Hundreds of Rwandans who fled to Congo after the 1994 genocide return in UN repatriation
Hundreds of Rwandan refugees who were living in eastern Congo since the 1994 genocide in Rwanda were repatriated on Saturday, the U.N. refugee agency said, after Rwandan-backed rebels seized key parts of the region.
Most of the refugees were women and children, and 360 of them crossed the border in buses provided by Rwandan authorities and were escorted by the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, and aid group Save the Children, local authorities said. The goal is to repatriate 2,000 people, UNHCR said.
'We are happy to welcome our compatriots. They are a valuable workforce for the country's development,' said Prosper Mulindwa, the Rwandan mayor of Rubavu, during a brief ceremony at the border.
The returnees were transported to a transit center where they will receive emergency assistance and support for reintegration.
They were among the hundreds of thousands of Hutus who fled Rwanda after the state-sponsored 1994 genocide that left up to a million minority Tutsis and moderate Hutus dead. Most had returned when Tutsi-led Rwandan troops first invaded Congo in 1996. But Rwandan authorities said thousands of Hutu militiamen and ex-soldiers had stayed and joined Congo's army to destabilize Rwanda.
For decades, mineral-rich eastern Congo has been ripped apart by violence from government forces and different armed groups, including the Rwanda-backed M23, whose recent resurgence has escalated the conflict and worsened an already acute humanitarian crisis.
The rebels are supported by about 4,000 troops from neighboring Rwanda, according to U.N. experts.
Among the Rwandan returnees, personal testimonies highlighted journeys marked by exile and a deep connection to a homeland some have never known.
Nyirakajumba Twizere was born in 1996 in Congo and had never seen Rwanda.
'I never thought this day would come," he said. 'I'm finally going back to the land of my ancestors.'
The repatriation is based on a tripartite agreement between Rwanda, Congo and UNHCR that has been in place for more than a decade. According to Rwandan authorities, more than 101,000 refugees have already been repatriated, including 1,500 since the beginning of 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Democrat state rep admits she's in the US 'illegally'
Minnesota state Rep. Kaohly Vang Her admitted Monday she is in the US 'illegally' in a shocking confession that rocked the nation as riots unfolded in Los Angeles over ICE deportations. Her, a Democrat elected in 2018, was discussing illegal immigrant eligibility for public health care when she disclosed personal details about her own family. She revealed that her father misrepresented his familial relations when he filed her family's immigration paperwork decades ago. 'Because his mother had died, my father - as the one processing the paperwork - put my grandmother down as his mother,' she said on the House floor. 'And so I am illegal in this country. My parents are illegal here in this country.' State law requires candidates for the Minnesota legislature to be a qualified voter in the state, which includes being an US citizen for at least three months. Her was born in Laos and came to the US with her family as a refugee when she was just four years old, according to her campaign biography. Although Her is reportedly a naturalized citizen, making her eligible to hold office in Minnesota, the Democrat's remarks have sparked a wave of outrage online. Her admission, which has gone viral on social media, comes as several Democratic lawmakers have come under fire over the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots that broke out in LA over the weekend. Social media users were quick to demand Her be 'removed' from her position, despite it being perfectly legal for her to hold office. 'We've been told for years that illegal aliens don't vote in our elections. Now we find out that they RUN in our elections. How freaking rich is that!' one critic tweeted. Another wrote: 'This is exactly why Americans are fed up. Our laws must be enforced, no exceptions.' 'She needs not only to be removed from the House but also from the country! Illegal aliens out!!' one X user urged. 'Remove her from the office,' echoed another. The controversy surrounding Her's commentary comes as tensions over illegal aliens remain heightened across the country. Los Angeles faces a possible fourth day of protests over immigration raids in the city, as Democrats and Republicans clash over what has become the biggest flashpoint in the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally. Violent demonstrations protesting ICE raids broke out across the LA over the weekend, leading President Donald Trump to order deployment of the National Guard . California officials vowed to sue Trump on Monday to roll back the administration's National Guard deployment, saying the president trampled over the state's sovereignty . Gov. Gavin Newsom called the presence of troops on the streets of Los Angeles both 'illegal and immoral.' US officials said about 1,000 National Guard members were in the city under federal orders by midday Monday to respond to immigration protests. The full 2,000 members authorized by Trump were expected to be on the ground by the end of the day. Trump said in a post on his social media site that the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not sent Guard members. ICE agents at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations over the weekend. And although the streets in Democratic-led Los Angeles were calm on Monday, t he White House and congressional Republicans contended the protests were a further reason for Republicans in Congress to pass Trumps 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that would increase border security and military spending. The bill, now in the US Senate after clearing the House of Representatives, would also slash taxes, cut Medicaid benefits and do away with green-energy initiatives.
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
'We were friends of the US': Fearful Afghans face Trump travel ban
Ahmad has been hiding in Afghanistan for former Afghan military employee is living in fear of being found by the Taliban, which seized power in 2021 as US forces withdrew from the Central Asian a result, Ahmad is unable to get a job or access medical care, relying on donations from friends outside the country to survive. His son, 12, is unable to go to they are found, Ahmad says, the Taliban "will remove" hope had been refugee resettlement in the US, but - with just a medical check to complete - the process was put on pause by the Trump he hoped. Then, on Thursday he woke to the news that US President Donald Trump had issued a new order banning the entry of Afghan passport holders to the US, citing national security threats."I am not a threat to the United States," Ahmad told the BBC. The BBC is not using his real name because of concerns about his safety."We were friends of the United States," he added. Why are these 12 countries on the list?How nations have responded Everything else we know about the ban - so farTrump's new ban dodges pitfalls from last time, experts sayChad halts US visas in revenge for Trump travel ban Trump's sweeping travel ban came into force on Monday, blocking people from Afghanistan and 11 other countries, including seven from Africa, as well as countries like Haiti and Yemen, from entering the US. There are partial bans on seven other to the ban, Afghanistan was included because the Taliban are considered by the US government to be a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group, and the country does not have "a competent or co-operative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents", or "appropriate screening and vetting measures". It also notes a relatively high rate of people overstaying their Trump administration has, however, recently dropped temporary protected status for more than 9,000 Afghans living in the US, arguing its assessments showed the security and economic situation in Afghanistan had those living in Afghanistan are faced with a series of restrictions brought in by the Taliban government in line with its strict interpretation of Sharia ones affecting women - including the enforcement of head coverings, restrictions on travel and education over the age of 12 - amount to a "gender apartheid", according to the United Nations. The Taliban says it respects the rights of women in line with Sharia and Afghan culture.A different UN report from 2023 found there were credible reports that hundreds of former government officials and armed forces members had been killed since the group returned to power in 2021, despite a general amnesty. The Taliban has previously said all Afghans could "live in the country without any fear" - and those abroad should come back and help rebuild the country."There is a general amnesty," Mohammad Suhail Shaheen, Taliban ambassador to Qatar, told the BBC earlier this year. "Countrywide security is prevalent in Afghanistan. Every citizen and traveller can travel to any corner of the country without any obstacles or any difficulties."There are exceptions to Trump's ban - including for Afghans who worked directly with the US military before the Taliban back took control of the country in Ahmad, whose application for resettlement was backed by a former US service member, does not qualify for a Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) because he did not work directly for the he is far from the only one. Trump to end protected status for Afghans Some 200,000 Afghans have been resettled since the US military's chaotic withdrawal, but there are still tens of thousands more waiting for a have fled across the border to neighbouring Pakistan to wait for a decision to be made on their who spoke to the BBC's Afghan Service, is currently in Pakistan - which has been expelling tens of thousands of Afghans in recent months. If the path to the US is closed to her, she is not sure what to do next."Returning to Afghanistan is not an option for us - it would be incredibly challenging," she said. "Our children have already lost years of education, and we have no hope of safely going back." More than 8,300 family members of US citizens are ready for an interview in Afghanistan, with more than 11,400 others awaiting family reunification, according to US Department of State data shared by who asked to be identified by his nickname, is one of the 200,000 Afghans who have already reached the US, because he worked directly for the US military. He is now a US sister, however, remains in Afghanistan where she and her husband are "living in a hide and seek game", he says. They change their address and city every couple months in order to stay passed the background and medical checks for refugee resettlement, but like the others who spoke to the BBC, they became trapped when the process was paused in latest order has made Mojo, who lives in Houston, Texas, and the rest of his family lose "all our hope completely" ."I wish that he would change his mind, make some exception, change the rules or take his order back and let people have a peaceful life," he said. Pakistan expels tens of thousands of AfghansAfghans hiding in Pakistan live in fear of forced deportationEx-US generals describe chaos of Afghanistan withdrawal The ban also affects Afghans who are not trying to reach the US for Ghafari is studying at Cornell University in New York state, but is currently in Germany for the summer with her young said she began a "frantic" race back to the US on Thursday in order to continue her studies, before the start of the travel ban on ban has put her under "immense pressure" and has made her feel "very vulnerable", the the 30-year-old former politician told the makes it worse, she said, was that she regularly had to return to Germany every few months to maintain her residency status there too. Describing her situation as "precarious", she said she worried about how she could make her regular trips to Germany when the travel ban VanDiver, of AfghanEvac, said the ban broke a promise Americans had made to Afghans over the 20 years they were in the country."This policy punishes people who escaped the Taliban, risked everything to support democracy, are already vetted, were told by the US government to wait," he wrote on social media platform X."They're not threats. They're our allies - and they're being left behind."Meanwhile, many of those still in Afghanistan have other problems to contend one Afghan man in Kabul told AFP news agency: "We don't even have bread, why are you asking me about travelling to America?"Additional reporting by Azadeh Moshiri and Gabriela Pomeroy
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
The lessons Britain can learn from Denmark's migrant crackdown: How nation has cut asylum claims by 90% with its 'zero refugee' policy
Sir Keir Starmer 's warning that uncontrolled immigration risks creating an 'island of strangers' has prompted fury across much of the British left - including excitable comparisons to Enoch Powell. But head to Denmark and you'll find their fellow-wingers aren't just outspoken about the need to tackle the issue - they've put their words into action, to dramatic effect. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made tackling out-of-control immigration a key priority since coming to power in 2019, vowing to pursue a 'zero-refugee' policy that involves actively discouraging people from coming to the country. Despite this measure remaining controversial, no one can deny its success, with asylum claims dropping by almost 90 per cent over the past decade. Last year they plummeted to 2,333, while the UK total hit a record 108,138. And while Reform UK surged in this month's local elections on an anti-immigration ticket, right-wing parties with similar policies in Denmark performed poorly in the latest European elections. It's no surprise Britain's ailing Prime Minister is interested in Denmark's migration model, with Sir Keir meeting Mr Fredericksen at Downing Street in February to hear about her approach. With its impeccably liberal credentials, the Nordic country seems an unlikely source for some of the toughest migration policies in Europe. But, for Ms Frederiksen's Social Democrats, opposition to mass immigration is a sensible left-wing position, given its negative impacts mainly fall on those lower down the social ladder. 'No matter if you look at statistics on crimes or if you look at problems on the labor market, insecurity in local communities, it is the most vulnerable who experience the consequences [of uncontrolled migration],' Ms Frederiksen said in a widely-reported interview with Politico. She went on to describe mass migration into Europe as a 'threat to the daily life' of the continent, echoing comments made by US Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference. Denmark's tough approach to immigration dates back to the 2015 migration crisis, when annual asylum requests reached 21,316 in a country of only six million. The country famously banned the burka, the garment fully covering the face and body worn by devout Islamic women who'd been brought to the country by their husbands. New rules came in compelling all newcomers and their children to learn Danish or lose asylum-seeker benefits. In 2018, the country's previous government brought in the so-called 'anti-ghetto law', which aims to reduce the number of 'non-Western' residents in certain housing areas to less than 30 per cent by 2030. The rules, which were updated in 2021, give local authorities the right to set up 'prevention areas' where they can refuse to rent to those who are not originally from Denmark, the EU or EEA or Switzerland. Critics have called the policy discriminatory and they are currently being challenged in the European Court of Justice. However, they continue to receive support from cross-party MPs who urge something be done to force integration. Other policies appear to quite deliberately introduce a hostile environment for migrants. Asylum seekers refused the right to stay are denied benefits. They get food, served three times a day, at the country's two deportation camps They are sent to the camps to await removal by the Danish Returns Agency, which gets extra funds for results. As Danish immigration minister Kaare Dybvad Bek recently told the Mail: 'We stand very hard against giving migrants the right to remain here. If you're rejected as an asylum seeker, you have a very low possibility of staying in Denmark.' Controversially, Denmark's border force has powers to confiscate items such as jewellery and watches from incoming migrants to help fund the cost of their stay. Migrants who give up on Denmark and return home voluntarily are given a £4,500 sweetener to leave. And if a migrant's country of origin is deemed 'safe', such as Syria after the recent fall of President Bashar al-Assad, even a successful asylum seeker can lose Danish residency and face being returned home. Denmark also publishes league tables of criminal convictions based on the perpetrators' national origins, something the UK does not do, although Home Secretary Yvette Cooper recently agreed to publish such data by the end of this year. These tables show that offences, particularly by foreign-born gang members, became an increasing problem after 2015 - a difficult truth that has nonetheless bolstered public support for cutting migration. The latest polling shows that the Social Democrats remain by far the most popular party, with 22.9 per cent of the vote - nearly 10 points ahead of the second-biggest rival. By contrast, the Danish People's Party, which is usually described as far-Right, is on just 4.4 per cent, down from 21.1 per cent ten years ago. Considering Denmark's multi-party system, these are numbers Sir Keir could only dream of. During a visit to Albania last week, the Labour leader announced plans for a Rwanda-style scheme to deport failed asylum seekers to the Balkans while they await deportation - a policy that Denmark is advocating on the EU level using a yet to be determined 'third country'. He suggested he would be speaking with the country's PM, Edi Rama, about the idea of hosting some of these so-called 'return hubs' - only for him to immediately rule this out. Sir Keir's announcement, while botched, reflects his desperation to find a deterrent to Channel migrants following a surge in crossings since he came to power. Arrivals this year have topped 12,000 - an increase of 40 per cent on 2024. As he observes these numbers tick up - and the popularity of Reform and groups much further to the extremes rising with them - Sir Keir would do well to heed the advice of Danish immigration minister Kaare Dybvad Bek. 'There is no doubt in my mind that traditional political parties taking immigration seriously is the reason why we don't have large far-Right parties in Denmark,' he said in a recent interview. 'I think that is true for most European countries – if you take immigration back under democratic control, then you restrict how much the far-Right can grow.'
