Palestinian president thanks Saudi Arabia for supporting French recognition of Palestine
RIYADH — Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas expressed his heartfelt gratitude on Friday for Saudi Arabia's ongoing efforts and steadfast positions under the leadership of King Salman bin Abdulaziz and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
His remarks came after France's historic commitment to recognizing the State of Palestine.
Abbas welcomed a message from French President Emmanuel Macron, who confirmed that France would officially recognize the State of Palestine during the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September.
The Palestinian president praised this courageous step, which he said would contribute to establishing peace based on the two-state solution as outlined in international law.
He emphasized that Macron's announcement marked a significant victory for the Palestinian cause and reflected France's dedication to supporting Palestinian rights and the legitimate claim to its land.Abbas urged the global community to follow suit, recognizing Palestine in accordance with international resolutions.Saudi Arabia has consistently supported the Palestinian cause, emphasizing its commitment to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.The kingdom has repeatedly stated that Palestine is its top priority, advocating for Palestinian rights in various international forums.The Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Friday described Macron's announcement as a "historic decision," reflecting global consensus on the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and the establishment of their independent state.The statement reiterated Saudi Arabia's call for all countries yet to recognize Palestine to take similar steps, supporting peace and the rights of the Palestinian people.Saudi Arabia has also been a leading donor, providing approximately $5.5 billion in humanitarian and developmental aid for Palestine through 306 projects in various sectors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
21 minutes ago
- Arab News
Why the delay in judging Israeli war crimes?
The Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem released a comprehensive report on July 27 describing the Israeli war on Gaza as genocide. However, the delay in publishing such an indictment is troubling and adds to an existing problem of politically motivated decision-making processes that have, in their own right, prolonged Israeli war crimes. The report accused Israel of committing genocide, a conclusion reached after a detailed analysis of the military campaign's intent, the systematic destruction of civilian life, and the government-engineered famine. This finding is significant because it adds to the massive body of legal and testimonial evidence affirming the Palestinian position that Israel's actions in Gaza constitute a genocide. Moreover, the fact that B'Tselem is an Israeli organization is doubly important. It represents an insider's indictment of the horrific massacres and the government-engineered famine in Gaza, directly challenging the baseless argument that accusing Israel of genocide is an act of antisemitism. Western media were particularly interested in this finding, even though numerous firsthand Palestinian reports and investigations are often ignored or downplayed. This double standard continues to feed into a chronic media problem in its perception of Palestine and Israel. Claims by Palestinians of Israeli war crimes have historically been ignored by mainstream media or academia. Whether the Zionist militia's massacre of Tantura in 1948, the actual number of Palestinians and Lebanese killed in the massacres of Sabra and Shatila in Lebanon in 1982, or the events resulting in the Jenin massacre in the West Bank in 2002, the media has frequently ignored the Palestinian account. It often gains a degree of validation only if it is backed by Israeli or Western voices. The latest B'Tselem report is no exception. But another question must be asked: Why did it take almost two years for B'Tselem to reach such an obvious conclusion? Israeli rights groups, in particular, have far greater access to the conduct of the Israeli army, the statements of politicians, and Hebrew media coverage than any other entity. Such a conclusion, therefore, should have been reached in a matter of two months, not two years. This kind of intentional delay has so far defined the position of many international institutions, organizations, and individuals whose moral authority would have helped Palestinians establish the facts of the genocide globally much earlier. For example, despite the International Court of Justice's historic ruling on Jan. 26, 2024, that determined there are plausible grounds for South Africa's accusation of Israel of committing genocide, the court is still unable, or unwilling, to produce a conclusive ruling. A definitive ruling would have put significant pressure on Israel to end its mass killing in Gaza. Instead, for now, the ICJ expects Israel to investigate itself — a highly unrealistic expectation at a time when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promises his extremist ministers that Israel will encourage the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. The same indictment of intentional and politicized delays can be attributed to the International Criminal Court. While it issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on Nov. 21, 2024, no concrete action has been taken. Instead, it is Karim Khan, the ICC's chief prosecutor, who finds himself attacked by the US government and media for having the courage to follow through on the investigation. Individuals, too, especially those who have been associated with 'revolutionary' politics — the likes of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Bernie Sanders, among others — have been reluctant to act. On March 22, 2024, Ocasio-Cortez refused to use the term genocide in Gaza, going as far as claiming that while she saw an 'unfolding genocide,' she was not yet ready to use the term herself. Sanders, on the other hand, who has spoken out repeatedly and strongly against Netanyahu, describing him in an interview with CNN on July 31 as a 'disgusting liar,' has had repeated moral lapses since the start of the war. When the term genocide was used by many far less 'radical' politicians, Sanders doubled down during a lecture at a university in Ireland. He said that the word genocide 'makes him queasy,' and he urged people to be 'careful about it.' Delays born of political calculation and fear of retribution have given Israel the critical space it needed to carry out its genocide. Dr. Ramzy Baroud These are not simply lost opportunities or instances of moral equivocation; they have had a profound and direct impact on Israel's behavior. The timely intervention of governments, international institutions, high courts, media, and human rights groups would have fundamentally changed the dynamics of the war. Such collective pressure could have forced Israel and its allies to end the war, potentially saving thousands of lives. Delays born of political calculation and fear of retribution have given Israel the critical space it needed to carry out its genocide. Israel is actively exploiting this lack of legal and moral clarity to persist in its mass slaughter of Palestinians. This must change. The Palestinian perspective, their suffering, and their truths must be respected and honored without needing validation from Israeli or other sources. The Palestinian voice and their rights must be truly centered, not as an academic cliche or political jargon, but as an undeniable, everyday reality. As for those who have delayed their verdict regarding the Israeli genocide, no rationale can possibly absolve them. They will be judged by history, and by the desperate pleas of Gaza's mothers and fathers, who tried and failed to save their children from the Israeli killing machine and the world's collective silence or inaction.
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Civil Affairs proposes amendment to death reporting rules for resident expatriates
Saudi Gazette report RIYADH — The Agency of the Ministry of Interior for Civil Affairs has proposed an amendment to Article 52 of the Civil Status Law aimed at updating regulations for reporting deaths to ensure broader system coverage. According to the agency, the draft amendment — published on the 'Istitlaa' platform for public feedback before final approval — is intended to improve the quality of civil registry data, support government decision-making, and deliver more integrated and efficient services to beneficiaries. The proposed changes include making it mandatory to report the deaths of resident expatriates who are married to Saudi citizens. This measure seeks to strengthen record completeness and ensure that official statistics reflect all relevant cases.
Saudi Gazette
3 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Commemorative stamp issued honoring Prince Khalid Al-Faisal
Saudi Gazette report MAKKAH — Saudi Post, in cooperation with the Emirate of Makkah Province, has issued a commemorative postage stamp honoring Prince Khalid Al-Faisal, adviser to the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and governor of Makkah, in recognition of his contributions to cultural and social development. The stamp is part of a series of commemorative issues highlighting distinguished national figures. Prince Khalid expressed his gratitude to King Salman for approving the release of the special stamp, noting that the honor reflects the King's support and guidance since the beginning of his public service career. He also extended thanks to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, describing the recognition as a generous gesture characteristic of the Kingdom's leadership. The Makkah governor prayed for the continued security and stability of Saudi Arabia under its wise leadership.
