
Appeals board rejects €30m Bartra apartment scheme for Old Navan Road
An Bord Pleanála has rejected plans by builders, Bartra, for its contentious plans for a €30m apartment scheme for Dublin's Old Navan Road.
It is now the second failed attempt by Bartra to secure planning permission to redevelop the site.
Advertisement
Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd was planning to construct a five storey 56 apartment scheme on the site at Brady's Public House, Old Navan Rd, Dublin 15.
The refusal upholds a decision by Fingal Co Council to refuse planning permission after 75 objections were lodged against the proposal.
One of those to object was Castleknock resident, Barry O'Lone, who in 2023 turned down a €100,000 offer from Bartra to withdraw a High Court challenge against a 210-bedspace co-living scheme for the same site opposite his family home.
The co-living scheme did not proceed and in May of last year, Bartra Property (Castleknock) Ltd lodged plans for the apartment scheme for the site.
Advertisement
As part of his objection, Mr O'Lone repeated the allegation that he was previously offered €100,000 by Bartra in April 2023 to withdraw the High Court judicial review against the co-living scheme.
In its refusal to the 56 unit scheme, the appeals board concluded that having regard to its height, massing, bulk and design and its lack of a direct relationship with the public open space located immediately to the north-east of the subject site, the proposed development fails to integrate with the established character of the area.
The appeals board stated that as a result the scheme would be contrary to the Fingal County Development Plan 2023-2029, which requires that new development adds quality by integrating high quality design and ensuring good quality accessible public realms, by ensuring development contributes to a positive sense of place, local distinctiveness and character.
The appeals board also refused planning permission as the absence of adequate on-site car parking provision would result in substandard residential amenity for future occupants of the development, would be likely to lead to overspill parking in the vicinity of the subject site and would be likely to result in congestion and obstruction of road users, which would endanger public safety by reason of traffic hazard.
Advertisement
In the Bartra appeal lodged, Thornton O'Connor Town Planning stated that there are not many better sites in the city that have the capacity for increased height and density.
Business
Airbus finalises deal to take over Spirit Aerosyst...
Read More
The planning consultants stated that the height, scale and massing of the proposal were very similar to the building already permitted on the site.
Director of the planning consultancy, Patricia Thornton, stated that the scheme cannot be considered to be overbearing, over-scaled, or to cause material overlooking.
Ms Thornton also argued that the scheme has been carefully crafted to the highest architectural standards and that the issue of the provision of on-street parking can be overcome by on-street parking controls.
Bartra did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
14 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Disgraced lawyer from Kilmacolm can't attend court date due to wedding
Iain Robertson, 71, told judge Olga Pasportnikov on Monday that he wouldn't be able to be present for a proceeds of crime case on June 23, 2025. The High Court in Edinburgh heard that this was because he was a guest at a marriage ceremony on the same day. Robertson, who is representing himself in a bid by the Crown to recover money he made from a £1.5 million laundering racket, told judge Pasportnikov: 'I'm on home leave for a wedding that day. I have a week of home leave every month.' Robertson, of Kilmacolm, is currently the subject of an action brought by prosecutors under proceeds of crime laws. Robertson was given eight years in January 2023. He and two other corrupt solicitors - Alistair Blackwood, 69, and David Lyons - used their law firm Robertson & Ross in Paisley to launder cash obtained illegally. The trio acted alongside Mohammed Aziz, 63, and Robert Ferguson, 69, in a course of criminal activity. The five men were sentenced following a nine-week trial at the High Court in Glasgow before judge Lord Richardson. READ MORE: Man made £442k in ill-gotten gains during time as drug dealer The trial was the culmination of a process which had been triggered by a Law Society probe into activities at the firm. They were convicted of fraud and multiple charges under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Robertson, Lyons and Aziz were also convicted on charges of being involved in serious organised crime. All were sent to prison. Prosecutors told jurors the case centred on four transactions carried out between May 2015 and July 2016. The first transaction involved a £79,340 stolen cheque due to be paid to a law firm in Jersey. The next centred on £240,000 from a fraudulent house sale in London. The third transaction saw £985,000 stolen from the hacked bank account of an individual. And the final illegal activity was uncovered after Robertson claimed to be acting for a man who wanted to sell his home in Essex. READ MORE: Four men jailed after £6m corruption and bribery probe at health boards The court heard that the "seller" was said to be staying at a flat that turned out to be Ferguson's address. A total of £181,786 was made from the fraudulent sale. In each transaction, the proceeds were funnelled through the client bank account held by Robertson's firm in Paisley, Robertson & Ross. Limited and false records were created to make them appear legitimate. Fake papers and fake IDs - including a passport and driver's licence - were collated in a bid to cover up the crimes. The Law Society raised concerns about several of these transactions before alerting police to the potential illegal activity. The trial heard that lawyer Robertson, who has been suspended by the Law Society along with Blackwood, was at the heart of the money-laundering scheme since he had access to his firm's client account. Judge Pasportnikov fixed a hearing in the proceeds case to take place on June 30, 2025.


STV News
18 hours ago
- STV News
Disgraced lawyer 'can't attend court hearing due to wedding'
A disgraced lawyer serving time for money laundering can't attend court for a hearing as he's attending a wedding on the same day, a judge heard. Iain Robertson, 71, told judge Olga Pasportnikov on Monday that he wouldn't be able present for a proceeds of crime case on June 23. The High Court in Edinburgh heard that this was because he was a guest at a marriage ceremony on the same day. Robertson, who is representing himself in a bid by the Crown to recover money he made from a £1.5m laundering racket, told judge Pasportnikov: 'I'm on home leave for a wedding that day. I have a week of home leave every month.' Robertson, of Kilmacolm, Renfrewshire, is currently the subject of an action brought by prosecutors under proceeds of crime laws. Robertson was given eight years in January 2023. He and two other corrupt solicitors – Alistair Blackwood, 69, and David Lyons – used their law firm Robertson & Ross in Paisley, Renfrewshire, to launder cash obtained illegally. The trio acted alongside Mohammed Aziz, 63, and Robert Ferguson, 69, in a course of criminal activity. The five men were sentenced following a nine week trial at the High Court in Glasgow before judge Lord Richardson. The trial was the culmination of a process which had been triggered by a Law Society probe into activities at the firm. They were convicted of fraud and multiple charges under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Robertson, Lyons and Aziz were also convicted on charges of being involved in serious organised crime. All were sent to prison. Prosecutors told jurors the case centred on four transactions carried out between May 2015 and July 2016. The first transaction involved a £79,340 stolen cheque due to be paid to a law firm in Jersey. The next centred on £240,000 from a fraudulent house sale in London. The third transaction saw £985,000 stolen from the hacked bank account of an individual. And the final illegal activity was uncovered after Robertson claimed to be acting for a man who wanted to sell his home in Essex. The court heard that the 'seller' was said to be staying at a flat that turned out to be Ferguson's address. A total of £181,786 was made from the fraudulent sale. In each transaction, the proceeds were funnelled through the client bank account held by Robertson's firm in Paisley, Robertson & Ross Limited, and false records were created to make them appear legitimate. Fake papers and fake IDs – including a passport and driver's licence – were collated in a bid to cover up the crimes. The Law Society raised concerns about several of these transactions before alerting police to the potential illegal activity. The trial heard that lawyer Robertson, who has been suspended by the Law Society along with Blackwood, was at the heart of the money-laundering scheme since he had access to his firm's client account. Judge Pasportnikov fixed a hearing in the proceeds case to take place on June 30, 2025. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Powys County Times
18 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Dale Vince's High Court claim against Daily Mail publisher thrown out
Green energy industrialist Dale Vince's High Court claim against the publisher of the Daily Mail has been thrown out by a judge. Mr Vince brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) over an article headlined 'Labour repays £100,000 to sex pest donor', published in June 2023. The story reported that the Labour Party was handing back money to donor Davide Serra with a picture showing Mr Vince holding a Just Stop Oil banner. This picture, published in print and on The Mail+ app, was changed to one of Mr Serra online 47 minutes after publication, while the original picture of Mr Vince remained in the print version. An employment tribunal in 2022 heard Mr Serra had made sexist comments to a female colleague which were found to amount to unlawful harassment related to sex. Mr Vince claimed ANL misused his personal data and that the publication of his photograph with this story would lead readers to believe he had been accused of sexual harassment. ANL had defended the claim, with its lawyers previously telling the High Court in London that it was an abuse of process and a 'resurrection' of a libel claim that was dismissed last year. In a judgment on Monday, a High Court judge threw out the data protection claim. Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no real prospect that Mr Vince will succeed on his claim. 'As in the defamation proceedings, it is accepted that on reading the text of the article published in Mail+ and the Daily Mail any ordinary reader would very quickly realise that Mr Vince was not being accused of sexual harassment. 'Considered on this basis the personal data relating to Mr Vince was processed fairly.' He said there was 'every reason' why the data protection claim should have been heard with the defamation claim last year. 'Both claims arose out of the same event, the publication of the article in Mail+ and the Daily Mail,' he added. 'Both claims rely on the same factual circumstances, namely the juxtaposition of the headline, photographs and caption, and the contention that the combination of the headline and the photograph created the misleading impression that Mr Vince had been accused of sexual harassment.'