Dalai Lama celebrates his 90th birthday, triggering geopolitical questions for the future
Tibetans fear China will eventually name a rival successor to the Dalai Lama, bolstering Beijing's control over Tibet, the territory it poured troops into in 1950 and has ruled ever since.
The man who calls himself a 'simple Buddhist monk' celebrated in India, where he has lived since he and thousands of other Tibetans fled Chinese troops who crushed an uprising in their capital, Lhasa, in 1959.
The Dalai Lama says only his India-based office has the right to identify his eventual successor.
'I join 1.4 billion Indians in extending our warmest wishes to His Holiness the Dalai Lama on his 90th birthday,' the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, said in a statement, read at celebrations in the Himalayan hill town where the Dalai Lama lives.
'He has been an enduring symbol of love, compassion, patience and moral discipline,' he added.
China insisted on Wednesday that it would have the final say on who succeeds the Tibetan spiritual leader.
Modi's effusive support is significant.
India and China are intense rivals competing for influence across south Asia, but have sought to repair ties after a 2020 border clash.
The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, also said in a statement, read at the celebrations in India, that Washington was 'committed to promoting respect for the human rights and fundamental freedoms of Tibetans'.
'We support efforts to preserve Tibetans' distinct linguistic, cultural and religious heritage, including their ability to freely choose and venerate religious leaders without interference,' the statement added.
Taiwan's president, Lai Ching-te – who leads an island that China says is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to seize – said in a statement read at the ceremony that the example set by the Dalai Lama 'resonates with all who cherish freedom, democracy and respect for human rights'.
Messages from three former US presidents were also broadcast.
'At a time when we see the forces of division tearing at the fabric of our common humanity … I'm grateful for your enduring efforts to build a better, kinder, more compassionate world,' Bill Clinton said.
'The world is a troubled place, and we need your spirit of kindness and compassion and love more than ever,' George W Bush added.
Barack Obama wished a 'very happy birthday to the youngest 90-year-old I know'.
'It is humbling to realise that you've been a leader on the world stage for longer than I've been alive,' Obama said, in his message to his 'dear friend'.
'You've shown generations what it means to practise compassion, and speak up for freedom and dignity,' Obama added. 'Not bad for someone who describes himself as a simple Buddhist monk.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
25 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trade war: Trump reveals first nations to pay delayed 'liberation day' tariffs
Donald Trump has warned that all goods from Japan and South Korea will face tariffs of 25% from 1 August. The announcement, via his Truth Social platform, marks the restart of the threatened "liberation day" escalation that was paused in April, for 90 days, to allow for negotiations to take place with all US trading partners. The US president included copies of letters to the leaders of both Japan and South Korea informing them of the tariff rates. Those duties will come on top of sector-specific tariffs - such as 50% rates covering steel - which are already in force. He warned the rates could be adjusted "upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country". Country-specific tariffs had been due to take effect from Wednesday this week but Mr Trump had earlier revealed that nations would start to get letters instead, setting out the US position. Duties would take effect from 1 August, without any subsequent deal being agreed, it was announced. The letters sent to Japan and South Korea cited persistent trade imbalances for the rates and included the sentence: "We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far." He ended both letters by saying, "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The European Union - the biggest single US trading partner - is among those set to get a letter in the coming days. Mr Trump has also threatened an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning itself with the "anti-American policies" of BRICS nations - those are Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and whose members also include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. The UK, bar a massive shock U-turn, should be exempt. 2:49 The country was the first to be granted a trade deal, of sorts, in May and the Trump administration has claimed many others had been offering concessions since the clock ticked down to 9 July. The UK is not expected to face any changes to its current 10% rate due to the trade truce, which came into effect last week. While UK-made cars aerospace products face no duties under a new quota arrangement, it still remains to be seen whether 25% tariffs on UK-produced steel and aluminium will be cancelled. 5:08 They could, conceivably, even be raised to 50%, as is currently the case for America's other trading partners, because no agreement on eliminating the rate was reached when the government struck its deal in May. It all amounts to more uncertainty for the UK steel sector. A No 10 spokesman said on Monday: "Our work with the US continues to get this deal implemented as soon as possible. "That will remove the 25% tariff on UK steel and aluminium, making us the only country in the world to have tariffs removed on these products. "The US agreed to remove tariffs on these products as part of our agreement on 8 May. It reiterated that again at the G7 last month. The discussions continue, and will continue to do so." China and Vietnam have also secured some US concessions. The dollar strengthened but US stock markets lost ground in the wake of the letters to Japan and South Korea being made public, with the broad-based S&P 500 down by 1%. Stock markets in both Japan and South Korea were closed for the day but US-traded shares of SK Telecom and LG Display were down 7.5% and 5.8% respectively.
Sky News
37 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trade war: Trump reveals first two nations to pay delayed 'liberation day' tariffs
Donald Trump has warned that all goods from Japan and South Korea will face tariffs of 25% from 1 August. The announcement, via his Truth Social platform, marks the restart of the threatened "liberation day" escalation that was paused in April, for 90 days, to allow for negotiations to take place with all US trading partners. The president showed off copies of letters to the leaders of both Japan and South Korea informing them of the tariff rates. Those duties will come on top of sector-specific tariffs - such as 50% rates covering steel - already in force. He warned the rates could be adjusted "upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country". Country-specific tariffs had been due to take effect from Wednesday this week but Mr Trump had earlier revealed that nations would start to get letters instead, setting out the US position. Duties would take effect from 1 August, without any subsequent deal being agreed, it was announced. The letters sent to Japan and South Korea cited persistent trade imbalances for the rates and included the sentence: "We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far." He ended both letters by saying, "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The European Union - the biggest single US trading partner - is among those set to get a letter in the coming days. Mr Trump has also threatened an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning itself with the "anti-American policies" of BRICS nations - those are Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and whose members also include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. The UK, bar a massive shock U-turn, should be exempt. 2:49 The country was the first to be granted a trade deal, of sorts, in May and the Trump administration has claimed many others had been offering concessions since the clock ticked down to 9 July. The UK is not expected to face any changes to its current 10% rate due to the trade truce, which came into effect last week. While UK-made cars aerospace products face no duties under a new quota arrangement, it still remains to be seen whether 25% tariffs on UK-produced steel and aluminium will be cancelled. 5:08 They could, conceivably, even be raised to 50%, as is currently the case for America's other trading partners, because no agreement on eliminating the rate was reached when the government struck its deal in May. It all amounts to more uncertainty for the UK steel sector. A No 10 spokesman said on Monday: "Our work with the US continues to get this deal implemented as soon as possible. "That will remove the 25% tariff on UK steel and aluminium, making us the only country in the world to have tariffs removed on these products. "The US agreed to remove tariffs on these products as part of our agreement on 8 May. It reiterated that again at the G7 last month. The discussions continue, and will continue to do so." China and Vietnam have also secured some US concessions. The dollar strengthened but US stock markets lost ground in the wake of the letters to Japan and South Korea being made public, with the broad-based S&P 500 down by 1%. Stock markets in both Japan and South Korea were closed for the day but US-traded shares of SK Telecom and LG Display were down 7.5% and 5.8% respectively.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Xi Jinping may be losing control of China's military
General He Weidong, a vice-chairman of the Communist Party's Central Military Commission and China's number two-ranked uniformed officer, was reportedly last seen in public on March 11. The general was known as a Xi Jinping loyalist in the military. The Financial Times reports that former and current US officials believe that he has been removed from his People's Liberation Army and Party posts. There are even unverifiable rumours that the general died in May – in the PLA's 301 Hospital in Beijing – but in any event General He has evidently been sidelined, no longer able to implement Xi's orders. Many believe that China's leader was the one who sacked the general. 'The fact that Xi Jinping can purge a CMC vice-chair shows how serious he is about stamping out corruption in the military,' Neil Thomas of the Asia Society Policy Institute told the Financial Times. 'Xi wants to turn the PLA into an effective fighting force beyond China's borders but also into a complete servant to his domestic agenda.' The FT apparently agrees with this assessment, labelling General He's treatment 'the most dramatic act of [Xi's] military anti-corruption campaign and first firing of a general in that role in six decades'. Xi has been powerful for a long time, so it's natural that analysts and journalists ascribe every significant action in China to him. It's also true that, at one time, he had almost complete control of the military, which reports not to the Chinese state but to the Communist Party. Xi's continual 'corruption' purges, carried out throughout his rule, and his major reorganisation of the PLA, conducted in the middle of last decade, gave him the opportunity to install loyalists. So, unsurprisingly, the Xi-is-strong narrative has persisted. Australia's ABC argues that General He may have fallen because of Xi's need to control internal politics: 'In He's case, the removal may have been less about personal wrongdoing and more about managing factional rivalry and consolidating political control.' Others have suggested that Xi has become a Stalin-like paranoid who sees enemies everywhere and so churns the ranks of senior officers. But General He is not the only recent uniformed victim, nor the only general to have been toppled who was supposedly loyal to Xi. Also disappeared include General Li Shangfu, a defence minister, General Wei Fenghe, one of Li's predecessors, and General Miao Hua, head of personnel and ideological inspection. 'The continuation of the purges is hard to explain if Xi dominates the political system because his supporters are now being purged,' Charles Burton of the Prague-based Sinopsis think tank told me this month. 'Sometimes the simplest explanations are the most credible. The simplest explanation is that Xi's enemies – not Xi himself – removed Xi's loyalists.' There is evidence indicating that Burton, a former Canadian diplomat in Beijing, is right. According to the Jamestown Foundation, beginning July 9 of last year PLA Daily, the Chinese military's main propaganda organ, ran a series of articles praising 'collective leadership,' a clear criticism of Xi's demand for complete obedience. These articles – apparently written by those aligned with the number one-ranked uniformed officer, Central Military Commission Vice Chairman General Zhang Youxia – are unlikely to have appeared if Xi were in complete control of the military. There is also evidence that Xi has lost influence among civilians. His skipping of the just-completed Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro – the first such gathering he has missed – is a clear signal that he might no longer be in control. Perhaps he is no longer permitted to travel outside China. Some point to the Politburo's establishment of new coordination 'regulations,' announced by Xi himself on June 30, as marking a formal limitation on his power. The Chinese regime has been especially opaque this decade, so it has been even harder to read than in earlier times. Nonetheless, there are obvious signs of instability. Is China's unstable regime more or less dangerous? As an initial matter, strongmen like Xi rarely go quietly. If he is under threat, he may well think that he has to act against the others fast. Among other things, China triggering a war would inhibit other senior CCP leaders from trying to remove him in the midst of fighting, so he may think that provoking a conflict is in his interest. A regime in turmoil is probably not capable of the planning and unity necessary to start large-scale military operations, such as an invasion of the main island of Taiwan. Yet it is more likely to end up in a conflict than a stable one. China has for years been provoking countries on its periphery, from South Korea in the north to Australia in the south. Additionally, Chinese planes and ships have been challenging America in the global commons in risky confrontations. Now, China may be unable to defuse any crisis that it causes, either by accident or on purpose. Because only the most hostile responses are considered acceptable in a militarised and highly turbulent Beijing, regime figures will not be able to deal with others constructively. A weak Xi and a Communist Party in turmoil are dangerous, and probably far more dangerous than a strong leader and a stable ruling group.
