Nurses take trust to tribunal over trans colleague's use of changing rooms
The eight nurses are taking action against County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust after a colleague was allowed to use the women's changing facilities at Darlington Memorial Hospital.
They have filed the claim on the grounds of sexual harassment, discrimination, victimisation and breaches of the right to a private life, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Seven of the nurses were at a preliminary hearing at Newcastle Tribunal Centre where a judge discussed an application by the trust to delay the hearing from its current trial date of June 16.
The trust has claimed that a postponement is necessary to allow more time for an internal investigation to be completed.
The hearing is continuing.
Ahead of the hearing, nurse Bethany Hutchison said outside court: 'We are nurses who love our jobs and our patients and only want to be afforded the dignity of getting dressed and undressed for work without a man present.
'I would like to remind everyone that we are doing this for the safety and dignity of every woman and girl across society and that we will continue to fight these unlawful policies.
'Thank you again to our many supporters.
'We see you and hear you and are delighted to stand with you.'
The nurses are being supported by the Christian Legal Centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
6 days ago
- The National
Trans people face 'total ban from single-sex spaces under EHRC rules'
While services will not be compelled to provide single-sex spaces, The Times reported that trans people could be barred from accessing any that do exist – whether those spaces align with their birth sex or their acquired one. The difficulty stems from the fact that trans people will not be allowed to use facilities that align with their acquired gender – but can also be banned from using facilities that align with their birth sex if they look too much like their acquired gender. READ MORE: Trans toilet rules 'may force Scottish museums to close' Draft EHRC guidance states: 'For example, a trans man [who was born a female] might be excluded from the women-only service if the service provider decides that, because he presents as a man, other service users could reasonably object to his presence, and it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim to exclude him.' The Times reported that the finalised guidance would have the same effect as this draft guidance. It will apply to organisations that provide public services, including shops, museums, gyms, prisons, and NHS departments, among others. The statutory guidance, which will have to be approved by Labour's Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson, is further expected to say that trans people can be excluded from single-sex sports, and that people could object to trans people's 'presence' if they feel it is a vulnerable situation, such as changing clothes. Services will be allowed to request to see people's birth certificates to decide whether they are allowed in a single-sex space – but will have to tread carefully as doing so insensitively could be considered discrimination, The Times reported. However, services will also have to provide suitable facilities for trans people to use, meaning a separate space may be the only option many places have. The EHRC is facing a legal challenge over its draft guidance, with a full hearing due in November. Good Law Project, who are bringing the challenge, claim the EHRC guidance goes 'far beyond' the Supreme Court's ruling, which said in April that sex must be considered biological under the 2010 Equality Act. 'It amounts to a bathroom ban for trans people, violating people's right to privacy in their everyday lives,' Good Law Project said. READ MORE: EHRC changes guidance on single-sex toilets after legal challenge People have privacy rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which campaigners argue may be breached by having to reveal biological details to use the toilet. 'We'll be arguing in November that the EHRC was wrong to say employers can only provide gendered toilets based on 'biological sex', and wrong to ignore ways that companies and the public sector can provide trans inclusive men's and women's facilities,' Good Law Project said. The EHRC has also faced criticism for the speed at which it has consulted on its draft guidance, using artificial intelligence to sift through 50,000 representations at a reported rate of 1850 per day. A legal challenge against the short consultation period was thrown out in June. A spokesperson for the EHRC said: 'The code of practice has not yet been finalised. We received an extremely high volume of responses to the consultation and are grateful to everyone who shared their feedback. 'To ensure we give these responses the consideration they merit, we are working at pace to analyse them and are amending the draft code of practice text where necessary to make it as clear and helpful as possible. The news comes after a Scottish Government report found that negative media and political attention around trans people is impacting on gender healthcare, making it harder to recruit and retain staff. 'But our code will remain consistent with the law as set out by the Supreme Court.'
The Herald Scotland
15-07-2025
- The Herald Scotland
Peggie v NHS Fife: The crucial lesson from Darlington nurses
The similarities between Sandie Peggie's changing room row against NHS Fife and eight nurses in Darlington are startling. Both centre around transgender medics' access to female-only changing rooms, with health boards in Fife and Darlington working off guidelines that allows those to use facilities of their chosen gender – rather than biological sex. And there is just a few short months separating the two rows. In summer 2023, nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital began expressing concern at sharing changing facilities with a colleague who was born male but identifies as a woman. A legal challenge followed, with the group of nurses criticising the use of County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust's policy called 'Transitioning in the Workplace'. That allowed anyone identifying as a woman to access female changing spaces. Meanwhile, on Christmas Eve in 2023, Kirkcaldy nurse Ms Peggie complained about sharing a changing room with Dr Beth Upton, a trans woman. Her legal row with NHS Fife has become one of the biggest news stories of the year. Ms Peggie, similar to the Darlington nurses, had been told to use a cupboard or toilet cubicle to change instead of the female-only space in an attempt to resolve the issue. However, it is the differences between the cases that are the most revealing – and they could serve as an important lesson to Scotland. While Ms Peggie's employment tribunal against MHS Fife resumes on Wednesday, the Darlington nurses will not go to court until October. And yet, the Darlington Eight as they have become known have already had a win. In the wake of the Supreme Court judgment, which ruled the definition of a woman was binary and based on biological sex, UK Health Secretary Wes Streeting personally intervened on the case. He had ordered Darlington Memorial Hospital to give female nurses their own changing room. This decision by Mr Streeting is significant and has cooled what could have been a troublesome affair for the NHS in England. NHS England also declared the changing facilities at the Darlington Memorial Hospital were 'inadequate' for female staff. In Scotland it is a different story entirely. Health Secretary Neil Gray has maintained he has faith in the board at NHS Fife. He was warned in June last year the health board may have acted illegally in the female-only changing room row. Read more Unspun: In February, Mr Gray was asked by journalists if he had confidence in the management of NHS Fife, with the Health Secretary replying: 'Of course I do'. Since then, a political storm has erupted. The row over gender policy in Scotland has once again consumed Scottish politics, and it appears it is here to stay. An intervention from the Health Secretary of course would not have ended the dispute, with Ms Peggie free to continue her legal case against NHS Fife. But his intervention could have been crucial. It could have saved time, money and ended a toxic debate on both sides. The Darlington Eight showed us there was an easy solution but Scotland did not take it.
Daily Mirror
03-07-2025
- Daily Mirror
Bella Culley could be separated from her baby behind bars in 'traumatic' update
Suspected British drug smuggler Bella May Culley has raised grave concerns from experts who are raising the alarm about her bleak prison conditions. The 18-year-old, from Billingham, County Durham, is accused of trafficking cannabis into Georgia. If found guilty, she could be looking at life in prison, very far from home. The teen sobbed in court this week as she claimed she was "forced by torture". Bella said: "I didn't want to do this. I was forced by torture. I just wanted to travel. I study at the university… to become a nurse. "All I wanted to do was to travel and this happened to me. I'm clean - I had nothing in my blood test. I wanted to make my family proud. Thanks for listening." Brit gang 'threatened to decapitate' 'drug mule' Bella Culley 'and kill her family' For now, the British student awaits her fate at the notorious Women's Penitentiary Number Five in Georgia, close to the Russian border. It's understood that Culley, who is pregnant, is sharing a cell with two other inmates in the 'hellhole' jail known for its cramped and dirty conditions. The teen has claimed she's had no medical care in jail, despite her pregnancy. Her lawyer, Mariam Kublashvili said back in May: "She is pregnant and needs medical care which she complained she wasn't getting – there were no tests or checks or medical examinations done, she told me. She said she asked for a doctor, but the doctor wasn't speaking English and they couldn't understand each other." And campaigners and lawyers are now warning that Culley's apparent lack of medical care could "raise serious human rights concerns." Describing reports of Bella being denied medical care as "extremely worrying", Adam Jones, from law firm HD Claims, told the Mirror: "Even while incarcerated, individuals have the right to basic healthcare, and pregnancy care falls firmly within that. Georgia is a signatory to multiple international conventions, including the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN's Convention Against Torture. "These establish a minimum standard of care, especially for vulnerable individuals such as pregnant women. Day-to-day, Bella should be receiving routine antenatal check-ups, access to qualified medical professionals, proper nutrition, and immediate care in the event of complications. Denial of such care may breach Article 3 of the ECHR, which prohibits inhuman or degrading treatment." Human rights organisations have long had serious concerns about conditions in prisons in Georgia, particularly regarding healthcare access and the treatment of foreign nationals. Mr Jones added: "Vulnerable prisoners, especially young women, often face language barriers, limited access to legal support, and difficulty advocating for themselves in an unfamiliar system." The reported conditions of Women's Penitentiary Number Five make for grim reading. Multiple inmates are said to be squeezed into single cells, in a Soviet-era facility described as being in a state of decay. Although some improvements have been seen in recent times, thanks to funding, there have been distressing accounts from behind the prison's allegedly grimy walls. One inspection found that prisoners were forced to squat in front of guards, said to be particularly traumatic when they are menstruating. Meanwhile, a report from the latest inspection of the prison found that new inmates were spending up to two weeks in internal classification cells before being assigned to their block. According to this report, which followed complaints over hygiene from inmates: "Even though they are legally guaranteed the right to exercise, they are unable to benefit from this right. "The internal classification cells are located in the C residential building of the facility, and there is no designated outdoor space available for the inmates housed there to get fresh air." Although improvements in cleanliness were noted, "it was found that the facility frequently does not receive drinking water", with both staff and inmates forced to collect water in containers, which they would then store. It's clear this is a hostile environment for a young pregnant woman, and it's feared things could get even worse should Culley end up giving birth behind bars. According to Mr Jones: "If Bella were to give birth while imprisoned, her baby would likely be taken into the care of the state or handed over to relatives, depending on the circumstances and Georgian family law. Immediate separation after birth can have traumatic effects, both psychologically and physically, particularly without proper postnatal care or support systems in place. "Her case highlights a broader issue: the urgent need for transparent oversight in how prisons handle the care of pregnant women, especially foreign nationals. Without international scrutiny or legal intervention, individuals like Bella risk being left without even the most basic care, simply because of where they are.' The Mirror also heard from Kirsty Kitchen, Head of Policy at Birth Companions, a charity supporting women who face inequalities and disadvantages during pregnancy. Ms Kitchen warned that the organisation is "deeply concerned by reports that Bella May Culley has not been receiving appropriate medical care while held in Rustavi's prison number 5." She told us: "The United Nations' Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners, commonly known as the 'Bangkok Rules', are clear: pregnant women in prison must have access to healthcare that is equivalent to that which would receive in the community, along with a healthy environment, adequate nutrition, fresh water supplies, and regular exercise. "Yet the most recent inspection of the prison, carried out by the ombudsman of Georgia, found a range of issues with drinking water, proper ventilation, and long waits for medical services to address physical and mental health needs. "The UN rules also state that pregnant women should not be held in prison pre-trial, and should receive non-custodial sentences wherever possible. On these grounds, the refusal of Bella's application for bail, which would allow her to access maternity care in the community and have the support of her family, is a huge disappointment." Highlighting what needs to be done next, Ms Kitchen added: "We need to ensure her physical and mental health needs are being met, and work to secure her release from an environment that is clearly not a safe or appropriate place in which to navigate pregnancy." Bella was first arrested at Tbilisi International Airport on May 11, after being reported missing in Thailand. She has been accused of smuggling drugs into Georgia following her travels in South East Asia. Cannabis was legalised for recreational use in Georgia back in 2018, with limited possession also being decriminalised; however, the selling of cannabis remains illegal. The Mirror has approached the Georgian Ministry of Justice for comment.
