logo
Buchanan County's money pit

Buchanan County's money pit

Yahoo17-05-2025
The road to government waste is paved with good intentions. No one ever says, 'let's build a giant hole and bury $6 million in taxpayer money.'
At least not out loud. The waste part only becomes apparent after years of cost overruns and a limited return on investment. It turns out the bridge really does lead to nowhere.
Buchanan County, led by Western District Commissioner Ron Hook, seems intent on leading county taxpayers toward its own version of a costly big dig. The off-again, on-again dream of revitalizing Lake Contrary seems to be gaining momentum with a plan to spray the lakebed with a weed-killing chemical as a precursor to full-scale dredging.
There's no question this lake, which is located outside the city limits, is in sorry condition. Without dredging, it shares the fate of all oxbow lakes: slow decline into a sediment-filled bog.
The question is whether the county has put forward a viable plan for saving the lake and whether the promised economic and recreational benefits will materialize. County officials breezily suggest dredging the lake for $6 million, but other media accounts have put the figure at $8 million to $11 million. It's also worth asking whether the county is including the cost of disposing of the dredged material, which can be expensive depending on whether it's dumped in the river or applied on farmland.
This is a considerable financial commitment any way you slice it. Taxpayers deserve full transparency on where the money is coming from and what the county would be giving up – roads, crime prevention, economic development, etc. – to put so many of its eggs in Lake Contrary's basket.
Lake Manawa, an oxbow lake near Council Bluffs, Iowa, was dredged for $4.2 million in 2016. It's reasonable to believe that costs have risen since then. It's also worth noting that the state of Iowa contributed to the cost of dredging.
At Lake Contrary, Buchanan County might be on its own in shouldering the burden, which speaks volumes about what other agencies think of this project.
Before moving forward, the county needs to ask someone other than a Lake Contrary property owner about the costs and benefits. The county likes to point to Mozingo Lake, which did produce an economic benefit for Nodaway County. However, the federal government contributed to Mozingo's development because the lake serves as a water source for Maryville.
Lake Contrary lacks that kind of utility, which means Uncle Sam is less likely to pitch in. Nor was Mozingo plagued with the kind of crime and property maintenance issues that make it a steep challenge to get Lake Contrary anywhere close to what it once was.
The decision to spray for weeds puts Buchanan County closer to a point of no return on dredging. This might be a good deal if you own lake property or a speedboat, but the rest of us are wondering if this is another bridge to nowhere.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles defends Jennings settlement, makes the case for reelection
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles defends Jennings settlement, makes the case for reelection

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles defends Jennings settlement, makes the case for reelection

Many candidates describe Charlotte City Council as dysfunctional and lacking in transparency, but as Mayor Vi Lyles seeks a fifth term, she wants to improve that perception. However, she says she's standing by the decision to settle with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Johnny Jennings. The city is paying more than $300,000 to its top cop after Jennings says he was mistreated by former councilmember Tariq Bokhari during the councilman's quest to secure outer carrier vests. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Charlotte City Council settles with Chief Johnny Jennings The settlement sparked controversy when the city refused to disclose until Jennings made it public under pressure. Channel 9's Joe Bruno sat down with the mayor to talk about the state of the city and her efforts to secure her fifth term this November. Lyles: 'I believe that we treat people fairly. If you know, in our HR programs, and all of the things that we do, that Johnny isn't any different than other people that we've actually had these kinds of contracts with. I just tell you, by the person that he is, is because he gave the media the story, and it wasn't something that we would have done.' Bruno: 'So the city never would have revealed this?' Lyles: 'We'd have to ask a lawyer that, and I'm not a lawyer today.' She's the mayor today and wants to call herself that a year from now. As she campaigns for another term, she is aggressively backing the sales tax increase for transit. She says she also understands public safety needs to be a priority. Bruno: 'How safe do you consider Charlotte?' Lyles: 'I think it all depends on where you live and what you're doing and whether or not we have a program for you at this time.' She says if given another term, she wants to see the city prioritize addressing homelessness. 'I think the housing of the unhoused is one of the things that we have to tackle pretty immediately,' she said. Her fifth term isn't guaranteed. She's facing four challengers in the Democratic primary, but she says her work isn't finished and she's prepared to make the case to voters. Charlotte's city council primaries are Sept. 9. Early voting began Thursday. Before you head to the voting booth, check out our Political Beat Candidate Guide. We asked every candidate key questions on topics that matter to you. VIDEO: Where you can vote early in Charlotte for the primary election Solve the daily Crossword

EPA to rule on biofuel waivers, but big oil refiners may need to wait
EPA to rule on biofuel waivers, but big oil refiners may need to wait

Fast Company

time26 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

EPA to rule on biofuel waivers, but big oil refiners may need to wait

President Donald Trump 's administration is expected to rule on a growing backlog of requests from small oil refiners seeking relief from U.S. biofuel laws as early as Friday, but will delay a decision on whether larger refiners must compensate by boosting their own biofuel blending, according to two sources familiar with the planning. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday will announce decisions on some of the 195 pending small refinery exemption requests that date back as far as 2016, the sources said. The rulings will not be a sweeping win for small refiners, and will include some partial denials of waivers, according to one of the sources briefed on the decisions. The administration is also expected to issue a supplemental rule as early as next week to seek public comment on whether larger refiners should make up for the exempted gallons in a process known as reallocation, the source said. How the administration deals with exemption requests and the reallocation issues will have consequences for the oil and agricultural industries, and impact the price of commodities from gasoline and renewable diesel to soybeans and corn, along with the companies that produce them. In the past, widespread exemptions without reallocation have sent renewable blending credit prices lower, denting prices for corn-based ethanol and soybean-based biofuel. The EPA and White House did not respond to requests for comment. The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard requires refiners to blend biofuels like ethanol into the fuel pool or by the tradable credits, known as RINs, from refiners who do. Small refiners can petition the EPA to receive an exemption if they can show financial hardship. The EPA has a mounting backlog of such requests going back years – the result of political indecision and legal wrangling across multiple administrations. Both the agriculture and the oil industries are keen for resolution. Granting exemptions without forcing other refiners to make up the difference increases the supply of credits and puts downward pressure on their prices. Farm and biofuel groups have lobbied the EPA to limit the number of exemptions and to force other refiners to make up for exempted gallons. The oil industry is strongly opposed to reallocation, arguing it creates an uneven playing field and imposes burdensome regulatory costs. The EPA said earlier this year that it would force larger refiners to make up for future exempted gallons, but was silent on how it would treat exempt gallons from the dozens of backlogged requests. The supplemental rule will include various options in a bid to test how the market may respond, the sources said. —Jarrett Renshaw, Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store