
3.8 Million Student Loan Borrowers Will Lose Access To Lower Payments By July If GOP Bill Passes
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to the media after the ... More House narrowly passed a bill forwarding President Donald Trump's agenda at the U.S. Capitol on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. The tax and spending legislation, in what has been called the "big beautiful bill", redirects money to the military and border security and includes cuts to Medicaid, student loan forgiveness and repayment, and other domestic programs. (Photo by)
Nearly four million student loan borrowers are at risk of losing access to affordable payments, as Republican lawmakers move forward to enact sweeping changes to repayment plans and student loan forgiveness programs.
One of the major targets of the proposed legislation is Parent PLUS borrowers. Parent PLUS loans are a type of federal student loan issued to the parent of an undergraduate student. While the student is the one who benefits from the loan, their parent is the legal borrower, and the parent is the one responsible for the loan's repayment. Historically, Parent PLUS loans have had fewer affordable repayment plan options compared to traditional federal student loans. But proposed legislative reforms would place even more severe limits on these loans, and would effectively cut off access to affordable repayment options for most of the 3.8 million borrowers who have Parent PLUS loans.
The reforms are part of a broader effort by congressional Republicans to use the budget reconciliation process to enact President Donald Trump's legislative agenda through narrow party-line votes, including extending major tax cuts and slashing government spending. The House already passed its version of the reconciliation bill last month, and GOP Senate leaders may bring their bill to a vote as soon as this weekend. While full passage of the legislation by Congress isn't a foregone conclusion, party leaders hope to have the bill on President Trump's desk sometime in July.
Parent PLUS Loans Have Had Limited Access To Student Loan Repayment Plans Tied To Income
Parent PLUS loans have always had more limited repayment options compared to most other types of federal student loans. As a rule, Parent PLUS loans are ineligible for income-driven repayment plans. IDR plans allow borrowers to have a monthly payment tied to their income and family size, with the possibility of student loan forgiveness after 20 or 25 years in repayment.
However, since 2006 there has been an important exception. Borrowers who consolidate their Parent PLUS loans into a federal Direct consolidation loan have been able to access the Income-Contingent Repayment plan, or ICR. ICR is the oldest and most expensive IDR plan, and may not make sense for higher-income earners. For example, a Parent PLUS borrower with an Adjusted Gross Income of $150,000 and a family size of 2 would pay around $2,150 per month under ICR – hardly an affordable payment, and likely more costly in this example than what the borrower would pay under a traditional Standard repayment plan.
But for Parent PLUS borrowers who have experienced a reduction in their income, Direct loan consolidation and ICR can be a lifesaver. A borrower with $150,000 of Parent PLUS loan debt on a fixed income of $40,000 annually would not be able to afford Standard plan payments, which could be more than $1,700 per month. But if the borrower consolidated their loans and enrolled in ICR, their monthly payment would be only $405 per month.
GOP Bill Would Cut Off Most Parent PLUS Borrowers From Affordable Payments And Student Loan Forgiveness
Legislation that Republican lawmakers in Congress are on the cusp of passing would make student loan repayment much harder for Parent PLUS borrowers, and the impacts could be profound. Both the House and Senate versions of the budget reconciliation bill would repeal the ICR plan (as well as PAYE and SAVE), including for current borrowers. The bill would create a new repayment option based on income called the Repayment Assistance Plan, or RAP. But Parent PLUS loans would be ineligible for RAP, even if they consolidate their loans.
The result is that most of the 3.8 million Parent PLUS borrowers would have no option to base their student loan payments on their income. In addition, these borrowers would effectively be cut off from student loan forgiveness, both under IDR plans as well as via the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. PSLF requires that payments be made under qualifying repayment plans, which for the most part are IDR plans. Without being able to access IDR, Parent PLUS borrowers would also not be able to access PSLF.
The GOP-sponsored bills do provide one important exception to the sweeping changes. Parent PLUS borrowers who have already consolidated their loans via the Direct consolidation program and are already enrolled in the ICR plan at the time that the bill is enacted would effectively be grandfathered in. While ICR would still be repealed, these borrowers would be moved to a modified version of the Income-Based Repayment plan, or IBR – a plan that historically has been unavailable for Parent PLUS borrowers. In many cases, IBR is a more affordable repayment option than ICR, which could result in lower monthly payments.
But all other Parent PLUS borrowers would be cut off from student loan forgiveness and income-driven repayment. This may also include borrowers who pursued so-called 'double consolidation' to enroll in other IDR plans like the SAVE plan or PAYE. As written, the legislation appears to only grandfather in consolidated Parent PLUS loans that are specifically enrolled in the ICR plan.
Can Parent PLUS Borrowers Act Now To Lock In Lower Student Loan Payments?
So can Parent PLUS borrowers who are not already enrolled in the ICR plan do anything now to preserve their access to income-driven repayment and student loan forgiveness? The answer is complicated, and may depend largely on a borrower's specific circumstances:
Ultimately, Parent PLUS borrowers are in a tough spot. There is a very real possibility that they could be cut off from affordable repayment plans and student loan forgiveness, quite soon. And they aren't the only borrowers who could face higher payments if the reconciliation legislation ultimately passes. Some student loan borrower advocacy organizations are urging borrowers to contact their congressperson and senators, as there is still time to make changes to the bills.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Flashback: NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani vowed to arrest Netanyahu if he visited the city
New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who declared victory in the Democratic primary for mayor on Tuesday, said previously that he would arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he ever visited the city. In December, former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, now editor-in-chief and CEO of Zeteo, asked Mamdani, "Mayor Mamdani, would you welcome Prime Minister Netanyahu to New York City for the — for whatever he comes for, given the U.S. is not a signatory to the ICC, so he can travel to the U.S., unlike a lot of other countries? Would a Mayor Mamdani welcome Benjamin Netanyahu to this city?" Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assembly member from Queens who was born and raised in Uganda, told Hasan, "No. As mayor, New York City would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu. This is a city that our values are in line with international law. It's time that our actions are also." Hasan pressed Mamdani, asking him if he would still arrest Netanyahu even though Israel is not part of the International Criminal Court (ICC), an organization that reviews global matters like war crimes and genocide. In February, President Donald Trump signed an executive order sanctioning the ICC in response to its May 2024 arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Mamdani told Hasan that, "It's time that we actually step up and make clear what we are willing to do to showcase the leadership that is sorely missing in the federal administration." In a speech earlier this month at the B'nai Jeshurun synagogue in Manhattan, Mamdani appeared to double down on his position that he would arrest Netanyahu as mayor. "My answer is the same whether we are speaking about Vladimir Putin or Netanyahu. I think that this should be a city that is in compliance with international law," Mamdani said. "And we have seen other countries across the world that are signatories of the ICC [International Criminal Court] that they would honor that same request, being Canada or other countries in Europe, and their honoring of it meant that Netanyahu did not travel there." During an event in May, Mamdani reportedly said that he believes "that Israel has a right to exist with equal rights for all," and recently told Late Night host Stephen Colbert that, "Yes, like all nations, I believe it has a right to exist." He has been linked to anti-Israel activism, according to a report by Canary Mission, a watchdog group that tracks antisemitism, which said that Mamdani regularly attends New York City's anti-Israel protests, and that he took part in protests against Israel days after the Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack that killed 1,200 Israelis. The report also noted that Mamdani's father, Mahmood Mamdani, is an anthropology professor at Columbia University, which has been a hub of anti-Israel protests since the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack. It also highlights that Mamdani's filmmaker mother, Mira Nair, signed an open letter calling for Israeli actress Gal Gadot to be removed from presenting at the 2025 Academy Awards. During his victory speech on Tuesday, Mamdani said that he envisions a New York City "where the mayor will use their power to reject Donald Trump's fascism, to stop mass ICE agents from deporting our neighbors and to govern our city as a model for the Democratic Party." Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.


Entrepreneur
29 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
College Majors and Careers That Make the Most Money: Report
As the price of an undergraduate degree continues to climb, many college students want to know which paths will bring financial security. A typical student graduating from high school in 2025 could take on an estimated $40,000 in student loan debt before they finish their college education, and interest rates on undergraduate federal student loans are the highest they've been in more than 10 years, Nerdwallet reported. The price tag that comes with a college degree has ballooned steadily over the past several decades — with a staggering rise in the past 15 years. Between 2000 and 2022, average tuition and fees increased by 60%, from $9,204 to $14,688 per year, and those costs spiked 13% in just 12 years between 2010 and 2022 alone, according to BestColleges. Related: These Are the College Majors With the Lowest Unemployment Rates — and Philosophy Ranks Higher Than Computer Science Today's college graduates can expect to spend $153,080 by the end of their undergraduate education, per Student Choice, an organization that partners with more than 300 credit unions to facilitate student lending solutions. But which college majors — and the careers they make possible for new graduates — provide the highest return on students' investment? Student Choice examined data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to pinpoint the median earnings for the top 20 most popular college majors in the U.S. The analysis assumed five years in the workforce and four years spent paying the average annual cost of college. Related: Goldman Sachs CIO Says Coders Should Take Philosophy Classes — Here's Why According to the report, engineering emerged as the degree with the highest five-year return on investment at 326.6%, and computer science/technology came in close second at 310.3%. Computer and information systems managers and advertising, promotions and marketing managers snagged the top spots for careers with the highest five-year return on investment, at 553.7% and 511.4%, respectively, per the data. Related: These 3 Professions Are Most Likely to Vanish in the Next 20 Years Due to AI, According to a New Report Take a look at Student Choice's infographic below for the full picture of its report on the majors and careers offering the highest return on investment for the price of a college education:

Los Angeles Times
31 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Court orders Trump administration to facilitate another deported man's return from El Salvador
WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court in New York on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a man who was deported to El Salvador roughly 30 minutes after the court suspended an order to remove him from the U.S. The ruling in Jordin Alexander Melgar-Salmeron's case marks at least the fourth time this year that President Trump's administration has been ordered to facilitate the return of somebody mistakenly deported. The government said 'a confluence of administrative errors' led to Melgar-Salmeron's deportation on May 8, according to the decision by a three-judge panel from the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The panel said administration officials must facilitate his return to the U.S. 'as soon as possible.' The judges gave them a week to identify his current physical location and custodial status and to specify what steps they will take to facilitate his return. Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose mistaken deportation in March became a flashpoint in Trump's immigration crackdown, was returned from El Salvador this month to face human smuggling charges in Tennessee. In April, a Trump-nominated judge in Maryland ordered his administration to facilitate the return of a man who was deported to El Salvador in March despite having a pending asylum application. U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher ruled that the government violated a 2019 settlement agreement when it deported the 20-year-old man, a Venezuelan native identified only as Cristian in court papers. And in May, another judge ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a Guatemalan man whom it deported to Mexico despite his fears of being harmed there. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy found that the removal of the man, who is gay, likely 'lacked any semblance of due process.' Kunzelman writes for the Associated Press.