GOP holdouts stall Trump agenda into the night, with outcome uncertain
Lawmakers returned to the House chamber at 9:30 p.m. EDT — after an hours-long delay — to hold a procedural vote that would open up debate on the megabill and tee up a vote on final passage.
The effort, however, stopped in its tracks after three hard-line conservatives — Reps. Keith Self (R-Texas), Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) and Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) — voted against the rule, along with centrist Republican Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.). Nine other Republicans declined to vote altogether, denying Republican leaders the majority needed to open debate on the megabill.
With all Democrats opposing the package, the vote remained stuck at 207-216 for a time, before Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.) voted to support the measure shortly after 11 p.m. That momentum in favor of the bill was quickly negated, however, when Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who voted against the megabill in the House last month, switched his vote on the rule from 'yes' to 'no,' setting GOP leaders back some more.
As of just before midnight, the vote stood at 207-217, with five GOP 'no' votes and eight Republicans not yet having voted.
Those eight were: Reps. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Michael Cloud (R-Texas), Andy Harris (R-Md.), Bob Onder (R-Mo.), Scott Perry (R-Pa.) and Chip Roy (R-Texas) had not yet voted as of 11:45 p.m.
The impasse has forced Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) into a game of chicken, with leaders vowing to hold the vote open indefinitely in an effort to force the holdouts into a change of heart.
'I'll keep it open as long as it takes to make sure we've got everybody here and accounted for and all the questions answered,' Johnson told Fox News's Sean Hannity just before 11 p.m. 'I made that commitment to my members.'
'This is part of the process,' he added. 'We are tying up some loose ends. We had a Senate bill that was sent over that was modified from the House version. We liked the House version better, no surprise about that, and we had reached a very delicate balance on it, so it's taken a little while to go through the changes and to have everybody fully process that and figure out what that means for them and their districts.'
Live updates: Republicans hold open critical vote on Trump megabill in dramatic scene
The Speaker said he spoke to three of the GOP 'no' votes, calling some of their positions a 'placeholder.'
'I've spoken to 'three of the four, I'm trying to find the fourth one,' Johnson said. 'But a couple of those are still waiting for some of those questions to be answered, and they're just sort of putting placeholders on the board, and I think they're open for conversation. Everybody's here in good faith, everybody wants to get to yes, everybody wants to deliver this agenda for the people, and we're going to give them every opportunity to do that.'
The logjam did not come as a complete surprise. Shortly before leaders called the procedural vote, a handful of hard-line conservatives announced they would not vote on the effort if top lawmakers called the referendum Wednesday, contending they needed more time to receive clarity about the policy details of the package — and, perhaps, ease their qualms and win their votes.
Johnson, however, tried to call their bluff, convening the vote despite the threats.
Some Republicans, including Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), relented on their initial opposition, supporting the procedural vote after hours of bashing the bill throughout the day Wednesday.
'We got clarification of what's going to be enforced,' Norman told reporters. 'We got clarification on how the IRAs are going to be dealt with. We got clarification on the tax cuts. And still we'll be meeting tomorrow on the specifics of it. But no, I feel comfortable with this.'
It is unclear what leaders will do next. As the clock approached midnight, lawmakers of both parties were milling around the chamber even as the vote tally remained frozen.
Johnson said Trump offered Wednesday night to call the remaining holdouts to try to get them on board.
'He has been, in fact, he called me most recently about an hour ago and said, 'Who else needs to have a discussion? I'm ready to get on the phone.' And I said, 'Mr. President, you've done your job and we'll do ours here,'' Johnson told Hannity.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump approval rating takes another hit in latest poll
President Donald Trump's approval rating slipped again in the latest Pew Research Center poll released Thursday. The Pew Research Center poll found that Trump's approval rating has dropped three percentage points over the past two months and is down nine points since shortly after he took office. The poll ultimately found that Trump had a 38% approval rating among all Americans, which is down from the 47% approval rating in January. The poll found Trump's approval rating also dropped among those who voted for him since taking office earlier this year. Trump's approval rating among his own supporters fell from 95% recorded earlier this year to 85% in the latest poll. The Pew Research Center found that an overwhelming majority of those who identify as strong Republicans still approve of how he is handling his job as president. About 93% approve of his job performance, slightly down from the 96% who said the same shortly after he took office. The research center highlighted a significant change in approval among certain Republican-leaning groups. The research center noted that there has been 'substantial erosion in his approval over this period among those who identify as Republicans but not strongly, as well as among independents who lean toward the GOP.' 'About six-in-ten of those in these groups approve of Trump's performance today, down from roughly three-quarters at the start of his second term,' the research center wrote in its press release. The Pew Research Center also found that public assessments of Trump's personality traits have also fallen off since 2024. More from the research center: Fewer now say he cares about the needs of ordinary people (37% today, 42% last summer), is a good role model (29% now, 34% then) or is mentally sharp (48% now, 53% then). Trump is widely described as standing up for what he believes in: 68% say this today, identical to the share who said this last summer. The poll was conducted among 3,554 adults from Aug. 4 to 10, 2025. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'
A key senator on the Foreign Relations committee called Donald Trump's Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin a 'disaster' Sunday and blamed the U.S. president for legitimizing his Russian opponent in front of the world. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States. It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted,' said Chris Murphy, the ranking Democratic member of the Foreign Affairs subcommittee on European security cooperation. Murphy told NBC's Meet the Press that Trump was forced to abandon his main commitment — a call for a ceasefire — during the meeting and was similarly unable to convince Putin to drop demands for Ukraine to cede more territory, something the senator from Connecticut said was 'stunning' to see a U.S. president consider. 'He wanted to be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. He was invited to the United States — war criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy said. Trump 'walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal. And I'm not even considering sanctions,'' the senator continued. 'And so Putin walks away with his photo op, with zero commitments made, and zero consequences. What a great day for Russia.' Murphy's comments to NBC come as two top Trump officials who traveled with the president to Alaska for the summit Friday, Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, did the rounds on separate Sunday morning programs defending the outcome of the president's meeting with Putin. The optics of the meeting are being endlessly scrutinized in the mainstream press, partly due to the few specifics released so far about what the two men discussed. Among those moments been picked apart by analysts included the arrival of the Russian president, which was preceded by U.S. troops, in uniform, rolling out a red carpet on the tarmac. On Sunday, Witkoff told CNN'S State of the Union that the U.S. secured what he claimed was a 'game-changing' development in the discussions: Putin's willingness to consider accepting a U.S. security agreement protecting the future sovereignty of Ukraine's borders. This was the first time negotiators were able to gain ground on the issue, he explained. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," he said. Witkoff wouldn't specify whether the security guarantee could lead to what Trump and his followers have long opposed — a promise to directly engage U.S. troops in defense of Ukraine should Russia continue crossing Trump's red lines. Murphy, on Sunday, seemed to imply that such a guarantee would be the bare minimum standard necessary for any peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. 'That [security guarantee] is an essential element of a peace agreement because any commitment that Vladimir Putin makes to not invade Ukraine again isn't worth the paper that it's written on,' said the senator. 'He's made that commitment many times. So yes, there has to be a guarantee that if Putin were to enter Ukraine after a peace settlement, that there would be some force there, a U.S. force, a U.S.-European force there to defend Ukraine.' He would go on to hammer Trump over reports that Witkoff wouldn't confirm when pressed by CNN's Jake Tapper, which revealed that Trump had signaled his own willingness to accept Russian demands for Ukraine to cede the entire occupied Donbas region as part of a potential agreement. Murphy said that the reported development was 'another sense that Putin is just in charge of these negotiations.' Chris Van Hollen, another Democrat on the Foreign Relations panel, was equally critical of Trump's meeting with the Russian president during an interview with ABC's Martha Raddatz on This Week. Heading into Friday's summit, Trump warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia continued to oppose peace efforts and said that he was working towards an immediate ceasefire. Afterwards, he claimed in a Truth Social post that "It was determined by all [in attendance] that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Van Hollen called this news a 'setback' for the U.S.'s European allies and Ukraine, while accusing Trump of being 'flattered' by Putin. 'There's no sugarcoating this. Donald Trump, once again, got played by Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin got the red carpet treatment on American soil. But we got no ceasefire, no imminent meeting between Putin and Zelensky,' said Van Hollen. Jake Sullivan, national security adviser to the Biden administration, agreed. "President Trump's stated goals were very simple, get an immediate ceasefire, and in the absence of a ceasefire, impose what he called severe consequences," Sullivan said. "Well, the summit has come and gone. There is no ceasefire. There are no consequences.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Monday with European leaders including Finnish president Alexander Stubb, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, French president Emmanuel Macron and the UK's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Stubb is known for his personal relationship with Trump, and is poised to be on-hand to quell any disputes between Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will also be in attendance. Zelensky is reported to be wholly opposed to any demand to recognize Russian occupation of the Donbas as legitimate.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Georgia GOP fears bruising primary in race to unseat Ossoff
Republicans are bracing for what could be another brutal primary as they look to unseat Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) next year. Former football coach Derek Dooley and Reps. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) and Mike Collins (R-Ga.) have all launched bids for the Republican nod to take on Ossoff. Not long after Dooley — who's seen as Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp's (R) preferred candidate — entered the race, the two congressmen quickly trained their fire on the political outsider. The early friction underscores the tall task ahead of Republicans: Avoiding a messy primary that leaves the nominee bruised and battered heading into the general election, while also dodging a major clash between Kemp and President Trump, who has yet to weigh in on his preferred candidate. 'As Republican strategists, we're always concerned that we're better at eating our own than winning in November,' said Heath Garrett, a friend of Dooley's since law school who is not involved in the campaign, 'and so, we also have to balance that with the reality that voters want a choice.' 'But can we mitigate the collateral damage so that we can all still win in November?' Garrett added. Dooley, whose father is former UGA football coach and Georgia icon Vince Dooley, became the latest entry in the Republican contest to take on Ossoff when he launched his campaign for Senate earlier this month. The younger Dooley has leaned hard into his own football background, best known for his time coaching at University of Tennessee, while touting himself as a political outsider. More importantly, he's seen as Kemp's preferred pick in the race after the governor declined an opportunity to run himself despite much courting from his party. A source close to the campaign told The Hill that Dooley has visited at least 16 counties since his launch, saying there was a 'really, really positive response to him entering the race.' Carter so far has a financial edge in the race with more cash on hand than Collins, who's been in the race for several weeks. Carter has loaned himself $2 million so far, though observers are watching to see how much money he ultimately pours into his bid. Carter's campaign has sought to align itself to the president, with a campaign spokesperson asserting that the congressman 'has stood with Trump from Day One.' 'Georgians know the difference between a fighter who stands with Trump versus a product of the same establishment machine that tried to stop him,' the spokesperson said. 'Collins, who has also sought to align himself to Trump, has started to establish himself as a serious candidate several weeks after launching his bid, including organizing a 159-county operation across the state and racking up endorsements from even some of Kemp's allies.' By comparison, the Georgia GOP is formally organized in only 142 counties. 'To get organized in all 159 counties in two weeks is relatively unheard of in Georgia,' said one Georgia Republican strategist, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'I think there's probably some prevailing thought in D.C., like, 'Oh, it's a congressman, like, how much widespread support can he really have, right, across the state?'' the strategist said. 'But Mike has clearly built an infrastructure very quickly.' The next marker observers will be watching for is third quarter fundraising reports, which will highlight how serious all three candidates are. All three men are also vying for the coveted Trump endorsement. A source close to Carter told said the Savannah-area congressman met with the White House about the race; a source close to the Collins campaign said Collins has talked to Trump about his Senate bid. Dooley has also visited the White House. Just hours into Dooley's entry, the tenor of the race quickly turned negative, with Carter and Collins attacking the former football coach. 'I will tell you this, and we're all proud of our dads, and I'm sure both my opponents are proud of their dads as well. But at the same time, we better take this serious,' Carter said while speaking to Henry County Republicans earlier this month, a thinly veiled shot at Dooley. 'You got to have somebody who can go toe to toe with this kid, and I'm that person who can go toe to toe with him,' he added, referring to Ossoff. Meanwhile, Collins's campaign has taken to mocking Dooley, such as when the former football coach posted that 'In coaching, we have a saying, 'Your film is your resume.'' ''Your film is your resume.' So true, Coach!' replied Collins's campaign, posting a clip of Louisiana State University defeating University of Tennessee, where Dooley formerly coached, 16-14 in a 2010 SEC game. In his first interview since launching his Senate bid, conservative radio show host and former Kemp aide Martha Zoller noted Dooley had only been in the race for about a week. 'It doesn't feel that way,' Dooley chimed in, 'because there's never – there's never been a candidate who's not a candidate, and never been in politics, get attacked more in a three-week span.' Georgia Republicans are no strangers to messy primaries, including 2020 when then-Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) challenged then-Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) for the Republican Senate nomination. The two traded barbs and negative attack ads, with Loeffler ultimately beating Collins by six points. But she was later defeated in the runoff against then-Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock. 'There are a lot of concerns, particularly after going through 2020, 2021, in the Senate race there and the runoff and the Kelly Loeffler situation — there are a lot of concerns by a lot of Republicans about that,' said conservative radio show host Erick Erickson, referring to concerns about a messy primary. 'But also it's notable Collins and Carter firing so hard at Dooley right now, who's got low-name ID, because I do think they realize he can be a competitive threat,' he added. Republicans are equally — if not more — eager to avoid a clash between Kemp and the president, who have a historically complicated relationship ever since the Georgia governor flouted Trump's ask to overturn the 2020 election results in his state. Several reports last month indicated Trump's and Kemp's orbits were at odds yet again, particularly over Kemp's reported push for Dooley. A GOP operative confirmed to The Hill that there had been a sense of 'annoyance' between Trump's and Kemp's camps over how to handle the race, but there have been efforts to smooth things over. 'Both sides recognize it's best if they're on the same side in the end,' the operative said. 'I think it's still TBD where that ends up.' A GOP source familiar also told The Hill 'there have been successful efforts to lower' the temperature. Still, there's a split between some members of the party over who should take the lead on the search to find the best consensus candidate. 'Kemp knows how to win statewide. Last time they picked a candidate, Herschel Walker didn't do so well,' one Senate GOP member said, referring to the dynamic with the White House and noting that members still remember the debacle that led to wins by Ossoff and Warnock in January 2021. 'His instincts are not necessarily the best. Kemp's are, and they need to get over the chemistry issue.' Meanwhile, others are eager to see the White House gets involved. 'I think most people here are still holding out hope that the White House steps in before the end of the year. Now is that wishful thinking? Maybe,' the Georgia Republican strategist said, who wasn't concerned yet about a messy primary. But 'every day that goes by is another day that Ossoff is untouched, is raising more money and … is padding his cash advantage over our nominee.'
