logo
Royal train to end 156 years of service as King Charles III seeks to economize

Royal train to end 156 years of service as King Charles III seeks to economize

Yahoo10 hours ago

LONDON (AP) — The Royal Train will soon leave the station for the last time.
King Charles III has accepted it's time to decommission the train, whose history dates back to Queen Victoria, because it costs too much to operate and would have needed a significant upgrade for more advanced rail systems, Buckingham Palace said Monday.
'In moving forwards we must not be bound by the past,'' said James Chalmers, the palace official in charge of the king's financial affairs. 'Just as so many parts of the royal household's work have modernized and adapted to reflect the world of today, so too the time has come to bid the fondest of farewells, as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding.''
The train, actually a suite of nine railcars that can be hitched to commercial locomotives, will be decommissioned sometime before the current maintenance contract expires in 2027. That will bring to an end a tradition that dates back to 1869, when Queen Victoria commissioned a pair of special coaches to accommodate her travels.
The decision was announced during the palace's annual briefing for reporters on the royal finances.
The royal family will for the fourth consecutive year receive public funding of 86.3 million pounds ($118 million), including 34.5 million pounds to fund the remodeling of Buckingham Palace, in the 12 months through March 2026.
This money comes from a mechanism known as the Sovereign Grant, which sets aside 12% of the net income from the Crown Estate to fund the official duties of the king and other members of the royal family.
The Crown Estate is a portfolio of properties that are owned by the monarch during his reign. The properties are professionally managed and the king cannot dispose of the assets.
The Crown Estate is one of the many relics of Britain's feudal past. King George III, who ruled during the American Revolution, surrendered management of the crown lands to Parliament in 1760 in return for a fixed payment from the Treasury.
The royal finances remain a topic of public debate, with Charles pledging to slim down the monarchy and cut costs as he seeks to ensure the institution's survival.
Buckingham Palace was quick to point out that while the Sovereign Grant has been unchanged for the past four years, inflation has eroded its value. If the grant had increased in line with inflation, it would have been about 106 million pounds this year, the palace said.
The basic grant was supplemented with 21.5 million pounds ($29.5 million) of income generated by properties outside the Crown Estate. This income increased by 1.7 million pounds, driven by a record year for visitors to Buckingham Palace and special tours of the newly renovated East Wing.
Craig Prescott, a constitutional law expert at Royal Holloway, University of London who focuses on the political role of the monarchy, said funding for the royals is relatively small when compared to the overall cost of the British state and it provides tangible benefits for the country.
'It's something that puts Britain on the world stage in a way that few other things do,'' he said, noting that Queen Elizabeth II's funeral was the largest gathering of world leaders in history and the coronation was broadcast around the world. 'It's one of those things that people think about when they think about Britain.''
Over the past year, Charles traveled to Australia and attended the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa — his first as the organization's head. The royals also took center stage at the 80th anniversaries of D-Day and V-E Day, which marked the end of World War II in Europe, and welcomed the leaders of Japan and Qatar as they made state visits to the U.K.
Overall, the royals made 1,900 public appearances in the U.K. and overseas. Some 93,000 guests attended 828 events at the royal palaces.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer Braced For Biggest Labour Rebellion Of His Time As PM Over Welfare Cuts
Keir Starmer Braced For Biggest Labour Rebellion Of His Time As PM Over Welfare Cuts

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Keir Starmer Braced For Biggest Labour Rebellion Of His Time As PM Over Welfare Cuts

Keir Starmer is facing the largest Labour rebellion of his time as prime minister as he tries to force through controversial welfare cuts. Dozens of his own backbenchers are set to defy him to vote against the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill in the Commons on Tuesday evening. Nearly 40 of them have signed a rebel amendment which would block the legislation, but the MP behind it says 'loads more' will also vote against the government. Rachael Maskell told BBC Breakfast: 'So many people say this is not the right thing to do, this is not a Labour thing to do. We're there to protect the poor, to ensure that disabled people have a future. 'But if you take away their personal independence, they won't be able to get to work, they won't be able to shower and wash and even eat day by day. 'So this is about dignity for disabled people and that's why so many of us feel so strongly about this.' At least 80 Labour MPs, along with MPs from every other party, would need to vote against the bill for the government to be defeated. Asked how many more Labour backbenchers could join the rebellion, Maskell said: 'There are loads more. I engaged with so many people yesterday who were saying 'I'm not signing your amendment, but I am voting down the bill'.' 'This is about dignity for disabled people which is why so many of us feel so strongly about this'Labour MP Rachael Maskell told #BBCBreakfast 'loads more' MPs have told her they will support her amendment to block the government's welfare reformshttps:// — BBC Breakfast (@BBCBreakfast) July 1, 2025 Even if the bill passes, a large number of Labour MPs voting against it would be a huge blow to Starmer's authority as he approaches the first anniversary of becoming prime minister. He watered down the government's initial welfare proposals after more than 120 Labour MPs vowed to vote against them. But even that has not been enough to win over a large section of his backbenchers, who point to the fact the government's own assessment estimates that 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of the cuts. Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds this morning urged Labour MPs to set aside their concerns about the cuts and vote with the government later. He told BBC Breakfast: 'I simply ask colleagues to read the proposals, compare them to what we have, and I think they're genuinely better. 'I absolutely do believe that they protect the most vulnerable people, which is exactly what people, I think, wanted from these reforms. They recognise we're spending a lot of money and no one's happy with the existing system, and that we can make those improvements and how the system works in the here and now and for the future are improved by these proposals.' Sadiq Khan Joins Growing Labour Backlash Against Starmer's Welfare Concessions Labour's Welfare Reforms Will Push 150,000 Into Poverty, Government Admits Andy Burnham Calls On Labour MPs To Vote Against Welfare Cuts Despite Starmer U-Turn

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store