
Incyte announces data from two studies evaluating INCA033989
Incyte (INCY) announced the first clinical data from two studies evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of INCA033989, a novel, first in class, Incyte-discovered, targeted monoclonal antibody in patients with mutant calreticulin-expressing myeloproliferative neoplasms, MPNs. These data – featured today in the Late-Breaking Oral Session at the European Hematology Association 2025, EHA 2025, Congress in Milan, Italy – focus on the dose escalation portion of the studies in patients with high risk essential thrombocythemia who are resistant/intolerant to prior cytoreductive therapy. The studies evaluated the safety and efficacy of INCA033989 in patients with ET as measured by hematologic response and reduction in mutCALR variant allele frequency. Results as of April 4, 2025, showed rapid and durable normalization of platelet counts across all dose levels, with a trend toward improved responses in higher doses, in patients with ET treated with INCA033989. Notably, 86% of patients at doses 400 mg and above achieved a complete or partial hematologic response, with the majority of patients achieving complete response. Eighty-nine percent of evaluable patients showed a reduction in mutCALR VAF from baseline. A partial molecular response was observed in 21% of evaluable patients after only 3 cycles of treatment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. Used 'Disinformation' to Defend Change to Vaccine Schedule, Expert Says: Reports
The Department of Health and Human Services sent Congress a document that cited disputed studies and misrepresented other findings, according to NPR and KFF Health News The document was written in support of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to change federal COVID vaccine recommendations for healthy kids and pregnant women 'This is RFK Jr.'s playbook,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of PediatricsThe Department of Health and Human Services sent Congress a document to support Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to change federal vaccine recommendations that cited unpublished or disputed studies and misrepresented other findings, according to NPR and KFF Health News. In late May, Kennedy, who has a history of vaccine skepticism, announced on X that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed the COVID vaccine from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, while touting President Trump's Make America Healthy Again agenda. "It is so far out of left field that I find it insulting to our members of Congress that they would actually give them something like this. Congress members are relying on these agencies to provide them with valid information, and it's just not there," Dr. Mark Turrentine, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Baylor College of Medicine, told KFF Health News, the outlet that obtained the FAQ document. The outlet also reported that the document suggests a link between heart conditions like myocarditis or pericarditis and the COVID vaccine, but updated research suggests that connection has decreased with newer vaccine procedures. The document also left out multiple other peer-reviewed studies that show the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis is greater after getting sick with COVID for both vaccinated and non-vaccinated people than the risk of the same complications after vaccination alone, per KFF Health News. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. "There is no distortion of the studies in this document. The underlying data speaks for itself, and it raises legitimate safety concerns. HHS will not ignore that evidence or downplay it. We will follow the data and the science," a HHS spokesperson told KFF Health News. 'This is RFK Jr.'s playbook,' Sean O'Leary, chair of the Committee on Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told KFF Health News. 'Either cherry-pick from good science or take junk science to support his premise — this has been his playbook for 20 years.' Read the original article on People


Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
NIH chief sidesteps controversy while other officials court it
National Institutes of Health director Jay Bhattacharya didn't aggressively push back and defend Trump administration budget cuts and grant freezes when senators grilled him last week about plans for his agency. An $18 billion cut in the 2026 NIH budget request was just a starting point for negotiations, he said. Why it matters: The hearing showed how the former Stanford professor is trying to deflect controversy over the administration's health agenda while others on President Trump's health team under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have leaned into their roles as disruptors. That's raising questions about who has the final say over the government's biomedical research hub. Bhattacharya is "in a difficult position with limited influence," Capital Alpha Partners analyst Rob Smith wrote in a note on Friday. "RFK appears to be running the show at the subagencies he oversees as HHS Secretary. It's our understanding that very little happens without his input." What they're saying: An HHS spokesperson told Axios that NIH and Bhattacharya are fully committed to advancing research, improving health outcomes and supporting scientific discovery. Constructive criticism pushes this innovation forward, they said. The big picture: NIH is the largest public payer of biomedical research in the world. It funds academic research and develops and funds much of the science behind products that drug companies eventually commercialize. The Trump budget's plan to cut its funding 40% next year could kneecap pharma and the biotech industry. State of play: Bhattacharya tried to find a middle ground during the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, taking credit for fighting what he called "politicized science" while telling lawmakers he didn't accept the job to terminate grants. "This is my first time through this budget fight, and so I'm still learning, but I'll tell you what I understand is that this — the budget — is a collaborative effort between Congress and the administration," Bhattacharya said. "We have tremendous health needs that we have to address. It's only excellent research that's going to solve those problems," he said. His written testimony didn't mention the cuts, instead laying out the administration's policy priorities for NIH and the funding they are requesting. Zoom in: It's true that the budget proposal is just the first step in a negotiation process, and Congress gets the final say on funding levels. But Bhattacharya's decision not to explicitly defend the budget cuts shows that his role remains cryptic on a health team that's eagerly pushing boundaries. Kennedy defended the cuts strongly when he appeared in front of the same panel last month. "All the money that we've been pouring into these programs for years has not resulted in better health for Americans. ... We won't solve this problem by throwing more money at it. We must spend smarter," Kennedy said. The intrigue: Bhattacharya was sworn in as NIH director in April — just as mass layoffs at the agency ordered by Kennedy and DOGE went into effect. He quickly sent an all-hands letter to staff expressing gratitude for their work and pledging to implement changes "humanely." Bhattacharya has set up an appeals process to review grants that were terminated through keyword searches and other aggressive efforts to root out DEI initiatives. NIH was one of the first agencies to tell employees they didn't have to answer Elon Musk's "five things" weekly emails, and Bhattacharya reportedly called the task silly in an address to NIH staff. But the frozen grants and budget request haven't earned him much of a grace period with Congress. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said last week the proposed budget cuts would "delay or stop effective treatments and cures from being developed for diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's, Type 1 diabetes — I could go on and on." "A President's budget is not a 'negotiation with Congress,' it's a statement of priorities and values," Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), the ranking member of the committee's subpanel on health, told Axios in a statement. Reality check: Bhattacharya is no stranger to controversy. During the pandemic, he was disparaged by the medical establishment for co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration, a petition arguing for COVID to spread among young, healthy people to reach herd immunity faster. He's been receptive to the idea that NIH-funded research in China led directly to the spread of COVID, and he's cast doubt on the merits of gender-affirming medical care for kids. "I think Dr. Bhattacharya wants NIH to continue to set the pace for medical progress, but what matters is whether he acts on intention and stops the dismantling of American-led research," Ellie Dehoney, senior vice president of policy and advocacy at Research!America, told Axios in an email. What we're watching: Bhattacharya is demurring, and there's bipartisan interest in keeping NIH well-funded. Congress in the near term is likely to maintain the status quo through stopgap spending measures.


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump turned 79 this weekend and will be 82 at the end of his term. How old is too old?
Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT The president is an old man. He sometimes mixes up names or garbles his words. Some voters worry that age is affecting his performance in arguably the world's most demanding job. Those sentences are true today: Donald Trump, who turned 79 on Saturday, is the oldest president ever at this point in his term. But they've also been true for the past eight years, both during Trump's first term and during Joe Biden's. At the end of Trump's second, he will be the oldest president ever — and among the oldest leaders Advertisement Many politicians, like many people, remain sharp and spry into old age. And older leaders can bring strengths: More experience and longtime ties with the voters they represent. But age also brings health vulnerabilities. Since the first members of Congress convened in 1789, Today's newsletter explains what we know about Trump's health and the ongoing debate around older elected officials. Advertisement The age of Trump Aging increases the risk of getting cancer, having heart attacks and strokes, and developing Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other neurodegenerative diseases. By the time Americans reach 65, about 90 percent suffer from at least one chronic condition, said Dr. Eric Topol, a cardiologist who studies aging. Topol published a book last month, ' On the other hand, Trump doesn't drink, and his wealth and office give him access to top-tier medical care. Trump's doctor calls his health ' Trump has for years given rambling speeches and misstated facts, which could make it hard to tell if his faculties are changing. Still, he often appears more tired today than he did in his first term. During the 2024 campaign, Trump warned that Biden would 'plunge the world into World War II' and mixed up Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley. Since starting his second term, Trump has Advertisement Right now, Americans don't seem too concerned about Trump's age and health: less than a third say those factors ' Age-old debate Being old, of course, is no guarantee of infirmity. And casually dismissing aging lawmakers also risks stoking stigma against older Americans in general. But Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election after a Some argue that younger politicians offer a clear break with the past and are more attuned to younger voters' concerns. Over the weekend, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, 35, Most voters, though, may have other ideas. Many Advertisement Potential guardrails Francis Shen, a University of Minnesota law professor who studies aging and the law, thinks strict age limits would bar older politicians who remain capable — and that the public debate should be about cognitive ability, not the year on a politician's birth certificate. Instead, he argues, Congress should require candidates for federal office to take and disclose cognitive assessments, much as it requires financial disclosures. Topol predicts that medical advances will soon enable routine testing to determine how vulnerable someone is to age-related disease, allowing political candidates to release more detailed metrics about their current and future health. Still, there's a long history of presidents of both parties That means if Trump experiences cognitive decline in office, it might be hard to know for sure. 🧩 6 Across: 69° POINTS OF INTEREST A person golfs at Puttshack in Seaport, which has seen higher traffic than usual on rainy weekends. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff Boston and New England A broken housing market: The price of the typical Massachusetts home is now Measles: A traveler sick with the highly contagious virus visited a Boston hotel, the Museum of Fine Arts, and Logan Airport earlier this month, Pièce de résistance: A 12-year-old who recreated the Boston Tea Party using more than 1,000 LEGO bricks will represent the city Rain check: A string of washout weekend days has Massachusetts residents [Redacted for a family paper]: Maine's newly redesigned license plate features a pine tree. Some drivers Trump administration Israel vs. Iran: Israel had a chance to assassinate Iran's supreme leader over the weekend, but US officials told their Israeli counterparts that Trump opposed doing so. Israel and Iran continued to exchange missiles. ( Pick and choose: After telling ICE to stop targeting undocumented workers at farms, restaurants, and hotels, Trump directed the agency to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities. ( G7 summit: Trump will meet with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney today. They may discuss trade negotiations ahead of talks with five other world leaders near Calgary, Alberta. ( 'No Kings': Anti-Trump protests in Boston and hundreds of other cities across the country drew millions of attendees, organizers said. Trump vs. Harvard: A judge will hear arguments today over Trump's effort to BESIDE THE POINT 🗓️ For your calendar: A Juneteenth whiskey tasting, the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, an audiobook walking club, and more 🏈 Sportswashing: The NFL is selling flag football to bougie parents ( Advertisement 🎥 Happy 50th: Read our film critic's memories of seeing 'Jaws' 👨🦲 Misters Worldwide: Pitbull's fans dress like him at his concerts. It's hysterical to see that many people in bald caps. ( ❤️ Love Letters: She's on all the dating apps, but Get outside: The Coolidge is hitting the road this summer. Here's where you can watch films curated by the nonprofit Brookline cinema on the Greenway and elsewhere al fresco. ( 🪦 RIP: Graham Gund, an architect and philanthropist who shaped Boston's skyline and art museums, Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at