Amtrak announces debut date for new Acela trains
New faster Acela trains will begin revenue service on August 28 along the Northeast Corridor between Washington, New York and Boston, Amtrak announced on Thursday.
'In just a few weeks, history will be made with the debut of NextGen Acela as we launch a new standard for American train travel,' said Amtrak President Roger Harris, in a statement.
Five of the new trainsets will be part of the initial launch, with a total of 28 expected to enter service by 2027.
Amtrak says the new trains will allow for 27% more seats per departure. The seats will feature individual power outlets, reading lights and winged headrests for comfort and privacy. The trains will be equipped with free, high-speed 5G-enabled Wi-Fi.
The new trains can reach a maximum speed of 160 miles per hour, 10 miles per hour greater than current Acela models. A tilt system will provide a smoother, quieter ride on the new trains, Amtrak says.
'It's a fundamentally better experience than anything Americans have been able to travel on to date in this country,' said Amtrak executive vice president Laura Mason in a video introducing the new trains.
The maximum speed of the NextGen Acela is still considerably slower than the world's fastest trains in Asia and Europe, some of which can travel at more than 200 miles per hour.
Amtrak first introduced its Acela product in 2000. The NextGen trains were outlooked to enter service in 2022, but experienced numerous hurdles delaying their introduction.
Amtrak said it would provide more information as the launch approaches about how passengers can locate and select NextGen Acela trains. Both the current and NextGen models will be in operation in the coming months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fueling Up: Should EG Group shed its US c-stores if an IPO is near?
This story was originally published on C-Store Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily C-Store Dive newsletter. Fueling Up is a column from C-Store Dive offering a fresh perspective on the top news and trends in the convenience store industry. He's no longer part of EG Group's c-suite, but Zuber Issa continues to put pressure on the company he co-founded over two decades ago. Before he and his brother resigned as co-CEOs, Issa told The Telegraph in December 2024 that they were planning to take EG Group public on the New York Stock exchange for about $13 billion pounds, equivalent to roughly $17.5 billion. A few months later, Issa told The Sunday Times that the 'road map is starting now' for the IPO, which would probably commence in 2026 and list EG Group under Cumberland Farms, its largest c-store banner in the U.S. Now, Issa appears to be changing his outlook. He told the Financial Times this week that he wants EG Group to sell its assets in the U.S. and that there are already parties interested in purchasing them. Selling these assets, including over 1,500 c-stores under several banners, would help EG Group relieve its over $5 billion in debt much faster than an IPO, Issa told the publication. As Issa continues to speak to the press, EG Group isn't talking. The company declined to comment on any speculatory IPO or sale of EG America to the outlets Issa has spoken with, and declined to speak when reached this week by C-Store Dive. Issa himself did not respond by press time when asked for comment by C-Store Dive. It's understandable for EG Group to keep quiet if either of these moves is in the works. But Issa's comments contradict what the company has done the past few years in growing its U.S. network. M&A efforts aside, EG America has revamped its digital ecosystem, overhauled its c-suite team and boosted its fresh food offerings amid efforts to unify its many c-store banners across the country. EG Group even said earlier this year that EG America has become its most profitable market. Which leads me to this: If EG Group is indeed mulling both options, how would selling EG America impact its potential IPO? Familiar territory In early 2023, reports surfaced that EG Group was looking to sell its assets in the U.S. in an effort to relieve over $8 billion of debt falling due in 2025. About two months later, the company entered into a $1.5 billion deal with Realty Income Corporation under which the real estate investment trust purchased over 400 c-stores in the U.S. and leased them back to EG America. Since then, EG Group has been on a selling spree both in the U.S. and overseas. It has sold over 100 locations across several states to Casey's General Stores and BreakTime Corner Market, spun off most of its c-store locations in the U.K. and Ireland to sister supermarket company Asda and offloaded 32 sites directly to Issa, who used the locations to launch a new banner, EG on the Run. The sales continued this week when EG Group agreed to sell its businesses in Australia and Italy for A$1.1 billion and 425 million euros, respectively, all of which will be used to repay debt, the company said in separate announcements. At the end of last year, EG Group said it had paid down a significant portion of its debts and grew underlying EBITDA by 10%, driven by growth across many of its business segments — notably the U.S. Issa told the Financial Times this week that a sale of EG America would leave the company with leverage of about three times its earnings, and that the sale would also help pay down its debts faster than if it were to IPO. Selling top-performing assets can be a 'very smart' decision for companies looking to repay debt or focus their attention elsewhere, corporate finance attorney Andrew Apfelberg, partner at Greenberg Glusker LLP, said in an interview. In EG Group's case, offloading its U.S. division — and not going public — could mean the company is refocusing on its home base of the U.K. 'It can be pretty smart to do a carve-out as opposed to selling the whole company,' Apfelberg said in reference to EG Group offloading EG America. 'Once you sell the whole company, you're sort of done — it's an all-or-nothing proposition.' EG Group could still go public on the New York Stock Exchange even if it sold EG America, said Edward Best, partner and co-chair of capital markets at Willkie Farr & Gallagher. But he added that having EG America under its belt would be wise if going public is still the ultimate plan, since investors already know the brand and its growth strategy. On the flip side, if EG Group sells its U.S. assets and still decides to go public, investors may wonder where its future growth is going to come from. 'Those are questions that people are going to ask, so I think it just raises some questions that they're going to have to answer,' he said. Editor's note: This story has been updated to note EG Group's sale of its Australian business. Recommended Reading How a sale of EG America could impact the c-store industry Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Computer chips made outside the US to receive 100% tariff likely spiking tech prices, but 'there's no charge' for companies currently building on American soil
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Apple CEO Tim Cook recently visited the White House, and after committing an additional $100 billion in US investment, Donald Trump held a press conference where he announced an addendum to his new tariff plan. Last week, Trump announced a whole new set of tariffs, with the likes of Taiwan receiving a 20% tax on its exports, but semiconductors were left in the dark, but no longer. In the conference, Trump states, "A lot of countries, a lot of companies are leaving various other places and they're coming to the United States." He continues, "So, in other words, we'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors" "Approximately" is a bit of a troubling word there, but it's effectively just a big number to push companies into continuing production in the US. Tariffs are intended to disincentivise companies from importing items from outside of the country where they are located. A tariff on the UK, for instance, will hit those in the US as the cost of that tariff is pushed onto the consumer. This is why the original high tariffs were changed, reinstated, and edited. The infrastructure needed to replace the need for importing in the first place can take years, so pushing a high tariff onto companies without giving this leeway doesn't really end up incentivising building chips on a national scale. He clarifies that "if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge even though you're building and you're not producing yet in terms of the big number of jobs and all of the things that you're building." These tariffs don't entirely rely on the honour system, though. Trump does state that tariffs will apply after the fact, so "if for some reason you say you're building and you don't build, then we go back and we add it up." This means the likes of TSMC and Samsung, both of which produce semiconductors, will not be hit by any tariffs. Both are continuing investments in the US. TSMC is based in Taiwan and is the largest semiconductor manufacturer in the world. TSMC and Samsung offer the smallest process nodes at 3 nm, which allows for much greater transistor density, and therefore better efficiency. TSMC's Arizona fab is currently on its 4 nm process, though it is expected to use its 2 nm process in 2028. As reported by The Guardian, Dan Lachica, president of the Philippine semiconductor industry, says this new rule would be "devastating" as semiconductors account for "around 70% of the country's exports." The Philippines is not expected to be the only country negatively hit by these tariffs. The trade minister of Malaysia, Tegku Zafrul Aziz, said Malaysia "will risk losing a major market in the United States if its products become less competitive as a result of the imposition of these tariffs." Malaysia is where Intel has a large packaging facility, and AMD operates too, though the former has manufacturing capability in the US, as well as elsewhere around the globe, and AMD uses TSMC to manufacture its chips. Apple's further investment in the US is paired with the announcement that it would be bringing its glass production line to a factory in Kentucky. A press release says "every iPhone and Apple Watch sold around the world will be built with Kentucky-made cover glass". As pointed out by The Guardian, Tim Cook noted in an earnings call in May that tariffs would cost the company $900 million in that quarter alone. Though the likes of TSMC (and partners like Nvidia) don't appear to be hit with a major negative impact from this new tariff change, the global effect on semiconductor production and research is bad news for broader competition. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Administration Said to Discuss Stake in Intel
00:00 Bloomberg's also learned that the Trump administration is in talks with Intel on the US government potentially taking a stake in the company. For more on the scoop, let's get to senior tech editor Nick Turner. Nick, thanks for joining us. A lot's changed this week. At the start of the week, we had President Trump pressuring the Intel CEO Lip-bu Tan to leave. Now we've got the US government potentially buying a stake in Intel. So what's changed? Well, the two men had a meeting, so I think that laid the groundwork for these latest discussions. And it seems like he's safe at the moment. That being Lip-bu Tan and his job at Intel. But it'll be interesting to see how this deal ultimately unfolds if it happens. But it would be just sort of kind of the latest White House attempt to sort of make a private public sector agreement that that would have been pretty unusual before this administration. So what are the details of this? Can you tell us from your reporting what you found out? Because it's also understood that, you know, this could have implications for Intel's Ohio plant. Yeah, I mean, that is kind of the crux of it. We don't have a lot of details in terms of of the money involved. What we know is that this plant in Ohio, it's sort of a collection of plants that ultimately they promised would become the biggest chip making facility in the world. This that was back during the Biden administration. And since then, they've kind of scaled back those plans. They've delayed the opening of the first plant until at least 20 the 2030s. And I know that certainly there's some legislators in Ohio and who want to see this happen faster. And and it seems like a priority for the White House as well. There's interesting political optics here as well, because, you know, we've had this news of a revenue sharing deal potentially with India and AMD over the sale of chips to China. And now this potentially the government taking a stake in a publicly listed company. This is the sort of thing that you might expect the Chinese Communist Party to do, getting involved in state owned businesses. What's what's the rationale here? Is there any precedent for this? You know, I mean, there's some maybe some recent precedent, as you just mentioned, with with this administration. But I think it is kind of charting new territory for the U.S. and and it will have to sort of see how it plays out. I mean, in the case of Intel, Intel does need help. I mean, I'm not sure whether they'll arrive at a figure that will put the company on the right track, per se. But certainly it's been losing money. It's been struggling to regain its technological edge. And the current CEO has really been focused on cost cutting, which makes it all the harder for the company to make good on promises to increase domestic manufacturing, which is obviously a Trump priority.
