
Electoral Amendment Bill passes first hurdle
The House heard spirited speeches for and against the controversial electoral law changes today.
The Electoral Amendment Bill claims it "makes a range of systems improvements to support the timeliness, efficiency, integrity, and resilience of the electoral system".
It makes a suite of changes including ending same-day voter enrolment, banning prisoner voting, changes to "treating" (such as offering free food) on Election Day and expanding anonymous political donation limits.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said the system was strong but needed "constant maintenance".
"Confidence in the Electoral Commission has fallen in recent years, and we know the system has come under significant strain.
"This bill overhauls a number of our dated and unsustainable electoral laws. The package of amendments will strengthen the system, helping to deliver timelier election results, manage the costs, clarify rules, and provide more efficient services to voters."
Same-day voting did make it easier for some people to vote, but it also removed the incentive for people to get enrolled before the election, he said.
"We had the Electoral Commission, on one hand, with one message saying, 'Get enrolled; get enrolled', and they were funded with many millions of dollars to encourage people to enrol, which the law says you should do; but, on the other hand, they were also saying, 'By the way, don't bother, because you can just rock up on election day and vote'.
"More people heard the second message than heard the first message. As a result, more and more people were turning up and enrolling when they voted. That's led to more and more special votes and pressure on the count."
Goldsmith said he had received advice that the final count, which took three weeks in the 2023 general election, could take even longer in future elections.
Labour's justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said it was a dark day for democracy, arguing the changes would make it harder for people to vote.
"Politicians should be making it easier for people to vote, not harder. That's how we make sure that everybody's voice is heard, that everyone gets a say, and that this democracy - this Parliament - is truly representative.
Webb pointed to Attorney-General Judith Collins' report that found the proposals were inconsistent with people's rights as further reason the legislation should be scrapped.
"The Attorney-General, frankly, slated this bill. I have never seen an Attorney-General's report which is so bluntly vicious and damning, saying things like 'freezing registration earlier in the voting period has the potential to harm confidence and trust'."
ACT Party justice spokesperson Todd Stephenson said shifting the enrolment deadline from the day of the election to 13 days before was a "modest change".
"Voting in a democracy such as ours does come with some responsibilities, and it's one of those responsibilities to actually be on the electoral roll - that's a legal requirement.
"If you can't be bothered doing that within a short period before an election, you've really got to question whether you have a commitment to being a participant in our democracy."
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson said it was already clear the bill would not achieve what its proponents were promising.
"This bill proposes the exact opposite of a modern and robust, effective democracy, because it intentionally seeks to deny entire groups of people and communities from having easier access to be able to enrol and to be able to vote, while at the same time it is shifting the threshold for donations to be declared."
Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said the changes were cynical.
"It's not a coincidence that the very communities who would be silenced are the same communities that wouldn't vote for this government, and probably the same communities that made up the netballers on the weekend.
"They say they're fixing democracy, but let's remember: this is the same government that has abolished Māori wards, introduced the Treaty Principles Bill, dismantled co-governance, Te Aka Whai Ora. And we know, again, why they do not want to see 16-year-olds voting."
The legislation is now off to select committee, having passed with support from coalition partners National, ACT and New Zealand First.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labour leader on latest poll numbers
politics about 1 hour ago Labour's had a bump in the latest political poll - up four points in the One News Verian poll - nipping at National's heels. Labour leader Chris Hipkins spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


Newsroom
5 hours ago
- Newsroom
Geoffrey Palmer: ‘Sounding the bugles of democratic retreat'
Comment: Nothing is more fundamental to the New Zealand system of democracy than elections. These give people a choice to express their political preferences and change governments. The Electoral Amendment Bill will make profound changes to how elections will be conducted from 2026. It will be harder for many people to vote in 2026 and particularly the young, itinerant, or poor.


The Spinoff
6 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The Green Party positions itself as the left's leader, and a friend to the coal miners
Sitting at around 10% in recent polls, the Greens will need to reach communities they haven't traditionally related to if they realistically want to lead the left bloc. Many of the promises made by political progressives this year have fallen under the umbrella of 'we'll clean up whatever the other guy is doing'. Labour would repeal the Regulatory Standards Bill within its first 100 days, Te Pāti Māori would establish a te Tiriti commissioner, and the Green Party, well, they hope to be leading the pack. Already armed with an alternative budget and a fiscal strategy, and with their sights set on a new eco-friendly industrial era and a new voter base among miners and farmers, the still self-described hippies reckon they're the strongest offering the left has got – but they're self-aware enough to know they'll have to spend the next 12 months convincing Aotearoa of that. The mood at the party's annual general meeting, held over the weekend at Wellington's Te Auaha – a Whitireia and WelTec creative campus set for the chopping block in the Te Pūkenga demerger, much to the party's chagrin – was jovial, ambitious and resolute. Powered by vegan salads and doughnuts from plant-based bakery Belén, party members spent the weekend fundraising by way of a 'Greenathon', which saw MPs perform in front of attendees for donations – Lan Pham did a dance routine with her twin, while Steve Abel, Benjamin Doyle and Kahurangi Carter belted out a rendition of Chappell Roan's 'Pink Pony Club', the latter of which raised $20,000 in five minutes. In the more serious moments, attendees did breathing exercises to deal with the bullshit, reaffirmed their political earnestness and also reaffirmed the importance of trying to understand where your racist uncle is coming from every now and then. When co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick delivered her address on Sunday – the main event of the AGM – she urged her supporters not just to connect with each other, but with 'the New Zealanders outside of this room', to build a bridge between those who 'straight up hate' politics and 'a bunch of earnest nerds' (aka the Greens). It's time to build a bridge and get everyone over it, the Greens reckon. 'In the political arena, it is pretty common for people to accuse the other side, and particularly the people who vote for them, of being idiots,' Swarbrick told the crowd. 'If we can't understand why people do the things that they do, then the logic tends to flow: they're wrong, and they just don't get it. That's clearly not a winning formula.' She's right – in terms of giving the major parties a run for their money, it hasn't been. The Greens have a loyal core voter base and 2023 was their most successful election ever, with 11.6% of the party vote and three electorates giving them 15 seats. Since then, polling has kept the party safely above 10% of the vote, and it remains the best-polling minor party alongside Act – but there's still a long way to go in terms of getting a shot at leading a government. And though the Greens have stayed mum on whether their closest frenemy's inability to dream up something concrete in terms of policy will aid them in the long run ('that's a question for the Labour Party,' Davidson told The Spinoff, smiling), there's no doubt that being the man with a plan has to mean something to someone. The Greens' AGM coincided with the tail-end of a small stint around the South Island by the Labour caucus, which reaffirmed that the legacy left party wouldn't commit to any policy promises until closer to the general election. In lieu of announcing any concrete policy, the party has instead gone hard on highlighting what they see as the government's failures, from school lunches to Family Boost to the price of butter – and are still polling on triple the numbers that the Greens have. Of course, the Greens are also constantly scrutinising the government's decisions while also offering up policies and alternative plans, but they have struggled to get the biggest power on the left bloc on board with the likes of their Green budget . It's one thing to be the 'big idea' factory, as Swarbrick described the party, but if you can't get the CEO to sign off on the proposals, you're not going to get anywhere. So why not try to position yourself as the one who should be calling the shots? Future finance minister? And so, the party has hopes that those who aren't traditional Green voters (specifically, the farmers and miners) could be persuaded to see the light. Yet reaching out to the blue-collar worker – who probably has some underlying feelings of class consciousness because their boss is driving a BMW while they've had to pick up extra shifts and still be stuck on public transport – hasn't been something the Greens, and the progressive left as a whole, are best at. After recently visiting miners on the West Coast, Swarbrick reckoned her party had 'a heck of a lot more in common with coal miners' than most realised – their shared interest being decent incomes, community and pride in their work. 'There were a few surprises to be perfectly honest [because], as you say, it's not a ground the Green Party are expected to occupy,' Swarbrick said. 'But it's not good enough for us simply to have the stacks of evidence if we're left clinging to [it] when the last tree is cut down – we have to bridge that gap.' With her sights quietly set on a possible future as finance minister, Swarbrick wouldn't confirm whether the party had any bottom lines ahead of possible coalition talks following next year's election. She and her co-leader have plenty of time to try to talk things through with Chris Hipkins, and less time to convince swing voters and those literally at the coal face that their version of a tail-wagging government would be better than the current one. And anyway, Swarbrick and Davidson made sure to repeatedly reaffirm their belief that 'no political party, no politician, is entitled to anything – New Zealanders get to decide the future of our country'. So, all of this aside, there might still be a bigger and more uncomfortable truth for the Greens to deal with: there are still many New Zealanders who aren't ready, or just don't want to, elect what's being touted as Aotearoa's most progressive parliament. Page 2