
The ghost of Muriel Spark
Spark made an art of beginnings and endings. We see it in The Girls of Slender Means, which begins and ends with the line 'long ago in 1945', and in her use of flash-forwards, so that the manner of a character's death is revealed at the start. The schoolgirl Mary McGregor, for example, in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, 'who was later famous for being stupid and always to blame… at the age of 23, lost her life in a hotel fire'. Lise in The Driver's Seat, who selects a stranger to murder her, will be 'found tomorrow morning dead from multiple stab wounds, her wrists bound with a silk scarf and her ankles bound with a man's necktie, in the grounds of an empty villa, in a park of the foreign city to which she is travelling on the flight now boarding at Gate 14.'
The Driver's Seat might be seen as the blueprint for the game Spark set in motion with Stannard, whom she handpicked after reviewing the second volume of his biography of Evelyn Waugh. Stannard, Spark wrote, was 'a literary critic and a scrupulous scholar', who understood the relationship between a writer's life and his work. When she first invited to him to her home, Stannard assumed it was to interview him for the job, but Spark had decided already that this stranger was the man she wanted.
Because she was a hoarder who had thrown away nothing on paper for 40 years, there was little research for Stannard to do: the facts of Spark's life were organised into box files equivalent in height to an airport control tower, in length to an Olympic-sized swimming pool and in width to the wingspan of a Boeing 777. Her vast archive, now divided between the National Library of Scotland and the McFarlin Library in the University of Tulsa, was her legal defence. 'The silent, objective evidence of truth' would 'stand by me', she wrote in Curriculum Vitae, 'should I ever need it'.
Before she became a novelist, Spark had been a biographer herself and the omniscient narrators of her novels were born from writing biography, because the biographer sees both the beginning and the end. Her first full-length book, published in 1951, was a life of Mary Shelley called Child of Light. 'Mary Shelley was born in 1797 and died in 1851,' Spark wrote. 'However variously the whole story is interpreted, no one can take these facts away.'
Muriel Spark, who shared the initials of both Mary Shelley and Martin Stannard, was born in Edinburgh on 2 February 1918, the day and month on which Mary Shelley died. Aged 19, after a first-class education at the school on which she modelled Marcia Blaine in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, Spark sailed to Southern Rhodesia to marry a schoolteacher who suffered, she soon discovered, from a severe mental illness. By the time her son, Robin, was born, the marriage was over. Leaving Robin in a convent in Gwelo, Spark returned to England in 1944 and worked, for the duration of the war, in black propaganda. She then, for 18 months, ran the Poetry Society, after which she set herself up as a biographer and critic. Until the end of the Fifties she lived from hand to mouth in bedsits, pitching ideas to publishers who then went bust. She wrote The Comforters soon after she converted to Catholicism in 1954, an event which coincided with a mental breakdown brought on by an excess of diet pills. Spark's fame was instant: by the 1960s her years of hardship were over. Twenty-one further novels, each flawless, appeared on a regular basis.
The biographer's task, Spark believed, was to summarise the facts. Biography is, after all, the art of summary and summary was the art in which Spark excelled: her novels, short stories and poetry, biographies of Mary Shelley and Emily Brontë, critical study of John Masefield, editions of the letters of Cardinal Newman, Mary Shelley and Charlotte Brontë, selection of Emily Brontë's poems and Wordsworth criticism measure two feet on the shelf. Each of Spark's brief books grew out of a mountain of paperwork, firming up the plot, pinning down the characters, lacing it all together with the elegance of a sonnet.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
'Treat me as though I were dead,' Spark told Stannard. This did not mean don't let me get in the way of your research, but assume I'll be ghost writing my own biography. Ghosts are everywhere in Spark's fiction, where they terrorise the living. Needle, the narrator of 'The Portobello Road', is smothered to death in a haystack and then haunts her murderer. In 'The Executor', which Spark considered, alongside 'The Portobello Road', her most satisfactory story, a famous Scottish novelist, living in an isolated house in the Pentland Hills, asks his niece and executor to sort his lifetime of papers into box files, which she does with impressive efficiency. 'There's little for me to do now, Susan, but die,' he says with a sly smile. Shortly afterwards he does die and Susan sells the archive to a foundation, withholding the 12 notebooks which contain his unfinished final novel 'The Witch of the Pentlands', about the trapping and trial of a witch. Why not write the ending herself, Susan wonders? But when she opens the 12th notebook, whose pages had previously been blank, there is a message in her uncle's handwriting: 'Well, Susan, how do you feel about finishing my novel? Aren't you a greedy little snoot, holding back my unfinished work, when you know the Foundation paid for the lot?' His concluding chapter, Susan discovers – where the witch out-foxes her persecutors – had been secretly written before his death and deposited earlier with the Foundation.
Stannard went about his task as he understood it: interpreting the documents, conducting interviews and putting together a portrait of his subject. Nine years later, in 2002, he delivered his first draft to Spark. It was what she called 'a hatchet job; full of insults', 1,200 pages of 'slander' and 'defamation' which she was sending to a libel lawyer. She did not recognise the humourless woman described; she had been turned into a fictional figure. Determined to prevent publication, she did what she could to spoil the book and hold up its progress. The biographer and his subject were yoked in a danse macabre of pursuer and pursued, the plight of each resided in the other. Her distress, Spark's friends say, effectively killed her, and when she died aged 88 in 2006, Stannard, now into the 14th year of his impossible task, was at work on the third draft. Muriel Spark: The Biography, which received stellar reviews when it finally appeared in 2009, is indeed the work of a literary critic and scrupulous scholar.
'What Spark wanted,' Stannard reflected, was 'to write the book herself.' So why didn't she write the book herself? Even he didn't know the answer. 'Why this intensely private person should have invited someone to write her biography remains mysterious,' Stannard says in his preface. But Spark had written the book herself several times: not as the story of her life, but as the story of her relationship with her biographer.
In The Ballad of Peckham Rye, published in 1960, Dougal Douglas, the horned stranger who creates havoc in south London, is ghosting the autobiography of the retired actress Maria Cheeseman, but she doesn't recognise herself: 'That last bit you wrote,' Miss Cheeseman complains, 'it isn't ME.' The book is meant to be factual, but Dougal keeps adding fictional details: she was born in Streatham, for example, and not Peckham. 'There's the law of libel to be considered,' Dougal explains. 'A lot of your early associates in Streatham are still alive. If you want to write the true story of your life you can't place it in Streatham.' Despairing of his subject's interference, Dougal throws down the gauntlet. 'I thought it was a work of art you wanted me to write… If you only want to write a straight autobiography you should have got a straight ghost. I'm crooked.'
Spark was crooked too, and biography and autobiography are crooked arts. Curriculum Vitae, like all CVs, is built on evasions, and biographies, as Spark well knew, are more than Wikipedia entries. She was a richly imaginative biographer herself, with trenchant views on the genre. In an article about Charlotte Brontë, Spark argued that 'biographical writing which adheres relentlessly to fact' distorts the subject, 'because facts strung together present the truth only where simple people and events are involved, and the only people and events worth reading about are complex'. Mary Shelley was both a complex and a conflicted character, and 'if we are to see the whole woman', Spark insisted, 'we must witness the conflict'. This is similarly the case with Spark, who left instructions throughout her work for her biographer to follow.
In Child of Light, which contained the first full-length study of Frankenstein, Spark saw in the scientist and his creature the model for the biographer and his subject. Like Boswell and Johnson, they are linked for eternity. 'There are two central figures – or rather two in one,' she explained in a brilliant analysis of Mary Shelley's first novel, because the Monster and his creator are bound together: 'Frankenstein's plight resides in the Monster, and the Monster's in Frankenstein.' So 'engrossed' are the couple, 'one with the other', that they are no longer individuals but 'facets of the same personality'. When the book became a film, it was unclear, for example, which of them was called Frankenstein.
A further reflection on biography can be seen in The Comforters, where Caroline Rose, a writer and Catholic convert recovering, as Spark was, from a breakdown, believes that her thoughts are being recorded by a ghost at an invisible typewriter. 'I have the feeling that someone is writing the story of our lives,' she tells her boyfriend. 'Whoever he is, he haunts me. The author records everything that's important about us.' Increasingly terrified, Caroline insists that, 'I won't be involved in this fictional plot if I can help it. In fact, I'd like to spoil it. If I had my way I'd hold up the action of the novel. It's a duty.'
While Spark's first book described the writing of her own biography, her first novel described the horror of being trapped in a book. From the very beginning, she foresaw the end.
Frances Wilson's 'Electric Spark: The Enigma of Muriel Spark' is published by Bloomsbury Circus
[See also: English literature's last stand]
Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: Deluded gender activists need to be brought to book
A reader hits out at the National Library of Scotland's decision to pull The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht from its 'Dear Library' centenary exhibition Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It is outrageous that the chief executive of the National Library of Scotland (NLS) has been so craven as to withdraw from its 'Dear Library' exhibition of 200 noteworthy books the much-praised The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht. This, as much as the Sandie Peggie case at NHS Fife, tells us how far a determined and deluded minority has permeated our institutions and, playing the victim, bullied people who should know better into acceding to their unjustified demands. First, this minority flies under the LGBT+ flag, but clearly its only interest is in the 'T.' Some lesbians, prominently Joanna Cherry KC, are strongly opposed to allowing biological males claiming to be women invading women's spaces, and are targets for trans activists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Second, the NLS has 'an LGBT+ staff network', and also 'LGBT+ partners'. What does this mean? Has the NLS other 'networks' and 'partners' who can blackmail its management into anathematising inoffensive (to most) books? Wester Hailes librarians Jessi Dimmock and Susannah Leake celebrate the opening of the centenary exhibition 'Dear Library' on the main staircase of the National Library of Scotland (Picture: Neil Hannah) And now an Edinburgh Fringe venue, Summerhall, has apologised for allowing Kate Forbes to appear at one of their events because of her Christian views on sexuality. Those objecting to her presence were so fearful – presumably of contamination – that they established a 'safe room' while she was in the building. What a piece of nonsense! Clearly, they are so insecure in their views that they cannot contemplate engaging in dialogue or debate with those whose only sin is to disagree with them. If these people are so confident in their views, why do they need to silence and cancel those who have not shown or threatened violence of any kind but merely stated fundamental truths: biological fact is not an 'anti-trans ideology'; and you cannot change your sex. Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Turn back tide This state of affairs simply cannot go on ('School trans toilet advice is not lawful, says council', Scotsman, 15 August). Scotland's credibility has reached a tipping point with not only this fightback against the law but with ridiculous judgements being made to cancel shows, remove books or ban certain people's attendance at the Edinburgh Festival, all in the name of very flawed political 'correctness'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad By chance, the architect of much of this is appearing at this very festival to promote her new book. Nicola Sturgeon must take a huge amount of the responsibility for creating such a maelstrom of confusion. It is very simple. The majority decision of the public against this utter confusion is final. That is the only outcome that can possibly work. Why isn't Holyrood being recalled from its break to please get its act together and stop trying to fight against the tide? With power comes a huge responsibility to fix the mess it has created. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Legacy of fear Neil Anderson states that, re Nicola Sturgeon, 'evidence suggests that she went out of her way to keep Scotland informed in her clear communicative style' (Letters, 15 August). My take on this, and something I have heard many others say, was her drive to keep the nation petrified with a daily update of the number of cases, deaths and continually ordering the nation to stay at home, inducing maximum stress to those most vulnerable – the elderly and infirm, many of whom to this day are still in a state of worry and anxiety. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Now, we see a different Nicola – one where, Frankly – everyone is a bully, she was a victim. She has no legacy, only quotes which enraged a majority of the nation if you disagreed with her gender nonsense, a photoshoot of a ferry with painted-on windows and a cardboard funnel and a lot of taxpayers' money down the drain fighting unwinnable court cases. From day one in power, it was all about her, nothing more, nothing less. Perhaps a decent legacy would be to apologise personally to Kate Forbes for creating the framework for her cancellation at Summerhall – or perhaps she too is 'terrified' to go anywhere near Scotland's only 5ft 2in ultimate street fighter! D Millar, Lauder, Scottish Borders Reid remembered George Reid was, as you rightly reported (14 August), an outstanding public servant. He was also my oldest friend stemming from 1959 when he was president of the Students Representative Council at St Andrews University and I held the same position at Edinburgh University. As students we travelled together with Donald Dewar to Kyiv, Leningrad and Moscow. Our wives Judy and Daphne happened to be at school and in the Guides together in Stirlingshire and we stayed with them in Geneva when George ran the International Red Cross. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We served together in the Commons and in the first Scottish Parliament he was my deputy and in the second my successor as Presiding Officer. I was pleased when the late Queen appointed him to join us as a Knight of the Thistle. We often talked about how our view of politics was similar though he started in the Labour Party and then moved to the SNP. He will be sorely missed. Lord Steel of Aikwood, Selkirk, Scottish Borders Picking cherries Oh dear! Andrew HN Gray, never one to get pesky facts get in the way of climate change denial and being anti-anything that looks suspiciously 'eco', has reiterated the internet legend cherry picking newspapers articles regarding the Arctic Seas getting 'hot' in 1922 and the Arctic melting in 1949 (Letters, 14 August). The point has always been that between then and now that process has sped up so drastically, in such a short space of time, it cannot be anything other than man-made, not a 'natural cycle', and it is long past the stage those old enough to know better ceased their tiresome fingers in ears la-la-laing just because they dislike the sandal-wearing lentil-munching smug cultist weirdos that are its loudest mouthpieces. Mark Boyle, Johnstone, Renfrewshire VJ Day While the United States commemorates VJ Day on 2 September, when the surrender documents were signed, it would have been appropriate if President Trump had attended a UK event yesterday – and would also have re-emphasised, before any meeting with Putin, that the aggressor in such unjustified wars must not benefit from subsequent ceasefire and peace agreements. John Birkett, St Andrews, Fife Peace summit Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It's perhaps no coincidence that the Trump, Putin summit in Alaska took place on VJ Day. The horrific destruction, obliterating Hiroshima and Nagasaki, made the world vow 'never again'. Yet we now find ourselves in a world arming itself for a nuclear war. The decision by Europe to increase spending on nuclear weapons, overtly to defend ourselves against Russian aggression, increases its likelihood. An unlikely source of peace comes in the form of Vladimir Putin. While Donald Trump winged it alone for the summit, Putin met with his senior advisors. What emerged from that meeting was the decision to broaden the summit's agenda to include steps back from the increasing nuclear threat. The proposal would be a nuclear weapon control treaty, involving all nuclear powers. It would be ironic in the extreme if Russia offered itself as the world's chief peacemaker. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Reading matters I wonder who was First Minister at the time Learn Together Scotland's schools volunteering scheme folded? To the best of my knowledge there is no current Scottish scheme for volunteers to help children with their reading. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Bookmark Reading Charity (based in London) has a scheme for in-person (in certain areas of England) and online support for children at English schools; they welcome volunteers from Scotland. Reading and book festivals are great – but some children need extra support before they can benefit from them. Libraries and other organisations, such as the Scottish Book Trust, do a great job in helping as best they can. But oh that we had financial and other support for literacy at Scottish Government level! There were, and I am sure still are, volunteers who care enough to give of their time and energy. Moyra Forrest, Edinburgh Flower power There's another reason for letting the second verse of Flower of Scotland be sung a capella at Murrayfield (Scotsman, 15 August). The bagpipes can't play the tune as written. Roy Williamson wrote the song with a very Scottish sounding chord on the word 'think' but the drone bagpipes can't play that chord. Consequently, with the pipe band, you hear the wrong tune, their version being much too cosy and relaxed. However, when the crowd takes over, the full Scottishness of the tune is revealed! So you can see how an initial mistake has given way to a much better rendition. Brian Bannatyne-Scott, Edinburgh Chips ahoy Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Delighted to see that Bill Greenock's daughter has made a successful transition from a catering course to a stellar career in computing (Letters, 15 August). I daresay I speak for many when I say we're all keeping our fingers crossed that in her new job she doesn't absent-mindedly put the chips into a pan of boiling fat. Robert Menzies, Falkirk Write to The Scotsman


Times
2 days ago
- Times
Donor ‘shocked' as national library excludes gender-critical book
Scotland's national librarian is facing mounting pressure to reinstate a gender-critical book which she banned from a major exhibition, after a key donor joined a revolt against the move. Alex Graham, who has given around £300,000 to the library, said he had been 'shocked and angry' to learn that The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht had been excluded from an exhibit that he personally supported with a donation of about £20,000. Graham, the creator of the television show Who Do You Think You Are, urged Amina Shah, Scotland's chief librarian and the chief executive of the National Library of Scotland, to reverse her decision. He said that if she did not, he would have to consider whether or not to continue to provide lucrative donations to the library, as he has done for the past 12 years. The critically acclaimed book, a collection of essays by more than 30 women about their role in the feminist campaign against Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-ID law, was set to be included in its Dear Library exhibition, after it was nominated by several members of the public. However, The Times revealed on Wednesday that it was pulled after a backlash by the library's internal LGBT staff network, which claimed it contained 'hate speech' and that displaying it would cause 'severe harm' to workers. They threatened to 'notify LGBT+ partners of the library's endorsement of the book' if management did not cave in. Shah justified the decision by citing the potential impact on 'key stakeholders' and the library's reputation if the gender-critical book was included, but has faced intense opposition after her ban was made public. In a major intervention, Graham called on the library to admit its mistake and reinstate the book to Dear Library, which Shah had publicly thanked him for his role in funding. He said that if it did not, he would have no option but to publicly disassociate himself from the campaign, saying the library had given in to what he claimed was a 'censorious, bullying culture' instead of standing up for ideals of free speech. The book's editors, Lucy Hunter Blackburn and Susan Dalgety, have branded the removal of their work 'cowardly and anti-democratic' and repeated their call for the decision to be reversed. 'I think this was a fundamental mistake and the correct thing for the library to do would be to put up their hands, admit that and reinstate the book,' Graham said. 'Instead, there have been weaselly responses. 'The library is not saying they have taken it out because it contains hate speech, because it does not. They've taken it out because of some ill-conceived notion that someone might be upset by its presence. That's not a good enough reason for me.' Graham added: 'This is not about taking one side or the other on the trans debate. It's about the principles of open debate and free speech, which to the national library should be sacrosanct. 'It isn't too late to redeem the situation. But if there is not a change of heart, I feel I will have no choice but to publicly dissociate myself from the exhibition and the campaign that surrounds it. 'This stupid escapade does not undo the very good work the library does, but it should never have happened. 'I couldn't say definitely that I will not donate any more money if they stick to their guns on this, but it has certainly given me pause for thought. That makes me incredibly sad.' Shah, who last year received a salary of between £105,000 and £110,000 in addition to pension contributions of £41,000, decided to exclude the book with the support of Sir Drummond Bone, the chairman of the National Library of Scotland (NLS). An insider within the cultural sector in Scotland said the decision was symptomatic of a wider trend of managers being seen to cave in to demands of young, activist staff members who have little resilience or tolerance of views different to their own. Graham became a major donor to the NLS as he credited free access to books at Cambuslang public library in his childhood as shaping his life and allowing him to go on to pursue a highly successful career in television. He sold his television company, Wall to Wall, in which he purchased a 33 per cent share for £1 in 1987, for about £25 million two decades later. Although the library receives the bulk of its funding from the Scottish government, private donors such as Graham, who has been repeatedly acknowledged by the library for his philanthropy, are also essential to its work. Graham has been one of the library's major donors over the past decade, funding major projects such as the digitisation of medieval manuscripts. He funds a scholarship at the library which is named in his honour, as is a room at the National Library of Scotland's moving image library at Kelvin Hall, Glasgow. Graham's generosity in supporting the centenary celebrations was singled out for praise by Shah at the launch of the Dear Library exhibition in June. Graham said he was initially impressed with it, before discovering that The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, which included a contribution from JK Rowling, had been excluded. 'On the opening night of the exhibition, I thought it was fantastic, because I found at least two books in there that I consider to be among the worst ever written,' Graham said. 'I said to Amina I thought that was great, because the whole point was that while some people are inspired by a book, others will hate it. That's the joy of the society we live in and the freedom that we have. 'There are books that are beyond the pale, but there are very few of them. You need to be very careful before you ban anything. 'This book [The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht] was clearly selected to be included, and frankly the management were then bullied out of that by a staff lobby group. 'They say they've removed this book to protect relationships with stakeholders. But they certainly didn't consult me and if they had, I would have voiced strong opposition. I am angry and disappointed at the decision to remove the book as well as the implication that as a stakeholder, I am somehow supportive of it, which I am not.' Kate Forbes, the deputy first minister, has found herself at the centre of a similar row after staff and performers at Edinburgh's Summerhall arts venue criticised her views on trans rights. Summerhall's bosses said Forbes had been permitted to speak at the venue as 'an oversight' after some of the artists set up a 'safe room' while the 5ft 2in politician was present as they were 'terrified' because of her opinions. A whistleblower who works within the arts sector in Scotland said that activist staff members were becoming increasingly powerful within major publicly funded institutions. 'I have been in so many meetings where it is just taken as a given that everyone there is in lockstep on these issues — that everyone hates JK Rowling and that books like The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht are dangerous and harmful,' a source claimed. 'The internal LGBT networks are given carte blanche and it is very isolating to those of us who do not agree with their extreme views, who are forced to self-censor or face, at best, being socially ostracised at work. 'It sounds ridiculous but those of us who don't agree with them feel like we're in an underground network like the French resistance or something, secretly sending each other supportive messages.' The insider added: 'A major part of the problem across the cultural sector is the infantilisation of younger staff members, who can't cope with any type of conflict or opposition to their views. 'This has now led to the ridiculous situation where people intolerant of ideas and books are not only working in our national library, but are calling the shots. Management are terrified and pander to them every time they have a tantrum.' The NLS has sought to defend its decision not to platform the book at its exhibition by claiming there were only 200 spaces for public display, and it received more than 500 nominations. However, documents released under a freedom of information request show that all books with two or more nominations were initially to be included in the public display, with the Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht obtaining four. Joanna Cherry, the former SNP MP and one of the essayists in the book, accused Shah of attempting to mislead her own staff with a message that claimed the library was not 'banning or censoring' books. Although the library does hold a copy of the book — a legal obligation given its statutory role — its exclusion from the Dear Library exhibition was the direct result of complaints from the LGBT staff network who did not like its contents, the documents show. 'I'm concerned that the librarian seems to be misleading her staff as well as the public and the media about what has occurred here,' Cherry said. 'The issue is not whether the book is available within the library's collections but her decision to withdraw it from an exhibition where it had rightly earned its place because of the prejudiced demands of a small group of her staff.' Cherry added: 'There is an increasing pattern in Scottish society where zealots masquerading as LGBTQ+ activists seek to censor women who want to talk about their rights. 'This book was written by feminists, survivors and lesbians. To remove it from an exhibition is not only an attack on freedom of expression, it is also discriminatory.' Hunter Blackburn said: 'We are very saddened that it has come to this, but we understand why Mr Graham has reached what must have been a very difficult decision for him. 'We will continue to seek for this to be resolved by the library making an unreserved apology, putting the book back in the exhibition where it won its rightful place, and, it becomes increasingly clear, undertaking a root-and-branch review of its internal culture and practices.' A spokeswoman for the NLS said: 'We are engaged in a robust and respectful conversation with Mr Graham about this matter, and we will accept his decision regardless of the outcome. 'It goes without saying we are indebted to Mr Graham for his support to the national library over the years. His assistance has helped us to preserve collections, reach new audiences and give young people's careers that much needed start through our apprenticeship programme.'


Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Dan Gunn on reconstructing the life of Muriel Spark through letters
Few people have immersed themselves in the lives of great writers as thoroughly as Edinburgh-born academic Dan Gunn. Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... First, there were the 25 years spent putting together the four-volume selection of Samuel Beckett's letters. He finished that in 2016, but two years later started work on the letters of Muriel Spark. The first of two volumes is published later this month, and for Spark aficionados, it's pure gold. The letters don't have all the answers. There aren't any surviving ones from before 1944, so there isn't anything about her Edinburgh childhood, adolescence, marriage, emigration to Southern Rhodesia (now ZImbabwe), motherhood, or the collapse there of her marriage to her manic depressive, violent husband or her wartime intelligence work. There isn't even too much about her 1954 mental breakdown and subsequent conversion to Catholicism or the six weeks in which she wrote The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yet if you want to follow her through the 1950s, watch her hitting her stride as a writer in the most transformative decade of her life, when she moves from being an unknown poet to a literary superstar on both sides of the Atlantic, the letters are enormously important. Read them, and you can almost see the self-confidence grow within her. At least that's what I thought as I followed her epistolary trail, noting how she switched from asking advice from Alan Maclean, the first editor of her books, to lambasting his failure to promote them properly. I've never read such sustained, imperious, angry eloquence. But perhaps, hints Gunn, it wasn't quite so simple. 'I was talking the other day with Alan Jenkins [a poet who had also known Spark] and I said that in this volume of her letters (1944-63) she's not that confident: she has doubts about her writing and her potential. And he said no, she never doubted her own genius. 'I think he's right, but I'm also right. I think she has an instinctive belief in her own utterly special way of looking at the world. How she translates that vision into writing is something else. When she's 14 and she wins an [Edinburgh-wide] poetry prize she already knows that's her path but it's only when she really gets going with prose and maybe only after two or three novels that she really gets a sense of 'Wow, this is it! I'm on the path and it's recursive: it comes back.'' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Other writers might kowtow to their publishers, conscious of the debt they owe them in getting their work into print, especially when – as with Spark - they changed their own rules just to do so. She was never like that. Here she is, in typically blistering form, on 13 November 1961, just after the publication of The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, telling Macmillan's why she wants to change some relatively minor detail of her contract: 'I know of no other writer on your list but myself," she writes, "who has had the opportunity to build an intelligent career in the world, or to get married, and who has consciously or deliberately set these safeties aside and endured poverty, and taken the risk of failure, in order to write well. 'It is not a spare-time hobby I am engaged in, but something for which I have had to sacrifice pleasures, and continually have to give up pleasures to do, and no matter how successful I become, I shall always have to make these sacrifices. It is not the kind of work that comes from a compromised life.' The letter, I should point out, continues in this rather magnificent vein for a full eight pages of Gunn's book. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The contrast with Beckett is enormous, Gunn says. 'He thought success was just a terrible mistake, that somehow they'd got it wrong. Once somebody published him, he didn't even consider moving. But Muriel believed in her success, and when it comes to publishers she does tend to think there are greener pastures somewhere else. She had great business acumen. I've transcribed hundreds if not thousands of her business letters, and though I didn't include many of them, cumulatively they're surprising - particularly as she doesn't write bestsellers, pot boilers, genre fiction. Her novels are too strange, too singular, and she never repeats herself. She writes the book she needs to write, and then says to her agents and publishers, 'You have one job and one job only - to make me money.'' Muriel Spark in 1983 | Getty Images This isn't as arrogant as it sounds, he says. ' I try to understand it in the context of her being a woman who had to support her family in a world of pretty creepy men, a lot of whom are trying to have at her in one way or another.' (Even, says her most recent biographer, Frances Wilson, to the extent of attempted rape.) Gunn met Spark 20 years ago when she was awarded an honorary degree by the American University of Paris, where he is a distinguished professor. 'She had a magical quality. Even though she could hardly see and was in considerable pain, she could completely command a room. She was so witty and clever, and the extent of her self-education was a revelation.' As was her charm. 'That was probably the hardest thing to communicate through her letters - unless I gave all the other side of the correspondence, which isn't really my job. But people loved her, absolutely loved her, which is why those publishers and agents put up with her being so extremely demanding.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Gunn is fully conscious of the fact that, as an editor of letters, he comes right at the end of a centuries-old tradition, one that vanished almost overnight with the arrival of email. 'There's a nostalgic element to representing a world we now don't know - where you had time to work out what you thought, sit down and write a letter. Certainly, Muriel put a lot of herself into those letters. But without letters, how are you ever going to reconstitute people's lives when they are dead?'