&w=3840&q=100)
AIFF begins hunt for new India men's football team head coach after parting ways with Manolo Marquez
The Kalyan Chaubey-led All India Football Federation has begun its hunt for the next coach of the Indian football team after parting ways with Spaniard Manolo Marquez. PTI
The All India Football Federation on Friday began the process to find a new head coach for its under-fire men's national team, setting July 13 as the last date for interested applicants, who must have at least 10 years of experience and 'cultural sensitivity' among other qualifications.
The process has been necessitated by the departure of Spaniard Manolo Marquez from the position. The 56-year-old parted ways on mutually agreeable terms with the AIFF after a string of poor results by the team. He had taken over just last year and had an entire year left on his contract.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The 'Head Coach - Senior Men's National Team' will report to the AIFF Secretary General and is accountable for the performance of the team in all matches and competitions it participates in during the term of the coach's contract,' the AIFF stated on its website and added that the duration and remuneration for the new appointee will be decided later.
More from Football
'The Head Coach will work closely with the National Team Department, the National Team Director and the Technical Director, to strengthen the position and performances of the Men's Senior National Team,' it added.
Minimum of 10 to 15 years of coaching experience at the elite youth and senior level football has been listed as a basic requirement.
'Experience as the first team coach of the senior national team will be preferred with experience of coaching in the World Cup and continental championship qualifiers being an advantage,' the AIFF added.
Minimum of AFC/UEFA Pro license or equivalent along with experience as a football player would also be assessed.
Aside from usual requirements of being flexible, efficient and resourceful, the AIFF also wants the next coach to have 'sound experience in the management of relationships; understanding needs, cultural sensitivity, and working with AIFF partners including media and sponsors.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Responsibilities
The 'primary objective' of the new coach would be 'to ensure that the National Team wins the maximum number of matches and competitions it participates in.'
The appointee will report regularly to the AIFF Secretary General and the Technical Committee, and work in close cooperation with the National Team Department, the National Team Director and the Technical Director.
Maintaining 'positive working relationship' with AIFF President, Secretary General, Technical Director, Media, and other relevant administrative staff" is also listed as one of the responsibilities for the new coach.
Marquez's predecessor Igor Stimac had a particularly bitter equation with current AIFF President Kalyan Chaubey and the Croat had even accused him of being vain.
'Duration and Remuneration can be decided during the interview period,' the AIFF said.
The shortlisted candidates will be called, and 'may be asked to make a presentation and/or attend an interview…'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Wimbledon 2025, July 5 schedule: Sinner, Swiatek, and Djokovic look to maintain momentum
Jannik Sinner and Novak Djokovic will both be looking to push on to the fourth round of the men's singles on the sixth day of The Championships at the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club, London. Sinner takes on Spaniard Pedro Martinez before Djokovic takes on his countryman Miomir Kecmanovic. In the women's singles, Iga Swiatek and Danielle Collins are set to go head-to-head on Centre Court. Defending champion Barbora Krejcikova faces a tie with American Emma Navarro in order to continue her title defence. ALSO READ: Wimbledon 2025, Day 5 Highlights: Sabalenka digs deep to knock out Raducanu; Alcaraz makes it through in four sets; Osaka and Keys knocked out There are three Indians in action in the men's doubles. N. Sriram Balaji and partner Miguel Reyes-Varela are up against Marcel Granollers and Horacio Zeballos, while Rithvik Bollipalli and Nicolas Barrientos are up against the British pair of Joe Salisbury and Neal Skupski. Yuki Bhamri is also in action with Robert Galloway against Nuno Borges and Marcos Giron. Here's the full list of fixtures (singles only) for day six of Wimbledon 2025: Centre court: Men's singles - [1] Jannik Sinner (ITA) vs Pedro Martinez (ESP) Women's singles - [8] Iga Swiatek (POL) vs Danielle Collins (USA) Men's singles - Miomir Kecmanovic (SRB) vs [6] Novak Djokovic (SRB) Court 1: Women's singles - [7[ Mirra Andreeva vs Hailey Baptiste (USA) Women's singles - [17] Barbora Krejcikova (CZE) vs [10] Emma Navarro (USA) Men's singles - [10] Ben Shelton (USA) vs Marton Fucsovics (HUN) - Not before 8:30PM IST Court 2: Women's singles - [23] Clara Tauson (DEN) vs [11] Elena Rybakina (KAZ) Men's singles - [11] Alex de Minaur (AUS) vs August Holmgren (DEN) Court 3: Women's singles - [16] Daria Kasatkina (AUS) vs [19] Liudmila Samsonova Men's singles - [19] Grigor Dimitrov (BUL) vs Sebastian Ofner (AUT) Court 12: Men's singles - [22] Flavio Cobolli (ITA) vs [15] Jakub Mensik (CZE) Women's singles - Zenyep Sonmez (TUR) vs [18] Ekaterina Alexandrova Court 18: Women's singles - Belinda Bencic (SUI) vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto (ITA) Men's singles - Marin Cilic (CRO) vs Jaume Munar (ESP) Court 14 Men's singles - Brandon Nakashima (USA) vs Lorenzo Sonego - Not before 5:00PM IST Court 16 Women's singles - Jessica Bouzas Maneiro (ESP) vs Dayana Yastremska (UKR) Indians in action Court 14 Men's doubles - N. Sriram Balaji (IND)/Miguel Reyes-Varela (MEX) vs [4] Marcel Granollers(ESP)/Horacio Zeballos (ARG) Court 15 Men's doubles - [6] Joe Salisbury (GBR)/Neal Skupski (GBR) vs Rithvik Bollipalli (IND)/Nicolas Barrientos (COL) Men's doubles - [16] Yuki Bhambri (IND)/Robert Galloway (USA) vs Nuno Borges (POR)/Marcos Giron (USA)
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Why it's Testing times for coach Gautam Gambhir and Team India
It seemed like the arc of a big-budget Bollywood drama: the arrival of a fiery new lead, an early rush of optimism, some swaggering victories, and then—just as the music swells—an abrupt turn into trouble. Gautam Gambhir's tenure as India's head coach has so far been part thriller, part family saga and part box-office the former opener took over from Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, it was billed as a new era: intense, fearless and unflinchingly direct. Few, however, anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the grind of responsibility. India won the T-20 series 3-0 in Sri Lanka but lost the ODIs there has been silverware—the Champions Trophy crown in February 2025 and an almost unblemished T20 record that includes clean sweeps against Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, besides beating South Africa 3-1 in November 2024 and England 4-1 in January-February this year. But Test cricket—that old, unsparing critic—has been far less Gambhir took charge, India have played 11 Tests: won three, lost seven and drawn one. The win percentage—just 27.3 per cent—is unsettling by Indian standards. The contrast between formats couldn't be starker: in white-ball cricket, India have thrived. In the longest form, they've stumbled, often spectacularly. But as in any great script, the coach is not the only character in this unfolding drama. The supporting cast has fumbled its lines too—dropped catches, misfiring bowlers, fragile middle orders. Gambhir's role is under scrutiny, yes. But so is the very fabric of India's Test would be safe to surmise that Gambhir's apprenticeship as India's head coach is now firmly behind him. When the former opener succeeded Rahul Dravid in July 2024, ahead of a white-ball tour of Sri Lanka, few could have anticipated how quickly the romance of appointment would give way to the reality of pressure. But in cricket, as in life, the longer format remains the true crucible. And there, the figures are far less LITMUS TESTIndia's Test troubles began last year at home—ironically, their fortress. In a rain-curtailed match in Bengaluru against New Zealand, Rohit Sharma opted to bat first on a damp surface. India were skittled for 46, their lowest-ever home total. What could have been dismissed as a freak collapse turned into a pattern as India went on to lose 0-3 to the visiting Kiwis, the spinners feasting on frail techniques and poor whitewash inflicted by New Zealand stripped much of the sheen from India's 2-0 Test series victory over Bangladesh in September 2024—a series where the opposition offered little resistance. Then came the marquee tour of Australia, stretching from November to January. A famous 295-run triumph in Perth briefly rekindled hope, but it was swiftly extinguished by three sobering vulnerabilities were laid bare by their second-innings batting collapses: 175 in Adelaide (a 10-wicket loss), 8 without loss in Brisbane (match drawn), 155 in Melbourne (a 184-run defeat), and 157 in Sydney (defeated by six wickets). Such performances with the bat simply do not win you Test in the very Perth Test they won, India had been bowled out for just 150 in the first innings. Yet they rallied spectacularly in the second, declaring at 487 for 6—a commanding total that piled pressure on Australia and paved the way for a memorable came June 2025—and with it, England. In Leeds, India walked into Headingley in the throes of transition: no Rohit Sharma, no Virat Kohli, no R. Ashwin. This, for all intents and purposes, was Gambhir's India—a fledgling side led by Shubman Gill, flanked by the youthful promise of Yashasvi Jaiswal, Sai Sudharsan and Rishabh Pant. The result? Another defeat. But this one was as humbling as it was a seaming Headingley pitch, India's batting order once again unravelled—not so much from lack of ability as from an alarming absence of application. Despite producing five centuries across the match, the side's brittle underbelly was ruthlessly exposed. In the first innings, only five batters reached double figures; of the remaining six, three were dismissed for second innings echoed the same dysfunction: three ducks, three others scoring 4, 4 and 8, with just five again crossing into double digits. The five centuries—so valuable in isolation—were effectively nullified by the anaemia of the rest. And yet, the blame cannot rest solely with the coach Gambhir, for all his vaunted cricketing intelligence and warrior's mindset, must shoulder a measure of responsibility. His combative persona may have set the press gallery alight, but his strategic imprint on this Test side remains elusive. The batting group, in particular, has displayed no coherent plan against lateral movement—a curious blind spot in a country where the ball is known to speak from the first session to the makes it more confounding is that Gambhir's own playing career was built on grit and adaptability, especially in challenging overseas conditions. His teams, thus far, have shown worryingly little of GAME, BIG PICTUREBut here's the inconvenient truth: a coach is only as good as his players. And cricket, most cruelly in Tests, offers no hiding place for errors that unfold over five that first Test against England, one top-order batter played across the line, gifting his wicket cheaply. A slip fielder shelled a regulation catch. A star bowler—expected to lead the attack—failed to take a single second-innings wicket. Gambhir could do little. In such a scenario, India were always destined to lose. It was not strategy that failed, but said, the coach is not blameless. Selection calls, rotation management, field settings and the overall tactical narrative remain squarely his remit. Why persist with some bowlers in conditions unsuited to them? Why the hesitation to groom a left-arm spinner when most of India's defeats have come without them? And why this inconsistency in trusting youth, one match too soon or one series too late?Gambhir's supporters argue he is still early into the job. His critics wonder aloud whether the learning curve, given the stakes, can afford to be so Gambhir was never expected to be Dravid. His appointment wasn't about calm stewardship—it was about changing gears. If Dravid was 'The Wall', Gambhir was brought in to rattle it, to infuse aggression, self-belief and a harder edge. That philosophy has, to some extent, delivered dividends in white-ball cricket. But Test cricket, with its long shadows and slower reckonings, demands more than passion. It demands patience, systems and the quiet, meticulous art of Gambhir must now decide is whether he is content to be a man of mood and momentum—or if he can become a craftsman of the format that still defines cricket's highest to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'I wouldn't pick this gentleman': Ex-England captain slams Prasidh Krishna after another disappointing performance for India
On a day when Indian pacers, Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep, went all over on England, Prasidh Krishna had a day to forget. Noting his performance, a former England captain has given a harsh verdict on Prasidh. read more Mohammed Siraj and Akash Deep emerged as the heroes for Team India on Day 3 of the Edgbaston Test against England. The duo picked up the entire English lineup- Siraj took 6 wickets and Akash Deep snared 4 dismissals. While Siraj and Akash prevailed in attaining purchase from the surface, it was a different scenario for the third bowler of the Indian pace battery. Prisidh Krishna went wicketless and was hammered by Jamie Smith and Harry Brook intermittently. He was given only 13 overs to bowl and in it, he conceded 73 runs, which can be adjudged quite expensive in the world of Test cricket. Krishna had a forgetful outing in the Oval Test as well, and after yet another flop show experts are losing patience on him. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Harry Brook and Jamie Smith smash records as England mount thrilling comeback against India at Edgbaston Michael Atherton goes harsh on Prasidh Krishna Former England captain Michael Atherton showcased his angst with Shubman Gill and Gautam Gambhir over the selection of Prisidh Krishna. Atherton did not mince any words and went harsh by stating that if he were at the place of Shubman Gill then he would not have picked Krishna, but rather entrusted Kuldeep Yadav to do the job for him. 'I wouldn't pick this gentleman, Prasidh Krishna. I would have picked Kuldeep Yadav,' said Atherton in commentary when Krishna was being hammered all over the ground by Smith and Brook. While Prasidh Krishna has had a dry run till now in the series, there is still time left for him to overturn the tide. However, he would have to perform in the second innings and justify his selection in the team. India gain massive advantage over England on Day 3 Having posted a massive total of 587 on the board, Team India endured the batting heroics of Harry Brook and Jamie Smith, and still managed to bundle out England at the score of 407. A lead of 180 has been garnered, which took the shape of 244 at stumps, following a positive display of batting by Yashasvi Jaiswal and KL Rahul. Day 4 will be crucial and could reveal the winner. India will start the Day 4 proceedings at 64/1.
