US Troops Make Detentions In Trump Border Military Zones On Maxico Border
New Mexico:
US troops have made their first detentions inside military areas set up on the US-Mexico border as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, the US Army said.
The unprecedented military areas along 260 miles (418 km) of border in New Mexico and Texas were declared extensions of US Army bases by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, allowing troops to temporarily detain migrants and other civilian trespassers.
Three "illegal aliens" were detained by troops in the New Mexico area near Santa Teresa on June 3, before being handed to US Border Patrol, Army spokesperson Major Geoffrey Carmichael said in an email.
"This marks the first time Department of Defense personnel have recorded a temporary detainment within either National Defense Area," Mr Carmichael said.
US presidents have long used active-duty and reservist troops on the international boundary in support roles to US Border Patrol such as surveillance and construction.
President Donald Trump took military use a step further by giving troops the right to hold trespassers they catch in the zones until civilian law enforcement assumes custody.
Federal troops can also search people and conduct crowd control measures within the areas, according to the Army.
Designation of the zones as military bases allowed troops to detain migrants without the need for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. The 1807 law lets a US president deploy federal troops domestically to suppress events like civil disorder.
Prosecution of dozens of migrants caught in the zones has faced setbacks in court after judges in New Mexico and Texas dismissed trespassing charges, and acquitted a Peruvian woman, ruling they did not know they were entering restricted areas.
The primary role of troops in the zones is to detect and track illegal border crossers, with around 390 such detections so far, the Army said.
News of the detentions inside military areas came as Trump deployed state-based National Guard troops to Los Angeles during protests over immigration raids.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Envoy Says He Does Not Think Palestinian State Is US Policy Goal: Report
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said he did not think that an independent Palestinian state remains a goal of US foreign policy, according to an interview with Bloomberg News released on Tuesday. "I don't think so," Huckabee said when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy, Bloomberg reported, Bloomberg reported. Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, is staunch pro-Israel conservative picked by President Donald Trump to be his envoy to Israel. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he told the news agency. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy, and he has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?" Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favors for the West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live under occupation. The White House and US State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Huckabee's remarks. An evangelical Christian, Huckabee has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘I would certainly invoke it': Trump signals readiness to use Insurrection Act as LA immigration protests escalate
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act if protests in Los Angeles escalate into what he defines as an "insurrection." The comment comes amid ongoing demonstrations now entering its fourth day against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, following his recent deployment of around 700 US Marines to Los Angeles in a bid to quell the protests. The National Guard had already been mobilised over the weekend, despite objections from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump doubled down on his criticism of Newsom, saying they had spoken just a day earlier. He described scenes of destruction during the protests, alleging that demonstrators used hammers to break curbs and repurpose chunks of concrete and granite as weapons. 'They were taking that concrete, going up in bridges and dropping it into the roof of a car... They were throwing it at our police... at our soldiers... Los Angeles right now would be on fire,' Trump said. 'We're not playing around.' Asked how he would determine if the situation qualified as an insurrection, Trump pointed to 'paid insurrectionists' and 'paid troublemakers' among the crowd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo 'You take a look at what's happening,' he said. 'It was terrible.' The Insurrection Act, a rarely used 1807 law, allows the president to deploy military forces within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. Trump's statement marks one of his most direct public signals of willingness to use the statute since nationwide protests began in response to his policies. The legal and political ramifications of invoking the act remain unclear, but experts note that such a move could ignite a constitutional standoff between federal and state authorities. What is Insurrection Act of 1807 The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a federal statute that empowers the US president to use military force within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or armed rebellion. It serves as one of the few legal exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits the use of federal troops in civilian law enforcement. Under the Insurrection Act, the president can: Deploy active-duty military forces across state lines Federalise National Guard units from individual states Bypass state governors' objections in cases deemed severe enough to threaten national security or civil order When has it been used before? Historically, US presidents have used the Insurrection Act sparingly — most notably during: The 1957 Little Rock crisis to enforce school desegregation The 1992 Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict After Hurricane Katrina (though the act itself was not formally invoked, expanded powers were considered)
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk backs JD Vance — and Trump's not happy: Michael Wolff says the President is paranoid
Elon Musk backs JD Vance — and Trump's not happy: Michael Wolff says the President is paranoid: The story of Elon Musk backing JD Vance has taken a serious turn — and President Donald Trump isn't pleased. According to veteran political author Michael Wolff, the President is growing paranoid, even suspicious, of his own Vice President. With Trump currently in the White House and Vance just one heartbeat away, this isn't just political gossip — it's a sign of real tension at the top. Why is Trump worried about Elon Musk supporting his own VP, JD Vance? In a report published by Raw Story, journalist Michael Wolff revealed that President Trump is becoming increasingly anxious about Elon Musk's influence — and the way it's shaping JD Vance's political identity. Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and X (formerly Twitter), has reportedly suggested that Vance would make a better president than Trump himself. In private, Musk has allegedly encouraged key donors and Silicon Valley insiders to look to Vance as a long-term successor. That idea, according to Wolff, has deeply unsettled Trump. Even though Vance is his running mate and now serves as Vice President of the United States, Trump is said to see him as 'too close to Musk' and a potential rival rather than a loyal partner. Is Trump's fear of being replaced by Vance real or just political paranoia? Wolff says the fear is real — and growing. 'He's always been paranoid, but this is different,' Wolff told Raw Story. 'Trump sees Musk's money, his power on social media, and the way he talks about Vance — and he's starting to think there's a plot.' Live Events Wolff claims Trump is even considering 'loyalty tests' for his vice president, privately questioning whether Vance is more committed to the MAGA movement or to Musk's vision of tech-backed nationalism. The timing matters here. We're deep into 2025, with Trump now in his second term, and Vance being groomed by many on the right as the future of the Republican Party. That kind of speculation — especially when amplified by Musk — is enough to trigger Trump's deep political insecurities. How has JD Vance responded to Trump's growing suspicion? Vice President JD Vance has publicly downplayed the rift, but his words reveal the pressure he's under. In a recent interview, Vance said, 'I'm the vice president to President Trump. My loyalties are always going to be with the president.' He also called Musk's recent comments a 'huge mistake' that stirred up unnecessary division. Vance has spent the past year carefully balancing his loyalty to Trump with his appeal to younger conservatives and Silicon Valley influencers. That balancing act has worked — until now. As Musk continues to throw subtle shade at Trump and hint at a post-Trump GOP, Vance is increasingly caught in the middle. Behind closed doors, some Republican insiders say Vance is being advised to 'stay in his lane' — not to appear too ambitious, not to align too closely with Musk, and definitely not to outshine the president. But that's easier said than done when Musk has nearly 200 million followers on X and regularly fuels speculation about Vance's future. What role did the Epstein post play in escalating the drama? Things really boiled over when Musk posted — and then deleted — a message on X hinting that Trump's name might be found in Jeffrey Epstein's court records. No evidence was provided, and Musk has since gone silent on the matter. But the damage was done. Wolff said this was the moment that sent Trump over the edge. 'That was a silver bullet. Even if there's nothing there, just the suggestion of it reactivates all of Trump's worst fears.' The deleted post was widely screenshotted and shared across social media, giving critics of Trump a new narrative — and giving Musk's feud with the president a deeply personal edge.
