logo
Reform UK chairman quits after calling question from party's newest MP ‘dumb'

Reform UK chairman quits after calling question from party's newest MP ‘dumb'

Irish Timesa day ago

The chairman of
Reform UK
has resigned, saying working to get the party elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'.
Zia Yusuf's decision follows a row in which he described a question to the UK prime minister
Keir Starmer
concerning a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP as 'dumb'.
Mr Yusuf had served 11 months as chairman. Announcing his resignation on Thursday afternoon, he said: 'I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results.
'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.'
READ MORE
Earlier, he had criticised the party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, after she asked Mr Starmer whether he would support banning the burka during prime minister's questions in Westminster on Wednesday – something that appears not to be a policy of Reform's.
Asked about the question on social media, Mr Yusuf had said: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff.
'I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.'
Mr Yusuf's resignation came on the day Reform hoped to cause an upset in Scotland, where it was contesting a Holyrood byelection in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.
Scottish first minister John Swinney has described the contest as a 'two-horse race' between his SNP and Reform.
[
If there's so much buyer's remorse about Brexit, why is Nigel Farage the rising figure in UK politics?
Opens in new window
]
Following Mr Yusuf's resignation, Reform leader
Nigel Farage
said he was 'genuinely sorry' that he had decided to stand down, paying tribute to him as 'enormously talented' and 'a huge factor in our success' at the local elections.
Mr Farage added: 'Politics can be a highly pressured and difficult game and Zia has clearly had enough. He is a loss to us and public life.'
A Labour spokesperson said: 'If Nigel Farage can't manage a handful of politicians, how on earth could he run a country? He has fallen out with everyone he has ever worked with. Reform are just not serious.
'The Reform chair has done a runner so that he doesn't have to front up Farage's £80 billion in unfunded cuts, which would spark a Liz Truss-style economic meltdown.
'Nigel Farage's plans would put up every single mortgage in the country and hammer family finances, while forcing them to buy private healthcare. Working people simply can't afford the risk of Reform UK.'
– PA

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colin Sheridan: Manscaping of society has gone on for far too long
Colin Sheridan: Manscaping of society has gone on for far too long

Irish Examiner

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Colin Sheridan: Manscaping of society has gone on for far too long

Considering the latest bromantic melodrama emanating from the sadistic reality TV show that is the USA, I'm thinking of writing a non-fiction book called The Penis Apologist in which I make a case that men should not be allowed to run for public office for a century — at least. The ban would be worldwide, and effective immediately. Where snap elections cannot take place, the closest female relative to the outgoing official's nemesis will be jettisoned in until a plebiscite is possible. In the case of Keir Starmer, for example, Jeremy Corbyn's wife would take charge. Their qualifications are irrelevant, just as they've been irrelevant for men. The same standard will apply to the general staff of all militaries. I understand there will be considerable pushback to this idea from all sides. From the feminists, who might argue that I am appropriating the legacy trauma of women everywhere. From the Andrew Tate acolytes, who will argue treachery to a non-existent brotherhood. From the centrists, who will accuse me of flagrant populism and suggesting I have hopped aboard a bandwagon — or a fallopian flotilla — all in the name of ingratiating myself to the sisterhood. To all of them, I simply say: This isn't working The manscaping of society has gone on for far too long and the results of the masculine monopoly have proven to be much too disastrous for humankind, for the planet, for the arts, culture, and academia. The only thing men have not ruined all by themselves is sport — both the watching of it and the playing of it. That, and drinking silently in pubs. Literally every other thing has been tainted to some degree by an inglorious arms race between men intent on one thing: Winning a big micky contest. The cost of that megalomaniac pursuit has been catastrophic. War. Famine. Drought. Climate change. Kanye. And now, in the case of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, a break-up so unedifying they make Kim Kardashian look like Grace Kelly. Women themselves are not entirely blameless. Maggie Thatcher didn't exactly woo the working class with a mother's touch. Kamala Harris may have proven slightly less duplicitous a president than Donald Trump, but she was too incompetent to defeat him. Liz Truss, Suella Braverman, and Priti Patel were nearly as bad as Boris Johnson, which is a quite the reach. Ursula von der Leyen displays all the empathy of a data centre, and I wouldn't trust Giorgia Meloni as far as I could throw her. Closer to home, the nuns — as a collective — did considerable damage, especially to women Despite all of this, I still think men have had the reins for long enough. All its brought us is disaster. As of this year, only 13% of the world's nations are led by women. Historically, only about one third of United Nations member states have ever had a woman serve as head of government. According to UN figures, women hold just 23% of ministerial positions globally in 2025. The same study notes women are more often assigned portfolios related to social affairs, while defence, foreign affairs, and finance remain predominantly the purview of men. In terms of wealth, women constitute approximately 13.3% of the world's billionaires. According to Forbes' rich list published this year, out of 3,028 billionaires globally, only 406 are women. Let's put the diversity, equity and inclusion argument to one side for a moment. Clearly, that was beyond our abilities to properly implement, probably because it was men responsible for it. Perhaps we don't even need to try that hard. Perhaps we should just seek to put the best people in the jobs with the most power. Perhaps, after many millennia of evidence, men are not those people. Perhaps the best people to be in power are those who do not seek it out. 'Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave my heart into my mouth. I love your majesty according to my bond; no more nor less.' So said Cordelia, the youngest of King Lear's daughters, when the narcissistic monarch sought some sycophancy before dividing up his kingdom. Cordelia the character was, of course, a work of Shakespeare's imagination. However, she endures in my mind as the antithesis of what we have come to expect from Trump, Putin, Biden, Boris Johnson, Churchill, Blair, Kennedy, Clinton, Netanyahu, Musk, Bezos et al. If we flipped it entirely, we should really let the children be in charge. We'd eat nothing but Nutella with every meal, but you'd be guaranteed wars would quickly end, the hungry would be fed, and there'd be no such thing as genocide. What is absolutely certain is that they could not do any worse.

The Irish Times view on  Israel's international reputation: sliding ever downward
The Irish Times view on  Israel's international reputation: sliding ever downward

Irish Times

time11 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on Israel's international reputation: sliding ever downward

Slowly but perceptibly, the relentless flow of images of horror and suffering from Gaza is hardening opposition to Israel's actions there, even among those traditionally considered the country's staunchest supporters. The shift will be unacceptably slow for anyone desperate to stop the killing, while it appears to have had little effect as yet on the brutal tactics of Israeli forces. But it represents a change of attitude among international political leaders and their voters that could have far-reaching consequences for the region. A YouGov poll this week showed support and sympathy for Israel in western Europe at its lowest ever level. Less than 20 per cent of respondents held a favourable opinion of the country. In what the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz described as 'a rebuke typically reserved for pariah regimes,' the UK has suspended free trade negotiations. Along with Canada and France, it has also threatened 'concrete actions' in response to what Keir Starmer describes as Israel's 'appalling' actions. Even Germany issued its harshest criticism since the war began with the Hamas attack of October 7th 2023, Chancellor Friedrich Merz saying he 'no longer understands' Israel's goals in Gaza. Ireland has been among the most vociferous EU opponents of the war and a further landmark arrived this week with Trinity College Dublin's decision to sever all ties with Israeli companies and universities. It remains to be seen whether other institutions follow suit, but the move, while largely symbolic, is significant nonetheless. READ MORE Supporters of Binyamin Netanyahu's government are quick to paint such gestures as anti-Smitic. It is true that the scourge of anti-Semitism can be found among some elements of the anti-war movement, as recent violent attacks in the US have shown. But the accusation that all protests are driven by hatred of Jews rather than humanitarian concern does not stand up to scrutiny. The charge wears even thinner given opposition in Israel itself. Former prime minister Ehud Olmert has described his country's actions as a war crime. Hundreds of former operatives of the intelligence agency Mossad, including three retired heads, have accused Netanyahu of continuing the violence for selfish political reasons, to satisfy far-right members of his government. These comments may reflect a rising awareness among some of the country's elite that what is happening in Gaza is not just an appalling tragedy for Palestinians. It also threatens to become a disaster for the state of Israel. With the governing coalition under the sway of far-right racist ministers who have no respect for international law or for the human rights of those they deem 'barbarians', Israel drifts ever further away from the liberal democratic values it purports to share with its increasingly sceptical friends and allies.

President criticises UK arms investment and US's ‘monstrous attacks' on universities
President criticises UK arms investment and US's ‘monstrous attacks' on universities

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

President criticises UK arms investment and US's ‘monstrous attacks' on universities

President Michael D Higgins has called on the United Nations General Assembly to use 'exceptional powers' to 'move past' the impasse at the organisation's Security Council to enable the flow of aid to Gaza. Mr Higgins also criticised a £1.5 billion arms investment, announced earlier this week by UK prime minister Keir Starmer. Mr Higgins claimed the move will 'make drones 10 times more lethal'. He was speaking at the University of Galway to mark the donation of his presidential archive and collection of books to the college. Speaking in the newly renamed Michael D Higgins Auditorium, the President criticised the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli and US-backed organisation, which has distributed a limited amount of aid in southern Gaza this week. The GHF has been heavily criticised by world figures for politicising the distribution of aid. READ MORE Aid distribution at GHF centres was paused earlier this week following a number of incidents where Israeli soldiers are reported to have fired on people seeking food. 'The entity that is in place [the GHF], and has been described as one that will distribute aid to the people of Gaza, is not acceptable to any of the United Nations agencies,' Mr Higgins said. He said it is 'essential' that food is distributed through non-militarised means. 'What is most important now, is that next week when the General Assembly [of the UN] meets, it uses the exceptional powers that it has to actually act. It has the power to move past the Security Council,' he said. Turning to the UK's arms investment announcement, he said it is 'not moral to be silent' in the current political climate. UK defence secretary John Healey told MPs on Monday that the £1.5 billion investment would make the British army '10 times more lethal'. [ Britain to move closer to 'warfighting readiness' as review calls for defence overhaul Opens in new window ] 'The prime minister next door [Keir Starmer] says: 'We are going to produce drones that are 10 times more lethal.' Think of the morality of that statement,' said Mr Higgins. 'It is necessary to say that we are not going to retreat from new versions of ecological responsibility, social justice and equality,' he said. The president said 'monstrous attacks' are being made against third-level institutions, especially in the United States. He said we are living in the 'worst period' for 'ignorant, ill-informed bullying', with universities put 'under the greatest pressure internationally, but in particular in the United States where they have had monstrous attacks on them', he said. Mr Higgins is a former lecturer and president of the students' union at the University of Galway. He confirmed he intends to return to living in Galway when his presidential term ends.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store