'Actual intelligence': Franken-PC debuts in Melbourne with a $35,000 price tag and claims of exceptional performance
Cortical Labs has built the first deployable biological computer, priced at $35,000
The CL1 integrates living neurons with silicon for real-time computation
The next step will be to build a biological neural network server stack
Despite the unquestionably impressive advancements we've witnessed in recent years, AI is still lagging far behind human intelligence. While it can process vast amounts of data, recognize patterns, and generate responses at speed, it lacks true understanding and reasoning, and although it's getting better, the issue of hallucinations - when the AI makes stuff up - remains a problem.
Two years ago, researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Australia, together with scientists at Cortical Labs in Melbourne, suggested that the answer to real, less artificial AI was organoids - computers built with human brain cells. Fast forward to today, and Cortical Labs has turned the theory into reality with the production of the world's first commercialized biological computer.
The CL1, which will be manufactured to order but is available for purchase online (the option to buy time on the chips will also be offered), is a Synthetic Biological Intelligence (SBI).
'Real neurons are cultivated inside a nutrient-rich solution, supplying them with everything they need to be healthy. They grow across a silicon chip, which sends and receives electrical impulses into the neural structure," the company says.
The world the neurons exist in is created by Cortical Labs' Biological Intelligence Operating System (biOS) and 'runs a simulated world and sends information directly to the neurons about their environment. As the neurons react, their impulses affect their simulated world. We bring these neurons to life, and integrate them into the biOS with a mixture of hard silicon and soft tissue. You get to connect directly to these neurons.'
By deploying code directly to the real neurons, the company claims the CL1 can solve today's most difficult challenges, 'The neuron is self-programming, infinitely flexible, and the result of four billion years of evolution. What digital AI models spend tremendous resources trying to emulate, we begin with.'
"Today is the culmination of a vision that has powered Cortical Labs for almost six years," noted Dr. Hon Weng Chong, Founder and CEO of Cortical Labs. "However, our long-term mission has been to democratize this technology, making it accessible to researchers without specialized hardware and software. The CL1 is the realization of that mission. While today's announcement is incredibly exciting, it's the foundation for the next stage of innovation. The real impact and the real implications will come from every researcher, academic, or innovator that builds on top of it."
A report from New Atlasclaims Cortical is constructing a 'first-of-its-kind biological neural network server stack, housing 30 individual units that each contain the cells on their electrode array, which is expected to go online in the coming months.' The site reports the company is aiming to have four stacks available for commercial use via a cloud system by the end of 2025.
As for pricing, the CL1 will be surprisingly affordable. 'The units themselves are expected to have a price tag of around US$35,000, to start with (anything close to this kind of tech is currently priced at €80,000, or nearly US$85,000),' New Atlas adds.
For context, Apple's 'best failure' the Lisa, which paved the way for the Macintosh and even Microsoft Windows, sold for $9,995.00 in January 1983 which, adjusting for inflation, works out to a comparable $32,500 today. Will the CL1 prove be as important to computing's future as the Lisa was? It's impossible to say, but for now its impact will largely depend on scalability, practical applications, and how well it integrates into existing AI and computing systems.
Computers built by human brain cells could help make AI less artificial
Brain-like computers could become reality sooner than you think
'An extension of a scientist's brain': Researchers explore AI to augment inspiration
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Light pollution is encroaching on observatories around the globe – making it harder for astronomers to study the cosmos
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. Outdoor lighting for buildings, roads and advertising can help people see in the dark of night, but many astronomers are growing increasingly concerned that these lights could be blinding us to the rest of the universe. An estimate from 2023 showed that the rate of human-produced light is increasing in the night sky by as much as 10% per year. I'm an astronomer who has chaired a standing commission on astronomical site protection for the International Astronomical Union-sponsored working groups studying ground-based light pollution. My work with these groups has centered around the idea that lights from human activities are now affecting astronomical observatories on what used to be distant mountaintops. Hot science in the cold, dark night While orbiting telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope give researchers a unique view of the cosmos – particularly because they can see light blocked by the Earth's atmosphere – ground-based telescopes also continue to drive cutting-edge discovery. Telescopes on the ground capture light with gigantic and precise focusing mirrors that can be 20 to 35 feet (6 to 10 meters) wide. Moving all astronomical observations to space to escape light pollution would not be possible, because space missions have a much greater cost and so many large ground-based telescopes are already in operation or under construction. Around the world, there are 17 ground-based telescopes with primary mirrors as big or bigger than Webb's 20-foot (6-meter) mirror, and three more under construction with mirrors planned to span 80 to 130 feet (24 to 40 meters). The newest telescope starting its scientific mission right now, the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, has a mirror with a 28-foot diameter and a 3-gigapixel camera. One of its missions is to map the distribution of dark matter in the universe. To do that, it will collect a sample of 2.6 billion galaxies. The typical galaxy in that sample is 100 times fainter than the natural glow in the nighttime air in the Earth's atmosphere, so this Rubin Observatory program depends on near-total natural darkness. Any light scattered at night – road lighting, building illumination, billboards – would add glare and noise to the scene, greatly reducing the number of galaxies Rubin can reliably measure in the same time, or greatly increasing the total exposure time required to get the same result. The LED revolution Astronomers care specifically about artificial light in the blue-green range of the electromagnetic spectrum, as that used to be the darkest part of the night sky. A decade ago, the most common outdoor lighting was from sodium vapor discharge lamps. They produced an orange-pink glow, which meant that they put out very little blue and green light. Even observatories relatively close to growing urban areas had skies that were naturally dark in the blue and green part of the spectrum, enabling all kinds of new observations. Then came the solid-state LED lighting revolution. Those lights put out a broad rainbow of color with very high efficiency – meaning they produce lots of light per watt of electricity. The earliest versions of LEDs put out a large fraction of their energy in the blue and green, but advancing technology now gets the same efficiency with "warmer" lights that have much less blue and green. Nevertheless, the formerly pristine darkness of the night sky now has much more light, particularly in the blue and green, from LEDs in cities and towns, lighting roads, public spaces and advertising. The broad output of color from LEDs affects the whole spectrum, from ultraviolet through deep red. The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned a study in 2019 which predicted that the higher energy efficiency of LEDs would mean that the amount of power used for lights at night would go down, with the amount of light emitted staying roughly the same. But satellites looking down at the Earth reveal that just isn't the case. The amount of light is going steadily up, meaning that cities and businesses were willing to keep their electricity bills about the same as energy efficiency improved, and just get more light. Natural darkness in retreat As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles (320 kilometers) away. When these urban areas are adjacent to an observatory, the addition to the skyglow is much stronger, making detection of the faintest galaxies and stars that much harder. When the Mt. Wilson Observatory was constructed in the Angeles National Forest near Pasadena, California, in the early 1900s, it was a very dark site, considerably far from the 500,000 people living in Greater Los Angeles. Today, 18.6 million people live in the LA area, and urban sprawl has brought civilization much closer to Mt. Wilson. When Kitt Peak National Observatory was first under construction in the late 1950s, it was far from metro Tucson, Arizona, with its population of 230,000. Today, that area houses 1 million people, and Kitt Peak faces much more light pollution. Even telescopes in darker, more secluded regions – like northern Chile or western Texas – experience light pollution from industrial activities like open-pit mining or oil and gas facilities. The case of the European Southern Observatory An interesting modern challenge is facing the European Southern Observatory, which operates four of the world's largest optical telescopes. Their site in northern Chile is very remote, and it is nominally covered by strict national regulations protecting the dark sky. AES Chile, an energy provider with strong U.S. investor backing, announced a plan in December 2024 for the development of a large industrial plant and transport hub close to the observatory. The plant would produce liquid hydrogen and ammonia for green energy. Even though formally compliant with the national lighting norm, the fully built operation could scatter enough artificial light into the night sky to turn the current observatory's pristine darkness into a state similar to some of the legacy observatories now near large urban areas. This light pollution could mean the facility won't have the same ability to detect and measure the faintest galaxies and stars. RELATED STORIES — Light pollution poses serious threat to astronomy, skywatching and more, study says — Best light pollution filters for astrophotography 2025 — World's largest telescope threatened by light pollution from renewable energy project Light pollution doesn't only affect observatories. Today, around 80% of the world's population cannot see the Milky Way at night. Some Asian cities are so bright that the eyes of people walking outdoors cannot become visually dark-adapted. In 2009, the International Astronomical Union declared that there is a universal right to starlight. The dark night sky belongs to all people – its awe-inspiring beauty is something that you don't have to be an astronomer to appreciate. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
The starter robot vacuum I'd buy with convenient self-emptying dock is over $300 off at Amazon
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Never buy a robot vacuum at full price. There's almost always some kind of deal on even the most expensive models from top manufacturers that can save you hundreds off the regular price. For example, right now, you can get the Roborock Q5 Max Plus Robot Vacuum at Amazon for $279.99 (was $599.99). The Roborock Q5 Max Plus is a step above the standard robot vacuum thanks to the self-emptying dock, which automatically transfers all the debris that your machine picked up into a garbage bag. It doesn't have the fancy mopping features found in some higher-end robot vacuums, but if you're fine with just the basic vacuum with the convenience of a self-emptying dock, it's well worth it at this price. Today's best robot vacuum deal The Roborock Q5 Max Plus is a budget robot vacuum with a few advanced features that make it worth buying for under $280. Self-emptying docks are attractive because of the hands-free setup, so you don't need to manually dispose of trash for weeks at a time. It can last up to 240 minutes on one charge, which is much longer than the average 150-minute runtime of similar models. Its modest 5500Pa suction, plus the DuoRoller Brush, makes it capable of removing pet and human hair, Deal The Roborock Q5 Max Plus makes a great starter robot vacuum with its modest suction, convenient self-emptying functions and hair removal features, and longer runtime at this price point. Its 5500Pa suction isn't anything to write home about, but it alleviates this with its DuoRoller Brush. Its rubber bristles more easily clean surfaces, from hardwood to carpet, and pick up pet and human hair. The Q5 Max Plus covers up to 3,767 sqft with its navigation system and can run up to 240 minutes at full charge, which is much longer than the 150-minute runtime on similar models. It can last up to seven weeks without emptying its dustbin, too, depending on how often you use it. The package only comes with two 2x2.5L dust bags to start, but you can easily buy a pack of 12 dust bags for less than $15 from Amazon. Note that it only supports 2.4G WiFi, so make sure your router supports that. If you use 5 GHz, you could consider setting up a dual-band router to switch between the two. For options like the Roborock Q5 Max Plus, I'd recommend comparing with the Roborock Q7 M5 and Roborock Q8 Max . You can also browse the rest of our best robot vacuums and wait for a sale on your favorite.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
I've just tested four new TCL Mini LED TVs, and I'm amazed at the step forward the Chinese brand has taken this year
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. At this point, we all know that TCL is capable of producing the occasional excellent TV, particularly once price is taken into account, but in recent years it has struggled for consistency. Previously on Adventures in AV The new LG C5 OLED is a fantastic five-star TV – but here's why I won't be upgrading There have been standout crackers (2023's C845K springs to mind), but we've deemed most of its models to be worthy of a maximum of four stars rather than five (and there are a few threes in there as well). 2025 is very much looking like the year that changes. Earlier this week, my esteemed colleague John Archer and I sat down for a mammoth testing session that included four new TCL TVs, and I was struck not only by how much of a step up they are over last year's models, but also by the consistency the brand seems to have suddenly achieved. We have so far published just one of the reviews from that testing session (check out our new TCL C8K review), but I've already gone on record to say that I really like the 98-inch C7K, too. Well, at the risk of spoiling our upcoming reviews of the other two models, the 65-inch C7K and 50-inch C6KS, they are also very impressive. These are all Mini LED TVs, with the C7K sitting below the C8K that we have reviewed. Both models feature something that TCL calls 'Halo Control Technology'. This is a snazzy name for a whole suite of technologies designed to improve contrast while reducing the flaws we often encounter with backlit TVs, such as blooming or 'halos' of light around bright objects on black backgrounds. On the evidence of the C8K and the two C7K models we looked at, that Halo Control Technology works a treat. I've seen very few Mini LED TVs that can go as bright and contrasty as these TCLs while remaining controlled and composed. But almost as important is how TCL seems to have matured in the way it tunes its TVs. Across the board, these TVs combined superb punch, vibrancy and sharpness with a level of balance and control I haven't typically associated with the brand before. The Filmmaker Mode has been particularly well implemented, delivering a less processed and more cinematically authentic picture without the sort of drab flatness that's all too common from the Filmmaker Modes of many rival backlit TVs. The smaller, much cheaper CK6S doesn't feature the new Halo Control Technology, yet its contrast and composure are still very good for the low asking price (just £400 in the UK at the time of writing). Again, though, it's the TV's general balance of punch and authenticity that really appealed to me. What's perhaps most impressive, though, is how alike all of the TVs are. While there are naturally performance downgrades as you drop from the C8K to the C7K and then to the C6KS, the general approach to picture quality is very consistent, indicating careful, considered tuning. The best TV brands have a sort of picture quality DNA that you can see across their models – I can instantly tell a Samsung from a Sony, for example – and it appears that TCL may have now settled on its own. There are still plenty of TCL models we haven't looked at, and perhaps they will contradict what I've seen so far. But on the evidence of these four TVs, it looks like TCL has taken a big step forward this year, and if I were a rival brand that still makes lots of money from sales of backlit TVs, I'd be very worried. MORE: These are the best TVs you can buy right now And here are the best TVs under £1000 TCL's new Mini LED TV range comes with huge brightness gains, reduced blooming and souped-up sound
