logo
Rachel Reeves's cash Isa raid is a blatant attack on pensioners

Rachel Reeves's cash Isa raid is a blatant attack on pensioners

Telegrapha day ago
What are you doing with your cash savings? Let me know: sam.brodbeck@telegraph.co.uk.
I probably don't need to tell Telegraph readers not to trust Rachel Reeves.
Perhaps it's no surprise – given her history of, ahem, embellishing her CV – that I don't think the Chancellor is being entirely honest about her motives around Isas.
It is thought Reeves will use this month's Mansion House speech to announce a dramatic cut to the limits on cash Isas. Handily, this would not break her promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', and would land largely on the shoulders of pensioners.
Currently, you can save £20,000 a year into a single Isa, or across several types, such as investment Isas or the lifetime Isa. The Chancellor previously signalled the overall limit would not change, but is now understood to be preparing to slash the amount you can put solely into cash accounts to £5,000 or even £4,000 a year.
This will be justified by saying that savers need to be encouraged to invest in British companies. This, the Government would argue, generates higher returns for investors than boring old savings accounts – and gives London-listed companies a much-needed boost.
But the truth is that if you're an 85-year-old saver, you probably don't want or need to invest your cash – and Reeves, of course, knows this. Indeed, it would be an incredibly risky move. If Donald Trump's latest surprise move sends your portfolio down 20pc, you might not have very much time to recover those losses.
Instead, millions of cash Isa savers will simply be forced to put their money into traditional bank and savings accounts. Outside of the tax-free Isa wrapper, the interest on that cash will attract income tax just like any other earnings.
The 'savings allowance' does protect some interest from income tax, but it is set pitifully low.
While basic-rate payers can earn £1,000 a year tax-free, higher-rate payers only get £500 – while those earning more than £125,000 a year get... zilch. These limits have been frozen for nearly a decade, while wages and interest rates have soared.
By stealth, our tax bills, whether paid as a salary or savings interest, are rapidly rising.
Say the cash Isa limit does drop to £4,000 a year from April 2026. If you put the full amount in and add the remaining £16,000 into a savings account outside of an Isa paying, for example, 4.6pc, it would generate a tax bill of nearly £100.
And that's not taking into account any money you already have saved. Replicate that across millions of people across Britain, and HMRC – or rather the Chancellor – will be raking it in.
In January, Shawbrook Bank warned an extra 800,000 accounts would generate more than £1,000 of interest this year, triggering a tax bill. There were already more than six million accounts big enough to pass this threshold.
But this analysis does not take into account further reforms to Isa limits or what evasive action savers are already taking. Some £14bn flooded into cash Isas in April, a record for a single month, as families sought to shelter their money while they still can.
My advice to you is to do the same (you can find today's best cash Isa rates here). Savings passed between spouses are tax-free, and children have a very generous £9,000 Isa allowance of their own.
Remember too that you can hold cash in a stocks and shares Isa, though the rates are poor, or by-proxy via 'money market' funds that invest in low-risk assets that produce a similar return to cash.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer
Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer

The Sun

time38 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Starmer must stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government — or we'll all be much poorer

Red dread JUBILANT left wing MPs yesterday gloried in the humiliation of their own Prime Minister after smashing his welfare reforms. Emboldened by their victory, they queued up on the airwaves to demand skint Britain be hit with big tax rises and more spending. 1 Socialist darling Angela Rayner - credited with forcing Keir Starmer to duck the vital challenge of slashing Britain's soaring benefits bill - insists Labour is now 'in a better place.' Hardly. In a warning of the new reality facing voters, the cover of Lefty bible the New Statesman screams: 'Just Raise Tax!' And one Labour MP, hailing a 16 per cent increase in Universal Credit handouts, tweeted: 'That'll put money in people's pockets.' Yes, but only by taxing people who worked hard to earn it so you can hand it over to those who don't! Such is the new soft Left fantasy which suddenly holds such a grip on a weakened Prime Minister. Inevitably, their overwhelming new demand is for a punishing wealth tax to soak the rich. The fact it never works - nine of 12 countries which tried to impose one later scrapped it - simply doesn't compute with their rotten, class-obsessed, wishful thinking. Millionaires are already leaving Britain in droves believing Labour hates them for making money. Sky high taxes always kills growth which only a few months ago Starmer and his Chancellor insisted was their number one priority. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs Sir Keir must find it within himself to stop the soft Left hijacking his seriously damaged Government. Their toxic mix of more taxes, bigger Government, massive spending and weaker borders is a recipe for disaster. If the PM bows to their economic illiteracy, we'll all be much poorer. Trim the fat AFTER Labour's abject failure to curb welfare spending, what hope of them successfully delivering a massive overhaul of the NHS? The good news is that Health Secretary Wes Streeting is up for the fight. Fat jabs have given him a real chance of ending the obesity crisis - and saving billions. Streeting's main mission must be to ensure every penny of tax-payers money goes into patient care. That means Downing Street backing him in facing down ludicrous pay demands from the Marxist medics threatening strikes. But he also needs to resist easy Nanny State solutions to health issues which threaten to take over people's lives or remove freedom and choice. Instead, Wes should make fixing falling productivity in our bloated heath service his top priority.

Six Sheffield Wednesday players hand in notice over unpaid wages
Six Sheffield Wednesday players hand in notice over unpaid wages

Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Six Sheffield Wednesday players hand in notice over unpaid wages

Sheffield Wednesday's crisis has deepened with six players handing in their notice after wages were not paid, Telegraph Sport has been told. With the head of the Professional Footballers' Association, Maheta Molango, describing the situation at Hillsborough 'shocking' and 'not tolerable', it has emerged the clutch of first-team players have asked to leave. Owner Dejphon Chansiri has not paid salaries on time or in full for May and June, with no public explanation and the club already under a transfer embargo with restrictions on signing players. It can also be revealed that hopes of the Football League stepping in to pay wages are remote as Chansiri still owes many other clubs for transfer payments and contingencies, preventing the EFL from solving the pay row. Southampton are understood to be due money from midfielder Shea Charles's loan fee and salary last season. Telegraph Sport also understands Norwich are owed money for centre-back Akin Famewo, who moved to Hillsborough in July 2022. A deadline for payment was missed again last month. As Chansiri battles to avoid full-scale mutiny, with staff also unpaid, highly-rated manager Danny Rohl is also believed to be closing in on an agreement on a severance package after two seasons at the crisis club. Rohl has held talks with his coaching staff and informed them that he will be leaving, following negotiations over a settlement. Henrik Pedersen, one of Rohl's assistants, is in line to land the job as No 1 if he receives certain assurances. Wednesday have already been hit with restrictions over the next three transfer windows for exceeding 30 days of late payments between July last year and this June. An independent commission is to decide on potential punishment for non-payments of wages, but a points deduction for the forthcoming season appears inevitable.

Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away
Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Welfare reform has been postponed, but it isn't going away

In a human sense, it was impossible to watch Rachel Reeves fighting back the tears as she sat, as usual, next to her friend and ally Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions, and not to feel for her. Nonetheless, and with the best will in the world to her personally, there are some legitimate questions that arise from the welfare bill fiasco, in which she has played a key role. One of those questions, thrown at Sir Keir by Kemi Badenoch, is whether he will keep his chancellor in place for 'many years to come', as he said he would in January. Sir Keir, for whatever reason, declined to confirm that, which must have dented Ms Reeves's confidence; certainly, it didn't help the markets, which saw borrowing costs rise, gilt yields spike and the pound plunge amid speculation over the chancellor's future. Of course, Sir Keir should never have made such a remark in the first place, as prime ministers shouldn't limit any of their personnel options, but his reluctance to repeat it at the despatch box was deafening. We do not yet know the full details of Ms Reeves' role in this latest damaging policy U-turn, but it is plain that, as chancellor, she must carry her share of the responsibility, just as she must for the decision to restrict the pensioners' winter fuel payment, a universally hated move that inflicted disproportionate electoral damage on Labour. One of the obvious reasons why this welfare reform failed was because it was so clearly not an attempt at welfare reform at all but a traditional raid by the Treasury looking for some savings in a hurry. If, as the secretary of state nominally in charge, Liz Kendall, pleaded, it was really all about getting people with disabilities into work – a laudable aim – why was there so much talk about saving a very specific sum of money in the process, some £5bn? Why the rush in such a sensitive field? Why, if it was to help some of the most vulnerable in society break through a wall of discrimination and towards a secure living, did the government's own assessment suggest it would push 250,000 people, later 150,000 people, with disabilities into poverty? Ms Kendal's plans suffered greatly from being associated with plugging a hole in one of Ms Reeves' spreadsheets, and once this was twigged by Labour backbenchers, the policy was in grave trouble. A half-baked attempt to fool the Labour rebels by promising a review of the personal independence payment (PIP) points system was immediately rumbled when it was soon discovered that the review, a co-production with disability rights group, would probably only be ready after the already-planned changes to PIP entitlement were implemented. That revelation, made so late in the day of the crucial vote, only made matters worse. To save anything, the bill had to be gutted. In the end, what's left of the welfare bill will cost Ms Reeves more money. Given that the disability rights groups have now also been given an effective veto on welfare reform, along with the numerous Labour rebels, it is perfectly possible that no serious attempt to reform the social security system will be made in this parliament. That cannot be allowed to happen. The pressure on the public finances caused by ever greater numbers of people claiming PIP, and the welfare system generally, has the capacity, bluntly, to bankrupt the nation. What should have happened is for two comprehensive reviews to be undertaken properly, and urgently, by the government. One would be into the social security system as a whole. The second, also in an area neglected for too long, would be into paying for adult social care. They are of course related, and both would seek to be fair to vulnerable people and the taxpayer. A great reforming government, as this one should aspire to be, could have produced a Beveridge Report for the 21st century, and a modernised welfare state that commanded wide public, if not cross-party, consent. The landslide Labour majority should cement it in place. Instead, the Commons majority has suffered a major landslip towards Corbynism. In the long run, it may mean welfare reform will be forced through by the radical Right, either under Ms Badenoch or Nigel Farage – the ultimate calamity. Such are the dangers, and the challenges remain. Welfare reform remains unavoidable – a 'moral imperative', as the prime minister said last week. The public demands it. The rate of outright social security fraud remains relatively low, but there is public disquiet about whether the funds are being put to best use, and whether all the criteria attached to schemes such as PIP are well designed. In-person assessments, for example, would help build confidence in the system, as would a more transparent Motability scheme. There is as yet no satisfactory consensus on whether mental health conditions, among the young especially, are being over-diagnosed. One system that tries to cover everything from ADHD to arthritis needs a great deal of work. Hence the review of PIP now being led by the respected welfare minister Sir Stephen Timms, which should always have preceded the welfare bill. He will need to listen to groups representing disabled people, but he must, as an overriding priority, produce a plan for a system that cannot expand beyond the nation's ability and willingness to support it, economically and politically. Welfare reform may have been postponed, but it isn't going away.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store