Federal government outlines its basis to deport Mahmoud Khalil in new memo
The memo says the Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate is deportable because of his 'beliefs, statements or associations' that would compromise US foreign policy interests. It was submitted in response to a request from an immigration judge for evidence to support the deportation case.
The administration previously said it based its deportation order for Khalil on an obscure provision from the Immigration and Nationality Act – which provides broad authority to the Secretary of State to revoke a person's immigration status if their 'activities in the United States would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences' to the country.
'For cases in which the basis for this determination is the alien's past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations that are otherwise lawful, the Secretary of State must personally determine that the alien's presence or activities would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest,' the memo from the secretary reads.
The secretary made his determination 'based on information provided by the DHS/ICE/HSI regarding the participation and roles of (redacted) and Khalil in antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which fosters a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States,' Rubio states.
The actions and continued presence of Khalil in the US 'undermine U.S. policy to combat anti- Semitism around the world and in the United States, in addition to efforts to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence in the United States,' the memo continues.
The memo contains no allegations of criminal activity.
Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Jamee Comans ordered the federal government to turn over evidence supporting its order to remove Khalil, a legal permanent resident, from the US by Wednesday evening or she would move to terminate the case, according to Khalil's lawyers.
Khalil's lawyers told CNN they do not expect the federal government to provide additional evidence to fulfill the judge's request.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's big budget bill would jump-start his immigration agenda
Building the border wall. Increasing detention capacity. Hiring thousands of immigration agents. The budget bill narrowly approved by the Senate on Tuesday includes massive funding infusions — roughly $150 billion — toward immigration and border enforcement. If passed, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" will cement President Trump's hard-line legacy on immigration. Read more: By a single vote, Trump's megabill passes the Senate The budget bill would make Immigration and Customs Enforcement the highest-funded law enforcement agency in the federal government, exceeding its current yearly $3.4-billion detention budget many times over. It also would impose fees on immigration services that were once free or less expensive and make it easier for local law enforcement to work with federal authorities on immigration. The 940-page Senate bill will now head back to the House, which passed its version in May, also by one vote, 215 to 214. The two chambers must now reconcile the two versions of the bill. Though the legislation is still evolving, the immigration provisions in the House and Senate versions are similar and not subject to the intense debates on other issues, such as Medicaid or taxes. Many of the funds would be available for four years, though some have longer or shorter timelines. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that, if enacted, the bill would increase the deficit by at least $3.3 trillion over the next 10 years. Here are key elements concerning immigration: $46.5 billion toward fortifying the U.S.-Mexico border wall and interdicting migrant smugglers at sea. This includes building barrier sections and access roads and installing barrier-related technology such as cameras, lights and sensors. The legislation doesn't reference specific locations. Trump, in his first term, repeatedly vowed that Mexico would pay for the wall. It didn't. $32 billion for immigration enforcement, including staffing of ICE and expanding so-called 287(g) agreements, in which state and local law enforcement agencies partner with federal authorities to deport immigrants. $7 billion for hiring Border Patrol agents, customs officers at ports of entry, air and marine agents and field support staff; retention bonuses; and vehicles. $3.3 billion to hire immigration judges and support staff, among other provisions. Trump has said he wants to hire 10,000 ICE agents, as well as 3,000 Border Patrol agents. $45 billion to build and operate immigrant detention facilities and to transport those being deported. $5 billion for new Customs and Border Protection facilities and improvements to existing facilities and checkpoints. It's unclear how this could affect California or the Border Patrol checkpoint on Interstate 5 near San Onofre. The bill allows for families to be detained indefinitely, pending a removal decision.. Heidi Altman, vice president of policy at the National Immigration Law Center, called that a blatant violation of the so-called Flores settlement agreement, which has been in place since 1977 and limits to 20 days the duration children can legally be detained. $13.5 billion to reimburse states and local governments for immigration-related costs. These are divided into two pots of funding: $10 billion for the "state border security reinforcement fund" and the "Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide" or BIDEN fund. Both would fund the arrest by local law enforcement of immigrants who unlawfully entered the U.S. and committed any crime. "You can think of it like a gift for [Texas Gov. Greg] Abbott," Altman said. A fee of at least $100 for those seeking asylum, down from a $1,000 fee outlined in the House bill. Applicants also would pay $100 every year the application remains pending. This is unprecedented — a fee has never before been imposed on migrants fleeing persecution. At least $550 ($275 on renewal) to apply for employment authorization for those with asylum applications, humanitarian parole and temporary protected status. Currently there is no fee for asylum seekers and a $470 fee for others. At least $500 for temporary protected status, up from $50. The stated fees are minimums — the bill allows for annual increases and, for many, prohibits waivers based on financial need. "The paradox of a fee for an employment authorization document is that you're not allowed to work, but you need to pay for the fee," said Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst with the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. Altman noted that imposing a yearly fee on asylum seekers for their pending applications punishes people for the U.S. government's backlogged system, which is out of the applicant's control. Other sections exclude lawfully present immigrants, such as refugees and those granted asylum, from benefits including Medicare, Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Another provision excludes children from the child tax credit if their parent lacks a Social Security number. Altman, whose organization has closely tracked the immigration aspects of the funding bill, said people can look at the legislation two ways: big picture — as a $150-billion infusion to supercharge what the Trump administration has already started — or surgically, as a series of policy changes that will not be easy to undo "and make an already corrupt system subject to even fewer safeguards and really go after people's most basic needs." Bush-Joseph had a different view. She said the funding reinforces an outdated and inflexible immigration system without fundamentally changing it. "That's why there's all this money going to the border even though there aren't a lot of people coming now," she said. Money alone won't change things overnight, Bush-Joseph said. It takes time to hire people and to open detention facilities. Immigration judges will still have a massive backlog of cases. And getting foreign countries to agree to accept more deportees is tricky. "Arresting and detaining people with private contractors doesn't get you to an agreement from El Salvador to take five more planes per week," she said. During a White House event Thursday, Trump urged Congress to pass the bill quickly, saying it "will be the single most important piece of border legislation to ever come across the floor of Congress." Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, one of three Republicans who voted against the bill Tuesday, had called it "reckless spending," writing on X: "I'm all for hiring new people to help secure our borders, but we don't need it to the extent that's in this bill, especially when our border is largely contained." Across the political aisle, Democrats including California Sen. Alex Padilla have slammed the bill, saying the immigration-related funding increases amount to a substantial policy change. 'You would think that maybe just for a moment, Republicans would take this reconciliation process as an opportunity to do what they said before they wanted to do and modernize our nation's immigration system," Padilla said last month. "But they're not." Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
CNN
40 minutes ago
- CNN
Stefanik criticizes Columbia University president over potential violation of the Civil Rights Act
House Republican Leadership Chairwoman Elise Stefanik is criticizing Columbia University's president over past comments that the congresswoman said are a potential violation of the Civil Rights Act, including her call to have an Arab person on the university board, as the university faces continued investigations into its handling of antisemitism on campus. In a letter sent to acting university president Claire Shipman on Tuesday, Stefanik and GOP Rep. Tim Walberg, chair of the House Education and Workforce Committee, pointed to a message from January 17, 2024, where Shipman – then the chair of Columbia University's board of trustees – said the university needed 'to get somebody from the middle east [sic] or who is Arab on our board,' adding, 'Quickly I think. Somehow.' Stefanik and Walberg asked Shipman to clarify her comment, adding: 'Were Columbia to act on this suggestion and appoint someone to the board specifically because of their national origin, it would implicate Title VI concerns.' Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color or national origin in programs or activities receiving federal funding. The letter also points to Shipman's criticism of Jewish board member Shoshana Shendelman, whom Stefanik and Walberg claim is one of the board's 'most outspoken members against the bullying, harassment, and intimidation of Jewish students.' Shipman said of Shendelman in January 25, 2024, according to the letter: 'I just don't think she should be on the board.' The committee says the comment raises 'the question of why you appeared to be in favor of removing one of the board's most outspoken Jewish advocates at a time when Columbia students were facing a shocking level of fear and hostility.' In a statement, a Columbia University spokesperson said, 'These communications were provided to the Committee in the fall of 2024 and reflect communications from more than a year ago. They are now being published out of context and reflect a particularly difficult moment in time for the University when leaders across Columbia were intensely focused on addressing significant challenges.' 'This work is ongoing, and to be clear: Columbia is deeply committed to combating antisemitism and working with the federal government on this very serious issue, including our ongoing discussions to reach an agreement with the Joint Task Force to Combat Antisemitism,' the spokesperson added, referring to the Trump administration task force that is investigating antisemitism on campus. 'Acting President Claire Shipman has been vocally and visibly committed to eradicating antisemitism on campus; the work underway at the university to create a safe and welcoming environment for all community members makes that plain.' In the letter, the committee cited a message from October 30, 2023 – weeks after the October 7 Hamas attack – where Shipman said to then-president Minouche Shafik, 'People are really frustrated and scared about antisemitism on our campus and they feel somehow betrayed by it. Which is not necessarily a rational feeling but it's deep and it is quite threatening.' Stefanik and Walberg wrote in the letter to Shipman, 'Your description—that people feel 'somehow' betrayed and that this is 'not necessarily a rational feeling,' but that it is 'threatening'—is perplexing, considering the violence and harassment against Jewish and Israeli students already occurring on Columbia's campus at the time.' The letter comes as the Trump administration has accused dozens of US universities of tolerating antisemitism. The Trump administration previously alleged that Columbia violated Title VI by acting with 'deliberate indifference' towards harassment of Jewish students on campus since October 2023. For months, Columbia has faced intense pressure from Republicans, including President Donald Trump, over its handling of antisemitism on campus. In March, the Trump administration canceled $400 million in federal funding over campus protests. The university has since made apparent concessions, including restrictions on demonstrations, new disciplinary procedures and immediately reviewing its Middle East curriculum. Last month, the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights escalated its fight with the university, declaring the school doesn't meet accreditation standards because of its failure to protect Jewish students.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Americans at July 4th celebrations warned of lone wolf terrorist threat
Local and federal authorities across the country are likely preparing for potential threats during Fourth of July celebrations next weekend amid tensions between the United States and the Middle East, according to a former US Secret Service agent. Tensions escalated on June 22, when the US Military bombed three key nuclear sites in Iran, according to Trump administration officials. 'Due to the Iran conflict, the Department of Homeland Security has a National Threat Advisory System, and as of June 22, we are at a heightened threat environment,' Michael Verden, founder and CEO of security firm The Lake Forest Group, told Fox News Digital. 'That level will stay in place until September 22, and it could be extended based on the conflict in Iran.' 5 A view of New York City's 48th annual Macy's 4th of July fireworks as seen from The Edge observation deck on July 4, 2024 in New York City. Getty Images Verden, a former USSS agent and law enforcement officer, added that certain 4th of July activities and travel will see increased security and precautionary measures 'because of this heightened threat environment.' DHS said in a June 22 bulletin that 'Iran also has a long-standing commitment to target US Government officials it views as responsible for the death of an Iranian military commander killed in January 2020.' 'The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland,' DHS said. 5 Thousands of young people celebrate the Fourth of July along the coast in La Jolla on a hot summer day on July 4, 2023 in San Diego, California. Getty Images 'Multiple recent Homeland terrorist attacks have been motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment, and the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could contribute to US-based individuals plotting additional attacks.' Verden recalled a mass shooting that took place on the Fourth of July in Highland Park, Illinois, in 2022 that left seven people killed, including an 8-year-old boy. While the shooter's motive has not been described as an act of terrorism, Verden said that shooting three years ago brought more attention to the possibility of bad actors targeting 'open-air events.' In more urban settings, bad actors could also target subterranean spaces, such as subways or threats 'from the water,' he said. 5 Spectators cheer during the 2023 Nathan's Famous Fourth of July International Hot Dog Eating Contest at Coney Island before being cleared due to thunderstorms on July 4, 2023 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. Getty Images Public and private events will need to coordinate with local law enforcement for the holiday, according to Verden. Federal intelligence officials, meanwhile, will try to proactively identify and stop any emerging threats 'associated with the homeland, and a 4th of July event is definitely associated with the homeland,' Verden said. The former USSS agent also said law enforcement will put a heavy emphasis on 'access control,' which includes everything from verifying credentials at admission for an event, checking bags, checking parked vehicles for explosives, looking out for suspicious activity and so on. 'If there was some type of suspicious activity, do you have tactical units to respond to … a group of people that seems suspicious, or other assets such as explosives? They call it explosives ordinance disposal, which is EOD. So, if someone found a backpack that was unattended, do you have canine assets, or do you have EOD teams to respond to that?' Verden explained. 5 People attend the Independence Day parade, which is traditionally celebrated every year in Washington DC, on July 4, 2023. Anadolu Agency via Getty Images Law enforcement will also be looking to cover high vantage points. Verden noted that the Highland Park shooter and the gunman who shot at then-candidate Donald Trump at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last year were both positioned on rooftops. Verden said Fourth of July event attendees should familiarize themselves with venue layouts, and read website descriptions of events before attending. Revelers should also have a plan in the event of an emergency situation, such as coming up with a meeting location, especially if cell services crashes and there is no way to get in contact with loved ones. Law enforcement officials should take a 'three-step approach' in the event of an emergency, according to Verden. First, assess the event space and come up with a security plan; have a pre-determined incident commander in the case of an emergency; and adequately train first-responders and other officials prior to an event. 5 Local and federal authorities across the country are likely preparing for potential threats during Fourth of July celebrations next weekend amid tensions between the United States and the Middle East, according to a former US Secret Service agent. Nathaniel Gonzales – 'There's always a little bit of a heightened risk level when it comes to these patriotic [events]. … This is when the Declaration of Independence was ratified on this date. So, there's always that concern of our adversaries. This would be an opportune time for them to do some type of an attack,' he said. A recent assessment released last week by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) found that Israel's Operation Rising Lion, followed by US bunker-busting strikes, 'effectively destroyed Iran's centrifuge enrichment program.' But authors David Albright and Spencer Faragasso cautioned that 'residuals such as stocks of 60%, 20%, and 3-5% enriched uranium and centrifuges manufactured but not yet installed … pose a threat as they can be used in the future to produce weapon-grade uranium.' According to the ISIS report, 'extensive damage' was confirmed at nearly all major Iranian nuclear and missile facilities, including the destruction of uranium metal conversion plants, fuel fabrication centers, and the IR-40 Arak heavy water reactor. The report noted that the Israeli and US strikes 'rendered the Fordow site inoperable,' citing high-resolution satellite imagery of deep bunker penetrations. The bunker strikes have prompted conversations about Iranian retaliation against the United States.
