PBDS voices concern over inclusion of wakaf in Sarawak Land Code
Dr John Brian Anthony
KUCHING (May 22): Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak (PBDS) has expressed deep concern over any proposal to incorporate provisions related to 'wakaf' – the Islamic endowment system – into the Sarawak Land Code.
Its permanent chairman Dr John Brian Anthony said the introduction of wakaf into the Sarawak Land Code could create a dual land ownership framework that complicates land administration and weakens the clarity of property rights.
'This could have unintended consequences for development, inheritance, and dispute resolution—especially for mixed-religion or indigenous communities,' he said in a statement.
He was commenting on the Land Code (Amendment) Bill 2025, which was passed during the State Legislative Assembly (DUN) sitting on Tuesday.
Among the important provisions in the Bill includes the introduction of Section 171A, which formalises the registration of wakaf land in the Land Registry.
Deputy Premier Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hasan, who tabled the Bill, explained that the move empowers the Majlis Islam Sarawak and also extends to other religions with similar practices, reinforcing Sarawak's inclusive approach to land rights and religious diversity.
In this regard, John Brian pointed out that while PBDS respects and recognises the importance of religious freedom, the party also emphasises the need to preserve Sarawak's unique legal and cultural identity.
'Sarawak is a model of religious and cultural diversity. Introducing wakaf laws into civil land legislation risks upsetting this balance by creating perceptions of religious favouritism and state-sanctioned religious encroachment into secular legal systems,' he said.
'For Dayak and other native communities, land is not just an economic asset but it is tied to ancestry, tradition, and identity.
'The idea of a parallel land system based on religious principles raises serious alarm and may erode confidence in the impartiality of our land laws,' he added.
Moreover, he also stressed that Sarawak's land laws are governed under its own jurisdiction as guaranteed by the Malaysia Agreement 1963.
'We reject any attempt – direct or indirect – to import religious land systems that may be influenced by federal institutions or ideologies not rooted in Sarawak's legal traditions.'
As such, John Brian said the people of Sarawak, Muslims and non-Muslims alike, deserve to be fully consulted on any changes to land laws.
He reiterated that no major legal reform should be pushed through without transparent, inclusive engagement with stakeholders, civil society, and local communities.
'We call on the Sarawak government to halt any proposal to introduce wakaf laws into the Land Code until full public consultation is held and guarantees are given that Sarawak's multicultural fabric and state autonomy will not be compromised,' he said. Dr John Brian Anthony lead PBDS Sarawak Land Code wakaf
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
Federal Court ruling on SIS Forum fatwa appeal set for June 19
The Federal Court will deliver its ruling on June 19 in the appeal filed by SIS Forum (Malaysia) against a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities, which declared the organisation deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The matter was confirmed by Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar, counsel for the Selangor Fatwa Committee, when contacted today. 'The court informed...
Focus Malaysia
an hour ago
- Focus Malaysia
Why is a non-Muslim DAP rep allowed to poke his nose in the running of Islamic affairs?
MUSLIMS seem to be divided over the recent 'open-minded' move by the Negeri Sembilan Islamic Religious Council (MAINS) to include non-Muslim politicians in its Islamic affairs briefing. This came about as a pro-opposition netizen questioned the presence of the state's Industry and Non-Muslim Affairs Committee chairman Teo Kok Seong (not to be mistaken for his controversial academician namesake) at the briefing on grounds that 'matters pertaining to Islamic affairs should shield be left to Muslims to manage by themselves'. 'Such action is incorrect and should be questioned,' he penned on X in reaction to a photo bearing the caption 'There is a DAP representative in the MAINS meeting as an observer'. Sampai sekarang kerajaan Negeri Sembilan PH-BN tak memberikan penjelasan kenapa ada pemimpin non-muslim yang masuk dlm mesyuarat Majlis Agama Islam Negeri Sembilan. Hal ehwal urusan agama islam biarlah org islam sendiri uruskan. Tindakan ini tidak betul & perlu ditegur. — (@ahmadazarul_) May 29, 2025 Earlier, MAINS had defended the briefing held on May 20 which Teo who is also a two-term Bahau state assemblyman attended as part of an inclusive and integrated governance approach involving members of the state executive council, including non-Muslims. 'The attendance was in line with the directive and consent of the Negeri Sembilan ruler Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir aimed at providing exposure and deepening understanding of Islamic administration in the state,' read the statemen by MAINS. The council further noted that it had previously conducted a similar briefing with all state assembly members – including non-Muslims from both government and opposition – on Oct 8 last year. This approach reflects its commitment to progressive and inclusive Islamic governance, according to the council. Many Madani government backers ticked of the poster for his narrow mindset, alluding to the point that Tuanku Muhriz as the Negeri Sembilan ruler had consented the move given Teo's attendance would further enhance the understanding of non-Muslims on the state's Islamic administration. Moreover, the poster was either oblivious or had y chosen to ignore to ignore the fact that MAINS had clarified on the matter on May 27 which is two days prior to his social media post. As one commenter aptly put it, though there was a non-Muslim presence in the briefing, 'it's the Muslims who eventually make decisions on Islamic matters'. This is when it became obvious that the issue here is not about non-Muslims sitting in the briefing or interfering in the administration of Islamic affairs but merely a tool by the pro-PAS faction to demonise DAP. To counter the grouses of a pro-opposition commenter as to why 'only Muslins are busy inviting non-Muslims to gatherings/conferences related to Islam when the same is not reciprocated by non-Muslims', one rational Muslim furnished the following cheeky response: 'How is this possible when some radical Muslims have even demanded that the Christian cross at churches be removed. And now you want to be invited to interfaith dialogues?' – May 31, 2025
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Federal Court ruling on SIS forum fatwa appeal set for June 19
KUALA LUMPUR: The Federal Court will deliver its ruling on June 19 in the appeal filed by SIS Forum (Malaysia) against a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities, which declared the organisation deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The matter was confirmed by Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar, counsel for the Selangor Fatwa Committee, when contacted today. 'The court informed the parties of the decision date via email on May 20,' he said. In addition to the Selangor Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government are also named as respondents in the appeal. On Aug 21, 2023, the Federal Court granted leave to SIS Forum and its founder, Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar, to appeal against the Court of Appeal's earlier decision dismissing their bid to annul the fatwa. In a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal held that the fatwa issued by the Selangor Fatwa Committee did not constitute a final decision and, therefore, could not be challenged by way of judicial review. SIS Forum and Zainah had appealed to the Court of Appeal after the High Court dismissed their application for a judicial review on Aug 27, 2019. The fatwa, gazetted by the Selangor State Government on July 31, 2014, declared SIS Forum, as well as any individual or group subscribing to liberalism and pluralism, as deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The fatwa further directed that any publication espousing liberal or pluralist views be banned and seized, and urged the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission to censor social media content deemed contrary to Islamic teachings and syariah law.
