UK says it will buy F-35 jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs
THE HAGUE, Netherlands, June 25, (AP): The United Kingdom will buy 12 U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear bombs and will join NATO's shared airborne nuclear mission, in a major expansion of its nuclear deterrent, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Wednesday.
The government called it "the biggest strengthening of the U.K.'s nuclear posture in a generation.' Starmer made the announcement while attending a NATO summit in the Netherlands. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte welcomed the decision, calling it "yet another robust British contribution to NATO.'
The U.K. phased out air-dropped atomic weapons in the 1990s after the end of the Cold War. Its nuclear arsenal now consists of submarine-based missiles.
Only three NATO members - the U.S., Britain and France - are nuclear powers, while seven nations contribute to the alliance's nuclear mission by contributing jets that can carry either conventional or weapons or American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe.
The use of nuclear weapons by the U.K. as part of the mission would require the authorization of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the U.S. president and British prime minister.
Starmer also announced that the U.K. will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from interest on seized Russian assets. The announcements come as the U.K. and other NATO members pledge to increase spending on security to 5% of gross domestic product by 2035.
The total includes 3.5% on defense and another 1.5% on broader security and resilience efforts. The U.K. currently spends 2.3% of national income on defense and says that will rise to 2.6% by 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Short and sweet: How NATO aims to avoid bust-up
THE HAGUE: Netherlands' Prime Minister Dick Schoof (right) welcomes Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer for a meeting at the Catshuis on the sidelines of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Heads of State and Government summit in The Hague on June 24, 2025. — AFP THE HAGUE: Faced with volatile US President Donald Trump, NATO has tried its best to limit the chances of a diplomatic dust-up at its summit in The Hague. With leaders expected to agree to a deal ramping up defense spending designed to keep Trump happy, the alliance wants to present a message of unity and strength. Here's how NATO is hoping to avoid any temper tantrums from Trump that could spoil the party: With just a dinner hosted by the Dutch king on Tuesday and one two-and-a-half-hour session involving NATO's 32 leaders on Wednesday, the summit is a short one. Cutting it down to the bare bones is fully intentional and modeled around the last gathering of NATO leaders Trump attended in London in 2019. 'Meetings are being kept short, contentious subjects avoided,' said Jamie Shea, a former NATO official involved in planning previous summits. 'They're making sure Trump isn't bored with lengthy meetings where he has to stay for hours after he's made his own speech.' It's not only the meeting that will be short - but also the summit's final declaration. In total it should be just five paragraphs long, or one page, much shorter than the voluminous statements of years gone by. Featuring prominently will be the new spending deal that allows Trump to claim a major foreign policy victory. Cracks between Washington and Europe on how to deal with Russia and Ukraine will be largely papered over thanks to some diplomatic finessing. Both will only be mentioned in passing and the focus will be on the subject Trump cares most about: money. One of the biggest headaches for NATO was what to do about Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky. The war-time leader has been a central figure at recent summits and European allies were desperate to keep sending a signal of strong support. But given Trump's animus towards Zelensky after their infamous Oval Office bust-up, there was little appetite to have them spend too much time together. In the end NATO decided to sideline the Ukrainian leader by inviting him to the dinner with the king and an industry forum - but not to the main work session with the alliance's members. But expect the unexpected But however well NATO's planners do their job, there is no way to fully mitigate the chances that an outburst from Trump could derail the event. At his first NATO summit in 2018, Trump publicly berated Germany, had a frosty exchange with then NATO boss Jens Stoltenberg and even physically shoved Montenegro's leader aside. And last time around, in Britain in 2019, the NATO summit was overshadowed by Canada's Justin Trudeau being caught gossiping about Trump on hot mic. With the Iran-Zionist conflict entering dangerous new territory following US strikes on Tehran's nuclear sites, and a trade stand-off still pitting Washington against Europe, there are plenty of topics beyond NATO that could cast a long shadow. — AFP
Kuwait Times
7 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Palestinian activist details 104 days spent in US custody
NEW YORK: Mahmoud Khalil, one of the most prominent leaders of pro-Palestinian protests on US campuses, recounted his experience surviving 104 days in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention after being targeted for deportation by the Trump administration. 'I shared a dorm with over 70 men, absolutely no privacy, lights on all the time,' the 30-year-old said Sunday on the steps of Columbia University, where he was a graduate student. Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to an American citizen and has a US-born son, had been in custody since March facing potential removal proceedings. He was freed from a federal immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana on Friday, hours after a judge ordered his release on bail. The activist was a figurehead of student protests at Columbia University against US ally the Zionist entity's war in Gaza, and the administration of Donald Trump labeled him a national security threat. 'It's so normal in detention to see men cry,' Khalil recalled, deeming the situation 'horrendous' and 'a stain on the US Constitution'. 'I spent my days listening to one tragic story after another: Listening to a father of four whose wife is battling cancer, and he's in detention,' Khalil detailed in his first protest appearance since regaining his freedom. 'I listened to a story of an individual who has been in the United States for over 20 years, all his children are American, yet he's deported.' The circumstances of the detention were tough, Khalil described, and he took solace where he could find it to gain the strength to carry on. 'It is often hard to find patience in ICE detention,' Khalil said. 'The center is crowded with hundreds of people who are told that their existence is illegal, and not one of us knows when we can go free. 'At those moments, it was remembering a specific chant that gave me strength: 'I believe that we will win,'' he continued, to cheers from the audience. Khalil said he even scratched the phrase into his detention center bunk bed as a reminder, being the last thing he saw when he went to sleep and the first thing he read waking up in the morning. He repeats it even now, 'knowing that I have won in a small way by being free today'. Khalil took specific aim at the site of his speech, Columbia University, chastising the institution for saying 'that they want to protect their international students, while over 100 (days) later, I haven't received a single call from this university'. Khalil's wife Noor Abdalla, who gave birth to their son while her husband was held by ICE, said his 'voice is stronger now than it has ever been'. 'One day our son will know that his father did not bow to fear. He will know that his father stood up when it was hardest, and that the world stood with him,' Abdalla said. – AFP
Arab Times
7 hours ago
- Arab Times
Bezos' lavish wedding in Venice draws fire over inequality
VENICE, Italy, June 25, (AP): This weekend's star-studded Venice wedding of multi-billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez has galvanized activist groups that are protesting it as a sign of the growing disparity between the haves and have-nots as well as disregard of the city's residents. About a dozen Venetian organizations - including housing advocates, anti-cruise ship campaigners, and university groups - have united to protest the multi-day event under the banner "No Space for Bezos,' a play on words also referring to the bride's recent space flight. They have staged small-scale protests, unfurling anti-Bezos banners on iconic Venetian sites. They were joined this week by Greenpeace and the British group "Everyone Hates Elon,' which has smashed Teslas to protest Elon Musk, to unfurl a giant banner in St. Mark's Square protesting purported tax breaks for billionaires. "IF YOU CAN RENT VENICE FOR YOUR WEDDING YOU CAN PAY MORE TAX,' read the banner, which featured a huge image of Bezos. Police quickly took it away. There has been no comment from Bezos' representatives on the protests. The local activists had planned a more organized protest for Saturday, aiming to obstruct access to canals with boats to prevent guests from reaching a wedding venue. Then they modified the protest to a march from the train station after claiming a victory, asserting that their pressure forced organizers to change the venue to the Arsenale, a more easily secured site beyond Venice's congested center. "It will be a strong, decisive protest, but peaceful,'' said Federica Toninello, an activist with the Social Housing Assembly network. "We want it to be like a party, with music, to make clear what we want our Venice to look like." Among the 200 guests confirmed to be attending the wedding are Mick Jagger, Ivanka Trump, Oprah Winfrey, Katy Perry, and Leonardo DiCaprio. Venice, renowned for its romantic canal vistas, hosts hundreds of weddings each year, not infrequently those of the rich and famous. Previous celebrity weddings, like that of George Clooney to human rights lawyer Amal Alamuddin in 2014, were embraced by the public. Hundreds turned out to wish the couple well at City Hall. Bezos has a different political and business profile, said Tommaso Cacciari, a prominent figure in the movement that successfully pushed for a ban on cruise ships over 25,000 tons traveling through the Giudecca Canal in central Venice. "Bezos is not a Hollywood actor,'' Cacciari said. "He is an ultra-billionaire who sat next to Donald Trump during the inauguration, who contributed to his re-election and is contributing in a direct and heavy way to this new global obscurantism.'' Critics also cite Amazon's labor practices, ongoing tax disputes with European governments, and Bezos' political associations as additional reasons for concern. Activists also argue that the Bezos wedding exemplifies broader failures in municipal governance, particularly the prioritization of tourism over residents' needs. They cite measures such as the day-tripper tax - which critics argue reinforces Venice's image as a theme park - as ineffective. Chief among their concerns is the lack of investment in affordable housing and essential services. City officials have defended the wedding. Mayor Luigi Brugnaro called the event an honor for Venice, and the city denied the wedding would cause disruptions. "Venice once again reveals itself to be a global stage,'' Brugnaro told The Associated Press, adding he hoped to meet Bezos while he was in town. Meanwhile, a Venetian environmental research association, Corila, issued a statement saying Bezos' Earth Fund was supporting its work with an "important donation.' Corila, which unites university scholars and Italy's main national research council in researching Venetian protection strategies, wouldn't say how much Bezos was donating but said contact began in April, well before the protests started.
