logo
‘I was in shock': DC gallery pulls exhibits of Black and LGBTQ+ artists amid Trump DEI crackdown

‘I was in shock': DC gallery pulls exhibits of Black and LGBTQ+ artists amid Trump DEI crackdown

The Guardian01-03-2025
A Washington DC art gallery has abruptly cancelled two exhibitions featuring Black and LGBTQ+ artists, prompting accusations that it has caved in to Donald Trump's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes.
The Art Museum of the Americas, run by the Organization of American States (OAS), was due to present the shows Nature's Wild with Andil Gosine and Before the Americas in March.
The decision to pull the exhibits coincided with an executive order issued by the Trump administration directing a review of relationships with international organisations that receive US funding. To Gosine, it is an alarming example of pre-emptive capitulation – obeying in advance.
'There's a long history of the arts being attacked by conservative forces,' the 51-year-old Canadian artist and curator told the Guardian. 'What I'm disappointed about with the OAS is that this is not Trump's action; this is anticipating. This for me is even scarier because it feels like we have this closeup view to how fascism unfolds.'
The cancellation was a crushing blow for Gosine, a professor of environmental arts and justice at York University in Toronto, who put years of work into the exhibition. It was inspired by his 2021 book Nature's Wild: Love, Sex and Law in the Caribbean, which explored ideas about ecology, sexuality and human rights. His preference for working with public institutional spaces led him to the OAS and its Art Museum of the Americas in Washington.
'For three years they have been consistently enthusiastic,' he said. 'Every time I proposed something they were quick to write letters of support for it. They seemed very happy up to the day before cancellation; I have all these enthusiastic emails. I don't think we had one bad word in that time.'
Gosine added: 'I have not put more resources or time into any project. This was to be the feather in my cap because it was a very personal project. I grew up in Trinidad; the exhibition was around unpacking a life. The signature image for the exhibition was an image of me at three years [old].'
The show was to include works by a dozen artists from across the Americas, many of them LGBTQ+ people of colour. It was to feature sculpture, photography, video, acrylic paintings, oil paintings and collage including a video installation by the Black artist Lorraine O'Grady, who died in December aged 90.
Gosine used funds awarded to him to keep the budget as low as possible, for example creating work in the US so it would not have to be shipped from Canada. World Pride had selected it as one of their marquee arts events and organised dedicated programming. The opening date was brought forward to 21 March so that a Canadian mission could visit.
But at 9am on 5 February Gosine received a phone call from the museum's director, Adriana Ospina. 'She said: 'I've been ordered to cancel the exhibition.' She didn't give a direct reason. I mean, I was in shock. Never in a million years.
'There are lots of challenges to this space; I was prepared to make up for all of them. But there would be no discussion. She alluded to budget restraints at their museum but that was perplexing because in fact they were contributing almost nothing to the show.'
Ospina sent a follow-up letter but it still gave no reason for the termination, Gosine said. But to Gosine there is little mystery. On 4 February Trump issued an executive order directing his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, to review relationships with international organisations receiving US funding. The US is the biggest contributor to the OAS secretariat's budget, giving $55m last year.
'It's not accidental that on February 4 they get a letter saying, 'Hey, we might pull out your budget' and on February 5, they're like, 'OK!'' he said. 'The quickness of the response suggests to me that this is what I think will be a losing attempt to appease the administration.'
Gosine believes the OAS has surrendered its principles for nothing. 'How is an organisation like this one, that's been so associated with their human rights work more than anything else, going to fit in to a new political order? How smart is it to throw their allies, their communities under the bus for something that will not be successful? I can't imagine them keeping their budgets, given what kinds of cuts the US administration is making.'
Having planned every inch of the space for three years, Gosine says the show cannot survive as he conceived it, although elements of it will live on in exhibitions and events in Montreal, Toronto and New York. A substantial catalogue was due to go to press last week but will not see the light of day.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
Trump's dismantling of DEI initiatives across the federal government included the closure of diversity offices at the National Gallery of Art and Smithsonian Institution as well as the cancellation of a US Marine Band collaboration with young musicians of colour.
He has also taken control of the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and installed an acolyte as interim president. There are fears that his ability to threaten funding will help create a new political climate that discourages cultural institutions from engaging with topics related to race, identity and social justice.
Gosine added: 'The hardest part of that for me to understand is how people all the way along the line bend to the political tide. I reached out to a few people to get advice on this and I was surprised: there are powerful people who are big critics of Trump but who are unwilling to be uncomfortable. 'Well, how do I make sure my consultancy contract isn't at stake?'
'I feel people who have the most to risk are risking it. When I told the artists, they were ready to go to the streets. But it astonishes me how people in power are looking after what they mistakenly believe is a self-interest that will protect just them. It doesn't work like that. When human rights recede, everything comes tumbling down.'
Another shuttered exhibition, Before the Americas, featured works by African American, Afro-Latino and Caribbean artists, tracing the influence of the transatlantic slave trade and African diaspora. Curator Cheryl Edwards also received a call from Ospina informing her that exhibition would no longer go ahead.
Edwards said the only reason given for the cancellation was 'because it is DEI', telling the Washington Post: 'You can't tell me that the artists I've chosen for this exhibit are not top quality. The whole museum is DEI under that definition.'
The Art Museum of the Americas says in its mission statement that it 'exhibits, collects, studies and conserves modern and contemporary art of the Americas, in order to promote cultural exchange to advance the OAS four pillars of democracy, human rights, multidimensional security and integral development'.
A spokesperson for the museum did not respond to requests for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan
Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan

Republican state legislators in California filed suit Tuesday to block a mid-year redistricting plan meant to counter Texas' effort to redraw congressional district lines. The emergency petition argues that the process being used in the California assembly violates laws requiring a 30-day period between the introduction of legislation and voting on it. 'Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented instead with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature,' states the filing on behalf of senators Tony Strickland and Suzette Martinez Valladares, assemblyman Tri Ta and assemblywoman Kathryn Sanchez. California governor Gavin Newsom announced his state's redistricting plan last week in terms on social media mocking Donald Trump's flamboyance, intent on using the voting power of the US's most populous state to counteract Texas' redrawn map, which would be expected to deliver a net gain of five congressional seats to Republicans in 2026. Newsom praised the California effort on Monday, calling it a necessary response to Trump's influence over redistricting in Texas and other Republican-led states. 'We are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power,' Newsom said, adding that the proposal gives Californians 'a choice to fight back'. To do so in time for a special election in November, the state assembly must pass the plan this year. As has been a common practice near the end of legislative terms, California lawmakers took an existing bill introduced earlier in the session and gutted it of its language, replacing it with legislation that overrides the state's neutral redistricting commission to present maps to voters. The Mandeep Dhillon law firm filing the suit was previously owned by Harmeet Dhillon, who is now assistant attorney general overseeing the US Department of Justice civil rights division. Dhillon was known for her efforts to sue California's university system to overturn policies which barred controversial conservative speakers from appearing. She sold her firm to her brother Mandeep Singh Dhillon after Trump nominated her to take over civil rights enforcement in his administration. The suit does not challenge 'gut and amend' in principle, but rather asks the court 'to enforce an external constitutional constraint against the Legislature to protect the people's rights'. Internal polling presented to lawmakers showed voters favored the measure 52% to 41%, with 7% undecided, according to the local television station KCRA. Republicans in California condemned the proposal as an assault on the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission and said they plan to introduce legislation that advocates for creating similar map-drawing bodies in all 50 states. 'Governor Newsom, this is nothing more than a power grab,' Strickland said during a Monday news conference in Sacramento. He warned the redistricting tit-for-tat sets a dangerous precedent that will not be easily undone. 'The Golden Gate Bridge toll was supposed to be temporary,' he added. 'You're still paying the toll.' The legislature could hold floor votes to send the measure to voters for approval as soon as Thursday, KCRA reported. House Republicans currently hold a razor-thin three-seat majority in the US House and Trump has pushed to redraw district boundaries ahead of next year's midterm elections, in which the president's party typically loses seats. Republicans are also poised to redraw congressional districts in Ohio, Missouri and Florida, as well as potentially Indiana.

Trump rules out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of security guarantees
Trump rules out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of security guarantees

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

Trump rules out sending US troops to Ukraine as part of security guarantees

Donald Trump has ruled out sending US troops to Ukraine to enforce a potential peace deal with Vladimir Putin, tempering a promise to provide Kyiv with security guarantees that European allies had called a significant breakthrough towards halting the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine. Asked during a phone interview with Fox News whether he could assure listeners – including many members of his Maga base who support an isolationist America-first foreign policy – that the US would not put troops on the ground in Ukraine, he said: 'You have my assurance, and I'm president.' Trump did, however, say Washington may be willing to provide air support to Ukraine in order to backstop a deal, in what would still be a remarkable shift in his administration's policy on the conflict. 'There'll be some form of security. It can't be Nato,' he said, ruling out Ukraine's admission to the transatlantic bloc. 'They're willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you could talk about by air.' On Tuesday, the White House spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, said both leaders had expressed 'a willingness to sit down with each other'. She added: 'I understand accommodations for that meeting are under way.' Politico reported that the White House was eyeing Budapest as a first choice for the summit with US Secret Service teams scouting the Hungarian capital for a potential meeting venue. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, had proposed Geneva, with the Swiss foreign minister promising 'immunity' to Putin despite an indictment by the international criminal court. Russia has said it views the deployment of troops from Nato countries to Ukraine as a red line in negotiations. Trump dismissed that concern on Tuesday, and said he was still optimistic about the potential to reach a deal with Putin. Nato's secretary general, Mark Rutte, had described Trump's pledge on Monday to provide security guarantees to ensure Russia would abide by a peace deal as a significant breakthrough, as Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders convened at the White House for an extraordinary summit. In a press conference during the summit, Trump had declined to say whether US troops could be deployed to Ukraine in what could provide a 'tripwire' to prevent Russia from resuming the conflict in the future. European leaders held fresh talks on Tuesday after their White House meeting with Zelenskyy amid uncertainty over Putin's readiness to meet the Ukrainian president. Sources close to the talks told Agence France-Presse that Putin had proposed meeting with Zelenskyy in Moscow, hostile territory for a Ukrainian president who has reportedly survived a number of Kremlin assassination plots. Zelenskyy was said to have declined the invitation. It is unclear if or when the two leaders will meet. Putin is scheduled to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization security bloc meeting in Tianjin, China, at the end of August, complicating plans to hold a bilateral summit in the coming two weeks. The European 'coalition of the willing' first met virtually, co-chaired by Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, before joining a video conference hosted by the European Council president, António Costa. Europe's flurry of diplomacy is aimed at pushing Trump to take a tougher line with Putin, days after their friendly summit in Alaska. Trump, along with several European leaders in Washington on Monday, said Putin had agreed to face-to-face talks with Zelenskyy in the coming weeks in an attempt to end the three-and-a-half-year war in Ukraine. Moscow, however, has yet to confirm that any such meeting – which would be the first between the two leaders since the invasion – is in the works. The Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov has said only that Putin and Trump discussed the idea of 'raising the level of representatives' in Ukraine talks. In remarks late on Monday, Ushakov did not clarify what that would entail and made no mention of a possible trilateral meeting with Trump and Zelenskyy. On Tuesday, the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, told state TV that any meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents would have to be prepared 'very thoroughly'. In his interview with Fox News on Tuesday, Trump conceded it was possible that Putin did not want to make a deal. 'We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks … It's possible that he doesn't want to make a deal,' the US president said, adding that Putin faced a 'rough situation' if that were the case. At the heart of Tuesday's talks among European allies was the question of what security guarantees can be offered to Ukraine. On Monday, Zelenskyy described security guarantees as 'a key issue, a starting point towards ending the war' and he appreciated Trump's indication that the US was ready to be part of that guarantee. Zelenskyy said those guarantees would be 'formalised in some way in the next week or 10 days', which could prove to be a long time when it comes to diplomacy involving Trump's White House. In a social media post late on Monday, Trump said the White House talks included plans for European countries to provide security assurances to Ukraine with the US acting as 'coordinator'. Britain and several European allies have floated the idea of a 'reassurance force' that could be sent to Ukraine under a future peace deal to deter renewed Russian aggression. Their plans would need firm US backing and Trump has been resistant to deploying US troops as guarantors of any settlement. Moscow issued a statement on Monday evening rejecting any prospect of Nato personnel being deployed in Ukraine. 'We reaffirm our categorical opposition to any scenarios involving the stationing of a Nato contingent in Ukraine,' Russia's foreign ministry said. Other proposals for security guarantees include western allies offering Ukraine article 5-style protection, similar to Nato's collective defence pledge that treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. In a statement after Monday's White House meeting, Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, said that while Ukraine would not be joining Nato, western allies would commit to 'a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the United States, ready to take action if it is attacked again'. Zelenskyy has made clear that Ukraine would reject any deal limiting the size of its armed forces, insisting that 'a strong Ukrainian army' must be part of the country's security guarantees. These proposals run counter to the conditions Putin has previously outlined as acceptable for ending the war. While western leaders adopted an upbeat, congratulatory tone toward Trump at the White House, the gulf between Russia's demands and Ukraine's willingness to concede remains vast. There remains widespread confusion over what exactly Trump proposed and what, if anything, Putin agreed to during the Alaska summit. Some fear Trump may have overstated the outcome and misjudged Moscow's willingness to compromise. Monday's White House meeting shed little light on Putin's territorial terms. The Russian leader has demanded Ukraine's withdrawal from Donetsk and Luhansk, but Zelenskyy has set a firm red line against ceding land beyond the present occupation or legitimising Moscow's control. Some observers say that for all the diplomatic manoeuvring, there has been little real movement towards ending the war. 'Nothing had happened in Anchorage on Aug. 15th. Nothing happened yesterday in Washington DC,' Gérard Araud, the former French ambassador to the US, wrote on X. 'Putin, Zelenskyy and the European leaders were all relieved: they had avoided Trump taking unwelcome decisions. It was the triumph of empty vagueness and meaningless commitments.'

Ice used Marriott chain to detain immigrants, despite hotel's 2019 pledge not to cooperate
Ice used Marriott chain to detain immigrants, despite hotel's 2019 pledge not to cooperate

The Guardian

timea few seconds ago

  • The Guardian

Ice used Marriott chain to detain immigrants, despite hotel's 2019 pledge not to cooperate

A Sheraton hotel in Louisiana has been used by immigration officials to hold people who are being deported, in what appears to be a contradiction of a position Sheraton's parent company, Marriott, took in 2019 when it said its properties would not be used in cooperation with Ice. The Intercept first reported that the hotel, located on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria, Louisiana, near a major deportation hub and airport used by Ice, had been used by immigration officials earlier this month to hold a father and his teenage son for four days after their arrest in New York. They were then deported to Ecuador. The Intercept cited phone-tracking evidence that had been shared with the publication and was later seen by the Guardian. The evidence corroborates the account of a source with knowledge of hotel operations in Alexandria, who told the Guardian that they believed the venue had been used to detain immigrant families and unaccompanied children since it was renovated in late 2023. The source observed Ice contractors known to assist in the transfer of unaccompanied minors operating at the Sheraton as recently as June of this year. The source added that other hotels in the area have also been used to hold immigrant families. It is not clear whether Marriott has a formal contract with Ice or what the company knows about Ice's use of the Sheraton in Alexandria. In one case that emerged last year, Marriott sued a New York-based franchise after the hotel entered a partnership with the city for it to be used as an immigrant shelter, saying it had done so without Marriott's consent. Marriott did not respond to several requests for comment. 'It would be highly unfortunate if major hotel chains are facilitating the Trump administration's cruel policy of deporting families,' said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project. In 2019, during Donald Trump's first term, Marriott rejected the idea that any of its hotels or properties – which include Sheraton and Courtyard hotels – would be used by Ice to detain immigrants. It made the statement at a time when the Trump administration was calling for a mass roundup of undocumented immigrants. Citing anonymous sources, ABC News reported at the time that administration officials had internally discussed the possibility that they might need hotel rooms because of limited capacity at Ice detention centers. 'Our hotels are not configured to be detention facilities, but to be open to guests and community members as well. While we have no particular insights into whether the US government is considering the use of hotels to aid in the situation at the border, Marriott has made the decision to decline any requests to use our hotels as detention facilities,' a company spokesperson said in July 2019, according to ABC News. The company's position won it plaudits at the time, such as public recognition by the American Historical Association, an association of professional historians, which announced in a public statement that it appreciated Marriott's 'principled stand' and noted the importance of immigrants to the hotel and related industries. It is well-documented that Ice does use hotels to house immigrant families who are being deported from the US or being transferred to other detention centers. In a case that attracted national attention in April, Ice detained two families in Louisiana with three of their US citizen children and held them incommunicado and under guard at a hotel for days on end, despite multiple attempts by family members and lawyers to contact them. The families, along with their US citizen children, were deported in the early hours of 25 April and, according to legal filings, had been held at a location in Alexandria. Filings in that case reviewed by the Guardian include a short, handwritten submission by one of the mothers written on paper that closely matches images of branded Sheraton notepads posted online. The Guardian could not independently confirm whether the families had been detained at the Sheraton in Alexandria. Sign up to Headlines US Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The Intercept's reporting focused on the story of Edison Iza and his 15-year-old son, Roger, who were reportedly arrested by Ice at an immigration check-in New York on 9 August. The pair were then reportedly flown to Louisiana and 'locked up' in the Sheraton hotel, where they stayed for four days without access to their phones or the internet. 'We couldn't call or go on the web to ask for help,' Roger told the Intercept. 'Without our phones, we didn't know any names or phone numbers.' Ice did not immediately respond to the Guardian's questions about the agency's use of the Sheraton, including whether it has a contract with the hotel or uses it on an ad hoc basis. The hospitality industry is especially vulnerable to Ice raids and the Trump administration's deportation program, given the high percentage of workers in the industry who are undocumented. While the Department of Homeland Security issued guidance earlier this year that Ice agents were not to conduct raids at hotels, restaurants and farms, that guidance was later reversed, according to a June report in the Washington Post. About 34% of housekeepers, 24% of cooks and 20% of waitstaff employed by the US hotel industry is undocumented, according to the 2023 census. Additional reporting by Maanvi Singh Do you have a tip on this story? Please contact a Guardian reporter on Signal at 646-886-8761

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store