Codesa 2 has many agendas to fill
The list of 'eminent persons' who will 'champion and guide' President Cyril Ramaphosa's national dialogue reads like a 'Who's Who' of this country's 'nice people'.
Lest that sound a little cynical, we will acknowledge that the delegates to this 'national convention' do seem the types who can put petty party politics aside and make the future of the country their priority.
They come from across the spectrum of South African life, from Springbok captain Siya Kolisi, to Gift of the Givers founder Dr Imtiaz Sooliman and will, presumably, bring a broad range of opinions to the debate.
What we're not getting are loudmouth politicians like Julius Malema, who have quickly dismissed Ramaphosa's idea as a form of political theatre.
Now that can be good – because the extremist views will be absent or at least muted – or bad – because, like it or not, populist politicians who like to sound radical or revolutionary do have appeal for a mass market.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa announces 'Eminent Persons Group' to guide national dialogue – These are the people appointed
Some are billing the gathering – in both positive and negative senses – as 'Codesa 2' in reference to the original Codesa (the Convention for a Democratic South Africa), which helped steer the country to democracy after long and arduous talks in the 1990s.
The original Codesa achieved its aim of shepherding the country to democracy, but it definitely left unfinished business – such as the issue of land – which have returned to haunt South Africa.
If this Codesa 2 is to succeed, however, it must, this time around, give more attention to the hopes and fears of the black majority, rather than reassuring whites that everything will be fine in the future.
As it was in the 1990s, right-wingers are the fly in the ointment, with their revved-up aims to achieve 'de-centralisation' and 'self-government'.
The national convention has to satisfy multiple different constituencies. And that won't be easy.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa urges caution as floods claims lives in Eastern Cape
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
15 minutes ago
- IOL News
Sleeping While the Lies Were Written – A Call to Stand with South Africa
Presidents Cyril Ramaphosa and Donald Trump held a dramatic meeting at the White House in May, where the latter reiterated his unfounded allegations about the so-called white genocide in South Africa. Image: AFP While South Africans rested under our night sky, a distorted narrative about our nation was quietly taking shape in Washington. The Trump administration, through the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, released a report that paints South Africa in the most troubling and inaccurate terms. This so-called assessment, claiming to be the result of 'engagements with stakeholders' in South Africa, alleges a severe deterioration of human rights in the past year. It brands our Expropriation Act as 'substantially worrying,' accuses the Economic Freedom Fighters of encouraging farm attacks, and concludes that Afrikaners are being targeted as an ethnic minority. These claims are not only misleading — they are outright falsehoods. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The report leans on selective anecdotes, ignores verified data, and omits the context of our constitutional democracy. It overlooks that land reform policies are grounded in law, subject to judicial review, and aimed at correcting historic injustices. It repeats discredited myths about 'white genocide,' despite numerous independent investigations debunking such claims. This narrative is not about protecting human rights — it is a political weapon designed to undermine South Africa's sovereignty. The most dangerous aspect of this report is its arrogance. Too often, foreign officials arrive on our soil convinced they have diagnosed our problems before speaking to the people who live here. By the time they check into their hotels, they have already designed solutions that disregard local realities. The following day, they begin recruiting allies to impose their vision. This is not partnership — it is paternalism. It reduces our people to subjects of external judgment rather than citizens capable of defining their destiny. This is not the first time Africa has been subjected to such treatment. History is filled with examples of outsiders painting the continent as broken to justify interference. Nelson Mandela warned that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of others; the inverse is also true — when our sovereignty is undermined, the freedom of all who value self-determination is at risk. Today, the tactics have shifted from open colonialism to narrative warfare, but the aim is the same: to weaken, divide, and control. It is no coincidence that this report comes at a time when the South African government is seeking to grow revenue and resources in a competitive global economy. The subtext is clear—apply pressure through negative international perception, create economic vulnerability, and force political concessions. Tariffs, trade restrictions, and selective sanctions often follow such campaigns. This is not about human rights; it is about leverage. South Africans cannot allow this narrative to go unchallenged. We must respond by writing, speaking, researching, and sharing our truths. Our universities, journalists, artists, and community leaders must actively dismantle the myths being exported about our nation. My research, The Invisible Faith in Democracy: Ekaslam, has shown how foreign perceptions often strip township communities of their agency, treating them as evidence for pre-written stories rather than as living, complex societies. This report is a textbook example of that practice. To those abroad who care about fairness: understand that South Africa is a vibrant, plural democracy with a fiercely independent judiciary, active civil society, and a free press. Our path is not perfect — no democracy's is — but it is ours to walk. Do not mistake the noise of politics for the collapse of a nation. To those within our borders: let us unite in defending our sovereignty, for this moment calls for solidarity beyond party lines. The architects of this report, along with the local voices who contributed to it, should bear the weight of shame for misrepresenting the country we have built together. South Africa is not defined by the distortions of foreign actors. It is defined by the resilience of its people, the strength of its Constitution, and the unwavering belief that freedom, once won, must be guarded fiercely. The world must know we will not bow. We will rise—together. Ngomane, PhD Candidate | University of the WitwatersrandTheatre Practitioner | Researcher | Dramaturge
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Will Suzuki build cars in SA? Minister Tau engaging with carmakers as tariff debate rages
Donald Trump's automotive tariffs, while only affecting the Mercedes-Benz operations in South Africa, have sparked conversations on whether the government is sufficiently protecting own market. According to Lightstone, around 37% of the vehicles that South Africans purchase are locally produced, while a significant 36% are imported from India and 11% from China. At a media event outlining South Africa's response to Donald Trump's tariffs, held in Pretoria on Tuesday, Minister of Trade and Industry, Parks Tau, revealed some interesting insights into the country's plan for the automotive industry. Asked whether the government was considering raising the import tariffs on Indian and Chinese vehicles in order to prevent our market from being flooded, Tau did not rule out such a move but said the Department of Trade, Industry and Commerce (DTIC) was not in favour of punitive measures. 'With regards to Chinese and Indian auto, it is a discussion that we're currently having with the intention of taking a less punitive approach, but rather taking a more proactive approach of getting some of those products manufactured in the country.' Tau said many Chinese manufacturers had expressed interest in establishing themselves in the country and were making contributions towards a revised Automotive Production and Development Program (APDP), which is currently under review. Tau said he could not comment on what the actual decision would be, regarding tariffs, but added that it was the government's intention to accelerate the policy development process and related instruments in the implementation of the APDP. Discussions with Suzuki Auto Earlier this year Naamsa CEO Mikel Mabasa revealed that at least three Chinese car manufacturers were considering setting up vehicle production facilities in South Africa. Interestingly, the DTIC has also been engaging with Suzuki Auto, which recently became the country's second best-selling brand, thanks largely to an affordable product portfolio sourced almost entirely from its Maruti Suzuki division in India. 'I should say that we spoke about the Chinese, but in the next two weeks, we'll also be engaging with both Japan and India. You would know that Suzuki has a great presence in the country right now, and we will be visiting. 'So whilst it's a Japanese company, they're exporting from India to the South African market. So we'll be touching (base with) both the parent company and the company that's exporting into the South African market to see how we can cooperate and collaborate, on the basis of seeking to attract them as an investor into our country. 'So we're not holding the stick as a starting point. We start with the carrot and then balance it with the stick," Tau concluded.
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
South Africa-US spat ramps up as DIRCO fires back
The SA government has rejected the latest US State Department human rights report's portrayal of the country's democratic and legal systems. Image: GCIS The South African government has strongly rejected the latest US State Department human rights report, calling it a 'deeply flawed and inaccurate' portrayal of the country's democratic and legal systems. ADVERTISEMENT In a statement issued by the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), officials said they were 'deeply disappointed' by the US's assessment, particularly its claims that human rights conditions have 'significantly deteriorated' in South Africa over the past year. The report, released on Tuesday, criticised South Africa's handling of the Expropriation Act, suggested a lack of accountability for alleged human rights abuses, and raised alarm over violence and rhetoric directed at Afrikaners – including concerns over the controversial 'Kill the Boer' chant. AfriForum Raises Alarm Over Afrikaner Safety The report has already triggered a response from civil rights group AfriForum, which renewed its call for President Cyril Ramaphosa to publicly denounce the chant and take stronger action to protect the rights of Afrikaners and other minorities. AfriForum warned that the strained diplomatic relationship with the US could worsen, and that failure to act may prolong or increase tariffs on South African exports. ADVERTISEMENT The organisation said Ramaphosa's inaction 'undermines the interests of all South Africans' by placing 'ANC ideology over constitutional obligations and the welfare of citizens.' DIRCO Pushes Back DIRCO responded sharply, accusing the US government of producing a report that 'misrepresents facts and ignores judicial processes currently underway in South Africa.' They cited an incident involving the deaths of farm workers that the report framed as extrajudicial killings, despite the matter being under ongoing judicial review. 'This is not only premature but a fundamental distortion of the facts,' DIRCO said. ADVERTISEMENT 'South Africa's constitutional democracy includes independent oversight institutions that are functioning and active.' The ministry also defended South Africa's land reform efforts, referring to recent praise from the UN Human Rights Office, which called the Land Expropriation Act a 'critical step toward addressing racially skewed land ownership' – directly contradicting the US report's claims. US Criticism Called Hypocritical DIRCO went further, pointing out what it called the irony of criticism from a country that recently withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council. 'The United States faces documented human rights issues of its own, including systemic discrimination, treatment of refugees, and questionable practices by its immigration enforcement agencies,' the statement said. ADVERTISEMENT DIRCO also questioned the political motivations behind the report, suggesting it reflects President Donald Trump's foreign policy priorities rather than objective human rights assessments. Tensions Set to Rise The latest exchange adds fuel to growing diplomatic tensions between Pretoria and Washington, following the US's imposition of tariffs and increasingly critical rhetoric regarding South Africa's international alliances and domestic policies. While the US remains a key trade partner, South African officials have signalled that diplomatic engagement through formal channels – and not external pressure – will guide the country's response. 'We remain committed to open dialogue, but we will not accept mischaracterisations that damage our international reputation without basis,' DIRCO said. ADVERTISEMENT As both countries dig in their heels, observers warn that the rift could escalate into broader consequences for trade, diplomatic cooperation, and international perceptions of human rights credibility on both sides. Have DIRCO taken the correct stance to hit back at the allegations? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
