Fetterman Defends Job Performance as Health Concerns Persist
BOSTON—Sen. John Fetterman dismissed questions about his job performance and mental health as an ideologically motivated smear campaign, saying it was time to move on from what he cast as a manufactured scandal.
'For me, it's very clear, it's just part of this weird smear, this thing,' Fetterman (D., Pa.) said at a joint event with his delegation partner, Sen. Dave McCormick (R., Pa.). 'I'm here. I'm doing that job. I'm defending on all those things and all of those important votes. I've always been there.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Income Can Affect Your Health And Population Health
Los Angeles, CA - September 21: Hundreds of needy people line up around the block to receive food ... More from embattled 14th District Los Angeles City Council member Kevin de León, during a free food distribution. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) Low-income individuals that received regular monthly cash stipends visited the emergency department less, had fewer hospital admissions and participated in more outpatient subspecialty care according to an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The authors of the study looked at nearly 2900 low-income individuals who applied for a lottery in Chelsea, Massachusetts. Of those individuals, about 1750 of them received $400 per month for a nine month period. The individuals that received money had 27% fewer emergency room visits compared to those that did not receive the monthly payments. The aforementioned study underscores the powerful role socioeconomic status plays in shaping health outcomes across populations. So how exactly can income affect health? Below are some of the most important ways money can influence health and its related outcomes. Higher income generally translates to better quality healthcare services. Individuals with more money are more likely to have health insurance, which allows them to afford hospital visits, prescription drugs and preventive interventions. Conversely, those with lower incomes may be hesitant to receive healthcare they need because it is too expensive, leading to untreated illnesses that could be managed or even cured with early intervention. In 2022, nearly 26 million nonelderly Americans were uninsured according to Kaiser Family Foundation. Nearly 2 in 3 (64%) of nonelderly Americans who were uninsured said they were because the cost of healthcare insurance was too high. As an example, consider a low-dose CT scan of the chest that is done to screen for lung cancer. The out-of-pocket cost for the study is typically around $300, and insurance coverage for it is variable. Nearly half (44%) of lung cancers are caught at a late stage, with survival rates falling to just 7% according to the American Lung Association. With lung cancer being the deadliest cancer of all cancers, those with less income are less likely to be screened and less likely to find lung cancer at a stage where it is treatable and curable. Living environments are another critical determinant of health outcomes influenced by income. Wealthier individuals can afford housing in neighborhoods with lower crime rates, better schools and facilities such as gyms and parks that contribute to superior physical and mental health. Low-income individuals, on the other hand, may live in poor neighborhoods and may be exposed to environmental hazards like mold and air pollution. Consider asthma, an obstructive lung disease that causes coughing, wheezing and chest tightness. Many allergens can trigger asthma, which include but are not limited to dust, mold and air pollution. Thus, those that live in poorer neighborhoods and are constantly exposed to these environmental hazards are more likely to develop asthma, which can be life-threatening if not treated appropriately. One's income can also have a profound effect on determining the quality and quantity of food one can afford. Higher-income households have the luxury of greater access to more nutritious food, while lower-income families may have to purchase cheaper, less healthy and processed foods out of necessity. Healthier foods cost nearly twice as much as unhealthier foods on average per serving, according to research from the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Cheaper processed foods are usually higher in sugars, fats and salts. These types of foods contribute to poor nutrition and chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and obesity. Financial stability can also contribute to mental well-being. For example, those that live in poverty have to worry about their next meal and whether or not they will have food to eat. These worries can lead to a high level of anxiety and even depression, which can detrimentally affect mental health. It is of no surprise that those with the lowest incomes in a community suffer 1.5 to 3 times more frequently from anxiety, depression and other mental health illnesses compared to those with the highest incomes. What can be done to alleviate the obvious and profound health disparities caused by income inequality? The obvious answer is expanding access to healthcare insurance for all populations. Currently, 44 million Americans are enrolled in healthcare coverage through the Affordable Care Act according to KFF News. In addition, there must be a concerted effort by lawmakers and community activists to invest in safe and affordable housing, improve the availability of nutritious foods in low-income neighborhoods and expand important healthcare services such as preventive screening studies in an effort to decrease cancer in impoverished areas throughout the U.S. Income and health are inextricably related, and so much work needs to be done in America to address health inequities caused by income inequality.
CBS News
33 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pope Leo XIV accepts Bishop David Zubik's retirement from the Diocese of Pittsburgh, appoints new bishop
The Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh will have its 13th bishop in its history. The Holy See announced that Pope Leo XV has accepted the resignation of Bishop David Zubik at 6 a.m. local time. Zubik reached the mandatory retirement age of 75 last September. In his place, Pope Leo named Auxiliary Bishop Mark Eckman as the 13th bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh. "With a grateful and humble heart, I accept this appointment and ask for the prayers of all the faithful," Bishop Eckman said. "Together, we will continue the mission of Jesus Christ with hope." Bishop Eckman will be installed officially on Monday, July 14, 2025, in a special mass at Saint Paul Cathedral in Oakland. "I am both grateful and thrilled with this appointment," Bishop Zubik wrote in a letter to clergy and staff. "Bishop Eckman knows the diocese, and we know him as an exceptional pastor, and outstanding administrator - truly an exemplary priest." Bishop Eckman has been an auxiliary bishop since 2022 and is a longtime parish priest.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Four key reasons for the downfall of Trump and Musk's presidential bromance
President Donald Trump's 'bromance' with Elon Musk appears to be heading for a breakup after the latter savagely attacked the president's 'big, beautiful bill' on Tuesday as the legislation faces an uncertain future in the Senate. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' the world's richest man wrote on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The outburst came days after Musk left his role as a special adviser to Trump. These tumultuous four months saw him spearhead the Department of Government Efficiency, which is tasked with cutting waste, excess, and fraud from federal expenditure and has overseen the mass firing of tens of thousands of officials, bureaucrats, and staffers. The 'First Buddy' first came out in support of the Republican during last year's presidential election and donated more than $288m to the MAGA cause. But the endorsement has taken a brutal toll on Musk's businesses, especially Tesla, which suffered a 71 percent decline in its first-quarter profits and has borne the brunt of much of the public backlash. Despite the signs of discord, Musk and Trump 'remain friends and allies,' according to one White House source cited by Axios. However, another alleges that Musk feels 'butthurt' over how his time in the administration ended. According to the report, there are multiple reasons for the growing distance between Trump and Musk. 1. EV tax credit cut Trump's signature bill eliminates an important consumer tax credit for EV owners, worth up to $7,500, which Tesla reportedly spent $240,000 lobbying to maintain as of late April. Musk reportedly pleaded with Trump for its retention behind the scenes. Still, it was ultimately unsuccessful, a frustration that lingered despite the president turning the White House lawn into a Tesla dealership in March to help promote Musk's cars after vandals targeted his showrooms. 2. Musk wanted to stay on Axios reports that the billionaire actually wanted to stay on in his role as a 'special government employee' beyond its statutory limit of 130 days, despite numerous reported blowups with members of Trump's cabinet in private. Ultimately, however, an extension deal could not be reached with the president's team. 3. Billionaire wanted air traffic controllers to use Starlink Another reported disagreement concerned Musk's appeal to the Federal Aviation Administration to begin using his Starlink satellite technology. This demand was rejected due to both conflict-of-interest concerns and technological reasons. 'You can't have air traffic control just run off satellites,' a source told Axios. Musk's presence in the West Wing sparked several other conflict-of-interest concerns, the most recent of which saw 42 Democrats write to the Pentagon's inspector general to sound the alarm over SpaceX's potential involvement in Trump's Golden Dome anti-missile defense system. 4. Trump's removal of Jared Isaacman as his nominee to be NASA's next administrator Among the billionaire's alleged enemies in the White House was Sergio Gor, director of the Office of Presidential Personnel, with whom he is said to have clashed. When Trump abruptly decided over the weekend to withdraw the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA's next administrator, rumors quickly spread that Gor was behind the decision and intended it as an 'out-the-door 'f*** you' to Musk.' That claim has been disputed, however, with complaints from Republican senators about Isaacman's track record as a Democratic donor also given as a reason for the decision. 'Perception is reality, though, and I'm pretty sure Elon thought the NASA situation was a last insult,' an official told Axios. 'So here we are.' Elsewhere, Trump's former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, a bitter enemy of Musk, has suggested that the first schism in their relationship came in March when the president refused to show the billionaire the Pentagon's attack plans for a hypothetical war with China. Speaking to The Atlantic last month, Bannon said of that moment: 'You could feel it. Everything changed. The fever had been broken.'
