Private medical colleges in Telangana credit ₹25,000 stipend, take back ₹20,000 in cash, allege MBBS students
Speaking to The Hindu, interns from multiple private institutions detailed disturbing practices employed by the administrations to create an illusion of compliance. At Patnam Mahender Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, for instance, an intern alleged that ₹25,000 is credited to their bank account every month, only to be withdrawn and ₹20,000 returned to the college in cash. 'We are made to open specific bank accounts just for this purpose. It is all a show so they can claim compliance on paper,' said the intern.
When students raised these concerns with the college management, they were told that while stipends could not be paid, the institution would waive bus and hostel fees instead. 'But even those promises remain only on paper,' the intern added.
'We work 36-hour to 40‑hour shifts, caring for real patients, often in inadequate facilities and instead of fair pay, we are being extorted and silenced,' said another intern.
The issue, long festering under the surface, has recently gained momentum when interns from multiple colleges formed informal groups to protest and submit written representations to their college managements to escalate the matter.
Another intern from Chalmeda Anand Rao Medical College in Karimnagar revealed that students receive just ₹2,000 as monthly stipend, and that too as a lumpsum after six months. 'We are sent on compulsory field visits to rural health centres but are not allowed to use our personal vehicles. The college insists we use their bus and then deducts the transport charges from our stipend. So, for two to three months, we end up getting only ₹500 or ₹1,000 as stipend,' the intern said.
Fear of administrative backlash is silencing many students. 'If someone raises their voice individually, they are threatened with academic retaliation, blocking logbooks or delaying internship completion. That could make us ineligible for NEET-PG, so most remain silent,' he added.
Another intern added that some colleges are allegedly hiding behind a 2003 government order that allowed colleges to collect a one-time 'stipend fee' of ₹5,000 per year. 'They are using a two-decade-old GO to justify this exploitation, even though multiple new GOs and NMC directives have since superseded it,' the intern added.
The Hindu contacted both the private medical colleges for their comments on these charges, but there was no response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
4 hours ago
- The Print
MBBS guidelines for students with disabilities reduce a life to a limb
'Can you bear weight and stand on your affected leg?' 'Can you climb up or go down stairs on your own?' One of his patients — a young student with partial hemiparesis — had cleared the NEET 2025 exam. He had studied harder than most, navigating a world that rarely bends for someone like him. But now, his future was to be decided not by his merit, but by a checklist. A self-declaration affidavit demanded answers to questions like: It was a quiet Saturday when the storm broke. The National Medical Commission, after nearly nine months of silence and court-mandated deliberation, released its interim disability guidelines for MBBS admissions — just two days before NEET 2025 counselling was to begin on 21 July. I hadn't even finished reading the document when my phone rang. On the line was a seasoned paediatrician, his voice sharp with anger. The doctor was furious. 'What does this have to do with being a good doctor?' he asked. He was right. On asking the wrong questions This is a textbook example of what happens when policymakers ask the wrong questions — questions that conflate bodily symmetry with clinical skill, and confuse physical conformity with professional competence. Questions that reduce a life to a limb, and a calling to a staircase. I know this too well — not as an observer, but as someone who lives it. I, too, have a mobility impairment. I cannot stand unsupported on one leg. Stairs have never been my friend. And yet, I serve in a medical institution. I have taught, practiced, published, and argued in the highest court of the land. These are not exceptions made in spite of my disability — they are the realities I live and deliver, every single day. Last year, when the Supreme Court heard Om Rathod vs The Director General Of Health Services, I submitted a report that the bench later called 'pivotal.' The judgment became a watershed moment: it rejected deficit-based models of disability, affirmed the right to reasonable accommodation, and directed the NMC to adopt a functional and inclusive approach. It asked for reform. It asked for imagination. It asked for justice. Also read: Disability inclusion isn't charity. Indian universities and faculty must act The doctors they chose not to see Not long after, NMC reached out to me — unofficially, of course. Not for structural change or inclusive policymaking, but for a list. A list of doctors with disabilities. Given my experience in disability rights litigation, they knew I was connected to a network of professionals who had shattered every stereotype the system once held against them. So I responded — not just with names, but with stories. I sent them ten. A liver transplant surgeon who walks with an orthosis. A urologist who operates using a standing wheelchair. A blind psychiatrist whose insight transcends sight. A neurodivergent doctor who navigates the chaos of medicine with quiet brilliance. Ten doctors who didn't ask to be celebrated. They asked only to be seen. But none — not one — was included in the final committee. Instead, the same architects of the earlier, exclusionary guidelines returned. But there was one new inclusion — a doctor from an Institution of National Importance with a physical disability. When I saw his name, I hoped. But even he endorsed the screening-out criteria: 'Can you climb stairs? Can you stand on your affected leg?' The irony was painful. He couldn't do those things either. And yet, he had approved their use to exclude others. I understand why. In medical college, I, too, once believed that my body was the problem. The curriculum, rooted in the medical model of disability, framed people like me as patients, not peers. My impairment wasn't a variation — it was a flaw to be fixed. It took years — and reading the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) — to unlearn this. The social model of disability shifted everything. It didn't ask what is wrong with you? It asked, what is wrong with the environment that excludes you? That question was radical. And healing. It's why when former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud ruled in the Om Rathod case, he didn't stop at asking for doctors with disabilities on expert panels. He demanded experts in disability justice. Because lived experience alone isn't enough. Without critical consciousness, it risks replicating the very oppression it seeks to escape. This was also the reason the Supreme Court ordered training of all 16 medical boards with doctors with disabilities. Also read: DPDP Act offers no special protection for disability data. It leaves PwDs vulnerable The guidelines we got What we received on 19 July is not reform. It's a ghost of the past. The interim guidelines still ask whether a student can climb stairs, but not whether the college has a ramp. They ask whether a student can bear weight, but not whether the system can bear the weight of its own prejudice. Rights delayed — or disguised as gatekeeping tools — are rights denied. The NMC had a chance to do better. It could have asked better questions. It could have brought in the right people. It could have listened to the doctors who redefined medicine by refusing to be erased. It didn't. And that silence speaks louder than any announcement. In the end, it's not just disabled students being screened out, but also the possibility of a more humane, just, and inclusive medical education system. And that is a diagnosis the nation can no longer afford to ignore. Dr Satendra Singh is a medical doctor and Director-Professor at University College of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, New Delhi. He tweets @drsitu. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Youth with muscular dystrophy set to be co-op sr inspector
Pudukottai: For 22-year-old R Gobinath, stepping outside after five long years is not just about fresh air — it's about stepping into a new life. Battling muscular dystrophy since his school days, the young boy has now cleared Group 2A combined civil services exam mains Feb 2025, and is set to join the cooperative department as a senior inspector. In the last five years, he had hardly gone out except for writing exams. Diagnosed with the condition while studying in Class VIII, Gobinath lost the ability to commute on his own. "Since then, I had to drop him off at the campus," says his father K R Raja who had quit his job to take care of his son. After completing Class XII, Gobinath cleared NEET in 2020 but could not secure a medical seat through counselling. "He was devastated. The boy is intelligent and has a good academic track record, but he lost his confidence," Raja recalls. But his family encouraged him to continue his education through distance learning. Gobinath went on to earn a BA in History from Alagappa University and is now pursuing his MA there. His perseverance paid off when he secured a rank of 977 in the TNPSC exams, qualifying under the specially-abled category in the first attempt. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like For the chosen ones! 4&5 Bed Condominiums at Financial District, Hyd Sumadhura Group Learn More Undo His father said Gobinath studied using TN books, and did not get coached. Gobinath had requested the district administration to be posted in his home district of Pudukottai. "It will be better if the govt along with the posting can also arrange for a battery operated wheel chair for him," Raja said. "While I was confined to my home, there were times I felt life had closed all doors on me, but my parents kept reminding me that one success can change everything. Clearing this exam has brought back my confidence. I want to serve people with the same dedication my family showed in standing by me," Gobinath said. Gobinath had not taken much treatment ever since he was diagnosed with the condition, except for a few physiotherapy sessions. "Treatment for this costs a fortune and not everyone can afford it. Steps should be taken to ramp up efforts to extend as many special wheelchairs, assistance, and special beds" he said. Gobinath has been receiving Rs2000 monthly in welfare assistance from the govt. While muscular dystrophy has a few limited treatments to manage quality of life and symptoms, there is no permanent cure for the condition as yet. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
NEET UG Counselling 2025: Round 1 seat allotment results on August 11
NEET UG Round One Counselling 2025: The Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) will announce the NEET UG round one seat allotment list on August 11. Earlier, the MCC had already extended the deadline to August 7, at 1:30 pm due to technical glitches on the official website, allowing candidates additional time to select their preferred medical and dental colleges. The extension in the round one choice filling and locking process was done following multiple requests from NRI/CW candidates and ongoing court cases. Candidates who receive a seat in round 1 must download their allotment letter and report to the allotted college within the specified dates to confirm their admission. Those who do not secure a seat or wish to participate in further rounds can wait for the next phase of counselling. The MCC will release detailed guidelines for the reporting process along with the results on August 11. Step 1: Visit the official MCC website at Step 2: Locate and click on the link for 'NEET UG 2025 Round 1 Seat Allotment Result.' Step 3: Log in using your NEET roll number and password or application number. Step 4: View the details of the allotted college and course. Step 5: Download and save the seat allotment letter. Step 6: Carry the allotment letter to the allotted college for admission and document verification. Despite increase in MBBS seats, 2,849 remained vacant in 2024: Govt data Meanwhile, despite a significant 39 per cent increase in MBBS seats over the past few years, a considerable number of undergraduate medical seats remain vacant across India, data from the National Medical Commission (NMC) reveals. The data was presented in the Lok Sabha on August 1 by Anupriya Patel, Minister of State in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The unstarred question was asked by a member of the Telugu Desam Party, Putta Mahesh Kumar. The number of MBBS seats rose from 83,275 in 2020–21 to 1,15,900 by 2024–25; however, the number of vacant UG seats (excluding AIIMS and JIPMER) peaked at 4,146 in 2022–23, before witnessing a gradual decline to 2,849 in 2024–25.
