Germany stops military exports that could be used in Gaza
The move by Germany, which had previously stopped short of tougher lines against Israel's government taken by some of its European Union allies, appears likely to further isolate Israel over the military takeover plan which has been condemned by the United Nations and supporters of Israeli hostages still held in Gaza.
In a statement, Mr Merz emphasised that Israel 'has the right to defend itself against Hamas's terror' and said the release of Israeli hostages and 'purposeful' negotiations towards a ceasefire in the 22-month conflict 'are our top priority'.
He added that Hamas must not have a role in the future of Gaza.
'The even harsher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip, approved by the Israeli cabinet last night, makes it increasingly difficult for the German government to see how these goals will be achieved,' he added.
'Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice.'
The German government remains deeply concerned about the suffering of civilians in Gaza, he said, adding: 'With the planned offensive, the Israeli government bears even greater responsibility than before for providing for their needs.'
He called on Israel to allow comprehensive access for aid deliveries — including for UN organisations and other non-governmental organisations — and said Israel 'must continue to comprehensively and sustainably address the humanitarian situation in Gaza'.
Germany also called on Israel's government 'not to take any further steps toward annexing the West Bank'.
It is not clear which military equipment from Germany will be affected.
Germany, with its history with the Holocaust, has been among the strongest western backers of Israel, no matter which government is in power.
Mr Merz's government did not join announcements by French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer that they plan to formally recognise a Palestinian state next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
UN holds crisis talks over Gaza occupation after Israel's plan for complete military takeover of Gaza sparks international backlash
The UN Security Council is to hold emergency talks today after Israel's plan for a complete military takeover of Gaza sparked international condemnation. Israel's ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, claimed the session was initiated by the UK – and he hit out, insisting that Downing Street would not 'sit idly by' if it was 50 British citizens still being held captive by Hamas terrorists. Of the 50 remaining hostages taken by Hamas fighters during their attack on October 7, 2023, it is believed only 20 are still alive. The UN meeting was announced as US special envoy Steve Witkoff met Qatar 's prime minister in Spain to discuss a new proposal to end the war. Egypt and Qatar are preparing a new ceasefire framework that would include the release of all the remaining hostages in one go, in return for the end of the war and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. A joint statement by nine countries, including Germany, Britain, France and Canada, said that they 'strongly reject' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's decision for a large-scale military operation in Gaza, saying it will worsen the 'catastrophic humanitarian situation', endanger hostages and further risk mass displacement. They also said that any attempts at annexation or settlement in Gaza violate international law. A separate statement by more than 20 countries, including Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, called Israel 's decision a 'dangerous and unacceptable escalation'. Russia said it will aggravate the 'already extremely dramatic situation'. The Israeli security cabinet's decision to take full control of Gaza has also been met with fury by the families of the remaining hostages, who called the decision a 'death sentence' for them. Hostage Matan Zangauker's mother Einav said: 'The living will be murdered, and the dead will disappear for ever. I will finish with a direct call to the prime minister: If you conquer parts of Gaza and the hostages are murdered, we will pursue you. 'Your hands will be stained by the blood of the kidnapped.' The plan has also caused a rift between Israel's security cabinet and defence leaders. Israel Defence Forces chief Eyal Zamir reportedly warned against the proposal, telling ministers that the hostages' lives 'will be in danger if we proceed with a plan to occupy Gaza'. He added: 'We have no way to guarantee they won't be harmed. If that is what you're aiming for, I suggest you drop the return of the hostages as one of the war's objectives.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron of making it harder to achieve a ceasefire with their intention to recognise a Palestinian state. Yesterday, hospital officials in Gaza said that, in the past 24 hours, 11 Palestinians seeking aid were shot dead and 11 adults died of malnutrition-related causes.
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
The demonisation of Israeli ‘settlers'
In the UK today, hold the wrong view and you're cast as beyond the pale. Brexiteers are bigots. If you oppose mass immigration, you're a far right racist. Among parts of the political class and commentariat, these labels are considered the consensus. The political and media establishment have crafted a narrative in which dissent from liberal orthodoxy is indistinguishable from moral degeneracy. And it's not just in Britain. Remember when Hillary Clinton branded swathes of Americans a basket of deplorables? Many who find themselves on the receiving end of this treatment, often working-class, politically moderate folk, are stunned to discover that their legitimate fears have been transmuted into hate by those unwilling to hear them. Israel's most demonised group may well be the 'settlers'. Britain's own Foreign Secretary David Lammy has frequently demonised them, calling their behaviour 'abhorrent', and the current British government has focused repeatedly on settlers as a useful tool to openly criticise Israel as the major obstacle to peace. For many years, within Israel they have been treated by similar elites not as citizens with arguments but as extremists to be condemned. Their intentions are questioned. Their stories ignored. Their presence framed as a national embarrassment. Those Israelis expelled from Gaza in 2005 know this dynamic well. For decades, they were flattened into a caricature: dangerous religious fanatics, enemies of peace, the one-dimensional villains in a geopolitical morality play. But while the demonisation of those we disagree with is easy, it is also dangerous and unhelpful. It replaces analysis with outrage and renders complex problems unsolvable by pretending they are simple. If the Gaza settlers had truly been the sole obstacle to peace, then peace should have followed their removal. But only 20 years after Israel's unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip, that illusion lies in ruins. Over 8,000 Israelis were expelled from their homes, their communities razed, their lives uprooted by the very state they believed they were defending. The land they left behind was seized by Hamas, and within mere weeks rockets began to fall on Israeli towns. Withdrawal was supposed to help end the conflict. Instead, it shifted its axis, and set the stage for possibly the darkest days in Israel's history. The Gaza disengagement was conceived as a strategic reset. It was meant to reduce friction, ease international pressure, and create space for a political solution. In practice, it was read by Israel's enemies as a surrender. Many of the settlers of Gush Katif in the Gaza Strip said so at the time. They warned that abandoning Gaza unilaterally would embolden terrorists, demoralise Israeli society, and create a power vacuum certain to be filled by Hamas. They were right. And they were ignored. As in Britain's own simmering culture war, these debates within Israel have long been raw and deeply personal. Some argued that settlers were the front line, protecting not only themselves but the neighbouring kibbutzim and towns of the Gaza envelope. Once unknown outside Israel but today symbols of destruction wrought by Palestinian terrorists, communities like Be'eri, Nahal Oz, and Kfar Aza, dismissed that logic. They claimed the settlers were the source of the danger, not the shield from it. They protested their presence, demanded their removal, and celebrated disengagement as a path to calm. Eighteen years on, the Palestinian barbarity of 7 October delivered clarity, but far too late. The same kibbutzim that rejected the settlers' role as guardians became the primary targets of Hamas's most brutal assault. Entire families were butchered. Hundreds were abducted. The border was breached with appalling ease. What the settlers had claimed, that their presence was a form of defence, was no longer abstract. It had become painfully real. Yet today, political memories have shrunk, and 20 years seems now like a lifetime ago. Much of Israeli society has woken up to realise that the issue of Jewish settlement is not simple or binary. So how did settlers become the bogeymen of Israeli society? There is a wider cultural shift that must be acknowledged. In Israel's early years, the pioneering ideal was firmly associated with the political left. The kibbutz movement represented sacrifice, collectivism, and national purpose. It was admired both at home and abroad, especially in Britain, where young volunteers travelled to join what they saw as a moral experiment in shared destiny. But over time, as the global left lost its affection for Israel and the Israeli left lost its grip on power, that pioneering ethos migrated. Today, it lives, uneasily, in the settler movement, which is often religious, often nationalist, and often scorned by the very societies that once romanticised Zionist pioneering. This shift has not only alienated the international left. It has distorted the moral lens through which the conflict is viewed. For many in the Arab world, all Israelis are 'settlers'. To them, Tel Aviv is no less illegitimate than Gush Katif or Itamar. That language has now taken hold in the West, particularly among activists with no roots in the region but with absolute certainty in their politics. The word 'settler' has become a slur, emptied of context and weaponised with abandon, even by our own Foreign Office. But facts remain. After the disengagement, Hamas took over. It didn't build hospitals or universities, but terror tunnels, rocket factories, and arsenals. It diverted international aid into military infrastructure and hoarded millions of pounds of cash underground. And it made its intentions explicit: not coexistence, but annihilation. What began with the evacuation of Gaza's 'settlers' ended in the massacre of civilians. The arc is not incidental. That is why to many Israelis today, surrender is no longer an option. But to the settlers of Gush Katif, the surrender happened 20 years ago. And it happened not through negotiation, but through unilateral withdrawal under fire. It took just one month for Gaza to become a launchpad for terror. It took 18 years for the rest of Israel to understand what the settlers already knew. How long, then, before Britain widens its view? The demonisation of settlers has prevented many from seeing this clearly. Like Brexit voters or immigration sceptics in Britain, they were condemned not for being wrong, but for being unfashionable. Elements of their beliefs and actions were and are ugly or unacceptable. But in matters of national survival, fashion is a poor guide. Twenty years on, we know that disengagement from Gaza was not the end of the conflict, but the beginning of a war waged with increasing boldness against a nation that dared to believe land for peace was still a plausible formula.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce nominated to be deputy U.N. ambassador
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce has been nominated to be the deputy representative to the U.N. 'I am pleased to announce that I am nominating Tammy Bruce, a Great Patriot, Television Personality, and Bestselling Author, as our next Deputy Representative of the United States to the United Nations, with the rank of Ambassador,' President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday. 'Since the beginning of my Second Term, Tammy has been serving with distinction as Spokesperson of the State Department, where she did a fantastic job,' he added. 'Tammy Bruce will represent our Country brilliantly at the United Nations. Congratulations Tammy!' Bruce has become one of the most well-known faces of Trump's State Department in the first six months of his second stint in the White House. She has regularly held press conferences on the administration's foreign policy. This comes as the U.S. doesn't currently have an ambassador to the U.N. Former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, who was ousted following the Signal scandal in which sensitive battle plans were inadvertently shared with a prominent journalist, has been nominated but has yet to be confirmed. He had his confirmation hearing last month, but the Senate hasn't held a vote on his nomination yet. It was first revealed in January that Bruce, a former Fox News contributor and radio host, would join the State Department. Trump has made several picks from the network to join his administration, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox & Friends co-host. Bruce had long been a Democrat and liberal activist before becoming a conservative and backing Trump, Politico noted. Deputy representative is a role that requires Senate confirmation, meaning that legislators will have the opportunity to scrutinize Bruce, who, if confirmed, would take on the role as the Trump administration's actions have put the U.S. on a collision course with allies. Specifically, her new posting comes as the U.S. is backing Israel even as the global community is increasingly critical of the country amid its war in Gaza.
