Fear of immigration raids force the cancellation of several July festivities in Los Angeles
The El Sereno Bicentennial Committee was one of the first organizations to announce the cancellation of its 66th Independence Day Parade in a June 20 statement on Facebook.
'We stand with our community. The safety of our participants, spectators and volunteers is always at the forefront,' according to the post.
The celebration is typically composed of numerous local organizations, schools and entertainment groups along with more than 1,2000 people marching in the parade, according to the committee.
However, many groups withdrew their entries from this year's parade, which ultimately led to the committee's decision, according to the post.
Ongoing raids throughout Los Angeles in Home Depot parking lots, popular food vendor locations and car washes have stoked fear in residents.
'You can see the impact of these random raids everywhere in our city — families are scared to go eat at restaurants, kids are scared their parents aren't going to return from the store — the fear is there because they've seen videos of people being shoved into unmarked vans by masked men refusing to identify themselves,' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told The Times.
Other previously scheduled events that have been postponed or canceled due to immigration enforcement activities include:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Green Card Applications Suffer Major Blow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Employer-sponsored green card applications are facing historic delays, according to a new report from the Cato Institute. On Monday, the libertarian think tank in Washington, D.C., published the results of its investigation into the processing times that immigrant workers now face when applying for green cards. It found that the average length had risen to 1,256 days, or 3.4 years, at the end of the second quarter of 2025—compared to 705 days (1.9 years) in 2016. Newsweek has contacted U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for comment via email. Why It Matters Average processing times have now reached an all-time high, according to Cato's analysis. The think tank added that the general difficulty applicants have in securing green cards threatens to undermine the competitiveness of the U.S. in attracting global talent. These drawn-out timelines create difficulties for both employees and employers, and they add to a mounting backlog for authorities at a time when the U.S.'s immigration architecture is already being significantly reshaped by the policies of President Donald Trump's administration. What To Know According to the Cato Institute's report, even applicants who pay a $2,805 "premium processing fee" wait almost two years on average before making it out of the "government's regulatory morass." These wait times are in addition to the time applicants must wait to secure a cap slot—based on the numerical limits the government sets on green cards by country and category—as well as the months of prefiling that must be done before applications can begin. A woman clutches a U.S. flag as she prepares to take the oath of citizenship in commemoration of Independence Day during a naturalization ceremony in San Antonio on July 3. A woman clutches a U.S. flag as she prepares to take the oath of citizenship in commemoration of Independence Day during a naturalization ceremony in San Antonio on July 3. Eric Gay/AP Photo The Cato Institute broke the process for employer-sponsored applications into six stages, all of which have risen since 2016: The prefiling stage: Employers and applicants gather documentation proving eligibility. Employers and applicants gather documentation proving eligibility. Prevailing wage determination: The Department of Labor evaluates the job to estimate a wage. The Department of Labor evaluates the job to estimate a wage. U.S. worker recruitment: Employers must also strive to recruit U.S. workers. Employers must also strive to recruit U.S. workers. Labor certification: Employers apply for a labor certification after proving no sufficiently qualified Americans responded to the job postings. Employers apply for a labor certification after proving no sufficiently qualified Americans responded to the job postings. Employer petition: Employers file a petition with the Department of Homeland Security, which checks the worker's eligibility and the employer's ability to pay them. Employers file a petition with the Department of Homeland Security, which checks the worker's eligibility and the employer's ability to pay them. Green card application: The employer requests status adjustment to permanent residence, requiring background and medical checks and a confirmation of the job offer. This protracted and complex process, according to the think tank, means employers are all but required to grant temporary work visas (such as the H-1B) to their employees before securing a green card, further drawing out these waiting times. According to a separate report from the immigration services company Boundless Immigration, citing data from USCIS, case completions across the board have fallen this year. In the second quarter of the federal fiscal year, which runs from January 1 to March 31, these dropped 18 percent year over year to 2.7 million. Meanwhile, the backlog of pending cases at USCIS grew to 11.3 million, the highest in over a decade. What People Are Saying The Cato Institute wrote in its report: "America will lose the global talent competition when other countries grant green cards in a matter of a few weeks or months, not years. It is time for the U.S. government to radically streamline its legal immigration system and eliminate unnecessary, burdensome procedures."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump Presidency Reboot Suffers From Predictable Plots
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. Performative AND Substantive When his presidential reality show was cancelled after one season in 2020, Donald Trump was determined that the show's 2025 reboot wouldn't suffer from the same lack of consistent plot lines and poor story development. Every week of the new season has Trump confronting a clearly defined villain who taps into racist, misogynistic, and/or xenophobic stereotypes. Trump is cast as vanquishing the invented villain, often while outperforming and dominating a quisling Democrat who is portrayed as inept in the task. In perfecting the formula, Trump has seized on Black women mayors — first Karen Bass in Los Angeles and now Muriel Bowser in D.C. — as the perfect foil for the MAGA base. And so it goes with the Monday launch of what will be at least a weeklong episode: the purported federal takeover of D.C. It's bad, yes. But there are also real limits to Trump's seizing federal control of D.C. police, deploying the D.C. National Guard, and assigning federal law enforcement to fight street crime. For Trump, the performance is what matters most. For us, it's important to recognize that it is performative and that provoking our outrage is part of the point. That doesn't mean the performance doesn't have substantive implications or isn't outrageous. One of the very real dangers of Trump is this reckless disregard for the substantive consequences of his performative flourishes. In the end, we don't have to choose. It's both/and. Some of the smartest analysis of this week's Trump plot line: Steve Vladeck: 'The upshot of all of this is that the President does have two important authorities when it comes to 'local' law enforcement in the District of Columbia: He can use the (small) D.C. National Guard in circumstances in which he probably couldn't use any other military personnel; and he can require the use of MPD 'for federal purposes' for up to 30 days. That's not nothing, but it also isn't anything close to some kind of federal takeover of the nation's capital.' Brian Beutler: 'But the upshot is the same. Trump has asserted political control over the city's police force and flooded streets with various other federal law-enforcement officers, supposedly to drive homeless people out of sight, and further reduce crime. But the overwhelming majority of us will experience it as a sucker punch — his way of proving he can provoke us without consequence.' Justin Glawe: 'While the reality of crime in America doesn't comport with the narratives being pushed by the White House, it's no surprise that the American right has glommed onto two random incidents in order to further their authoritarian goals.' Quote of the Day 'The most benign interpretation is that this is an attempt to gain a public-relations victory by claiming credit for the already historically low crime rates in D.C. The worst-case interpretation is that it is a test run for more legally dubious uses of military forces in other American cities.' —Carrie Lee, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund and a former professor at the U.S. Army War College, on President Trump's deployment of the National Guard in DC Breaking … A new WaPo exclusive: The Trump administration is evaluating plans that would establish a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' composed of hundreds of National Guard troops tasked with rapidly deploying into American cities facing protests or other unrest, according to internal Pentagon documents reviewed by The Washington Post. The plan calls for 600 troops to be on standby at all times so they can deploy in as little as one hour, the documents say. They would be split into two groups of 300 and stationed at military bases in Alabama and Arizona, with purview of regions east and west of the Mississippi River, respectively. New Modern Record: 60,000+ In Immigration Detention The number of people in immigration detention has risen from about 39,000 in January to more than 60,000 today, exceeding the previous record of 55,654 set in August 2019 during Trump's first term, the NYT reports. Harvard Close To Coughing Up $500M To Settle With Trump Ongoing negotiations between Harvard University and the Trump administration to settle trumped-up claims of antisemitism on campus are closing in on the structure of a extortive deal that would include the university paying $500 million to free up billions in frozen federal research funding. Judge Blocks Trump Funding Freeze U.S. District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich of D.C. – a Trump appointee – ordered the Trump administration to restore frozen federal funding for the National Endowment for Democracy. Judge Calls Out Trump DOJ In Ghislaine Maxwell Case In rejecting the Trump DOJ's request to release grand jury materials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer of Manhattan called out the administration for misleading the public into thinking the Jeffrey Epstein-related materials would contain new information: Insofar as the motion to unseal implies that the grand jury materials are an untapped mine lode of undisclosed information about Epstein or Maxwell or confederates, they definitively are not that. A 'public official,' 'lawmaker,' 'pundit,' or 'ordinary citizen' 'deeply interested and concerned about the Epstein matter,' Motion to Unseal at 3, and who reviewed these materials expecting, based on the Government's representations, to learn new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes and the investigation into them, would come away feeling disappointed and misled. There is no 'there' there. Blast from the Past The right-wing extremist Ammon Bundy cannot use bankruptcy to erase a $52 million defamation judgment won against him by an Idaho hospital system, a court ruled last week. Only the Best People President Trump plans to nominate the woefully unqualified E.J. Antoni, currently the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Antoni, a strident BLS critic, would replace Erika McEntarfer, who was fired by the president after he baselessly claimed that the jobs numbers were 'rigged.' Chart of the Day A new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office shows how regressive President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is:
Fox News
8 hours ago
- Fox News
MORNING GLORY: Trump meets Putin amid an era done away with John Quincy Adams' 'abroad'
In a lengthy and beautifully crafted address on Independence Day, July 4, 1821, then-President John Quincy Adams delivered an extraordinarily detailed and learned lesson on the founding of America. It's one that still deserves repeated and close reading -- though much of it will simply not be understood by most Americans today, for it is dense in references to history no longer taught widely in the United States. Adams' most memorable sentences are often quoted: "[America] has, in the lapse of nearly half a century, without a single exception, respected the independence of other nations while asserting and maintaining her own. She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when the conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart. She has seen that probably for centuries to come, all the contests of that Aceldama the European world, will be contests of inveterate power, and emerging right. Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence, has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will recommend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example." The declamation that America "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy" is a favorite text of both the pre-World Wars One and Two isolationists in America, but of course both global conflicts reached out and drew the United States into them. Now, far, far more than in 1917 and 1941, the assumptions of our sixth president simply no longer apply. There is no longer any "abroad." The idea of an "abroad" about which Americans could be either indifferent or at most the subject of a distant approval or remote scorn, is dead. To repeat: There is no such thing as "abroad." Not even remotely. What remained of the concept after Pearl Harbor was shattered by Sputnik in 1957, and then by successive generations of missile technology. With the rise of hypersonic missiles only fools would believe that there is an "abroad" anywhere on the globe that the United States can disregard. Beijing's hypersonic arsenal can reach Washington, D.C. in two hours or less, and that margin is going to shrink rapidly. Russia's hypersonic missiles can reach the lower 48 even sooner and Alaska in a blink. Other nations will inevitably add to the number of potential adversaries that can change the world via hypersonic missilery and wreck enormous, perhaps Republic-ending damage on the country. Of course, America possesses a "second strike" capability deep under the seas in our Ohio-class submarines, and even an enormous fusillade of thousands of hypersonic missiles would be unlikely to cripple all of our B-2s and B-21s or ever missile silo. The United States would take down with it all of the evil powers that combined to strike it first, just as it did from 1941 to 1945. But there would be no "Marshall Plan" waiting for anyone or any country on the other side of such an unimaginable catastrophe. Thus it must be deterred. Deterrence is only accomplished by the reality of American military power and the military power of the allies on which it can rely. To repeat a third time: There is no "abroad." This very dangerous word will only grow more so with the years. President Trump's decision to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons program alongside Israel's blows against that fanatical theocracy's ballistic missile capability shielded the entire world from the most unstable and terror-addicted regime in the world obtaining the ability to threaten all of the West and beyond with Armageddon. For a time, at least, the precise and purposeful application of American military force to the missile and nuclear arsenal of an enemy on the brink of "breakout" kept the number of nuclear powers stable. Bravo, President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Whatever criticisms come their way on whatever other subject, the most important mission of their careers is complete. (Though both men may be obliged by the fanatics in Tehran to do it again.) The West still has enemies, of course, and the most formidable one is the Chinese Communist Party that dominates the People's Republic of China, and its ruthless leader, Xi Jinping. Xi and the CCP are followed in second place by Xi's equally ruthless if not quite as powerful ally in Putin's Russia, not to mention the unstable nuclear powers of North Korea and Pakistan. The West's nuclear arsenal —distributed among our allies Great Britain and France and especially alongside that of Israel and our sometimes friend India— combines with our own prodigious, yet in-need-of-modernization nuclear arsenal to hold the most dangerous enemies at bay. There are only four actual superpowers in the world —the quartet of nations that can project nuclear power far beyond their borders and which possess intelligence and espionage capabilities that are unmatched except by each other's capabilities: The United States and Israel on the side of the West and the PRC and Russia on the side of despotism. All others in the "nuclear club" have limitations imposed by their own chaotic domestic politics or lack of deliverable firepower and the will to use it. That's national security realism in a nutshell. When two of the leaders of any of these four nations meet, it is a significant occasion. It is a very good thing that President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu have met three times in 2025 and have spoken far more frequently than that. Xi and Putin have only met in person twice in this year, but their "partnership" is very close even though Xi is to Putin as Trump is to Netanyahu: the senior partners to their powerful but not nearly as powerful junior partners. This is the basic geopolitical structure of the world and only with that understanding of reality can analysts judge what President Trump gets out of his meeting with the Russian tyrant this week —if anything is even made public afterward. It will take months, if not years, to assess what happens this week. Putin has attempted to play every American president since Bill Clinton, sometimes successfully, sometimes fooling them only for a time. The temptation to "strike a deal" with Putin is the same as the apple on the forbidden tree in Genesis. That way lies ruin. But sizing up the tree and the apple at close range can have benefits. President Trump has met with Putin six times prior to this week and has spoken with him often. The real estate developer-turned-television force-turned president has as much of the skills set anyone could have to deal with such a stone-cold killer as Putin. Trump survived not just two assassination attempts in 2024 but years of lawfare preceded by the plots of the permanent left embedded in our vast administrative state during his first term. Trump is as tough and as resilient as any president since Richard Nixon. There will be no hot mic whisperings of weakness, nor will there be blunt assessments spoken like that of former Vice President Dick Cheney: "[W]hat I see [in Putin is] a KGB colonel." Trump is a realist, just like his friend of old from New York in the 1980s and early 1990s, RN. Trump is as tough as W standing in the ruins of the Twin Towers, as tough as the genuine war hero H.W., as tough as Reagan, Ford and Ike. If Trump can bring an end to the savagery underway in Ukraine on terms acceptable to President Zelensky, it will be an achievement greater than his interventions to stop the hostilities between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, Thailand and Cambodia and last week's peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Trump's destruction of the Iranian nuclear program is the biggest building block of his legacy, rivaled only by the Abraham Accords. If he can bring a ceasefire to Central Europe that is acceptable to our allies and the Ukrainian people, it will be the third pillar of his legacy, with the fourth —the rebuilding of the American military into so potent a force that no one, not even China's Xi, dares to risk a confrontation with us— as his fourth. On top of those four pillars can rest an era of prosperity and renewed American growth and innovation. If anyone is hoping for the president to fail in this endeavor as described, they are not patriots but partisans blind to the realities of the world. There are a lot of those sorts of partisans in the U.S., and increasingly our NATO allies are showing themselves to be unreliable. Like it or not, the near-term security prospects of the West rest on Trump, and serious people must prefer that to the infirmities of President Biden or the illusions of President Obama. Trump has confidence in his own abilities and serious analysts of realpolitik should too. At this point, after "Midnight Hammer" and the other ceasefires, after all of the decade since he came down the escalator, there is very good reason to believe he can achieve as much as any other American at the table with Putin. Anyone hoping for his failure should assess their own mental health. It is in the interests of everyone on the planet that knows no "abroads" that stability break out everywhere, beginning in Alaska this week.
