logo
Why it's impossible to know what will happen next

Why it's impossible to know what will happen next

Yahoo06-04-2025

A version of this post first appeared on TKer.co
It's been a challenging few days.
There's been a mountain of news about the direction of global trade policy, which has been followed by a tsunami of research and insights intended to help investors make sense of it all.
I've spent a ton of time sifting through much of it, and I've concluded: It is impossible to know what will happen next.
While everyone agrees that the announced tariffs are negative at least in the near-term, the range of potential outcomes is very wide and impossible to define precisely. Not only are the indirect effects hard to capture, the uncertainty is heightened by the possibility that at least some of the tariffs are short-lived or negotiated lower.
Consequently, I'd caution against listening to folks who have a high degree of confidence in the particular outcome they're touting. There are just too many unknowns to be able to model a clean forecast.
A couple of analysts I follow had some particularly insightful commentary on the murky state of things.
"There is no tariff playbook," BofA's Savita Subramanian wrote on Thursday. "Known unknowns are plentiful." From her note:
Investors looking for historical parallels are faced with scant observations from incomparable eras (e.g., 1930s Smoot Hawley ended badly). Import/export exposure by company is difficult to estimate and not regularly disclosed. Full supply chains are hard to figure out. Secondary impacts are even hazier: prolonged negotiations could stall activity spiraling into a recession. Calls to boycott U.S. goods could ramp further. But pricing power and currency moves can mollify tariff impacts. Ex-U.S. multinationals can avoid tariffs (and maybe enjoy lower corporate tax rates) by expanding U.S. footprint. Our constructive equity outlook relies on at least partial resolution from which corporates can plan and grow by early 2H25, as capacity buildouts are multi-quarter phenomena.
Among the many challenges in analyzing the impact on the stock market is the fact that regulations don't require publicly-traded companies to disclose many details about their overseas exposure. This is something I've mentioned in past discussions about S&P 500 revenues generated outside of the U.S.
To Subramanian's point about boycotts, earlier this week Goldman Sachs economists also highlighted the challenges in estimating the magnitude of this second order effect.
Subramanian estimates that the impact of tariffs could drag S&P 500 earnings per share (EPS) by 5% to 32%. Yes, that's a wide range. And even she acknowledges that it's derived from an "oversimplified scenario analysis."
Upgrade to paid
On Bloomberg Radio on Friday, Renaissance Macro's Neil Dutta addressed the shock to GDP that economists have been estimating as a result of the announced tariffs. He too cautioned: "These calculations understate the hit to some extent, because you're just looking at direct costs. You're not including, 'What are the ramifications to corporate confidence? Household confidence?' The spillover and knock-on effects. I think that's why I think it can be even worse."
In terms of modeling how the ongoing trade war will unfold, Dutta added: "We're all just guessing at this point."
Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks, also speaking to Bloomberg on Friday, said: "The world economy and the world order beyond the economy — meaning geopolitics and international relationships — has been shook up like a snow globe by the events of the last days, and nobody knows what it's going to look like."
"Today, whatever your forecast may be, you have to say the probability that I'm right is lower than ever," Marks added. "Because the probability that we know what the future is going to look like is lower than ever."
While uncertainty and market volatility may be elevated in the near term, experts generally agree that stocks continue to be attractive for long-term investors. It's just that the near future has become very difficult to predict.
It's times like these where the best move is to stick to your financial plan, which hopefully takes into consideration periods of high volatility and uncertainty.
If there's any good news, the first quarter just ended. This means we'll soon be in earnings season, when companies will give more color on what they see and where they expect things to head.
This could be productive, because so far we haven't heard much about how tariffs may impact earnings. Here's what RBC's Lori Calvasina had to say in her research note on Wednesday:
We've been reading earnings call and conference transcripts closely since November across market capitalizations, sectors, and industries and feel fairly confident in saying that U.S. public companies have been very reluctant to discuss tariff impacts (outside of China) until specific details have been provided by the administration, and even then, many still have not given sell-side analysts a lot of specifics to start factoring into their models. The incremental information provided Wednesday (we hope) will enable sell-side analysts to push companies a bit harder to get the conversation going about these policies. This is important, because for U.S. equities to put in a durable bottom, EPS forecasts need to be adjusted which in turn will give investors confidence to assess valuations and make decisions about when opportunity has been unlocked in certain corners of the U.S. equity market.
"Like most analysts and strategists, we'll be digesting the implications of the newly announced reciprocal tariffs in the coming days," Calvasina wrote.
All eyes and ears will be on Corporate America in the coming weeks as earnings season picks up.
Will we get more clarity? Or will we learn they have no clue where things are headed either?
As always, keep your stock market seat belts fastened. Investing in the stock market is an unpleasant process.
I was on podcast with Plancorp CIO Peter Lazaroff. We talked about TKer's 10 Truths About The Stock Market and how investors can use them to make sense about markets today. Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, and beyond!
There were several notable data points and macroeconomic developments since our last review:
👍 The labor market continues to add jobs. According to the BLS's Employment Situation report released Friday, U.S. employers added 228,000 jobs in March The report reflected the 51st straight month of gains, reaffirming an economy with growing demand for labor.
The unemployment rate — that is, the number of workers who identify as unemployed as a percentage of the civilian labor force — ticked up to 4.2% during the month. While it continues to hover near 50-year lows, the metric is near its highest level since November 2021.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
While the major metrics continue to reflect job growth and low unemployment, the labor market isn't as hot as it used to be.
For more on the labor market, read: 💼 and 📉
💸 Wage growth ticks higher. Average hourly earnings rose by 0.3% month-over-month in March, up from the 0.2% pace in February. On a year-over-year basis, this metric is up 3.8%.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
For more on why policymakers are watching wage growth, read: 📈
💼 Job openings fall. According to the BLS's Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, employers had 7.57 million job openings in February, down from 8.76 million in January.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
During the period, there were 7.05 million unemployed people — meaning there were 1.07 job openings per unemployed person. This continues to be one of the more obvious signs of excess demand for labor. However, this metric has returned to prepandemic levels.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
For more on job openings, read: 🤨 and 📈
👍 Layoffs remain depressed, hiring remains firm. Employers laid off 1.79 million people in February. While challenging for all those affected, this figure represents just 1.1% of total employment. This metric remains at prepandemic levels.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
For more on layoffs, read: 📊
Hiring activity continues to be much higher than layoff activity. During the month, employers hired 5.4 million people.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
That said, the hiring rate — the number of hires as a percentage of the employed workforce — has been trending lower, which could be a sign of trouble to come in the labor market.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
For more on why this metric matters, read: 🧩
🤔 People are quitting less. In February, 3.2 million workers quit their jobs. This represents 2% of the workforce. While the rate is above recent lows, it continues to trend below prepandemic levels.
(Source: BLS via FRED)
A low quits rate could mean a number of things: more people are satisfied with their job; workers have fewer outside job opportunities; wage growth is cooling; productivity will improve as fewer people are entering new unfamiliar roles.
For more, read: ⚙️
📈 Job switchers still get better pay. According to ADP, which tracks private payrolls and employs a different methodology than the BLS, annual pay growth in March for people who changed jobs was up 6.5% from a year ago. For those who stayed at their job, pay growth was 4.6%.
(Source: ADP)
For more on why policymakers are watching wage growth, read: 📈
💼 Unemployment claims tick lower. Initial claims for unemployment benefits declined to 219,000 during the week ending March 29, down from 225,000 the week prior. This metric continues to be at levels historically associated with economic growth.
(Source: DoL via FRED)
For more context, read: 🏛️ and 💼
💳 Card spending data is holding up. From JPMorgan: "As of 28 Mar 2025, our Chase Consumer Card spending data (unadjusted) was 1.5% above the same day last year. Based on the Chase Consumer Card data through 28 Mar 2025, our estimate of the US Census March control measure of retail sales m/m is 0.41%."
(Source: JPMorgan)
From BofA: "Total card spending per HH was up 0.1% y/y in the week ending Mar 29, according to BAC aggregated credit & debit card data. The slowdown relative to last week was likely due to unfavorable base effects from Good Friday timing (3/29/24 vs 4/18/25). Total card spending growth in the DC area remains weaker than the rest of the country, likely due to the impact of DOGE cuts."
(Source: BofA)
For more on the consumer, read: 🛍️
⛽️ Gas prices tick higher. From AAA: "Gas prices made a bigger jump this past week, with the national average for a gallon of regular going up by more than 10 cents to $3.26. Several factors are driving the increase, including refinery maintenance and summer-blend gasoline switch. The last time the national average reached $3.26 was back in September, consistent with seasonal shifts, but current prices remain below what they were this time last year."
(Source: AAA)
For more on energy prices, read: 🛢️
🏠 Mortgage rates tick lower. According to Freddie Mac, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage declined to 6.64% from 6.65% last week. From Freddie Mac: "Over the last month, the 30-year fixed-rate has settled in, making only slight moves in either direction. This stability is reassuring, and borrowers have responded with purchase application demand rising to the highest growth rate since late last year."
(Source: Freddie Mac)
There are 147.4 million housing units in the U.S., of which 86.9 million are owner-occupied and about 34.1 million of which are mortgage-free. Of those carrying mortgage debt, almost all have fixed-rate mortgages, and most of those mortgages have rates that were locked in before rates surged from 2021 lows. All of this is to say: Most homeowners are not particularly sensitive to movements in home prices or mortgage rates.
For more on mortgages and home prices, read: 😖
🏢 Offices remain relatively empty. From Kastle Systems: "Peak day office occupancy was 63.1% on Tuesday last week, up two tenths of a point from the previous week. In Austin, the South by Southwest conference and festival led to lower daily occupancy nearly every day. And in Houston, CERAWeek 2025 resulted in significantly lower occupancy last Thursday and Friday before rebounding after the conference, peaking at 71.2% on Tuesday. The 10-city average low was on Friday at 34.3%, down 2.1 points from last week."
(Source: Kastle)
For more on office occupancy, read: 🏢
👎 Manufacturing surveys deteriorate. From S&P Global's March U.S. Manufacturing PMI: "A key concern among manufacturers is the degree to which heightened uncertainty resulting from government policy changes, notably in relation to tariffs, causes customers to cancel or delay spending, and the extent to which costs are rising and supply chains deteriorating in this environment. Tariffs were the most cited cause of factory input costs rising in March, and at a rate not seen since mid-2022 during the pandemic-related supply shock. Supply chains are also suffering to a degree not seen since October 2022 as delivery delays become more widespread."
(Source: S&P Global)
The ISM Manufacturing PMI also deteriorated, signaling contraction in the industry.
(Source: ISM)
Keep in mind that during times of perceived stress, soft survey data tends to be more exaggerated than actual hard data.
For more on this, read: 🙊
🤷 Services surveys are mixed. From S&P Global's March Services PMI: "March saw a welcome rebound in service sector business activity after a weak start to the year, with employment also returning to growth after a decline seen in February. However, the rate of expansion remains below that seen throughout the second half of last year. Combined with a weak manufacturing reading for March, the survey data point to GDP having risen at an annualized rate of just 1.5% in the first quarter, down sharply from the 2.4% rate seen at the end of last year."
(Source: S&P Global)
Meanwhile, the ISM Services PMI cooled in March.
(Source: ISM)
🔨 Construction spending ticks higher. Construction spending increased 0.7% to an annual rate of $2.2 trillion in February.
(Source: Census)
🏭 Business investment activity ticks lower. Orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft — a.k.a. core capex or business investment — declined 0.2% to $75.13 billion in February.
(Source: Census via FRED)
Core capex orders are a leading indicator, meaning they foretell economic activity down the road. The growth rate had leveled off a bit, but they've perked up in recent months. However, economists caution that this may reflect a pull forward in sales ahead of new tariffs.
For more on core capex, read: 🤔 and 📉
🇺🇸 Most U.S. states are still growing. From the Philly Fed's January State Coincident Indexes report: "Over the past three months, the indexes increased in 47 states, decreased in one state, and remained stable in two, for a three-month diffusion index of 92. Additionally, in the past month, the indexes increased in 35 states, decreased in nine states, and remained stable in six, for a one-month diffusion index of 52."
(Source: Philly Fed)
📉 Near-term GDP growth estimates are tracking negative. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model sees real GDP growth declining at a 2.8% rate in Q1. Adjusted for the impact of gold imports and exports, they see GDP falling at a 0.8% rate.
(Source: Atlanta Fed)
For more on the economy, read: 📉
🚨 The tariffs announced by President Trump as they stand threaten to upend global trade with significant implications for the U.S. economy, corporate earnings, and the stock market. Until we get some more clarity, here's where things stand:
Earnings look bullish: The long-term outlook for the stock market remains favorable, bolstered by expectations for years of earnings growth. And earnings are the most important driver of stock prices.
Demand is positive: Demand for goods and services remains positive, supported by healthy consumer and business balance sheets. Job creation, while cooling, also remains positive, and the Federal Reserve — having resolved the inflation crisis — has shifted its focus toward supporting the labor market.
But growth is cooling: While the economy remains healthy, growth has normalized from much hotter levels earlier in the cycle. The economy is less "coiled" these days as major tailwinds like excess job openings have faded. It has become harder to argue that growth is destiny.
Actions speak louder than words: We are in an odd period given that the hard economic data has decoupled from the soft sentiment-oriented data. Consumer and business sentiment has been relatively poor, even as tangible consumer and business activity continue to grow and trend at record levels. From an investor's perspective, what matters is that the hard economic data continues to hold up.
Stocks are not the economy: Analysts expect the U.S. stock market could outperform the U.S. economy, thanks largely due to positive operating leverage. Since the pandemic, companies have adjusted their cost structures aggressively. This has come with strategic layoffs and investment in new equipment, including hardware powered by AI. These moves are resulting in positive operating leverage, which means a modest amount of sales growth — in the cooling economy — is translating to robust earnings growth.
Mind the ever-present risks: Of course, this does not mean we should get complacent. There will always be risks to worry about — such as U.S. political uncertainty, geopolitical turmoil, energy price volatility, cyber attacks, etc. There are also the dreaded unknowns. Any of these risks can flare up and spark short-term volatility in the markets.
Investing is never a smooth ride: There's also the harsh reality that economic recessions and bear markets are developments that all long-term investors should expect to experience as they build wealth in the markets. Always keep your stock market seat belts fastened.
Think long term: For now, there's no reason to believe there'll be a challenge that the economy and the markets won't be able to overcome over time. The long game remains undefeated, and it's a streak long-term investors can expect to continue.
A version of this post first appeared on TKer.co

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why AI Stock Broadcom Topped the Market on Tuesday
Why AI Stock Broadcom Topped the Market on Tuesday

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why AI Stock Broadcom Topped the Market on Tuesday

It announced that it started shipping its latest AI chip. The chip is a vast improvement over its predecessor, the company said. Meanwhile, two analysts published bullish updates on the stock. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › A new product rollout is always an attention-grabbing piece of news in the corporate world, and that goes double for businesses involved with artificial intelligence (AI). On Tuesday, specialty chip maker Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) announced it began shipping an advanced networking chip. Investors greeted this by pushing the company's stock up by more than 3% that trading session. That gain easily trounced the 0.6% increase of the S&P 500 index. Broadcom's Tomahawk 6 switch series is now on its way to the market, the company announced that morning (a switch, also known as a switching chip, is a highly specialized component that handles data trafficking through a computer network). According to Broadcom, the Tomahawk 6 boasts double the bandwidth of any switch available on the market just now. It's designed to handle the comparably much higher resource needs of artificial intelligence (AI) functionalities. The company said its new product has an unrivaled set of AI routing features and interconnect options. The announcement came two days before Broadcom is slated to publish its fiscal second quarter of 2025 earnings. What also helped the stock rise was a pair of bullish new analyst notes released in anticipation of those results. Both Citigroup's Christopher Danley and JPMorgan Chase's Harlan Sur maintained their equivalent of buy recommendations in their respective updates. Danley went as far as to raise his price target on the stock significantly to $276 per share from his previous $210. According to reports, Danley believes Broadcom will top analyst estimates for the quarter, especially considering that AI is an important driver of its sales, and demand for the technology remains scorching. I'd be as bullish as those two gentlemen; Broadcom is very well placed to be a main supplier expanding AI capabilities, and its fundamentals should reflect that going forward. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $356,261!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,291!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $657,385!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why AI Stock Broadcom Topped the Market on Tuesday was originally published by The Motley Fool

What Germany's Merz wants to tackle in Trump meeting
What Germany's Merz wants to tackle in Trump meeting

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

What Germany's Merz wants to tackle in Trump meeting

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is set to meet U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday, with much to discuss at a time of trade disputes and ongoing war in Europe. During both of his presidential terms, Trump has triggered tensions between long-standing allies U.S. and the European Union. "The tone is as rough as it has not been in a long time," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said in a speech on German-U.S. relations earlier this week. White House officials have not always found friendly words for Berlin in recent months, and vice versa. But there have been some signs of rapprochement, with the country's leaders now reportedly being on a first name basis after several phone calls. Building on this will be a top priority for Merz in D.C. "Top of the agenda for the German Chancellor will be to strike the right chord with Trump," Jörn Fleck, senior director of the Europe Center at the Atlantic Council, told CNBC. Merz's conservative views on immigration, his links to U.S. businesses — the chancellor is a former BlackRock executive — "and a profile as an old-school outsider who was underestimated but won an election by pledging to restore his country's economy and security," could work in his favor, Fleck explained. Export-reliant Germany counts the U.S. as its biggest trading partner, leaving it vulnerable in the face of Trump's trade agenda. Penny Naas, who leads on the German Marshall Fund's allied strategic competitiveness work, told CNBC that this is especially true for sector-specific tariffs, for example targeting autos and steel. They "hit industries at the core of the German economy," she said. "Merz will want to see if there is any room for negotiation on these tariffs," such as the U.S. and EU cutting all industrial duties to zero, Naas added. Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs, which have also been imposed on the European Union, are also set to be on Merz's agenda, Franziska Palmas, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics, told CNBC. "He is likely to stress his support for free trade and a EU-US trade deal. He may point to the EU's proposal of a zero-for-zero tariff deal as an ideal outcome," she said. Negotiations between the EU and U.S. have so far been tough, but European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on Tuesday signaled talks were "advancing in the right direction." The Russia-Ukraine war will also almost certainly be discussed, especially after Trump's Wednesday phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. European leaders have pushed Trump to apply pressure on Putin, and Merz is expected to follow suit, the Atlantic Council's Fleck said. Palmas meanwhile said Merz would likely "reiterate Germany's strong support for Ukraine and the need for European countries to be involved in peace negotiations." U.S. support for Kyiv has been uncertain, along with Trump's focus on expediting peace-making between Russia and Ukraine — raising concerns in Europe. Topics like U.S. support for European troops on the ground, enforcing sanctions and sharing information may therefore come up, Fleck added. Another critical topic will be the NATO military alliance in which both Germany and the U.S. participate and specifically members' defense contributions. Trump has long been pushing for these expenditures to rise to 5% of each country's gross domestic product, meeting some resistance. Fleck noted that "Merz will want to make sure Germany is no longer seen as a laggard on defense spending and capabilities." Given Germany's recent fiscal reforms that allow for higher defense costs and its support for Trump's 5% NATO spending target, the German chancellor should have "a positive story to tell" on this front. Capital Economics' Palmas added that Merz may even use the occasion to announce a specific defense spending target.

This Unstoppable Dividend ETF Could Earn You $5,000 a Year in Passive Income
This Unstoppable Dividend ETF Could Earn You $5,000 a Year in Passive Income

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Unstoppable Dividend ETF Could Earn You $5,000 a Year in Passive Income

Dividend ETFs are collections of stocks that pay out a small amount in dividends each month or quarter. The more shares you own of a dividend ETF, the more you'll earn in passive income. By investing consistently over years, you could generate thousands of dollars in dividend payments. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF › Investing in dividend stocks can be a fantastic way to generate passive income through the stock market, and a dividend ETF can make the process even more hands-off. A dividend ETF is a collection of dividend stocks grouped into a single investment, and this type of investment can take much of the guesswork out of where to buy. Rather than having to research dozens of individual stocks, you can build a well-diversified portfolio with just one or two ETFs. It takes time and consistency to generate a substantial amount of passive income with dividend stocks, but it's possible to create a $5,000-per-year income stream with minimal effort. Here's how. Whether you're just getting started with dividend stocks or you're looking to add a solid ETF to your portfolio, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) can be a smart choice. One major advantage of this fund is its diversification. It contains 338 large-cap stocks that are fairly evenly allocated across 10 industries. It's most heavily weighted toward tech, with around 23% of the fund made up of tech stocks. By comparison, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (which tracks the S&P 500 itself), devotes around 30% of the fund to the tech industry. Greater diversification and less reliance on tech stocks can help limit your risk, especially during periods of volatility. Because this fund is relatively evenly spread across many industries, your investment won't be hit as hard if one or two sectors take a turn for the worse. The biggest perk of investing in dividend stocks is the passive income you'll receive in addition to your investment earnings. You'll earn a small amount in dividends per share, so the more shares you own, the more you'll receive in passive income. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF most recently paid a dividend of around $0.94 per share per quarter, which would add up to $3.76 per year. That may not sound like much, but again, that's the dividend per share. The more you own, the more you'll earn. To see how many shares it would take to reach $5,000 per year in dividends, we'll need to divide $5,000 by $3.76 for a result of around 1,330 shares. With this ETF currently priced at just under $200 per share, 1,330 shares would add up to an initial investment of around $266,000. Investing that much cash at once is wildly out of reach for the average investor, but there's good news: You can also invest smaller amounts over time. For example, say that you can afford to buy three shares per month, or 36 per year. At that rate, it would take around 37 years to accumulate 1,330 shares in total. Keep in mind, though, that these calculations assume the dividend payment remains the same over those 37 years. This ETF has a long history of increasing its dividend year over year, which means it may not take quite that long to accumulate $5,000 in annual dividend payments. Remember, too, that any dividends you receive are in addition to whatever you're earning in investment gains. Over the past 10 years, this ETF has earned an average rate of return of 11.5% per year. At that rate, if you were buying three shares per month for a total of $600 per month, you could accumulate around $3.5 million after 37 years -- on top of the $5,000 per year in passive income you'd be receiving from dividends. You also don't need to spend $600 per month or invest for 37 years to see substantial gains. Even a small fraction of those contributions could still add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars, in addition to the quarterly dividend payments. Investing in a dividend ETF is a fantastic way to build wealth while also generating passive income, and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF can supercharge your earnings while minimizing risk. The sooner you get started investing, the more you can potentially earn over time. Before you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $656,825!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $865,550!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Katie Brockman has positions in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Unstoppable Dividend ETF Could Earn You $5,000 a Year in Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store