logo
Kenya: people plan to march across country to honour those killed in 2024's anti-government protests

Kenya: people plan to march across country to honour those killed in 2024's anti-government protests

The Guardian4 hours ago

Update:
Date: 2025-06-25T08:39:35.000Z
Title: Last year's demonstrations, in which 60 people died and many more', 'disappeared', ', were prompted by proposed tax increases.
Content: Last year's demonstrations, in which 60 people died and many more disappeared, were prompted by proposed tax increases.
The Kenyan government's 2024 finance bill proposed a $2.7bn tax increase which included hikes on sanitary towels, digital content, car ownership, and basics like oil and bread, in a country already grappling with a particularly painful cost of living crisis.
Kenya's cash-strapped government had said previously that the tax increases were necessary to service the huge public debt of 10tn shillings (£60bn), equal to roughly 70% of GDP.
Critics of the hikes began turning their attention to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which was seen as the driving force behind president William Ruto's since withdrawn plans.
Two weeks before the protests last year started, the Kenyan government and the IMF had a meeting where they agreed the government would increase taxes, reduce subsidies and cut government waste – in effect austerity measures – as conditions to access the IMF's $3.9bn loan.
Ruto withdrew the bill a day after violent protests erupted around the country after its approval by parliament.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-25T08:39:35.000Z
Title: Welcome and opening summary
Content: Hello and welcome to our coverage of the events unfolding in Nairobi, Kenya, today.
Thousands of protesters have taken to Kenya's streets to mark a year since people stormed parliament at the peak of anti-government demonstrations, despite fears that they would be met by state-backed gangs and police violence.
Kenyans have planned to march across the country today to honour those who were killed during last year's protests. The demonstrations last year saw at least 60 people being killed and many more disappearing.
Early on Wednesday, police blocked major roads leading into the capitals central business district, while government buildings were barricaded with razor wire.
The protests last year came as a response to a series of proposed tax increases which included hikes on sanitary towels, digital content, car ownership, and basics like oil and bread while many in the country were already grappling with a cost of living crisis.
President William Ruto scrapped the bill in response to the backlash and restructured his cabinet to include opposition figures. However, deep resentment against the president has continued to rise and public anger over the use of force by security agencies has not abated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andy Burnham joins rebellion over benefit cuts
Andy Burnham joins rebellion over benefit cuts

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Andy Burnham joins rebellion over benefit cuts

Andy Burnham has joined Labour rebels to call on Sir Keir Starmer to pause his welfare cuts. The Mayor for Greater Manchester threw his support behind Labour MPs and Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, who were openly rebelling against cuts to disability benefits. Mr Burnham, a former Labour leadership contender, told BBC Newsnight: 'If I look back, if the government that I was in had listened to the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party], it would have been a better government, because it would have made better decisions. And I think this is a case in point here. 'It's not about doing something just to get on at the Government. Not at all. We all want the Government to succeed. But the Government needs, I think, to take a more unifying path. And on this issue, it should pause, it should get back around the table.' There is widespread speculation that the Government will be forced to delay the reforms, which would save the Treasury about £5 billion a year. But on Wednesday morning, Sir Keir doubled down on his insistence that the vote on Tuesday will go ahead, despite the rebellion growing even amid intense lobbying efforts from the Labour whips. The number of Labour MPs who have signed an amendment effectively killing off the package now stands at 123 – more than a quarter of the total of Labour MPs. That figure is far beyond what is needed in theory to overturn Sir Keir's large majority in the House of Commons and force the first defeat on this Labour Government as it approaches its first anniversary. Sir Keir told LBC in an interview broadcast on Wednesday morning: 'There'll be a vote on Tuesday, and we're going to make sure that we reform the welfare system.' Sir Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, also insisted on Wednesday morning that the vote would go ahead as planned next week. Labour is tabling legislation to bring into force its plan to raise the threshold at which the personal independence payment (PIP), which helps with the extra living costs from having a disability, kicks in. The legislation also halves the health top-up in Universal Credit for new claimants from 2026. Government insiders were caught off guard on Monday when 108 Labour MPs put their names to a so-called reasoned amendment calling for the measures to be delayed. If the amendment is voted through on Tuesday, the legislation does not progress. Sir Stephen has insisted the Government wants to go even further with its benefit reforms, despite Labour rebels attempting to kill off the plans. The disabilities minister told the work and pensions committee he would look to change the assessment process for PIPs in the years to come. Asked whether the PIP assessment would be 'refocused' in the future, Sir Stephen said: 'There may well be some changes that we want to make in the short term, but there are also some conversations I'd like us to have about how the assessment for this benefit may look in the long-term.' Asked how he would feel about having to rely on the Conservatives to force the legislation through, Sir Stephen said: 'I'd be delighted to have support from across the entire House for the excellent proposals that we're bringing forward.' Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, has said that she will instruct her MPs to vote for the benefit changes – but only if Sir Keir can commit to reducing the overall welfare bill. Cabinet ministers have been deployed to try to talk down the rebels, but the number of Labour MPs signing the amendment has jumped to 123 on Tuesday night. Some rebels are signalling they are prepared to vote down the welfare cuts package even if it means being kicked out of the Parliamentary Labour Party. Cat Eccles, the Labour MP for Stourbridge elected last year, replied 'yes' when asked on Times Radio if she was willing to lose the whip by voting down the Bill. Sir Sadiq, who as London Mayor is one of the most prominent elected figures in the Labour Party, spoke out against the welfare cuts on Tuesday. He told the Guardian: 'I have always said that more must be done to support people to go from relying on benefits to getting back into work. It's vital for a healthy and prosperous London. 'What we can't do is take away the vital safety net that so many vulnerable and disabled Londoners rely upon.'

Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician
Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician

Telegraph

time24 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Sadiq Khan is Britain's most cynical politician

Sadiq Khan is posing a unique problem for Keir Starmer at the most inconvenient time. At least part of the solution lies in the Prime Minister's grasp. It is striking how the era of devolution brought forth a cohort of politicians with absolutely no respect whatever for the basic principles of devolution. John Swinney, the First Minister of Scotland, whose responsibilities include keeping the health service and the ferries running, loves nothing more than to wax lyrical about the conflict in the Middle East, despite his having no more locus in Gaza and Israel than any other member of the Scottish public. Similarly, the Mayor of London just cannot resist any opportunity to stick his oar in where, from a strictly legislative perspective, he has absolutely nothing to contribute. Khan has announced (and I have no doubt that at least in his mind, his words were accompanied by a not-remotely-modest fanfare) that Labour must 'think again' about its welfare reforms, offering implied support to the more than 100 Labour MPs actively thinking of scuppering the Government's legislation. And why shouldn't Khan pontificate on issues over which he has absolutely no responsibility? It's not as if there are any problems in the capital that might need his attention. If the welfare reforms are rejected by the Commons, it would be genuinely catastrophic for the Government and the Labour Party. It's difficult to see how Starmer himself could remain much longer in office, especially if his Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall, has already returned to the back benches. Labour's programme for office, its very raison d'être, will have been upended. The Prime Minister would be a political laughing stock, staring at the very real prospect of losing his entire majority at the next election. Quite a turnaround from that optimistic day almost exactly a year ago when Starmer first arrived in Downing Street. Would Khan welcome the scenario that, by his own words, he is encouraging to happen? What could be in it for him? That is the key question. He has form, of course, in encouraging terrible things to happen to his party – and potentially, the country – provided it would advance his own career. In 2015 he was a million miles away from Jeremy Corbyn politically; Khan has always been on the centre-Left of his party and had organised Ed Miliband's successful leadership campaign in 2010 (another feat for which the party and the country can thank him). Nevertheless, he, along with the current Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, courted the support of Left-wing Labour members in the contest to win the London mayoral nomination for the following year by nominating Corbyn for the party leadership. This was an entirely cynical act given that neither of them wanted Corbyn to win the contest. The tactic worked – for Khan, not Lammy. And also for Corbyn. But not for the country. Does Khan have another career change in mind today? Having won three consecutive elections for City Hall it would be natural if he was thinking ahead, perhaps even to a return to the green benches of the Commons. Why shouldn't he try to 'do a Boris' and use London as a springboard to reach Downing Street itself? Which is where Starmer has an opportunity to restore at least a portion of his lost authority. Government whips are at the moment ringing round their charges and threatening them with the loss of the party whip if they vote against the welfare reforms. If such suspension lasted long enough, the rebels would not be able to stand as Labour candidates at the next general election. It's a serious threat that Starmer has carried out before and undoubtedly will again. But why should backbench MPs be the only ones to face such censure? Khan is an elected official of the Labour Party and is subject to the national party's disciplinary code just as much as anyone else. By encouraging rebellion against the Government from a safe distance he is, in effect, seeking to wield power without responsibility which, as Stanley Baldwin said in reference to the press, is the prerogative of the harlot. Perhaps a senior member of the whips' office might want to include Mayor Khan on his list of phone calls in advance of the Commons vote, in order to remind him that even London Mayors need the approval of the central party – and therefore of the leader – in order to stand for a parliamentary seat. In fact, if Khan is considering standing in London again for a fourth term, he would still need the official endorsement of the party, unless he felt he could win as an independent. In a situation where the stakes are as high as they are, Starmer cannot afford to withhold any weapon available to him. Elected Labour mayors should be as accountable as any anonymous back bencher, and should face exactly the same disciplinary measures if they decide to foment rebellion in the ranks. Sadiq Khan should be reminded that it's in his own best interests, not to mention the interests of the people of London, that he turns his mind to the responsibilities of his own office, and away from the responsibilities he might want to have at some point in the future.

Labour to press ahead with welfare vote despite major rebellion threat
Labour to press ahead with welfare vote despite major rebellion threat

The National

time36 minutes ago

  • The National

Labour to press ahead with welfare vote despite major rebellion threat

Overall, 134 MPs are now backing an amendment that would effectively threaten the Government's proposed changes in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, which would cut back disability benefit payments by around £5 billion per year. A total of 10 Scottish Labour MPs have added their names to the amendment, which notes that the UK Government's 'own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of [the bill], including 50,000 children'. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has supported the UK Government's plans to cut welfare Prime Minister Starmer said on Wednesday morning from The Hague: 'We're pressing on with a vote on this because we need to bring about reform.' READ MORE: Support for UK electoral reform is at a record high. Here's why Deputy Prime Minister Rayner clarified that a vote would be going ahead in response to a question from shadow chancellor Mel Stride. He asked if Rayner could guarantee that a vote on welfare changes will go ahead on Tuesday. Stride said: '(Rayner) completely sidestepped my question – she can't even defend her own Government's policy. Can she at least assure the House that the vote on Tuesday will actually go ahead?' The Deputy Prime Minister replied: 'I don't know if he, sort of, listened to what I said, because he was reading off the script, but what I can tell him – and I don't need a script – we will go ahead on Tuesday.' Appearing in front of MPs at the Work and Pensions Committee, disability minister Stephen Timms also insisted he's "looking forward to the debate" on Tuesday. Under the proposals in the bill, eligibility for the personal independence payment (PIP) will be limited along with the sickness-related element of Universal Credit. Scottish Labour MPs which have put their name to the amendment include Patricia Ferguson, Brian Leishman, Tracy Gilbert, Scott Arthur, Richard Baker, Lilian Jones, Elaine Stewart, Kirsteen Sullivan, Euan Stainbank and Maureen Burke. Defending the plans while at the Nato summit, Starmer said the current system 'traps people in a position where they can't get into work'. READ MORE: Poll: Jeremy Corbyn party would eat into Labour vote in blow to Starmer 'In fact, it's counterproductive, it works against them getting into work,' he said. 'So we have to reform it, and that is a Labour argument, it's a progressive argument.' Later on at PMQs, ex-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn pressed the Government on Gaza, asking why the UK still supplies parts for F35 jets used by Israel. Highlighting genocide was being committed in Gaza, he also asked Rayner whether she would support his private members' bill calling for an inquiry into the UK's complicity in Gaza. Rayner said the UK strongly opposes Israel expanding military operations in Gaza, its blocking of humanitarian aid, as well as Jewish settler violence in the occupied West Bank. She added the UK had suspended trade agreement talks with Israel and sanctioned individual settlers, but on the matter of genocide she said that is something for international courts to decide.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store