Three-person IVF technique spared children from inherited diseases, scientists say
The technique, which is banned in the United States, transfers pieces from inside the mother's fertilized egg - its nucleus, plus the nucleus of the father's sperm - into a healthy egg provided by an anonymous donor.
The procedure prevents the transfer of mutated genes from inside the mother's mitochondria - the cells' energy factories - that could cause incurable and potentially fatal disorders.
Mutations in mitochondrial DNA can affect multiple organs, particularly those that require high energy, such as the brain, liver, heart, muscles and kidneys.
One of the eight children is now 2 years old, two are between ages 1 and 2, and five are infants. All were healthy at birth, with blood tests showing no or low levels of mitochondrial gene mutations, the scientists reported in the New England Journal of Medicine, opens new tab. All have made normal developmental progress, they said.
The results "are the culmination of decades of work," not just on the scientific/technical challenges but also in ethical inquiry, public and patient engagement, law-making, drafting and execution of regulations, and establishing a system for monitoring and caring for the mothers and infants, reproductive medicine specialist Dr. Andy Greenfield of the University of Oxford, who was not involved in the research, said in a statement.
The researchers' "treasure trove of data" is likely to be the starting point of new avenues of investigation, Greenfield said.
Often during IVF screening procedures, doctors can identify some low-risk eggs with very few mitochondrial gene mutations that are suitable for implantation.
But sometimes all of the eggs' mitochondrial DNA carries mutations. In those cases, using the new technique, the UK doctors first fertilize the mother's egg with the father's sperm. Then they remove the fertilized egg's 'pronuclei' – that is, the nuclei of the egg and the sperm, which carry the DNA instructions from both parents for the baby's development, survival and reproduction.
Next, they transfer the egg and sperm nuclei into a donated fertilized egg that has had its pronuclei removed.
The donor egg will now begin to divide and develop with its healthy mitochondria and the nuclear DNA from the mother's egg and the father's sperm.
This process, detailed in a second paper in the journal, opens new tab, 'essentially replaces the faulty mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) with healthy mtDNA from the donor,' senior researcher Mary Herbert, professor of reproductive biology at Newcastle, said at a press briefing.
Blood levels of mtDNA mutations were 95% to 100% lower in six newborns, and 77% to 88% lower in two others, compared to levels of the same variants in their mothers, the researchers reported in a second paper.
"These data indicate that pronuclear transfer was effective in reducing transmission of mtDNA disease," they said.
The procedure was tested in 22 women whose babies were likely to inherit such genes. In addition to the eight women who delivered the children described in this report, another one of the 22 is currently pregnant.
Seven of the eight pregnancies were uneventful; in one case, a pregnant woman had blood tests showing high lipid levels.
There have been no miscarriages.
The authors of the current reports have also tried transplanting the nucleus of a mother's unfertilized egg into a donor egg and then fertilizing the donor egg afterward, but they believe their new approach may more reliably prevent transmission of the genetic disorders.
In 2015, the UK became the first country in the world to legalize research into mitochondrial donation treatment in humans.
That same year in the United States, pronuclear transfer was effectively banned for human use by a congressional appropriations bill that prohibited the Food and Drug Administration from using funds to consider the use of "heritable genetic modification".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
a minute ago
- Times
How China may save us all — Xi's power play to end emissions
In the year to March 2024, China emitted a staggering amount of carbon. Twelve billion tonnes. It was more than the rest of Asia combined. Twice that of the United States. Just slightly less than Britain belched out through the entire reign of Queen Victoria. In the year that followed, China also released a staggering amount of carbon. The total was easily equivalent to a coal power plant running continuously since the Norman conquest. But that year's staggering amount was in one very crucial aspect unexpected: it was, just, smaller than 2023's staggering amount. This might in turn end up being the most staggering statistic of the year. Because for the first time, analysis suggests China's energy use has increased but its carbon emissions have not. 'We are seeing the beginning of a decoupling,' said Ma Jun, from the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a non-profit Chinese research organisation. 'The deployment of solar is massive.' Ever since much of the world pledged to aim for net-zero carbon emissions, ever since the economies of Europe set out to do something unprecedented in the history of humanity — move from a dense and easy source of energy to a diffuse, difficult and variable source — there has been a niggling argument facing environmentalists. What is the point of doing this, sceptics would ask, when China is adding more emissions in a year than entire countries? What can Britain do, when China's carbon footprint is about 30 times as big and getting bigger? Now, though, it is not getting bigger. It is, as one environmentalist put it, the end of the 'But China' argument. But is it? 'There are lots of environmentalists saying, 'I told you so,'' said Sir Dieter Helm, a professor of economics at Oxford University. ''It's all working,' they say. 'Isn't it wonderful the Chinese have turned the tide, and are building all these renewables and are going to peak their emissions?'' Indeed it is, he said, compared with the alternative — but we should also look closely at what is going to happen to the many dozens of coal plants they are still building. 'If China's emissions plateau at the current level, that's a climate disaster. That's not a great success. That is horrendous.' In terms of emissions per capita, China is still less than the US — but comfortably exceeds the EU and UK. There are two narratives about China and net zero. For the first, go to the Northern Shaanxi Mine. There, in China's biggest coalmine, a mountain's worth of carbon has been pulled out of a scarred, dusty, black hellscape. It is still being pulled out. Last year, China started construction of 94 gigawatts of coal-fuelled power plants. To put that in scale, it is enough to power Britain's grid twice over. In this first narrative, while the West frets about wind turbines and veganism, here trucks the size of houses shift dirty fuel for a superpower still going all in on coal. For the second narrative, go to the Kubuqi desert of Inner Mongolia, China. There, across an area the size of New York, all you can see is solar panels. They sit, silent, turning sunshine on worthless ground into valuable clean energy to be sent south. Last year, China had 500GW of wind and solar projects under construction. While the West argues about the cost of renewables, in this narrative China is building more than the rest of the world combined. It is monopolising silicon and lithium. It is electrifying everything it can electrify. Cars. Industry. Trains. It is winning the next great industrial revolution: to become the world's first electrostate. Which narrative is true? Both. It is indeed building a coal station a week — give or take. But its biggest bet by far is on renewables. The proximal reason its emissions are falling, despite coal capacity going up, is in part because of something else entirely. Construction is falling too. A real estate crash means less carbon-intensive cement is being poured into the foundations of apartment blocks. But, there is hope this is more than a blip. Ma said it would be wrong to view the coal plants as a traditional part of the grid. 'China is going through a very difficult, but crucial, transition,' he said. 'How we adapt to a high penetration of renewable energy is a new challenge.' As Britain knows, when it is cloudy and the wind does not blow, you need a backup. Batteries and other storage are not ready at scale yet. This is why, in the UK, we still have so many gas plants — which a lot of the time sit unused. 'So, yes, there are more coal plants, but we can see quite rapid reduction of coal generation hours,' Ma said. 'We are paying a high price for energy security — building all this redundancy.' Can we believe the statistics, about those generation levels — and emissions in general? They are compiled from official sources, by Lauri Myllyvirta, from Finland's Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. Rich Collett-White, from Carbon Tracker Initiative, a think tank that analyses the energy transition, said that while there were always questions about how much we can trust Chinese statistics, he and other analysts thought the trajectory made sense. He said: 'A lot of the data that's out there is based on customs, and tracking commodity flows. That's fairly straightforward to verify, and I think would be quite difficult to fake.' It also fits with their policies. That Chinese emissions would peak around now should not be a surprise. It is exactly what President Xi promised. The country pledged to start reducing emissions before 2030, and reach net zero by 2060. Some observers expect the Chinese leader to announce a new target for 2035 at the UN general assembly in September. Richard Folland, also from Carbon Tracker, said that we often ignored this in the UK debates. He added: 'The approach the Chinese government take on targets is that they tend to underpromise and overdeliver.' For him, being five years ahead of schedule makes sense. 'It is important. It is a pivotal moment when China starts bending that curve downwards.' Is this job done, then? Globally, said Helm, the situation is dire. The concentration of CO₂ in the atmosphere — ultimately the only statistic that matters, and the only one you can absolutely trust — keeps on going up regardless. But, he conceded, 'this is better than if China was going the other way'. And for Ma there is a message too to the rest of the world. He said: 'Now is a very important moment. We hope there will be recognition that actions are being made in China.' If, sometimes, the rest of the world has used supposed Chinese inaction as an argument for their own inaction, he said, the reverse would not be true. He added: 'We will keep on doing this by ourselves. But if there's a chance to work together, with those who care about this issue, hopefully we can.' Change will not be fast. Over the next year, China will once again emit a staggering amount of carbon. Of every three carbon dioxide molecules put into the atmosphere, one will be Chinese. There is, critics point out, enough coal power being built that that could easily remain unchanged. Yet there is another China too. In the deserts of Inner Mongolia, endless solar farms catch the light. Stand on the shoreline of the Yellow Sea, and the sunrise that once scattered red in the air pollution glows red on the spinning blades of turbines. It is the biggest bet by far that a different kind of power is possible, and with it a riposte in steel and silicon to the argument, 'But China …'.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a doctor - this one household feature is slowly harming your health
A common household feature may be unknowingly creating an unseen health risk – and it's hiding in plain sight. According to GP Dr Emily Carter, older carpets pose an unexpected health threat. 'People usually think of carpets as harmless,' said Dr Carter. 'But old carpets can be a major source of indoor pollution.' Carpets are known to trap allergens like dust mites, pet dander, pollen, mould spores, and even chemical residues from cleaning products or smoke. Over time, these build up in the fibres and can trigger or worsen health issues especially in children, the elderly, and those with asthma or allergies. The difficulty is that this build-up can occur gradually - even when older carpet is regularly vacuumed or appears clean. There are certain recurring health symptoms to be on the look out for that may indicate that your home environment could be be impacting on your health. Signs include frequent sneezing, coughing, or itchy eyes while indoors, worsening allergy or asthma symptoms. Feeling tired or headachy without clear cause is another indicator. Sudden skin irritations - especially in younger children – can also result from carpet-trapped allergens. However, the tricky part with many of these symptoms is that many may be mistaken for seasonal allergies or minor colds. Dr Carter, who is also a UK-based mother of two young children, said she had seen first-hand the health issues that can be caused by older carpets. 'I've seen it in my own family, my youngest started getting skin rashes and breathing problems that we couldn't explain,' Dr Carter said. 'After having our carpets replaced and testing air quality, the symptoms started improving.' For anyone who is concerned about whether their carpet poses a possible health risk, the British doctor recommends a simple 'sniff test' as a first line assessment. 'If a room smells musty no matter how often you clean it, that's a red flag,' Dr Carter said. 'Especially in bedrooms, where people spend hours each night, clean air matters more than we think.' For families with babies, Dr Carter also urges extra caution: 'Young children spend a lot of time crawling and playing on floors.' 'Their immune systems are still developing, so they're more likely to react to mould spores and dust mites. If you notice frequent eczema flare-ups or a child often gets congested indoors, your flooring could be part of the problem.' According to My Home Improvements, most carpets should be replaced every 7–10 years, depending on usage, cleaning habits, and exposure to pets or dampness. The UK home renovation business suggests that any carpet over a decade old is likely to be 'past its best'. 'Your carpet is like a sponge, it absorbs everything that enters your home. Over time, it collects years of grime, allergens, and chemical residues that vacuuming can't always reach,' says an expert from My Home Improvements. 'Even professional deep cleans won't remove built-up toxins that have soaked into the padding underneath. 'Replacing old flooring might not be glamorous, but it could be the biggest upgrade you make for your health.'
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Wales debit card to pay for gluten free food in shops
People in Wales who cannot eat gluten will be given debit-style cards preloaded with money to help pay for their UK-first move, which begins later this year, will be an alternative to the current system where those with conditions such as coeliac disease - which affects about one in 100 people - get food on prescription from the Cherylee Barker, 54, from Narberth, Pembrokeshire, took part in a pilot scheme and got £14 a month, which she said "scratches the surface of the cost".A Coeliac UK report said a gluten free diet added 35% to food bills and Health Minister Jeremy Miles said the Welsh government wanted to "de-medicalise the supply of gluten-free foods". The new card will work like a chip and Pin bank card and be taken in most places that sell gluten-free food, including supermarkets, shops, community pharmacies and online stores, according to the Welsh would not say how much people will be given - just that it will vary by person and be regularly reviewed - or how much would be spent on the anticipate it will be "cost neutral" and not add any more to the NHS prescription model will still be available in Wales, which is similar to schemes in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Those with coeliac disease cannot eat gluten as their immune system attacks their own tissues and their body cannot properly take in nutrients. It results in symptoms including bloating, vomiting and diarrhoea. There is also an added cost . with gluten-free food more expensive Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury's and Morrisons, the four leading supermarkets. The average price of a own brand loaf of bread was 63p, compared with £2.26 for a gluten-free penne pasta averaged 56p per 500g whereas the lowest gluten-free option averaged £1.22. Ms Barker has been part of the pilot scheme in the Hywel Dda health board area for the past five gets £42 every three months, which equates to £14 a month, and described the previous prescription system as "slightly embarrassing" and the food "not that edible".She said: "I didn't want to take the money from the NHS. I thought 'just suck it up and see' but after a little while I just found it was just becoming more and more expensive."It isn't a lifestyle choice, it is a need."Despite saying the card was "fantastic" she said the amount she got was only "scratching the surface" of rising costs for everybody, especially coeliacs. Bethan Williams, 24, from Cardiff, said prescriptions did not work for her as the food was low a vegetarian, she said the cash cards could give people with additional dietary needs the freedom to make healthy choices."I am in a good position that I can afford the higher quality bread but that is not the case for all people," she said."Eating food and being able to eat a balanced diet isn't a privilege, it's something everyone should be entitled to." For businesses such as Plumvanilla Cafe and deli in Narberth, which accepts the cash card, making sure they can serve the community's needs is becoming more Beere, who works at the cafe, said: "We've noticed more and more people shopping with gluten-free requirements so we like to keep a big stock."But she added it was a challenge balancing stocking the shelves with the high cost items and making sure nothing goes to waste. Miles said the move would cut "administrative burdens on GPs and pharmacies".He added: "For people living with coeliac disease, following a strict gluten-free diet is not a lifestyle choice but a medical necessity."We want to de-medicalise the supply of gluten-free foods in Wales, giving people more freedom to access the food they want to eat, more conveniently, to help them to manage their condition." Tristen Humphreys from Coeliac UK said: "We need to recognise that a gluten-free diet is the treatment for coeliac disease, it's a serious autoimmune disease not a lifestyle choice – we want that recognised."He added supporting people's diets would help prevent health complications down the line and was "cost efficient" for the NHS and called on other UK nations to follow suit. Additional reporting by Sara Dafydd
