Reserved seats: ECP says majority judgement premised on ‘erroneous conclusion'
ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) submitted the majority judgement in the reserved seats case is premised on the erroneous conclusion that Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in addition to Sunni Ittehad Council(SIC) was before the Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC) and both sought allocation of the disputed reserved seats to 'SIC or to PTI'.
Barrister Sikandar Bashir Mohmand filed seven formulations before the Constitution Bench, which is hearing the review against the SC judgment on reserved seats.
He said that the PTI in its CMA 5913/ 2024 filed on 26-6-2024 did not pray for allocation of the reserve seats to 'PTI itself' or to 'either PTI or SIC'; instead PTI asserted; 'the denial by the ECP of reserve seats to the SIC will result in the national assembly and the provincial assemblies losing their representative character. These seats cannot be allowed to any other party.'
The ECP submitted that CMA 5913/ 2024 is stated to have been filed under Order XXXIII Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 (inherit powers of SCP) and not under Order V Rule 2 (2) which is the relevant Rule for an application for striking out or adding a party. Therefore, PTI did not formally seek 'impleadment' in Civil Appeals 333 and 334 of 2024.
The majority judgement incorrectly describes CMA 5913/ 2024 as 'PTI's application for impleadment'. As PTI was evidently not party to proceedings before the ECP, PHC and SCP, no relief could have been lawfully granted to it, even by exercising power under Article 187 (1) of the Constitution.
It submitted that the provisions of Article 51 and the Article 106 have been misconstrued in the majority judgement, which inter alia has distorted the scheme of the provisions of Article 51 and Article 106 as read with Section 104 of the Elections Act, 2017 and the Election Rules, 2017.
The ECP stated that it is an essential component of the scheme of the provisions of Article 51 and Article 106 that the List of Priority for Seats Reserved for Women and Non-Muslims (Form 66) of each political party, as well as, the nomination papers for candidates in such list must be submitted and scrutinised prior to polling day and in parallel with filing and scrutiny of nomination papers of candidates contesting on general seats.
The rationale being that the electors have notice of the candidates of the concerned 'political party' who may be elected on reserve seats before polling day.
The direction in paragraph 9 of the majority judgement allowing the filing of the List of Priority for Seats Reserved for Women and Non-Muslims (Form 66) after the election has concluded and returned candidates have been notified is in conflict with the Election Programme and the democratic objective and rationale.
The ECP stated that the timelines prescribed in paragraph 8 and 9 could only lawfully be prescribed by Parliament through legislation amending Article 51 Provisions (and Article 106 provisions), as well as, Sections 51, 66, 67 and 104 of the Elections Act, 2017. The said timelines could also not be prescribed without striking down the Election Programme dated 15-12-2023 as amended on 22-12-2023 read with Section 104 of the Elections Act, 2017.
The ECP submitted that the power to 'alter' the Election Programme vests solely with the ECP under Section 58 of the Elections Act, 2017 read with Article 218 (3) and Article 219 (d), as well as, the last sentence of Article 222 of the Constitution. Therefore, in any event such timelines could not be prescribed by the SCP, even under Article 187 (1) of the Constitution.
It contended that the timelines given in paragraphs 8-9 of the Majority Short Order are directly in conflict with the scheme and timeline in the Article 51 Provisions and also sections 51, 66, 67 and 104 of the Elections Act, 2017. Therefore, same could not be given in exercise of power under Article 187(1).
Since PTI was not a party to proceedings before the ECP, PHC and SCP and neither did it make an express prayer for allocation of the Disputed Reserve Seats to itself, this specific matter was never 'a case or matter pending before it' in terms of Article 187 (1) in consequently relief to PTI by invoking Article 187 (1) is impermissible.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FPCCI opposes new taxes in budget
KARACHI: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha has voiced strong opposition to reports of new taxes being imposed on existing taxpayers in the upcoming federal budget for the fiscal year 2025-26. The organization has urged the government to refrain from introducing new taxes on imports, exports, and other sectors in order to promote national trade, industrial growth, and to encourage new investments. The FPCCI warned that if the government imposes additional taxes under pressure from the IMF, the FPCCI will actively oppose such measures. FPCCI Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha emphasized the need to separate tax policy from tax administration to avoid conflicts of interest. He further suggested that the budget-making process should not be treated merely as a routine financial exercise but should be transformed into a strategic economic tool. Aman Paracha stressed the importance of expanding the tax net to include all untaxed and under-taxed sectors, noting that imposing additional taxes on those who are already compliant would have adverse effects. He highlighted that business activity is already sluggish and the business community is struggling to stay afloat. Imposing further tax burdens on existing taxpayers could lead to decreased revenue collection as it would open more avenues for tax evasion. He also expressed concerns over amendments introduced through Ordinance IV of 2025, particularly Sections 138(3A), 140(6A), and 175C, stating that these amendments grant excessive powers to tax authorities and violate Articles 4, 18, and 77 of the Constitution. He warned that such changes would significantly erode investor confidence. Paracha proposed the development of a harmonized structure for General Sales Tax (GST), featuring a unified compliance portal. He recommended gradually reducing the GST rate to 12% to lower business costs for the formal sector and stimulates economic growth. He also called for comprehensive reforms in Pakistan Customs, identifying outdated laws, tariff segmentation, under-invoicing, and weak enforcement as major challenges. He underscored the need for economic policy to strike a balance between revenue requirements and industrial development, especially through measures that boost Pakistan's export potential and attract investors. Finally, Muhammad Amaan Paracha appealed to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to immediately release the long-pending Rs23 billion subsidies related to additional electricity consumption and ensure that funds for this are allocated in the upcoming 2025-26 federal budget. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Rs10bn defamation case against IK put off
LAHORE: A sessions court adjourned the proceedings in the Rs 10 billion defamation case of Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif after the lawyer of former PTI chairman Imran Khan did not conclude cross-examination of Shehbaz Sharif. Earlier Shahbaz Sharif and his counsel appeared before the court through via a video link. Responding to the questions of Imran Khan, the prime minister clarified that he considers himself a public servant which is why he used the term 'public service' in first paragraph of his affidavit. He rejected the allegation that every word of his affidavit was false or that the affidavit itself was untrue. He also rejected an allegation that the charges leveled against Imran Khan in his affidavit were false. PM Shehbaz also told the court that he did not remember if the Supreme Court issued its verdict in the Panama Papers case on April 20, 2017. To another query of the defendant's counsel, he said it was incorrect to suggest that he filed the defamation suit against the PTI former chairman after the Supreme Court's decision in the Panama Papers case. Shehbaz also rejected a claim that he did not attach a receipt of sending a legal notice to the defendant before filing the suit. He stated that it was also untrue that no notice was served to the defendant prior to filing the suit. In his defamation suit filed in 2017, Shehbaz said Imran Khan leveled baseless allegations on him. He sought a decree for recovery of Rs10 billion as compensation from the defendant for publication of defamatory content. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ECP may summon PM, Punjab CM over LG polls delay
ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) can summon Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Chief Minister Punjab Maryam Nawaz over continuous delay in local government elections in the country's federal capital and the largest province. This was stated by Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja, Monday, heading a five-member full bench of the ECP, during the hearing on delay in LG elections in Punjab. 'The ECP cannot keep its eyes closed over this delay,' he told Punjab Local Government Minister Zeeshan Rafique. 'There should be some progress till next hearing of this case—if there's no progress, then we will issue an order regarding LG elections in Punjab—that would be embarrassing for you,' the CEC told the minister. 'Your party is in government in Punjab and at the centre. The local government elections have not been held in both the areas. On the other hand, local government elections in three provinces have been held,' Raja added. Punjab LG minister offered to share the draft of Punjab LG rules with the electoral body. The matter involving Punjab LG elections is pending with the related committee of the provincial government, he said. 'We will try to get the required legislation done as soon as possible,' Rafique said. The CEC responded that the ECP can summon the PM and the CM Punjab over delay in LG elections in Islamabad and Punjab. The case was adjourned but the next date of hearing was not fixed. Presently, the local bodies are in place in Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and cantonment boards but LG elections in Punjab and federal capital have been facing an inordinate delay since 2021. The local bodies term in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) expired on 14 February 2021, and in Punjab on 31 December 2021. The ECP is bound to hold LG elections within 120 days of the expiry of local bodies' term, under Section 219(4) of the Elections Act 2017. This law provides that the ECP shall hold elections to the local governments within 120 days of the expiry of the term of a local governments of a province, cantonment or ICT. Article 218(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan provides that it shall be the ECP's duty to organise and conduct the elections, and to make such arrangements as are necessary to ensure that an election is conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with law, and that corrupt practices are guarded against. The ECP says that whenever it finalises the LG polls' preparations, the LG laws are amended by the governments concerned, causing delay in the elections. According to the poll body, it carried out delimitation exercises four times in Punjab and five times in ICT for LG elections before the LG laws were amended each time by the governments concerned, shortly after the related polls schedules were issued. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
