First school year of cellphone ban well-received: minister
Manitoba banned phones in elementary classrooms last summer and introduced new rules to silence devices and keep them out of sight during Grade 9 to 12 lessons.
'How practical is that going to be in the real world? AI exists. Cellphones exist. Banning them is only going to make us sneakier,' said Diana Bonakdar, who just finished Grade 11 in Winnipeg.
Diana and Nadia Lovallo, the new co-presidents of the student council at St. Mary's Academy, question the effectiveness of the policy and its long-term impact.
'It scares people, but it doesn't stop them. We just find other ways to connect,' Nadia said, noting that school administrators blocked access to Snapchat on the campus WiFi network so teenagers started using VPNs (virtual private networks) to access the app.
'We're addicted to our phones. We grew up with them, so it's like telling someone to, 'Just quit smoking,' right away,' she said.
Reflecting on the policy on the first official day of summer break, Education Minister Tracy Schmidt said her office received overwhelmingly positive feedback about it.
The mother of three acknowledged that students found ways to sneak phones, but she suggested this 'slippage' demonstrates the addictive nature of the devices and the importance of keeping restrictions in tact.
'For me, it just really reinforces the need for us as government and as educators and as schools to really step in and help kids find that balance,' Schmidt said.
The minister indicated that school leaders attributed the new rules on accessing devices to increased levels of student engagement and greater in-person discussion and laughter on kindergarten-to-Grade 12 campuses.
Multiple high school teachers told the Free Press that consistent enforcement backed by the principal of a school was key to the policy's hyperlocal success, or else students shrugged off the rules.
'Teachers set a standard. Kids learn which teachers have what standards. They know the ones who are wishy-washy and bad at classroom management, or are trying to be friends with the kids,' said one teacher who wanted his name withheld from print for fear of retribution.
He indicated that differing opinions about whether cellphones had a place in his school caused tension among staff members. Some teachers were strict while others openly used their phone during the day, the teacher said.
The president of the Manitoba Teachers' Society said in a statement Monday that members' thoughts on the new approach to devices were 'largely positive.'
'Some teachers use technology much more than others, and not all teachers use technology or need to monitor it in the same ways,' said union leader Lillian Klausen, who represents upwards of 16,600 public school teachers.
High school teachers were permitted to allow phones during class periods this year if it was strictly for educational purposes. The rules also allowed teenagers in most high schools to access their phones during breaks.
(That was not the case at St. Mary's Academy, as senior years students were asked to be leaders for their younger peers and follow the same rules as the grade 7 and 8 students.)
Executive members of the Manitoba Association of Education Technology Leaders have repeatedly expressed hesitation about the partial phone ban since it was announced.
The self-imposed mandate of the organization is to 'promote and publicize the effective acquisition, organization, deployment, and integration of technology' in local schools.
Association president Richard Roberts warned about the 'out of sight, out of mind' phenomenon.
'Knowing that they have cellphones in their pockets, whether it's secretly at school or it's once they go home, are we actively educating them to be responsible, well-balanced citizens?' said Roberts, a teacher and technology integration consultant in Winnipeg.
Roberts said all students need to develop a skill-set to leverage technology and use it in an ethical way.
For that reason, he said he would love to see the province give middle years teachers more autonomy next year to integrate phones back into lesson periods on a case-by-case basis to improve digital literacy education.
maggie.macintosh@freepress.mb.ca
Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter
Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie.
Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative.
Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
We broke the story. AI is breaking the internet.
In the summer of 2019, Free Press investigative reporter Ryan Thorpe went undercover for a meeting with a local recruiter for a neo-Nazi group at a secluded park in St. Boniface. The man he met while infiltrating a white nationalist hate group turned out to be a Canadian Armed Forces reservist from Beausejour by the name of Patrik Mathews. In short order, Thorpe would uncover a story that would ultimately lead to a Maryland courtroom where Mathews would be sentenced to nine years in prison for what the FBI said was a plan to incite a race war in the United States. But five years later, all the work Thorpe did as part of our Homegrown Hate investigation is no longer part of the record as it's now defined by the 'intelligence' of Google's Gemini artificial intelligence search platform. Instead, this new approach to search for information delivers a summary — minus any links, sources or reason to look any further than the answer Google has just provided — when you type 'Patrik Mathews' into that search window: Patrik Mathews' biography, as summarized by a Google Gemini query. Take note how that summary makes no mention of the Free Press as the source of the investigation or Thorpe as the journalist – including the fact he had to contend with death threats as the FBI learned members of The Base were planning to kill him for exposing Mathews. In this AI-powered future of search, there is no reward for being the originating source: no links for readers to click to read more, and therefore no revenue to pay for that journalism – not even any recognition. Instead, what greets you is the 'answer' by way of an AI overview. That might be good for tech titans like Google who want to keep users looking at their pages. But it's yet another gut punch to content creators like the Free Press who rely on search engines to send readers our way. 'Large language models (LLMS) are harming publishers in two ways,' notes Paul Deegan, president of News Media Canada. 'First, AI companies are flagrantly scraping and summarizing content directly from published news articles via retrieval-augmented generation. Second, because AI overviews are significantly more comprehensive than the snippets associated with traditional links, users may feel they have no reason to click through to the source article on a publisher's website. 'With the user staying within Big Tech's increasingly tall-walled garden, rather than being directed electronically to news websites via links, publishers are deprived of audience, and their ability to sell advertising and subscriptions is significantly diminished. 'No clicks mean no cash for news businesses. Yet, AI companies are selling ads against copyrighted (and often paywalled) content as well as subscriptions for their premium products.' The harm to publishers' bottom lines isn't the worst of the problem with AI summaries. Accuracy is also a problem: a report by BBC earlier this year examining AI chatbots by Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Perplexity found 'significant inaccuracies' in more than half of their summaries of news stories. That's a study of news-article summaries; you might also have read funny stories about AI search results suggesting people eat a rock every day or put glue on their pizza, or less hilarious stories about it suggesting a mix of vinegar and bleach for home cleaning (a recipe for poisonous chlorine gas). This happens because AI generates text by making plausible predictions based on training data; nobody is checking for truth in its sources or its answers. The scale and scope of AI's errors and distortions is not known — not to audiences and media companies, not to regulators, lawmakers, academics or even the companies responsible for the AI chatbots. And as AI summaries and chats become more integrated into search systems, people rely on them more, so they're less likely to bother to double-check the information AI tells them. The journalism Ryan Thorpe produced for that special investigation — like all the journalism our newsroom publishes every single day — costs money to produce. Not just to pay investigative journalists, but to pay others in the newsroom to verify our work is accurate and objective, and to host the information on websites and apps for audiences to read it… if they can find it. If generative AI continues to crawl 'without consent, credit and compensation,' what does that mean for the long-term future of information we can trust — and for that matter, for human intelligence?
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Southern chiefs, Métis federation join forces in economic development, Indigenous rights protection
The Southern Chiefs' Organization and Manitoba Métis Federation announced plans Wednesday to partner on infrastructure and development projects, while seeking greater roles in initiatives led by federal or provincial governments. SCO Grand Chief Jerry Daniels and MMF president David Chartrand signed a memorandum of understanding at The Forks, a traditional gathering place for Indigenous Peoples, with the aim of advancing economic reconciliation and protecting Indigenous rights and the environment. 'We are forging a path toward economic independence and sustainability, ensuring the voices of First Nations and Red River Métis are integral to the design, approval and implementation of nation-building projects across this province,' Daniels told reporters. RUTH BONNEVILLE / FREE PRESS SCO Grand Chief Jerry Daniels (left) and MMF president David Chartrand signed a memorandum of understanding to advance economic reconciliation and protect Indigenous rights and the environment. 'This agreement lays the groundwork for a future where we have the control over the resources and development on our lands, and where we benefit directly from all projects that take place within our territories.' The five-year agreement emphasizes that project revenues would go toward housing, clean energy, transportation networks and other community infrastructure. Daniels and Chartrand said Indigenous Peoples must not only be consulted but they must be involved in the decision-making of federal and provincial infrastructure and development projects. The signing happened with an eye toward federal Bill C-5 (the Building Canada Act), which gives Ottawa new powers to speed up permitting for nation-building initiatives, against the backdrop of the U.S.-Canada trade war. The Manitoba government is proposing a new Crown-Indigenous corporation to proactively assemble Indigenous leaders for reviews and approvals of economic development projects. Sources told the Free Press earlier this week the short-term goal is to secure federal dollars for local nation-building projects. Chartrand said SCO and MMF will work with the province on the proposed Crown-Indigenous corporation. He said Bill C-5 will bring 'massive' job and training opportunities for Indigenous Peoples. 'Bill C-5 is coming, and it has to come. There's not a doubt it must arrive because the danger that (U.S. President Donald) Trump imposes on all of us is very scary, to be honest with you,' Chartrand said. 'This is an economic war, and people should not take it lightly.' He announced plans for an Indigenous-led natural resources committee that would look at harvesting practices, which are currently governed by the province. 'We would like to see freshwater fisheries be collectively owned by us, and control to be in hands of Indigenous nations,' Daniels said. Separately, MMF and SCO have several ongoing projects in downtown Winnipeg. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. SCO, which represents 32 First Nations in southern Manitoba, is involved in the redevelopment of the former Bay building and Portage Place. Chartrand said MMF, the national government of the Red River Métis, is finalizing an agreement for two more downtown buildings. He said MMF and SCO could partner on property development projects in the future. 'This is a message to all — the business community, the governments — that two massive groups are coming together, massive historical people are coming together, and with them they bring strengths, they bring leadership and we bring resources,' he said. 'We're not coming with our hands out, nobody is asking for money here. We'll earn our own.' Chris KitchingReporter Chris Kitching is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He began his newspaper career in 2001, with stops in Winnipeg, Toronto and London, England, along the way. After returning to Winnipeg, he joined the Free Press in 2021, and now covers a little bit of everything for the newspaper. Read more about Chris. Every piece of reporting Chris produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Time to press leaders to act quickly
Opinion When I first sat down to write this, the Air Quality Index (AQI) was 259. Think of the most polluted place anywhere in the world, and we were worse. Even Toronto was less than half. Looking at a world literally on fire, I have to confess that my first thought was not 'let's build a pipeline.' Nor to spend money on any other project that supports fossil fuel consumption (and thus adds to the fire). No doubt this is one of many reasons why I am not prime minister of Canada, or premier of Manitoba, or mayor of Winnipeg. Apparently, taking the oath of office somehow erodes your ecological understanding (or, in Mark Carney's case, his 'values'), blinding you to common-sense reasoning about the state of the Earth and its creatures. Nor does even the fate of your own children and grandchildren seem to matter any more. Because of the foolish choices made by politicians, those young people will soon have to live in a world where AQI 259 is the norm. Going forward, our two seasons in Manitoba will not be winter and construction, but winter and smoke. The vast northern boreal forests will continue to burn as long as there is dry wood and a spark – warming winters, hotter summers, increasing drought and lightning create a perfect (fire) storm. Now, because Premier Wab Kinew offered a pipeline to Churchill as a good idea for northern Manitoba, he has apparently been called a 'climate change denier,' prompting others to rise to his defence. He has also eagerly lined up with the federal government, whose 'big ideas' always seem to mean more pipelines, cross-country to Alberta, and little else. There is no point to me slinging mud here, however. I would just say that climate change denial is, as climate change denial does. Two years into his term – halfway to the next election – Kinew has (incredibly) made ecological action even less of a priority than former PC premier Brian Pallister. Granted, much of what Pallister attempted was pointless, even perverse. But however laughable that 2017 'Climate and Green Plan' was, in all its multi-pillared splendor, Kinew has not even attempted anything better on his own. So, I hope Kinew will be honest, talking to the climate refugees from our north, telling them that he has done (and intends to do) nothing to change their situation. They will likely be back, again and again, until they give up and just stay in the south. While Kinew and his crew are more politically savvy than their predecessors in government (not a high bar to clear!), there are still limits to how far they can go on a smile and shoeshine. Along with ecological inaction, critical issues in health care remain much as they were, and new concerns have come to light. It took a Free Press article to expose the shocking fact that personal care homes are receiving the same budgets for feeding their residents now as they did in 2009. Where are the whistle-blowers? Or do we, as a society, value our elders so little, that no one objected? There always seems to be money for road construction, or sports events, or local hoorah of some kind, to distract voters from the important issues. 'Bread and circuses' (panem et circenses) has been a political maxim since ancient Rome – feed and distract the masses, and you can do what you want the rest of the time. Except, here in Manitoba, our leaders seem to think they need more bread than our elders. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. I looked up the difference between MLA salaries in 2009 and 2025. They are receiving more than 20 per cent higher base salary today. To quickly solve the problem, I think we should roll back their salaries (and those of senior management in the WHRA and Shared Health) to 2009 levels. Then, take that extra money to improve the food at personal care homes, until our political leaders can figure out another way to pay the bill. Looking at Winnipeg, Mayor Scott Gillingham was elected, it seems, by those who wanted nothing much to change. He has delivered on that expectation, but in a world on fire, doing nothing is almost as bad as starting another one. We could be working toward an accessible, climate resilient and sustainable city, but that would require foresight totally missing right now in City Hall, which is myopically focused on wasting money we don't have on yet more road construction. From the first shovel to its opening, the Winnipeg Floodway took six years and was bigger than the Suez Canal. Want a big project? How about one that has been talked about for too long? Move the rail lines outside the city, put in an LRT and rework transit to provide electric bus service to neighbourhoods. The local economy would boom, emissions from transportation would plummet, quality of life for everyone would improve – and so would the air. Do it in six years. Or less. Peter Denton writes from his floodway-protected home in rural Manitoba.
