
When will there be a direct rail link from London to Switzerland?
Rebecca Halpern
A Your question is pertinent because there has been much talk this week about extended European links from London St Pancras International. At present, the only options for travellers on Eurostar from the UK are to Lille and Paris in France, the Belgian capital Brussels, and the Dutch cities of Rotterdam and Amsterdam.
Eurostar previously served many more destinations, as far south as Avignon and Marseille, but a combination of Brexit and Covid put paid to anything beyond the 'core' routes. These are highly profitable, and, with limited capacity at the St Pancras hub, Eurostar is content to continue with the same arrangement until the end of the decade.
According to briefings from the UK government, new routes to Germany could open as soon as 2030. But the much-trumpeted proposal for direct trains between London and Berlin looks entirely fanciful; the journey would take nine hours, and the cost would be ferocious.
Switzerland, though, is on the agenda for Eurostar. The company says it will launch a rail link from London to Zurich in the 'early 2030s'. The journey is expected to take five hours and 20 minutes. Announcing the plan, Eurostar's chief executive, Gwendoline Cazenave, promised: 'A new golden age of international sustainable travel is here.'
Well, it will be, at some yet-to-be-determined date in the future. I pressed Eurostar to ask whether the link could actually be running by 2030, and was told that this is a possibility – though rail insiders to whom I have spoken say that it's a most ambitious estimate.
Other operators are seeking to move into the UK-EU rail market. If any are allowed in, initially they will focus firmly on the richest pickings: London to Paris. If they extend beyond that, I believe the next targets could be Brussels and Antwerp, and possibly a combination of Charles de Gaulle airport and Disneyland Paris. Zurich and Geneva will be way down the pecking order.
At a best guess, I believe that Eurostar will begin London-Cologne-Frankfurt trains in around 2032, with a Zurich link being introduced a year or two after that.
Q I work for a big airport and am always getting it in the neck from friends and family about drop-off fees at the airport terminal. The news this week that almost nowhere else in the world has heard of such a thing is likely to make matters worse. Can you come up with a good riposte?
Name supplied
A The UK is, as ministers might say, world-leading in the field of charging for dropping off passengers outside the door of an airport. According to the RAC, 11 of the 20 biggest UK airports have increased their 'kiss and fly' charges since last summer. The field is currently led by Bristol, Gatwick, Leeds Bradford, Southampton and Stansted, all charging £7, while London City is now the only major airport with no fee.
Charges began at Birmingham airport as a response to the terrorist attack at Glasgow airport in 2007, which required all terminals to rework their access system – basically, putting in barriers to prevent anyone from driving an explosives-laden vehicle into an airport. The West Midlands hub wanted to offset some of the cost. As it became clear that passengers were prepared to pay it, the idea spread quickly across the UK, although Gatwick and Heathrow were late to the party, only imposing the charge after the financial disaster of Covid.
I think the airports can reasonably cite three lines of defence. The first, and most robust, is that it encourages passengers to arrive by public transport. For well-connected airports such as Birmingham, Gatwick and Manchester, this is particularly true. Next, with most airports breaking records in passenger numbers, it helps them to manage what would otherwise be difficult traffic. Finally, the cash – worth tens of millions each year at bigger airports – helps them to bring in new routes, to the traveller's benefit. The UK isn't just the world centre for drop-off charges, it is also the country with the most competitive airline business in Europe, and possibly the world.
Finally, in case you get a 'but London City doesn't have one...' challenge: the Docklands airport is very different from the norm. Because most passengers are on short business trips and don't have heavy luggage, they don't take more than a few seconds to exit the car, and so congestion is not an issue. Also, the usual deal is that each airport has a remote drop-off location that is free, often walkable, and has a shuttle bus link. That would be impossible in the constrained road links around London City.
Q I am flying to Bergerac in southwest France for a week's holiday, and am wondering about possible excursions from there – and whether I will need a rental car for them?
Robin S
A Bergerac, on a fold of the Dordogne River about 80 miles east of Bordeaux, is a lovely place to stay; the town is large enough to have some history and life, but calm even in the height of summer. The obvious city day trip is to Bordeaux, which will be most rewarding for its art and architecture. And you won't need a car: trains run roughly once an hour west from Bergerac, taking about 75 minutes each way.
In the opposite direction, I am a fan of the 'hanging gardens of Marqueyssac' (les jardins suspendus de Marqueyssac). These beautifully cultivated gardens are in a spectacular setting above the right bank of the Dordogne. Across the river, the 13th-century chateau of Castelnaud-la-Chapelle is impressive, especially for the way it has been brought back to life by Kleber Rossillon. He and his synonymous company specialise in heritage development; think of it as a private-sector National Trust.
To complete a triangle, the village of Beynac, back on the right bank, is a lovely village. La Petite Tonnelle on the main street is the place to eat, if you can get a table. Wander to the hilltop castle, too.
The excursion is tricky without a car. Every couple of hours, there is a train from Bergerac to the nearby town of Sarlat, taking around an hour. But you will still be an expensive (€40/£35 or so) taxi ride away from your destination. So I suggest you rent a car for the day. Asking locally, you may well find a garage that will let you have one for around €75 – this is likely to be less expensive, and less hassle, than picking up a car from Bergerac airport.
Q Why are there two flights from Newcastle to Malaga, on separate airlines, departing only half an hour apart? Surely there is no need for two flights that close together. Wouldn't it be sensible for one of them to fly later to provide another option?
Poppy C
A On Fridays and Saturdays this summer, Jet2 departs from Newcastle to Malaga at 7.05am, with Ryanair setting off on the same route within half an hour. There are no further flights to the Costa del Sol hub until the following morning. I agree it looks strange, and that the traveller would be better served by spacing them out: one in the morning, the other in the afternoon (allowing an evening return from Malaga, giving an extra day away). But each airline has a good reason for flying as it does.
Both airlines want to get their Newcastle-based aircraft up and flying as soon as possible at the start of the day. Both typically want their planes to fly two 'rotations' (flights there and back) in a day. One is a shorter trip, such as the 1,275-mile haul to Malaga, typically taking slightly under three hours each way. The other may be a Canary Islands journey, covering more than 4,000 miles there and back.
The shorter the first flight, the less likelihood of delays being incurred – simply because there is less scope for things to go wrong.
So Ryanair typically deploys its Boeing 737s at Newcastle to go to mainland Spain in the morning – Alicante or Malaga – and Tenerife, Las Palmas or Fuerteventura in the afternoon.
Jet2 has a much wider range of flights from Newcastle, including to Italy, the Greek islands, Malta, Bulgaria and Turkey, as well as the Spanish mainland and islands. The morning Malaga flight is typically followed by a longish trip – such as 2,000 miles each way to Antalya in southern Turkey.
Pertinently, the two airlines are serving different markets. Most Jet2 passengers are on package holidays, and would not naturally be tempted by Ryanair. Conversely, Ryanair is the friend of the independent traveller. So while it is annoying to have to get up at silly o'clock because the only flights from Newcastle to Malaga on some days are before breakfast, there are reasons.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jermain Defoe, 42, 'dating stunning recruiter 11 years his junior' - five months after split from Alisha LeMay
Former England ace Jermain Defoe is reportedly off the market - five months after his split from Alisha LeMay. The ex-Premier League star, 42, is said to be 'dating' recruiter Farran Tomlin - 11 years his junior, according to The Sun. The couple were reportedly seen last week relaxing in the British Airways First Class lounge at London Heathrow, ahead of their romantic escape to Bodrum, Turkey. A source told the publication: 'The pair were very loved-up and enjoying the perks of the lounge before their flight.' Turkish singer Dilek Sert Erdogan posted a snap of the couple at Hotel Bodrum, with the captioned: 'The amazing Jermain Defoe and his lovely wife Farran came to see our show. 'Even after I got off stage, they were still there… Turkish singer Dilek Sert Erdogan posted a snap of the couple at Hotel Bodrum 'Later, Farran messaged me saying: 'Jermain said: 'We have to stay afterwards - and let her know what an amazing voice she has.' How sweet is that?' 'We had a lovely little chat - they're such warm, genuine people. One by one they sparkle but together they shine!' MailOnline has contacted Jermaine's representative for comment. It comes just months after his split with Alisha, a year after their relationship was rocked by a cheating scandal. The footballer and influencer were first romantically linked in 2023, just weeks after he split from his wife-of-seven-months Donna Tierney. The couple made their red carpet debut in October 2023 and then sparked engagement rumours, after Alisha was spotted wearing a giant diamond on her ring finger. However, just days later Jermain was spotted with wedding planner Paige Mallabourn-Edmondson. It was reported in February 2024 that Alisha had given Jermain another chance and the pair headed on a 'make or break' holiday. But it seems that the last ditch attempt was unsuccessful, as a source told MailOnline that the pair have broken up. Jermain and Alisha made their last public appearance together in September, as they attended a 60th anniversary dinner for Chelsea restaurant Daphne's. The couple reportedly jetted to the Dominican Republic for a make-or-break holiday early last year after their relationship was rocked by a cheating scandal. At the time, sources claimed that despite vowing to give things another try, relations were still 'tense' after he was spotted kissing another woman. The footballer was reportedly aware he had 'a lot of work to do' to win back the influencer's trust. Pictures obtained by The Sun at the time showed Jermain and Alisha preparing to jet off on their Caribbean getaway, in a bid to reignite their romance. A source told the publication: 'To say things have been tense lately would be an understatement. 'Jermain knows he has a lot of work to do to make it up to Alisha but he has insisted he is committed to saving their relationship and has said he will do whatever it takes. 'He has been on the straight and narrow for the last few months since things went awry and hopes this trip will bring them closer together and prove his love for her.' After Jermain was seen out with Paige several times, Alisha took to Instagram at the time to post a message to her fans hinting at 'everything happens for a reason' and 'finding better', which was later deleted. The post read: 'Someday you'll realise that everything you've gone through was a blessing in disguise. 'Things didn't work out the way you expected them to because you were being prepared for something better, and all the restless nights wondering why everything happened to you will finally make sense.'


The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
Range Rover to remove convenient feature for next-gen model as designer bizarrely calls it ‘dirty'
THE ELECTRIC Range Rover will not feature a front trunk, according to the designer of the hotly anticipated SUV. The vehicle is yet to officially debut, with only teasers of its design revealed so far - although fans will be pleased to know the EV version closely mirrors that of the combustion-engine model. 4 4 But one convenient feature found in many electric vehicles won't be included - in a decision partly based on customer feedback. The car's designer, Lynfel Owen, recently referred to the front of the car as the "dirtiest part" and questioned why anyone would want to lean against it to use a front trunk. In an interview with CarExpert, Owen said: 'Why would I want to lean against the dirtiest part of the car to put stuff in?' He explained his reasoning in greater detail: 'We spoke to our customers… none of them have an issue [with] lack of storage space. 'The rear cargo space is exactly the same. We haven't had to raise the floor. The only compromise we have to make is we're not able to offer a seven-seat derivative.' Owen has spent the last decade overseeing JLR's transition to electric power, having risen to chief engineer of vehicle engineering for the Range Rover, Range Rover Sport and Defender models. 'I pretty much only ever worked on Range Rover,' he said. 'I've done a few other projects. I didn't work on the [Jaguar] I-Pace. I was working on the previous-generation Range Rover.' To that end, the I-Pace - launched under the Jaguar brand as the first premium all-electric SUV from any manufacturer when it was revealed in 2016 - became infamous for reliability issues, particularly with its electric drivetrain and battery pack. Its poor customer satisfaction prompted Jaguar Land Rover to learn from its failures, focusing on reliability, improved thermal management and customer-centric design in the development of the Range Rover Electric. Owen said: 'We're making sure we learn from, you know, our mistakes with respect to I-Pace. 'So we're testing all aspects of the car… we've just had a northern hemisphere winter that we've completed, so we've been doing our low-mu testing on the frozen lakes.' He added: 'Some people have got [chargers] bolted on. Their garage might have two or three cars… [so you don't have to use a] 15 metre cable. 'Cabin comfort. Battery temperature. Whether it's to cool it down, whether it's to warm it up. Recovering heat from the air at minus 15… It also reduces the heating energy consumption by over 40 per cent [compared to I-Pace].' This includes the decision to forgo a front trunk, with the rear cargo volume remaining unchanged from the combustion-engine version and the 117-kWh battery pack accommodated without raising the floor. This approach contrasts with the I-Pace, which offered a small front storage compartment. Indeed, due to packaging constraints, the electric Range Rover will only be available with two rows of seats - which rules out a seven-seat option. While a spare wheel will be offered, it will reduce luggage capacity as it will sit above the cargo floor. Much like the upcoming Range Rover, Mercedes' electric G-Class also lacks a front trunk - although they compensated with a uniquely styled tailgate-mounted cargo box. The electric Range Rover will not compete with the G580, Owen claims, as it offers unmatched off-road capabilities, combined with Range Rover's famed luxury. The electric Range Rover's world premiere is expected later this year, with deliveries expected to begin in 2026.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The government must ensure the promise of free childcare is delivered
Takeup of the government's offer of free childcare has been one-quarter higher than predicted, which has prompted some voices in the sector to warn of its imminent 'collapse', because it is unclear how the planned expansion of the scheme in September will be funded. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, in an exclusive interview with The Independent, says the unexpectedly high numbers signing up for the scheme is a 'good problem to have'. There is no doubt that there is a problem, however. The higher takeup meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the scheme in the last financial year, covering most of the first year of the Labour government, rather than the planned £1.6bn. That gap was covered by additional funding announced in the spending review in March, but as we report today, the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that the gap will continue to widen as the scheme expands. The next expansion will happen in September, when working parents with children aged nine months and older will be offered 30 hours a week of 'free' childcare. Of course, the care is not 'free' in that it has to be paid for by taxpayers generally – on the grounds that helping the parents of young children to work is a public good. As Ms Phillipson puts it: 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours, that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' The funding of the scheme will continue to be under pressure, but the most important fact about the scheme so far is that it has not collapsed. The Independent was among those voices warning that it had been underfunded by the Conservative government, but to its credit the new government has increased the money available. The finances of the scheme may be stretched, and many childcare providers continue to say that they cannot recruit enough staff at the wages they can afford, but the gloomier warnings of chaos and thousands of parents left without places have not yet been borne out. It is crucial to remain vigilant as the scheme expands so that remains the case. At the insistence of Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor in the previous government, the scheme was designed to start small, with a limited offer of free hours to older children, before expanding gradually to provide full coverage. This September's expansion is the final stage of that planned rollout, which so far has gone more smoothly than we expected. If the last stage is a stretch too far and some parents cannot immediately find the places they want, that would be a blow to the government's ambitions. Ms Phillipson is right that the problem facing the scheme in its final phase is the problem of success. The higher-than-expected demand means additional pressure on the public finances in the later years of this parliament – pressure that coincides with other increased demands on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, from slow growth, higher interest rates and a government U-turn on disability benefits spending. Providing greater access to free childcare is a good policy that will help working families. Its success and ambition should be applauded. The government must now make sure that its expansion is a success.