Delhi HC halts Gensol & BluSmart 3rd party claims on 220 EVs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Delhi: In another setback for Gensol Engineering and electric ride-hailing startup BluSmart Mobility , the Delhi High Court on Wednesday restrained them from creating third-party rights over 220 additional electric vehicles (EVs) leased to them by two separate lessors - SMAS Auto Leasing India and Shefasteq OPC SMAS Auto had leased 164 EVs to Gensol and 46 to BluSmart, while Shefasteq had leased 10.This is the third and fourth such petition filed by lessors against Gensol and BluSmart for failing to make lease and fleet management payouts.Justice Jyoti Singh, while appointing court receivers to take possession of the vehicles leased by SMAS and Shefasteq, refused to direct repossession of the EVs, as sought by the lessors.The court also asked Gensol to submit a status report on the leased EVs within two days, besides furnishing a comprehensive statement of their assets and liabilities.Last month, the court had restrained Gensol and Blu-Smart Mobility from creating third-party rights in respect of 95 Tata Xpres EVS leased by Clime Finance and 175 EVs by Japanese firm Orix Leasing and Financial Services.Counsel Saurabh Seth and Sonia Dube, appearing for Shefasteq, argued that these circumstances pose an immediate threat to the petitioner's asset as vehicles may be diverted or encumbered in favour of other financiers and the delay will also erode the commercial value of the undelivered EVs."The continued unauthorised possession of the EVs by the respondents (Gensol and BluSmart) is unlawful and has constrained the petitioner to seek, inter alia, the immediate appointment of a Receiver for taking custody and possession of the said EVs, with a view to preserving and maintaining them in a commercially viable and operable condition," SMAS stated in its petition.Markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had on April 15 barred Gensol's promoters, brothers Anmol and Puneet Jaggi, from accessing stock markets and ordered a forensic probe into their listed renewable energy firm. The brothers were later detained under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema) on charges of financial misconduct and diversion of funds.An interim Sebi report indicated fund diversion and governance failures within the company. The Jaggis face allegations of misuse of term loans availed by Gensol.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Does India needs new law on virtual digital assets, CBDT asks cryptocurrency players
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel MUMBAI: India's apex tax body has asked the cryptocurrency players whether the country needs a new law on virtual digital assets (VDA), which agency should administer such a statute, and whether the present tax regime has driven out traders and businesses to foreign shores. Crypto platforms have been also asked by the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) if the 1% tax-deducted-at-source (TDS) on every sale was too high, what should be the preferred TDS rate and why, and whether traders should be allowed to set off VDA losses to make the levy more equitable.A flurry of such questions, raising several other issues on the travails of the trade, have stoked hopes in the crypto industry which has been battered by stiff taxes, regulatory void, and Reserve Bank of India's customary aversion towards only are crypto gains taxed at the income tax rate of 30% (unlike the lower capital gains tax on stock profits), VDA traders can't offset profits with losses to lower the tax outgo. Many high-street banks are reluctant to offer accounts dedicated to pay or receive funds from crypto trades following central bank senior officials occasionally voicing their reservations on VDAs. Besides, there is no clarity under RBI rules and the Foreign Exchange Management Act ( FEMA ) on whether residents can buy and sell cryptos on offshore platforms.A combination of such factors has caused many large crypto investors to shift their trades-and in some cases even relocate-to Dubai which plans to position itself as the world's crypto are India too may change tack, thanks to the crypto adaptation by advanced markets and the digital coins emerging as an asset class and underliers of US mutual to Purushottam Anand, advocate and founder of Crypto Legal, a blockchain and crypto-focused law firm, "Considering the G20 Synthesis Paper, Finance Track Communique, and the recent Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance announcement selecting VDAs for a detailed examination this year, it is likely that the government will introduce a comprehensive VDA regulation. India has consistently emphasised that regulation or banning can be effective only with significant international collaboration."Since China remains the only major economy to impose a blanket ban, the global consensus today clearly leans towards regulation rather than prohibition, said platforms were asked to share their views by mid-August to the data analytics cell of CBDT. Here are some of the specific questions raised by CBDT:(a) Do you think the current VDA regulation in India is adequate or a comprehensive VDA law is required and the agency which you consider should be authorised to administer it (e.g, Sebi, RBI, MeitY, FIU-IND)?(b) What percentage of trading volumes has moved offshore, and under what circumstances (eg tax concerns, regulation, liquidity)? Which are the jurisdictions where users/businesses are shifting?(c) How would you compare India's VDA tax framework with major jurisdictions?(d) Have you observed any market impact due to the disallowance of loss set-off or carry-forward? In your view, how has the 30% flat tax affected volumes, liquidity etc?(e) What is the biggest challenge in implementing the TDS-identifying counterparty's residency status, calculating the market value of VDA, handling peer-to-peer transactions, or reporting to the income tax department's centralised processing centre?(f) Should there be different TDS treatment for market makers, or retail or institutional transactions?(g) What measures could be considered to ensure a level playing field between domestic and offshore VDA exchanges, particularly in relation to tax compliance for Indian customers?Since two years some exchanges have begun offering derivative products like crypto futures and more recently crypto options where the TDS impact is considerably lower. CDBT in its questionnaire has asked whether there was lack of legal clarity in derivatives, cross-border VDA transactions, and even in the very definition of VDA. Platforms have to also spell out whether they are ready for OECD's crypto-asset reporting framework (CARF)-a global plan to curb tax evasion and money-laundering.
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
Fewer South Koreans & Israelis, more South Africans now see India favourably—latest Pew survey
The Pew survey was carried out this year from January to April across 24 countries, just before the Pahalgam terror attack and the announcement of tariffs on Indian imports by US President Donald Trump. Its findings were made public on 13 August. Significantly, in South Korea, favourability fell by 16 percentage points from 2024, while in the US opinion was almost evenly divided. New Delhi: Up to 60 percent or more respondents in Kenya, the UK and Israel hold a highly favourable opinion of India, while most respondents in Turkey and Australia held an unfavourable view, according to a new Pew Research Center survey. In roughly half of the surveyed countries, more respondents held a positive view of India than a negative one, the survey report notes. Also, in half of the countries surveyed, men were more likely than women to have a favourable view of India, with differences by gender in double digits in Japan, the Netherlands, Germany, Argentina and France. The report also indicated a gradual change in perception of India in several countries, with 46 percent respondents in South Africa expressing a favourable opinion, marking the highest level since 2008 when the question was first asked, and up 17 percentage points since 2023. The shift can be attributed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi proposing in August 2023 that African nations, including South Africa, be granted permanent membership in the G20. In 2024, both countries also collaborated to establish the India-South Africa Chamber of Commerce. In a few European nations, views of India have gone up favourably, including by double digits in France and Germany, according to the survey. The two nations showed improvements of 11 and 10 percentage points, respectively, since 2023, compared to Italy, which showed a modest rise of 2 percentage points in favourability towards the subcontinent. In the Asia-Pacific region, respondents' views on India have remained relatively stable, with Australia maintaining the same percentage in 2024 and 2025, while Indonesia saw a slight increase in favourable views from 51 percent in 2024 to 57 percent in 2025. Conversely, perceptions in South Korea have declined to 42 percent this year from 58 percent in 2024. The Pew Research Centre conducted this survey following the inauguration of the Indian embassy in North Korea in December 2024. The Japanese hold India in high esteem, with favourable views rising to 58 percent this year from 55 percent last year. Also, while the majority of Israelis continue to maintain a positive perception of India, there has been a decline in favourability by 11 percentage points since 2023. The survey highlighted uncertainty among women from France, Poland, Hungary, Australia, and South Africa regarding their opinions of India. Views also varied by age in six countries, the survey noted. Young individuals from nations such as Brazil, the Netherlands, Japan, and the UK tend to have more favourable views than their older counterparts. For example, adults younger than 35 in the UK were 20 points more likely than adults 50 and above to have a good opinion of India. The survey also indicated that opinion of India varied along ideological lines in five countries. In Australia, Nigeria and South Africa, those on the ideological Right view India more favourably than those on the ideological Left. In the US and Mexico, the reverse is true, according to the survey. Neetu Sharma is an alum of ThePrint School of Journalism, currently interning with ThePrint. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: 'Nones' were 3rd largest group globally after Christians, Muslims in 2010-2020, finds Pew survey
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Fatal blast at US steel's Clairton plant sparks doubts over its future
The fatal explosion last week at US Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the US along with profits, share prices and steel prices have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved US Steel's nearly USD 15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley, David Burritt, US Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time. Will the explosion change anything? The explosion killed two workers and hospitalised 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the US. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong and that it sent technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support. Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay. US Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend USD 100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get US Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two where the explosion occurred were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, US Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odour into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organisation, said US Steel has been forced to pay USD 57 million in fines and settlements since January 1, 2020 for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he found no indication that US Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance programme for the Clairton plant. The Clairton plant, he wrote, is inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design. US Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said US Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. Will Clairton be modernised? It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest USD 11 billion into US Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the USD 2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, US Steel had signalled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that US Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. Relics of steelmaking's past In many ways, US Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, US steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the US has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favour. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the US, there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Centre for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe, Briem said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
