not going to reduce that limit.' The Financial Times reported this week that, according to a Whitehall figure, discussions were still taking place about the precise level for the cash Isas. While cash savings provide an important financial buffer, the Government also wants to see more consumers benefit from the long-term returns that investing can provide. Ms Reeves has said: 'It's really important that we support people to save, to achieve their aspirations. 'I'm not going to reduce the £20,000 Isa limit but I do want people to get better returns on their savings, whether that's in a pension or in their day-to-day savings.'
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves's cash Isa raid is a blatant attack on pensioners
What are you doing with your cash savings? Let me know: I probably don't need to tell Telegraph readers not to trust Rachel Reeves. Perhaps it's no surprise – given her history of, ahem, embellishing her CV – that I don't think the Chancellor is being entirely honest about her motives around Isas. It is thought Reeves will use this month's Mansion House speech to announce a dramatic cut to the limits on cash Isas. Handily, this would not break her promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', and would land largely on the shoulders of pensioners. Currently, you can save £20,000 a year into a single Isa, or across several types, such as investment Isas or the lifetime Isa. The Chancellor previously signalled the overall limit would not change, but is now understood to be preparing to slash the amount you can put solely into cash accounts to £5,000 or even £4,000 a year. This will be justified by saying that savers need to be encouraged to invest in British companies. This, the Government would argue, generates higher returns for investors than boring old savings accounts – and gives London-listed companies a much-needed boost. But the truth is that if you're an 85-year-old saver, you probably don't want or need to invest your cash – and Reeves, of course, knows this. Indeed, it would be an incredibly risky move. If Donald Trump's latest surprise move sends your portfolio down 20pc, you might not have very much time to recover those losses. Instead, millions of cash Isa savers will simply be forced to put their money into traditional bank and savings accounts. Outside of the tax-free Isa wrapper, the interest on that cash will attract income tax just like any other earnings. The 'savings allowance' does protect some interest from income tax, but it is set pitifully low. While basic-rate payers can earn £1,000 a year tax-free, higher-rate payers only get £500 – while those earning more than £125,000 a year get... zilch. These limits have been frozen for nearly a decade, while wages and interest rates have soared. By stealth, our tax bills, whether paid as a salary or savings interest, are rapidly rising. Say the cash Isa limit does drop to £4,000 a year from April 2026. If you put the full amount in and add the remaining £16,000 into a savings account outside of an Isa paying, for example, 4.6pc, it would generate a tax bill of nearly £100. And that's not taking into account any money you already have saved. Replicate that across millions of people across Britain, and HMRC – or rather the Chancellor – will be raking it in. In January, Shawbrook Bank warned an extra 800,000 accounts would generate more than £1,000 of interest this year, triggering a tax bill. There were already more than six million accounts big enough to pass this threshold. But this analysis does not take into account further reforms to Isa limits or what evasive action savers are already taking. Some £14bn flooded into cash Isas in April, a record for a single month, as families sought to shelter their money while they still can. My advice to you is to do the same (you can find today's best cash Isa rates here). Savings passed between spouses are tax-free, and children have a very generous £9,000 Isa allowance of their own. Remember too that you can hold cash in a stocks and shares Isa, though the rates are poor, or by-proxy via 'money market' funds that invest in low-risk assets that produce a similar return to cash.
