Sinn Féin minister urges BBC to ‘learn lessons' from Gerry Adams libel case
BBC
management must reflect on the outcome of the Gerry Adams libel case and avoid knee-jerk reactions to the verdict, a
Sinn Féin
minister has said.
Stormont's Finance Minister John O'Dowd said he welcomed the outcome of the high-profile case in Dublin's
High Court
.
Former Sinn Féin leader
Mr Adams
took the BBC to court over a 2016 Spotlight programme and accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson. Mr Adams denies any involvement.
A jury last Friday awarded Mr Adams €100,000 after finding in his favour.
READ MORE
It found he was defamed, the BBC's actions were not in good faith, and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way.
Mr Donaldson was shot dead in Co Donegal in 2006, months after admitting his role as a police and MI5 agent over 20 years.
Mr Adams's legal team said the verdict of the jury was a 'full vindication' for their client. The BBC said it was 'disappointed' with the outcome, warning it could have 'profound implications and potentially 'hinder freedom of expression'.
Following the jury's decision, Mr Adams said his case had been about 'putting manners' on the BBC. The veteran republican claimed the corporation upheld the ethos of the British state in Ireland and was 'out of sync' on many fronts with the Good Friday peace agreement.
The National Union of Journalists has described his remarks as 'chilling'.
Seamus Dooley, Irish secretary of the NUJ, also said the case showed the need for reform of Ireland's defamation laws.
However, Mr O'Dowd said the BBC's reaction to the case indicated it was 'unwilling to learn lessons'.
'I welcome the judgment,' he told BBC Radio Ulster.
'I think it's a timely reminder that everyone has the right to defend their name in court. Gerry has been successful in his case, and I think the BBC have lessons to learn, and they should instead of the knee-jerk reaction that we've heard thus far from them, I think they should take a time of reflection and reflect on that court judgment.'
The minister was asked if Mr Adams's claims about the BBC upholding the ethos of the British state and being out of sync with the Belfast Agreement reflected Sinn Féin's position on the broadcaster.
'I think it's a position that many in society hold,' he replied.
'There are many, many fine journalists from the BBC – there's no question about that. But I think the upper echelons of the BBC in the North and the reaction to the court judgment shows that they're unwilling to learn lessons.
'They're unwilling to reflect on their own role and responsibility. So, I think … this is a time for the BBC to reflect, and the upper echelons of the BBC to reflect, rather than some of the knee-jerk reactions we've seen from them thus far.' —PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
36 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Roads policing numbers at historic low of 618 gardaí, figures show
The number of gardaí involved in roads policing units has dropped to a historic low of 618 according to the latest Department of Justice figures. There has been a steady decline since 2009 when official figures for those engaged in roads policing began to be regularly published. That year 1,046 gardaí were assigned to road policing duties and the numbers involved fell to a low of 623 in 2017. They rose over the next four years to 736 in 2021 but have fallen again, down to 627 last year. In January this year the number of gardaí in the units dropped to 626, to 623 in February and was down to 618 by the end of April. READ MORE Every region and county has seen the number of roads policing gardaí drop, in some cases by more than 50 per cent since 2009. Garda Commissioner Drew Harris told the Oireachtas Transport Committee in May last year 'we plan to add 75 gardaí to roads policing this year and a further 75 in 2025, and working towards this, we are proactively recruiting into our roads policing units'. A recruitment campaign was undertaken in eastern, north-western and southern regions last year. But Susan Gray of road safety campaign group Parc said the figures show a reduction of nine members at the end of April compared to last year. 'They are just playing catch up all the time.' The figures show the Sligo/Leitrim Garda Division had 23 members in 2021, but it was down to 11 in February this year. Donegal had 31 Garda roads policing members in 2021, which fell to 21 last year, a reduction of 10 officers in three years. Official Road Safety Authority data shows 17 road deaths in Donegal last year, 'the highest number since 2010 when 19 died', Ms Gray said. Sixty-nine people have died on Irish roads so far this year, she said. In the Dublin Metropolitan Area the numbers have dropped from their 2009 high but have remained consistent over the last two to three years. In Dublin's eastern region which goes from Dún Laoghaire to Stepaside and takes in Dundrum, Blackrock, Shankill and Cabinteely, the numbers dropped from 18 in 2009 to four in 2023 and rose to nine the following year, where they have remained. In Laois/Offaly there were 42 dedicated roads policing officers in 2009 which fell to 24 in 2023 and dropped to 18 in April this year. 'It is very disappointing,' said Ms Gray. 'Everybody talks about road safety being a priority and everywhere we look it's obvious it's not a priority,' she said. 'We hoped to see the figures going up rather than down for gardaí involved in roads policing.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. READ MORE Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Scientist with ‘debilitating' condition alleges discrimination by not being allowed work from home
A scientist living with 'debilitating' endometriosis has accused international medical devices firm Abbott of discriminating against her by refusing to let her work from home to ease a daily commute of nearly four hours. The worker, who has over a decade of industry experience and advanced postgraduate qualifications, told the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) on Tuesday she was given ten minutes to pick up her things and get off an Abbott site last autumn after being told she failed her probation. She said she was reduced to 'crying all the way back' in a colleague's arms during the drive home. Abbott Ireland Ltd is denying complaints of disability discrimination and discriminatory dismissal under the Employment Equality Act 1998 by the worker, Ms X, who has been afforded anonymity by the WRC. READ MORE Ms X was hired by Abbott in spring 2024 and spent just short of six months working in an office at an Abbott site in a county town analysing test data, but was deemed to have failed her probation and was let go that autumn, the tribunal heard. The company's representative, Fiona Egan of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), submitted that Ms X failed her probation for 'conduct and performance' following a number of instances of lateness and uncertified absences from work. It had 'nothing to do with her condition', she said. Shaun Boylan BL, appearing for Ms X instructed by Sean Ormonde & Co Solicitors, said the firm's policy of refusing to allow probationary employees to work from home was 'implicitly discriminatory' against his client, as it put accommodations for her disability 'on hold for six months'. Ms X said she had been diagnosed with stage two endometriosis in 2022, a condition affecting the female reproductive organs. She said it causes her 'debilitating pain', accompanied by 'nausea, fainting and dizziness' which was at its worst during the 7-8 days of her period and required prescription-only codeine and opiate painkillers to manage. The daily drive from Ms X's home to the Abbott site was 'coming up on a four-hour commute to work every day', adjudication officer Brian Dolan remarked during the hearing on Tuesday. Ms X said she thought at first she should 'just endure' the commute. Her evidence was that she was 'promised in the interview that it would be a hybrid role' and that she had turned down roles elsewhere with a five-day-a-week on-site commitment because of that. Ms X said her immediate team consisted of six or seven colleagues, but 'nobody' was in office five days a week, and 'most' were working from home. On a date six weeks after she started, a 'very sudden' departmentwide meeting was called, at which she said a senior manager declared 'there would be no more work from home possible' at the site, barring the 'possibility' of one day a week. Ms X said she was in 'excruciating pain' that day and found the message 'difficult to take'. She told the commission she went straight to her team leader 'in visible distress, with tears in my eyes' and proceeded to tell him she had endometriosis. She said her team leader was 'empathetic' and 'supportive' at that stage and gave her an assurance that a 'one week in, one week out' work from home arrangement would be possible – but only once her probation was finished. Making it in for an on-site team meeting at 9.30am meant setting out from home at 6.30am or 6.45am, Ms X said. Over seven weeks before a probationary caution letter being issued in her final weeks on the job, Ms X was late eight times and absent without a medical cert on three occasions, leading to an occupational health referral. She said a senior manager later told her: 'The company cannot offer more than one day work from home past your probation,' and urged her to find somewhere to live closer to the site. The probation review continued into the following month, and concluded when her team leader called her into a conference room and read out a letter stating that her employment was being terminated, she said. The only reason stated was: 'Your standard of performance has not met company expectations.' 'I asked why. [My team leader] said: 'Everything is in the letter,'' Ms X said. After saying she could not continue with the meeting a company HR officer told her an outstanding pay matter could be handled by email and gave her 'ten minutes to leave, to grab [my] stuff and leave the premises'. 'Everyone was crying in the car,' she said. 'I hugged my colleague, in the car, and kept crying all the way back to Dublin,' she added. The adjudicator, Mr Dolan, told Ms X he had the power to order her reinstatement as a remedy under the equality legislation if she was successful in the case. Ms X replied: 'I'd probably never come back to Abbott.' The case has been adjourned to a later date, when three company witnesses, including Ms X's team leader and the senior manager are due to give evidence.
