Compass sues Zillow over ‘monopoly tactics' in private home listings
Real estate brokerage company Compass has filed a lawsuit against Zillow over its policy to ban private home listings.
In a filing with the US district court for the southern district of New York, Compass claims that 'Zillow has sought to rely on anticompetitive tactics to protect its monopoly and revenues in violation of the antitrust laws.'
Compass says that Zillow has implemented an exclusionary policy that says if a home seller and their real estate agent market their property off Zillow for more than one day, that Zillow and its allies, Redfin and eXp Realty, will ban that home from being listed on their search platforms.
'The Zillow Ban seeks to ensure that all home listings in this country are steered on to its dominant search platform so Zillow can monetize each home listing and protect its monopoly,' Compass said in the lawsuit.
Compass alleges that the 'Zillow ban' was enacted to prevent rivals from competing against it and reduces homeowner choice.
'In a free and competitive market, competitors' products and strategies should rise and fall on merit – not the whims of a monopolist gatekeeper like Zillow,' Compass said.
Compass wants an injunction that would prohibit Zillow from implementing and enforcing its 'Zillow ban' and implementing and enforcing similar policies. The company also wants a trial by jury and an unspecified amount in damages.
A Zillow spokesperson said in a statement on Monday that the company believes the claims in the lawsuit are unfounded and that it will vigorously defend against them.
'Our focus remains on creating a level playing field that serves the best interests of everyone in the home buying and selling journey,' the spokesperson said.
The housing market is always competitive, but has become more fierce of late. Last month the National Association of Realtors reported that sales of previously occupied US homes fell in April, as elevated mortgage rates and rising prices discouraged prospective homebuyers during what's traditionally the busiest time of the year for the housing market.
Existing home sales dropped 0.5% in April, from March, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4 million units, according to the National Association of Realtors. The sales decline marked the slowest sales pace for the month of April going back to 2009 in the wake of the US housing crisis. March's sales pace was also the slowest for that month going back to 2009.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Aukus vital to ‘deter Chinese aggression', say US lawmakers, as Trump urged to recommit to submarine deal
The Aukus pact is vital to 'deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region', Republican and Democrat lawmakers in the US have told the Pentagon, urging the US to recommit to the nuclear submarine deal with Australia and the UK. The Trump administration announced this month it would undertake a 30-day review of the Aukus agreement – the deal struck in 2021 that would see US nuclear submarines sold to Australia, and new-design nuclear-powered Aukus submarines built in the UK and Australia. A letter addressed to defence secretary Pete Hegseth, signed by five Republican and Democrat lawmakers, urged the Pentagon to back Aukus, despite growing concerns over laggard shipbuilding in both the US and UK. 'As the department of defense begins its 30-day review of the trilateral Aukus mission, we write to you to express our strongest support for the agreement. 'This is a defense alliance that is overwhelmingly in the best interest of all three Aukus nations, as well as the entire Indo-Pacific region. Indeed, as you noted in February when Australia provided the U.S. with a $500m Aukus payment, 'this is not a mission … America can undertake by itself. It has to be [done by] robust allies and partners. Technology sharing and subs are a huge part of it.' The letter said the breadth and depth of support for Aukus within the US Congress had grown dramatically and 'we have worked quickly to recognize Aukus's mission to deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email It also pointed to progress made, saying 'legislation necessary for Aukus to proceed had passed Congress; shipbuilding rates in the US had lifted substantially; and Australian naval officers had begun joint training on US nuclear-powered submarines.' Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, who is in London on his way to the Nato meeting at The Hague, said he was 'not going to speculate about what the review will ultimately say' but stressed a review of a major defence project was a 'perfectly natural step' for an incoming administration to take, one that was supported by Australia. Asked about workforce challenges faced by both the US and UK shipbuilding industries, Marles said the 'human dimension' was a key challenge in securing Aukus submarines. 'We are confident that we can get this right, but we're not sanguine about it. There is a lot of work to be done to meet the human challenge, but we believe we can get it done.' Democratic Congressman Joe Courtney, co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus (and whose district in Connecticut includes the shipbuilding hub of Groton), as well as Republicans Michael McCaul, chair emeritus of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, were the lead signatories on the letter. Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defence for policy at the Pentagon, is leading the 30-day US review, due to report in July. Colby has consistently declared he is 'very sceptical' about the pact and its benefits for America. He told the US Senate armed service committee that the US was not building enough submarines for its own defence, and would not sell submarines to Australia if that might jeopardise American interests. 'We don't want our servicemen and women to be in a weaker position and more vulnerable … because [the attack submarines] are not in the right place at the right time.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Under pillar one of the Aukus agreement, the US will sell Australia between three and five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, with the first to be delivered in 2032. These will replace Australia's ageing Collins class diesel-electric submarines to cover the 'capability gap' before Australia's own Aukus nuclear-powered submarines can be built. By the 'late 2030s', according to Australia's submarine industry strategy, UK shipbuilders will deliver the first specifically designed and built Aukus submarine to its own Royal Navy. Australia's first Aukus submarine – based on the UK design but to be built in South Australia – will be in the water 'in the early 2040s'. Aukus is forecast to cost Australia up to $368bn to the mid-2050s. Australia is providing significant subsidies to the industrial bases of both the US and UK. It has already paid $A798m (US$500m) – the first instalment of $A4.7bn pledged – to the US. It will pay A$4.6bn to the UK. But the deal's feasibility has come under significant pressure regarding both nuclear-capable senior partners. The US navy already has a shortfall of submarines, expected to worsen over coming years, and shipyards in America are running up to three years late in building new Virginia-class submarines, a 2024 US navy report found. The UK parliament announced its own inquiry into Aukus in April, which will examine whether 'geopolitical shifts since the initial agreement in 2021' have rendered the agreement unworkable. In Australia, there have been calls from a chorus of voices – including naval experts, former prime and foreign ministers, submariners, anti-war groups, and the Greens – for a domestic inquiry into Aukus, its feasibility and potential benefits to Australia.
Auto Blog
an hour ago
- Auto Blog
U.S. Senate Might Kill Automotive Fuel Economy Rules
The pursuit of fuel economy started decades ago In the 1970s, the United States faced a consequential energy crisis that exposed the auto industry's pitfalls in making fuel-efficient cars. At the time, most cars sold in the United States were anything but fuel sippers, and in some parts of the country, fuel dried up so fast that some states and municipalities had to start rationing fuel. For instance, New Jersey imposed mandatory odd-even rationing based on calendar dates and license plate numbers, prohibited sales when the car's tank was at least half full, and required a system of flags at gasoline stations to alert motorists about supplies. Seeing that drivers around the country were struggling to get around, Congress drew up the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules, which aimed to improve the average fuel efficiency of new vehicles sold by automakers in the United States. Despite Detroit automakers objecting to the rules and advocating for consumer choice, President Gerald Ford signed legislation creating CAFE standards in 1975. Customers pump gas into their vehicles at a Shell station on April 10, 2025 in Miami, Florida. Photo by ) — Source: Getty Images Senate considering eliminating CAFE fines, reports WSJ A recent report from The Wall Street Journal says that the U.S. Senate is considering a change that would make federal fuel-economy rules just friendly suggestions for carmakers. This move is part of a larger tax and spending bill linked to the Trump administration, which has been referred to by both President Trump and the media as the 'big, beautiful bill.' If it gets the green light, it would eliminate fines for car manufacturers who don't meet the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards; a move that would seriously weaken rules that previously pushed and incentivized automakers to make cleaner-burning and more fuel-efficient cars for the market. The idea to drop CAFE fines was included in the budget plan released earlier this month by the Senate Commerce Committee, which is led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). The committee claims that if enacted, this proposal could lead to modest savings for car buyers. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. GMC Hummer electric vehicles on the production line at General Motors' Factory ZERO all-electric vehicle assembly plant in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., on Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2021. — Source: Emily Elconin/Bloomberg via Getty Images Under the existing rules, automakers risk fines when the average fuel economy for their entire U.S. lineup falls short of the CAFE standard of 49 miles per gallon for the 2026 model year. Industry advocates and automakers argue that the rules, which increased under the Biden administration to 50.4 mpg by the 2031 model year, have become too strict and are accompanied by more punishing fines if they don't comply. 'The combination of high penalties with the nearly impossible CAFE standards finalized during the previous administration is a major problem,' said Alliance for Automotive Innovation president and CEO John Bozzella. The proposed changes are splitting the auto industry. According to the Journal, General Motors and Stellantis support eliminating the fines altogether. Meanwhile, several major automakers, including Toyota and Hyundai, told the Journal that they support revisiting the standards but oppose the wholesale elimination of CAFE penalties. Patrick Patterson walks to his vehicle after pumping gas at a Shell station on April 10, 2025 in Miami, Florida. — Source: Getty Images In recent years, Detroit-based automakers like GM and Stellantis have faced the heftiest CAFE-related fines. Since 2022, GM has paid $128 million for being CAFE non-compliant, while Stellantis has paid more than $425 million for the same reasons. Automakers can buy regulatory credits from competitors to offset fines, a significant revenue driver for electric car manufacturers like Rivian and Tesla. According to Rivian's Q1 2025 shareholder letter, the makers of the outdoor-aesthetic R1T electric pickup truck and R1S electric SUV earned $157 million from selling regulatory credits to other automakers. During the same quarter, Tesla earned $447 million from the same revenue stream. Industry advocates argue that the strict Federal regulations have created sparks of innovation in automakers and the vehicles they sell in the U.S. Over the past decades, automakers have spearheaded the development of gas-saving tech like turbocharged engines that provide greater power than the higher displacement engines they replace, automatic gearboxes with seven, eight, nine, 10 or more gears, as well as start-stop engine technology that automatically shuts off at stoplights to conserve gasoline. 'Automakers have proven time and time again that without strong and enforceable fuel-economy standards, many of them will leave proven, popular, and cost-effective technologies like hybrids sitting and gathering dust on the shelf,' Consumer Reports policy analyst Chris Harto told the Journal. 2025 Rivian R1T Final thoughts I do agree with the idea that strict regulations breed innovation. Although some technologies like continuously variable transmissions and start-stop engine technology can be annoying, on the other hand, you get some cool stuff like Honda's VTEC and BMW's tunable, turbocharged engines in its current M3 and M4. However, like any new measure introduced, it needs to clear the Senate parliamentarian's review to qualify for budget reconciliation, which allows Senate Republicans to pass budget bills with a simple majority instead of the usual 60 votes. It also has to be mainly about financial matters and must be approved by the House. We'll have to wait and see. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
BTC Miner Offers Cloud Mining Platform with $500 Bonus and Daily Passive Income
CALIFORNIA CITY, CA, June 23, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- As cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, ether and dogecoin continue to experience steady growth, investors are increasingly seeking stable, low-risk ways to earn returns. Cloud mining has emerged as a popular alternative, especially for those aiming to generate passive income without technical complexity. BTC Miner, opens new tab, a regulated cloud mining platform, says it provides users with a fully automated and accessible way to earn daily crypto income. Platform Offers $500 Bonus and Up to $50,000 in Referral Rewards To attract new users, BTC Miner is offering an instant $500 welcome bonus upon registration. The platform also includes a referral program that allows participants to earn up to $50,000 by inviting others to join and invest. The company says the platform is suited for both beginners and experienced investors, offering a user-friendly interface, smart contract automation and daily payout mechanisms. Multi-Currency Support and Regulatory Oversight BTC Miner supports deposits and withdrawals in a variety of leading cryptocurrencies, including BTC, ETH, LTC, USDT, USDC, XRP, SOL, DOGE and BCH. All mining contracts are executed via smart contracts, providing automated and efficient returns without manual action. As a regulated platform, BTC Miner emphasizes compliance and fund security as key pillars of its offering. Getting Started With BTC Miner To begin earning with BTC Miner: User Testimonials 'I used to trade bitcoin, but the volatility was too stressful,' said Li, a user in Beijing. 'Since I started using BTC Miner, I've seen stable daily earnings and no longer worry about market swings.' Helen, a crypto investor in London, added: 'As an early DOGE supporter, I was drawn to BTC Miner's low entry cost and reliable returns. I've already recommended it to many friends.' Contact Information Visit the company's official website at opens new tab or email info@ opens new tab to learn more. About BTC Miner BTC Miner is a leading cloud mining platform that lets users earn daily passive income with zero hardware. With support for major cryptocurrencies and a $500 welcome bonus, BTC Miner offers a simple, secure, and scalable way to grow digital assets. For more information, visit opens new tab. Disclaimer: The information provided in this press release is not a solicitation for investment, nor is it intended as investment advice, financial advice, or trading advice. Cryptocurrency mining and staking involve risk. There is potential for loss of funds. It is strongly recommended you practice due diligence, including consultation with a professional financial advisor, before investing in or trading cryptocurrency and securities. Media Contact Liam Carterinfo@ ### SOURCE: BTC Miner Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
