Lia Thomas records erasure illustrates NCAA transgender policy change
The U.S. Department of Education announced the resolution on July 1, stating the university will comply with Title IX after it allowed Thomas, a transgender athlete, to be part of the women's swimming team. Now, the university must not allow transgender athletes to compete in female athletic programs, in addition to erasing Thomas' achievements.
The agreement comes as President Donald Trump has made it a point of his presidency to ban transgender athletes from competing female sports. He's passed executive orders and threatened legal action regarding the issue, and it's resulted in changes to college sports.
Did NCAA allow transgender athletes in women's sports?
Yes. Thomas began transitioning in 2019 with hormone replacement therapy and followed the then-established NCAA and Ivy League rules. In 2022, the NCAA updated its transgender athlete policy. The update took a sport-by-sport approach that "preserves opportunity for transgender student-athletes while balancing fairness, inclusion and safety for all who compete." At the time, it aligned with decisions by United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, as well as International Olympic Committee.
Under the policy, at the start of the 2022-23 academic year sports calendar, transgender student-athletes had to document sport-specific testosterone levels at the beginning of their season, six months after the first and four weeks before championship selections.
Thomas won the NCAA Division I title in the women's 500-yard freestyle event in the spring of 2022 before the policy went into place.
How Trump Administration impacted transgender athletes
Trump had emphasized during his president campaign his goal of blocking transgender athletes from competing in women's sports. On Feb. 5, less than a month into his presidency, Trump signed an executive order that bars transgender women and girls from playing on school sports, and it would cut off federal money for schools that don't comply.
The executive order directs the Department of Education to pursue "enforcement actions" under Title IX, the federal law prohibiting discrimination based on sex at educational institutions that receive federal funding.
In April, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced legal action against Maine for refusing to ban transgender athletes from participating in women's sports. In June, Trump threatened fines in California and the Justice Department threatened to sue the state's public high schools after a transgender athlete was allowed to compete and won two medals at the track and field state championship.
Did NCAA transgender athlete policy change?
Yes. One day after Trump's executive order, the NCAA changed it's policy to only allow student-athletes assigned female at birth could compete in women's sports. The policy was "effective immediately and applies to all student-athletes regardless of previous eligibility reviews under the NCAA's prior transgender participation policy."
The updated policy states a student-athlete assigned female at birth "who has begun hormone therapy' may not compete on a women's team, and if they participated in any NCAA competition, the team would not be eligible for NCAA championships. The organization did state individual schools have the autonomy to determine athletic participation on their campus.
'We strongly believe that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards would best serve today's student-athletes instead of a patchwork of conflicting state laws and court decisions. To that end, President Trump's order provides a clear, national standard," NCAA President Charlie Baker said in a statement.
How many transgender athletes are in the NCAA?
Less than 10, according to what Baker told a Senate panel in December. There are about 510,000 men and women who compete in the NCAA.
The number reflects a similar percentage to how many transgender athletes compete in sports, starting at youth sports. According to the UCLA Williams Institute, transgender youth make up only 1.4% of American teenagers. A 2017 study of 17,000 young people found that about 1 in 10 transgender boys said they played sports, and it is roughly the same figure for transgender girls.
Lia Thomas records: What happens to them?
What happens to Thomas' NCAA records is unclear. The NCAA did not respond to a request for comment. Thomas won the women's 500-yard freestyle event in 2022, and she tied for fifth in the women's 200-yard freestyle and eighth in the 100-yard freestyle.
However, Thomas' records at Penn will be erased. She currently holds the records for:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
16 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
GOP Senator's Viral Photo After Major Bill Vote
On Tuesday, after a long vote with JD Vance as the tiebreaker, the Senate passed Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Now, the bill heads to the House, with Republicans trying to race to Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Of the most notable in the proposal, the bill proposes sweeping tax cuts for businesses and the country's wealthiest Americans. To offset the lost revenue, the bill would slash funding for healthcare programs like Medicaid, potentially leaving up to 17 million Americans uninsured. The bill would also cut SNAP, the food aid program relied on by 40 million Americans, by about 20 percent; roll back clean energy initiatives and student loan relief; and increase spending on the military and deportations. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill is projected to add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Rep. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska cast the last "yes" vote before JD's tiebreaker, which she later called an "agonizing" decision. While Murkowski supported the tax cuts in the bill, she raised concerns about the spending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food assistance. Nearly one-third of Alaskans depend on Medicaid, and food insecurity remains a problem as many communities are too remote, requiring food to be barged or flown in, an inaccessible and expensive process. To convince Murkowski, Republicans stuffed the bill with provisions specifically designed to help win over her vote, including doubling a fund to help rural hospitals from $25 billion to $50 billion over five years, exemptions on work requirements for food assistance, and a tax break for whalers. Murkowski was also seen looking in an image after the vote. Naturally, it's gone viral. "tfw you've just stripped healthcare from 17 million Americans and ensured the closure of rural hospitals," one wrote. "if I send you this pic it means I've made yet another horrible decision and abandoned my standards and morals," another said. "She knows what she did," this viral tweet read. People also reacted to her calling the decision "agonizing." "That pain you feel is in your conscience," one wrote. "'Agonizing' for Lisa Murkowski? 17 million Americans will lose health care as a result of her vote. Be so serious," said Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari. Everyone's pretty much asking the same thing: "Then why did you vote for it?" Welp, as the bill heads to the House to be deliberated and voted on, we will wait to see if it heads to Trump's desk to be signed into law. In the meantime, in the comments, let us know your thoughts about the bill, and if it passes, how it will impact you.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the US will charge 20% tariffs on imports from Vietnam under a new trade deal reached during last-minute negotiations. Products sent from Vietnam to the US had faced a 46% levy, which was set to go into effect next week as part of Trump's so-called "reciprocal" tariffs he announced in April. Dozens of other economies, including the European Union and Japan, are still scrambling to make their own deals with the US before the planned increases. Under the agreement, Vietnam will charge no tariffs on US products, Trump said in a social media post. Tariffs, which are a tax on imports, are almost always paid by the company that is buying the goods rather than the business which makes the product. While importers can decide to absorb the extra charge, they often choose to pass it on to the consumer. In the "Great Deal of Cooperation", as Trump called it, the US will also impose a steeper tariff of 40% on goods that pass through Vietnam in a process known as "trans-shipping". Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counsellor on trade and manufacturing, has claimed that a third of all Vietnamese exports to the US were actually Chinese products shipped through Vietnam. The president said on social media: "Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade. "In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff." Vietnam has become a major manufacturing hub for a number of major brands such as Nike, Apple, the Gap and Lululemon. It was a beneficiary of firms moving factories out of China to avoid the tariffs Trump announced during his first term in office. Share prices of companies making goods in Vietnam initially rose although those gains were trimmed after it emerged products will face a 20% tax. Trump and Vietnam's General Secretary To Lam held a phone call on Wednesday, during which he reiterated an invitation for the US president to visit the country. Separately, the Trump family has recently announced projects in Vietnam. The country's government approved a plan by the Trump Organization and local business Kinh Bac City Development to invest $1.5bn in hotels, golf courses and luxury real estate. The Trump Organization is also scouting for locations to build a Trump Tower in Ho Chi Minh City. Trump initially imposed steep levies on trading partners around the world in April , citing a lack of "reciprocity", but then announced a pause where they were all lowered to 10%. Many countries then approached the US to negotiate trade deals, according to the White House. Since April, Washington had so far only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower retaliatory duties with China. Nike pledges to cut reliance on Chinese factories Trump's tariffs leave China's neighbours with an impossible choice
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why Trump tax deductions — for tips, car loans and more — may not carry large benefits for low earners
Tax cuts are the centerpiece of a massive legislative package championed by President Trump and passed Tuesday by Senate Republicans. Many new tax breaks in the bill — on auto loans, tips and overtime pay, and for older Americans — are structured as tax deductions. How much money you save with tax deductions, which reduce your taxable income, depends on your bracket. Deductions are more valuable to higher-income households and less beneficial for lower earners, experts said. "The most modest-income workers can't use a tax deduction at all," said Carl Davis, research director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning policy think tank. Senate Republicans passed the legislation with the narrowest of margins on Tuesday. It now heads to the House, where its fate is uncertain. The Republican bill, originally called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, has more than $4 trillion of net tax cuts, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Among them are several new tax deductions: If enacted as drafted, these deductions would be temporary, available from 2025 through 2028. They also carry various limitations such as income restrictions. A tax deduction reduces the amount of income that's subject to tax, i.e., taxable income. You can find your taxable income on line 15 of your Form 1040 individual income tax return. While the proposed tax deductions may sound large, there are a few reasons why low earners may not see much or any benefit, experts said. Households need some taxable income to benefit from a deduction, said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation. Low earners already get a large financial benefit from the standard deduction, Watson said. The standard deduction is worth up to $15,000 for singles and $30,000 for married couples filing jointly in 2025. (If the bill passes as drafted, it would raise the standard deduction to $15,750 for single filers, and to $31,500 for married filing jointly.) More from Personal Finance:Senate Republicans' spending bill boosts child tax creditSenate bill touts tax help for seniors on Social SecurityTrump megabill axes $7,500 EV tax credit after September To get a financial benefit from the new tax deductions for car loans, seniors, tips and overtime, a household's taxable income would have to exceed these thresholds, experts said. More than a third, or 37%, of tipped workers in 2022 had incomes low enough that they didn't owe federal income tax, according to an analysis last year by the Budget Lab at Yale University. That means a "meaningful share" of tipped workers wouldn't benefit from a tax deduction on tips, it said. The relative value of tax deductions depends on a household's tax bracket, experts said. There are seven federal income-tax brackets: 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35% and 37%. Higher-income households generally fall in a higher tax bracket — any therefore can get a bigger benefit from reducing their taxable income. "If you're in a somewhat higher bracket, every dollar you get to deduct is worth more to you because that dollar would have been taxed at a higher rate," Davis said. Let's say two households — one in the 22% bracket and one in the 10% bracket — each deduct $1 of tipped income. The former gets a tax benefit worth 22 cents, while the latter gets one worth 10 cents, Davis said. There are other reasons why households may not be able to max out certain deductions. For example, households would need a car loan of roughly $112,000 or more to generate $10,000 of annual interest on a typical six-year loan, Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, an auto market research firm, told CNBC last month. Only about 1% of new auto loans are this big, according to Cox Automotive data. By comparison, the average new car buyer would be able to deduct $3,000 of interest from their taxable income in the first year of their loan, Smoke said. A deduction of that size would yield an average total tax benefit of about $500 or less in the loan's first year, he said. There are, however, two elements of the tax breaks that seek to better target benefits to low- and middle- income households. For one, they're all what's known as "above-the-line" deductions. This means households can claim them regardless of whether they use the standard deduction or itemize their deductions. High-income households may be more likely to itemize, meaning they detail a list of eligible deductions on their tax return. Taxpayers itemize when the deductions add up to more than the standard deduction. Some deductions are only available to taxpayers who itemize, such as for "SALT" (or, a deduction for state and local income taxes and property taxes) or mortgage interest. Also, the new deductions have income limits, barring them from the highest-income households. For example, the overtime deduction's value starts to decline once an individual's income exceeds $150,000 ($300,000 for married couples filing jointly). The value of the senior "bonus" falls once income exceeds $75,000 ($150,000 if married and filing jointly). Tax credits are another mechanism to lower a household's tax bill. A tax credit reduces your tax liability dollar-for-dollar. (If you claim a $1,000 credit, it can reduce your tax bill by $1,000.) Credits have the same dollar value regardless of your tax bracket. Unlike deductions, the "benefits from tax credits are skewed toward lower- and middle-income households," the Congressional Budget Office wrote in 2021. Credits can be "refundable" or "nonrefundable": The largest credits for individuals as measured by total government outlay are the child tax credit, earned income tax credit and the premium tax credit for health insurance, CBO said. The Senate legislation would permanently raise the maximum child tax credit to $2,200 starting in 2025, and would index this figure for inflation starting in 2026. The credit is partially refundable: Low earners can get up to $1,700 as a tax refund. But currently, 17 million children do not receive the full $2,000 child tax credit because their families don't earn enough and owe enough taxes, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
